Politics
Court dismisses suit seeking to sack Governor Akeredolu
- Jegede, PDP close case at Ondo Election Petition Tribunal
A Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a suit that challenged the emergence of Rotimi Akeredolu as the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the last governorship election in Ondo State.
Similarly, the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in October 10, 2020 governorship election in Ondo State, Eyitayo Jegede, and the party have closed their case and failed to call 400 witnesses to testify in the petition Jegede filed at the Ondo Election Petitions Tribunal seeking to nullify the victory of Governor Akeredolu.
Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a judgment on Wednesday, held that the suit filed by Mrs Olajumoke Anifowoshe was statute barred on the grounds that being a pre-election matter; it was filed outside the 14 days provided in Section 185(9) of the Constitution.
She prayed the court to void the outcome of the primary, from which Akeredolu emerged as APC’s candidate.
Justice Ekwo held that although the suit, originally filed on July 29, 2020 was instituted within the 14 days prescribed under Section 185(9) of the Constitution, it was wrongly commenced when the plaintiff chose to sue the Governor of Ondo State as against Oluwarotimi Akeredolu.
The judge said the amendment effected by the plaintiff on the originating summons, to substitute the Governor of Ondo State with Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, was done on August 13, 2020 outside the 14 days allowed by the Constitution.
The judge said the amendment of the originating process for the purpose of substituting the first defendant would have been in order if it was done within the 14 days allowed for the commencement of pre-election cases under Section 185(9) of the Constitution.
He noted that the Governor of Ondo State is not the same as Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, and that while the former is an office, the latter is a human being, who was a participant in the primary held on July 20, 2020.
The judge added that it was Akeredolu who participated in the primary, which is being challenged, and not the Governor of Ondo State, earlier sued by the plaintiff before the amendment was effected on the originating summons.
Justice Ekwo said, “When the plaintiff amended their originating summons on August 13, 2020 and substituted the initial first defendant (the Governor of Ondo State) with the present first defendant, Oluwarotimi Odunayo Akeredolu (SAN), (who actually participated in the primaries), the plaintiff created a constitutional debacle for herself by not considering the import of that decision against the provisions of S. 285 (9) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended),” the judge said.
Justice Ekwo faulted the argument by the plaintiff that the subscription of the Governor of Ondo State with Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (as the first defendant) was a mere misnomer.
“It must be understood that where misnomer is the issue concerning parties to an action, it must have to do with the correction of a typographical error or clerical mistake in the name of the party and not the replacement or substitution of party in a suit with another person as it happened in this suit.
“It is wrong for the plaintiff to use the process of amendment to substitute the Governor of Ondo State which they sued originally with Oluwarotimi Odunayo Akeredolu (SAN) and claim that the former was a misnomer.
“If the plaintiff now claims that they wrongly sued the Governor of Ondo State at the commencement of this suit, instead of the present first defendant, they cannot now say that it was a misnomer. It was without mincing words, a fatal error.
“The position of the plaintiff that the Governor of Ondo State at the time the action was filed was no other than the present first defendant is wrong in all ramifications.
“Misnomer will in appropriate circumstances operate to allow correction of letter(s) in a name or even the whole word that constitutes a name so that the person therein named is not mistaken for another entity.
“The substitution of a person or party with another person in the course of proceedings is outside the realm of misnomer.
“In this case, the plaintiff was bringing in the present first defendant through the backdoor in the course of proceedings in the name of a misnomer.
“It is neither plausible nor sensible to argue, as the plaintiff has done, that the amendment, which brought in the present first defendant dates back to when this suit was originally commenced.
“If the suit was improperly constituted ab initio, no amendment can cure such defect.
“I find that this suit was not instituted against the present first defendant, that is, Oluwarotimi Odunayo Akeredolu, SAN (who actually participated in the primaries of 20th July 2020) within 14 days as prescribed by Section 285(9) of the 1999 Constitution.
“I therefore hold that it is statute barred. Consequently, I therefore make an order dismissing this case for being statute barred.”
Meanwhile, the PDP candidate in the last Ondo governorship poll, Jegede, failed to call 400 witnesses to testify in the petition he filed to nullify the victory of Governor Akeredolu.
Jegede was the only witness that testified in the suit, as his counsel, Onyechi Ikpeazu, announced that the petitioners were closing their case at the resumed hearing on Tuesday.
The tribunal had given Jegede and the PDP nine days to call the over 400 witnesses listed to testify.
But Ikpeazu told the tribunal that they opted to narrow their case to the evidence presented before the court.
He said they were no longer interested in calling any witness.
Counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Charles Edosomwan, urged the court to give him time to further study the petitions.
Tribunal Chairman Justice Umar Abubakar adjourned hearing till January 19 to enable the respondents to open their defence.
![]()
Politics
Benue Govt Challenges Obi to Name Aide Behind Yelewata Convoy Blockade
Benue Govt Challenges Obi to Name Aide Behind Yelewata Convoy Blockade
…Says police should arrest anyone found culpable
The Benue State Government has challenged the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, to identify the government aide he alleged mobilised youths to block his convoy from accessing Yelewata community in Guma Local Government Area of the state.
The government said it was ready to support a full investigation into the incident and insisted that anyone found to have orchestrated the alleged obstruction should face the law.
The challenge was issued by the Chief Press Secretary to Governor Hyacinth Alia, Tersoo Kula, while appearing on The Morning Show, an Arise TV programme, on Wednesday.
Kula urged Obi and the NDC to go beyond making the allegation by naming the alleged aide and presenting evidence linking the individual to the reported blockade.
He said the police had the statutory responsibility to investigate the allegation, identify those behind the incident and prosecute anyone found culpable.
“The incident was completely unknown to the government until we started seeing pictures of what was happening,” Kula said.
He added, “I challenged them that they should name that aide. They mentioned a particular aide, and we said they should go ahead and mention him. If there’s any evidence, the police commissioner should ensure that the person who directed this is arrested and brought to book.”
The governor’s spokesman dismissed suggestions that Governor Alia could have deployed youths to frustrate Obi’s movement, insisting that the governor did not encourage political thuggery.
According to Kula, if Obi’s visit was considered a security or political threat, the appropriate course of action would have been to deploy recognised security agencies rather than mobilise youths.
“Governor Alia does not promote thuggery in Benue State. If Obi is a threat to him, or maybe he felt that Obi’s coming would cause a problem for him, the right thing to do is to get legitimate security operatives to do the needful and not to gather youths or send them to go and block him,” he said.
The controversy erupted following Obi’s reported attempt to visit Yelewata, a community in Guma LGA that was devastated by a deadly attack in June 2025, in which more than 200 people were reportedly killed.
Obi subsequently accused the state government of frustrating his visit after youths allegedly blocked his convoy and prevented him from accessing the community.
The Benue State Government, however, has denied having prior knowledge of the former Anambra State governor’s visit.
Kula reiterated that neither Governor Alia nor the state security agencies were informed ahead of Obi’s movement to Yelewata.
He questioned how a presidential candidate could embark on a visit to a security-sensitive community without ensuring that the relevant security agencies were adequately informed.
“If you are visiting a state, the security apparatus of the state is supposed to know. The Commissioner of Police, Director of DSS, Civil Defence and others are supposed to be aware so that they can provide adequate security for you,” he stated.
Kula also questioned how youths could have successfully blocked Obi’s convoy if adequate security arrangements had been made for the visit.
He maintained that the governor had not received any security briefing concerning Obi’s movement to Yelewata.
Meanwhile, the governor’s spokesman acknowledged that insecurity remained a major concern in Benue, despite describing the security situation as having improved to what he called “relative peace.”
He, however, stressed that the improvement would not make the state government complacent.
“What is happening in Benue State in respect to insecurity is happening to other states. It’s not peculiar to Benue,” Kula said.
“But there is no excuse saying that because it’s happening to other states, we should be comfortable. We are not comfortable.”
He said Governor Alia remained deeply concerned about insecurity and was committed to reducing attacks across the state to the barest minimum.
The latest controversy comes against the backdrop of heightened political activity and continuing concerns over security in parts of Benue, with the Yelewata incident again putting the state’s security situation and the relationship between political actors under public scrutiny.
Benue Govt Challenges Obi to Name Aide Behind Yelewata Convoy Blockade
![]()
Politics
Benue Govt Blasts Obi Over ‘Unapproved’ Visit: ‘He Is Looking For Our Trouble’
Politics
Igbo Group Rejects Tinubu Endorsement, Pledges Grassroots Support for Peter Obi in 2027
-
Auto2 days agoKaduna to Lead Govt Patronage of Local Vehicles as Sani Unveils Peugeot 5008
-
metro1 day agoEl-Rufai Demands ₦10bn from Defence Minister Over Southern Kaduna Killings Allegation
-
metro2 days agoOyoland Grand Chief Imam Celebrates Dr Sharafudeen Raji for Service to Islam
-
metro1 day agoCatholic priest leaves priesthood, weds Kenyan woman after 12 years in Kenya
-
Politics1 day agoWhy Did Peter Obi Attend Seyi Makinde’s Campaign Launch? Here’s What He Said
-
News1 day agoLagos Moves to Slash Agency Fees, Curb Rent Hikes With New Tenancy Bill
-
metro2 days agoSocialite Igho ‘Tiny’ Ubiribo Dies After Penis Enlargement Surgery
-
metro1 day agoNo US Case Against Tinubu, Family Enjoy Unimpeded Transit for UNGA — Ambassador Ibrahim

You must be logged in to post a comment Login