International
Israel’s presence in occupied Palestinian territories illegal – UN court
Israel’s presence in occupied Palestinian territories illegal – UN court
THE HAGUE, Netherlands: The top UN court said Friday that Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is “unlawful” and called on it to end and for settlement construction to stop immediately, issuing an unprecedented, sweeping condemnation of Israel’s rule over the lands it captured 57 years ago.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly denounced the nonbinding opinion issued by the 15-judge panel of the International Court of Justice, saying the territories are part of the Jewish people’s historic “homeland.” But the resounding breadth of the decision could impact international opinion and fuel moves for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state.
The judges pointed to a wide list of policies, including the building and expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, use of the area’s natural resources, the annexation and imposition of permanent control over lands and discriminatory policies against Palestinians, all of which it said violated international law.
The court said Israel had no right to sovereignty in the territories, was violating international laws against acquiring territory by force and was impeding Palestinians’ right to self-determination. It said other nations were obliged not to “render aid or assistance in maintaining” Israel’s presence in the territories. It said Israel must end settlement construction immediately and that existing settlements must be removed, according to a summary of the more than 80-page opinion read out by court President Nawaf Salam.
Israel’s “abuse of its status as the occupying power” renders its “presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful,” the court said, saying its presence must be ended as “rapidly as possible.”
READ ALSO:
- Rivers: Appeal Court dismisses suit against Tinubu, Fubara, others
- Dele Momodu, Doyin Okupe disagree over Tinubu administration’s policies
- Fed govt unveils roadmap for Africa’s digital revolution under AfCFTA
The court’s opinion, sought by the UN General Assembly after a Palestinian request, came against the backdrop of Israel’s devastating military assault on Gaza, which was triggered by the Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7. In a separate case, the International Court of Justice is considering a South African claim that Israel’s campaign in Gaza amounts to genocide, a claim that Israel vehemently denies.
The court said the General Assembly and Security Council — where staunch Israeli ally the United States holds a veto — should consider “the precise modalities” to end Israel’s presence in the territories.
Israel, which normally considers the United Nations and international tribunals as unfair and biased, didn’t send a legal team to the hearings. Instead, it submitted written comments, saying that the questions put to the court are prejudiced and fail to address Israeli security concerns. Israeli officials have said the court’s intervention could undermine the peace process, which has been stagnant for more than a decade.
“The Jewish people are not conquerors in their own land — not in our eternal capital Jerusalem and not in the land of our ancestors in Judea and Samaria,” Netanyahu said in a statement issued by his office, using the biblical terms for the West Bank. “No false decision in The Hague will distort this historical truth and likewise the legality of Israeli settlement in all the territories of our homeland cannot be contested.”
Speaking outside the court, Riad Malki, an adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, called the opinion “a watershed moment for Palestine, for justice and for international law.”
He said other nations must now “uphold the clear obligations” outlined by the court. “No actions of any kind … to support Israel’s illegal occupation.”
Hamas welcomed the court’s decision and said in a statement that “serious steps on the ground” need to be taken in response.
Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians seek all three areas for an independent state.
Israel considers the West Bank to be disputed territory, whose future should be decided in negotiations, while it has moved populations there in settlements to solidify its hold. It has annexed east Jerusalem in a move that isn’t internationally recognized, while it withdrew from Gaza in 2005 but maintained a blockade of the territory after Hamas took power in 2007. The international community generally considers all three areas to be occupied territory.
READ ALSO:
- Refinery: Dangote defends product quality, says diesel 80% better than imported ones
- Arrest Philip Shaibu now over airport shooting, Edo govt tells police
- BREAKING: FCCPC fines Meta platforms $220m over ‘discriminatory practices’ in Nigeria
The court’s decision strikes at the heart of the ambiguity of Israel’s administration of the territories. Israel hasn’t annexed the West Bank — though settler groups have pressed it to do so — but it calls it part of its homeland and has effectively treated it as an extension of the nation. Along with the settlements, it has appropriated large swaths of the territory as “state lands.” At the same time, Netanyahu’s government has repeatedly rejected the creation of any Palestinian state. Abbas’ Palestinian Authority has been restricted to control over divided enclaves scattered around the West Bank.
The Palestinians presented arguments at hearings in February, along with 49 other nations and three international organizations. In the hearings, Malki accused Israel of apartheid and urged the United Nations’ top court to declare that Israel’s occupation of lands sought by the Palestinians is illegal and must end immediately and unconditionally for any hope for a two-state future to survive.
Erwin van Veen, a senior research fellow at the Clingendael think tank in The Hague, said before the decision that a ruling that Israel’s policies breach international law would “isolate Israel further internationally, at least from a legal point of view.”
He said such a ruling would remove “any kind of legal, political, philosophical underpinning of the Israeli expansion project.” It could also increase the number of countries that recognize a Palestinian state, in particular in the Western world, following the recent example of Spain and Norway and Ireland, he said.
It’s not the first time the ICJ has been asked to give its legal opinion on Israeli policies. Two decades ago, the court ruled that Israel’s West Bank separation barrier was “contrary to international law.” Israel boycotted those proceedings, saying they were politically motivated.
Israel says the barrier is a security measure. Palestinians say the structure amounts to a massive land grab, because it frequently dips into the West Bank.
The court said that Israel’s construction of settlements in the West Bank violated international laws prohibiting countries from moving their population into territories they occupy.
Israel has built well over 100 settlements, according to the anti-settlement monitoring group Peace Now. The West Bank settler population has grown by more than 15 percent in the past five years to more than 500,000 Israelis, according to a pro-settler group. Their residents are Israeli citizens governed by domestic law and served by government ministries, services, banks and other businesses — effectively integrating them into Israel.
Israel also has annexed east Jerusalem and considers the entire city to be its capital. An additional 200,000 Israelis live in settlements built in east Jerusalem that Israel considers to be neighborhoods of its capital. Palestinian residents of the city face systematic discrimination, making it difficult for them to build new homes or expand existing ones.
The international community considers all settlements to be illegal or obstacles to peace since they are built on lands sought by the Palestinians for their state.
Netanyahu’s hard-line government is dominated by settlers and their political supporters. Netanyahu has given his finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, a former settler leader, unprecedented authority over settlement policy. Smotrich has used this position to cement Israel’s control over the West Bank by pushing forward plans to build more settlement homes and to legalize outposts.
Israel’s presence in occupied Palestinian territories illegal – UN court
ARAB NEWS
![]()
International
Trump unveils plan for US control of Strait of Hormuz, seeks payment for security
Trump unveils plan for US control of Strait of Hormuz, seeks payment for security
US President Donald Trump has announced plans for the United States to assume control of the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, declaring that Washington should be compensated for protecting one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes as tensions with Iran continue to escalate.
Speaking during a telephone interview with Fox News’ Fox & Friends, Trump said the US would become the “guardian” of the Strait of Hormuz and ensure that the critical shipping lane remains open for international commerce.
“We’re going to keep the strait, and we’ll probably run it. We’ll become the guardian of the strait. Maybe we’ll call it the guardian angel of the strait. And we should be reimbursed for that,” Trump said.
The US president argued that countries benefiting from the security of the waterway should contribute financially to its protection.
“We’re going to guard it. We’re going to get paid for guarding it—a lot of money. We’re going to be reimbursed because the other nations are very wealthy. They’re on our side, and we can’t be expected to do that for nothing,” he added.
Trump later expanded on the proposal, suggesting that commercial cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz could be subject to a 20 per cent transit charge to offset the cost of US security operations in the region.
His remarks came amid a sharp deterioration in relations between Washington and Tehran, following renewed military exchanges that have heightened fears of a wider regional conflict.
Iran recently announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, citing security concerns after a series of missile and drone strikes involving Iranian and US forces.
Tehran said commercial shipping through the strategic waterway would remain suspended until what it described as the restoration of “stability and calm.”
READ ALSO:
- Appeal Court upholds judgment barring INEC from recognising ADC state congresses
- Victor Osimhen reveals plans to earn university degree after football career
- Heavy rains, flash floods kill 51 as over one million affected in Bangladesh
Trump accused Iran of reneging on previous agreements designed to keep the waterway open for international navigation.
“We had a deal. It was a done deal, and then they broke it. They always break it. We’ve had 10 deals with these people, and so we’re just going to hit them very hard,” he said.
Meanwhile, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) insisted that the only way to restore normal maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is for the United States to halt its military operations in the Gulf.
The Iranian military warned that continued US intervention could further destabilise the region and disrupt global oil and gas supplies.
The latest confrontation follows several days of missile and drone attacks between the two countries, with Iran claiming responsibility for strikes on US military installations in the Gulf, while Washington launched retaliatory attacks on Iranian military targets.
The renewed hostilities have effectively undermined a temporary understanding reportedly reached between the two countries last month to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and reduce military tensions while diplomatic negotiations continued.
The Strait of Hormuz is regarded as one of the world’s most strategically significant maritime chokepoints, linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.
An estimated 20 per cent of global seaborne crude oil and a substantial share of the world’s liquefied natural gas exports pass through the narrow waterway every day, making it indispensable to global energy markets.
Major oil-exporting countries, including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, rely heavily on the route to transport crude oil and natural gas to international markets.
The renewed tensions have already sent global oil prices higher as investors worry that prolonged disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could tighten energy supplies, increase transportation costs and fuel inflation worldwide.
Trump’s proposal has also generated international legal debate, with maritime law experts questioning whether any nation can unilaterally assume control of or impose transit charges on an international waterway governed by international maritime law.
Diplomatic observers warn that any attempt to enforce such a policy could further complicate already fragile relations in the Middle East and heighten geopolitical risks in one of the world’s most volatile regions.
Governments, energy companies and international shipping operators are expected to closely monitor developments as the security situation in the Gulf continues to evolve.
Trump unveils plan for US control of Strait of Hormuz, seeks payment for security
![]()
International
Heavy rains, flash floods kill 51 as over one million affected in Bangladesh
Heavy rains, flash floods kill 51 as over one million affected in Bangladesh
At least 51 people have lost their lives and more than one million people have been affected after days of relentless monsoon rains, flash floods and landslides battered Bangladesh, leaving thousands homeless and forcing mass evacuations across several parts of the country.
The devastating floods have submerged communities in multiple districts, including the capital Dhaka, where flooded streets, traffic congestion and overwhelmed drainage systems have disrupted economic activities and daily life.
According to Bangladesh’s Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief, thousands of families have been displaced, with many taking refuge in government shelters as emergency responders continue rescue and relief operations.
Officials said the death toll could still rise as search-and-rescue teams continue to reach isolated communities cut off by floodwaters and damaged infrastructure.
The worst-hit area is Cox’s Bazar, where 28 of the 51 fatalities have been recorded. The southeastern district is home to more than one million Rohingya refugees, making it the world’s largest refugee settlement.
The severe weather has significantly worsened conditions in the refugee camps, where landslides and flooding have damaged shelters, blocked access roads and disrupted the delivery of food, clean water and medical supplies.
Last week, the disaster claimed the lives of several students and a teacher after floodwaters swept through their school in Cox’s Bazar, underscoring the growing dangers posed by the heavy rains.
READ ALSO:
- Bangkok bar fire kills at least 27, leaves 25 critically injured
- UK reaffirms visa requirement for Nigerians, citizens of 32 other African countries
- Publisher arraigned over alleged false reports claiming Gov Soludo disowned son
Before the flooding intensified, Bangladesh’s disaster management authorities had issued warnings about possible floods and landslides, prompting the evacuation of residents living in vulnerable communities.
Educational authorities also postponed public examinations in several districts to safeguard students and school personnel as the weather deteriorated.
In Dhaka, residents reported widespread flooding, with water rising to knee level in several neighbourhoods and causing severe traffic disruptions.
The flooding has also renewed concerns over the capital’s drainage infrastructure, with local media questioning the effectiveness of previous government investments aimed at improving flood management in the rapidly growing city.
According to the Flood Forecasting and Warning Centre (FFWC), water levels in several rivers remain above danger levels, although conditions in parts of southeastern Bangladesh are expected to improve gradually.
However, forecasters warned that continuing monsoon rainfall across the northeastern and northern regions could trigger additional flooding in the coming days, increasing the risk to already affected communities.
Emergency responders, including the Bangladesh Army, Fire Service and Civil Defence, police personnel and volunteers, have been deployed to rescue stranded residents, evacuate vulnerable families and distribute food, clean drinking water, medicines and other relief materials.
Authorities said numerous roads, bridges and embankments have been damaged, making access to several flood-hit communities difficult and slowing humanitarian operations.
Health officials have also raised concerns over the growing risk of waterborne diseases, including cholera, diarrhoea and typhoid, due to contaminated water supplies and overcrowded temporary shelters.
The government has urged residents living in flood-prone and landslide-prone areas to remain vigilant, monitor official weather advisories and comply with evacuation orders where necessary.
Bangladesh experiences seasonal flooding during its annual monsoon season, but climate experts say the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events have increased due to climate change, rising temperatures and changing rainfall patterns.
As one of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries, Bangladesh continues to face recurring floods, cyclones and river erosion that threaten millions of lives and livelihoods every year.
International humanitarian organisations, including United Nations agencies and aid groups working in the Rohingya refugee camps, are supporting relief efforts by providing emergency assistance to affected families.
Authorities said damage assessments are ongoing as rescue workers continue searching for missing persons and delivering humanitarian aid to flood-affected communities across the country.
Heavy rains, flash floods kill 51 as over one million affected in Bangladesh
![]()
International
Bangkok bar fire kills at least 27, leaves 25 critically injured
Bangkok bar fire kills at least 27, leaves 25 critically injured
At least 27 people have been killed and 25 others remain in critical condition after a devastating fire engulfed Rong Beer Na Lat Phrao bar in Bangkok, Thailand, triggering one of the country’s deadliest nightlife disasters in recent years.
The tragic incident occurred late on Sunday in Bangkok’s Chatuchak district, where the blaze reportedly started near the stage of the crowded entertainment venue before spreading rapidly through the building, cutting off electricity and filling the premises with thick smoke.
Eyewitnesses said panic erupted as customers and staff scrambled for safety, with many forced to flee through the building’s main entrance while flames spread across the venue.
Videos shared on social media captured horrifying scenes of terrified patrons screaming for help, while some escaped with their clothes on fire.
Emergency responders were alerted by a passing motorist shortly after midnight, prompting firefighters to rush to the scene. The fire was brought under control within about 30 minutes, but not before causing extensive destruction.
Rescue teams later discovered the bodies of many victims inside one of the bar’s bathrooms, where they had reportedly taken shelter in a desperate attempt to escape the smoke and flames.
According to Thai authorities, nine men and 18 women were among those killed, while 73 people sustained injuries, including 25 victims who remain in critical condition in hospitals across Bangkok.
Officials from Bangkok’s Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation said preliminary findings indicate that most of the victims died from smoke inhalation, while others suffered severe burns during the fire.
READ ALSO:
- UK reaffirms visa requirement for Nigerians, citizens of 32 other African countries
- Publisher arraigned over alleged false reports claiming Gov Soludo disowned son
- Dalung visits family of lynched Kaduna Islamic teacher, demands justice beyond sympathy
One survivor, Kaew-udon Poungppany, a 24-year-old citizen of Laos, recounted his unsuccessful attempt to rescue his younger brother, Phonepaseut Poungppany, who died in the tragedy.
“I grabbed a fire extinguisher and sprayed it at the door, but I couldn’t go any further. I heard people screaming,” he told reporters.
Another eyewitness, Surin Jaiharn, said he helped several people escape by using pieces of clothing to extinguish flames on their bodies before emergency services arrived.
Authorities have launched a full-scale investigation into the cause of the fire.
Preliminary investigations suggest the blaze may have been triggered by an electrical short circuit in an air-conditioning unit, although officials stressed that forensic experts are still examining the scene and no official cause has been confirmed.
Bangkok Governor Chatchart Sittipunt said investigators are also examining whether highly flammable decorative materials installed on the ceiling contributed to the rapid spread of the fire.
He disclosed that some victims were found unconscious close to the emergency exit, raising concerns that the escape route may have been blocked or difficult to access during the evacuation.
Thailand’s Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister, Anutin Charnvirakul, visited the scene and said a musician who was performing when the fire broke out reported hearing what sounded like explosions before smoke and flames engulfed the building.
According to the minister, many customers ran toward the rear of the building and hid inside the toilets, where a large number of victims were later found.
Authorities have since sealed off the entertainment venue, while the Chatuchak District Office ordered the building closed for 30 days pending the outcome of investigations.
The Thai government also announced financial assistance for victims’ families. Relatives of those who died will receive 29,300 Thai baht in compensation, while injured survivors undergoing treatment will receive 4,000 baht in emergency assistance.
The latest tragedy has once again raised concerns over fire safety standards in Thailand’s entertainment industry.
In 2022, a nightclub fire in Chon Buri Province killed 22 people and injured dozens after flames rapidly engulfed the venue.
Earlier, the Santika Club fire in Bangkok on January 1, 2009, claimed 66 lives and left more than 200 people injured, prompting calls for stricter enforcement of fire safety regulations.
In 2024, another electrical fire at Bangkok’s famous Chatuchak Weekend Market killed more than 1,000 animals, further highlighting ongoing concerns over electrical safety in public facilities.
Authorities have pledged a thorough investigation into the latest disaster, with investigators expected to determine whether negligence, electrical faults or violations of building safety regulations contributed to the deadly fire.
Bangkok bar fire kills at least 27, leaves 25 critically injured
![]()
-
metro1 day agoTroops kill ISWAP cameraman, recover footage exposing foreign terrorist facilitators in Borno
-
metro3 days agoREVEALED: Inside the intelligence-led operation that forced Oyo kidnappers to flee
-
metro21 hours agoBreaking: Gunmen kidnap Oyo school headmaster, demand ₦30 million ransom
-
metro3 days ago[VIDEO] Intelligence, not negotiation, secured release of Oyo abductees – Former DSS operative
-
metro1 day agoOyo High Court to deliver judgment in landmark hijab case Tuesday
-
metro2 days agoNotorious Bandit Leader Kachalla Sani Yellow Killed in Zamfara
-
Politics3 days ago2027 election: Tinubu’s retention of Shettima strengthens APC in the North – Kwankwaso
-
Aviation3 days agoKeyamo releases CCTV footage, challenges Peter Obi’s persecution claims
