International

Netanyahu faces delicate balancing act in US after Biden exits race

Published

2 years ago

July 23, 2024

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Netanyahu faces delicate balancing act in US after Biden exits race

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visits the US this week under pressure to end the Gaza war, from both Israelis and the US administration. How might the political turbulence in Washington shape the trip and future relations?

Mr Netanyahu is set to meet Joe Biden – if the president has recovered from Covid-19 – and address a joint session of Congress, the only foreign leader to do so for a fourth time.

The trip offers him a platform for a reset with Washington after months of tensions over his hardline approach to the war, and an opportunity to try and convince Israelis that he hasn’t undermined relations with their most important ally.

But it is overshadowed by President Biden’s decision not to seek re-election, highlighting political uncertainties about Israel’s next partner in the White House and possibly eclipsing some of the attention on Mr Netanyahu’s visit.

The prime minister got a lot of unwelcome attention in Israel until the moment he boarded the plane.

A drumbeat of protests demanded that he stay home and focus on a ceasefire deal with Hamas to free Israeli hostages.

“Until he has signed the deal that’s on the table, I do not see how he picks up and flies across the Atlantic to address the American political chaos,” said Lee Siegel, one of the family members who has come out to demonstrate. His 65-year-old brother Keith is a captive in Gaza.

The trip is a political move, he added, unless Mr Netanyahu stops being a “hurdle” and signs the ceasefire agreement.

Mr Siegel reflected a widespread view that Mr Netanyahu is slow-rolling the process for his own political reasons, roiling his negotiators when he recently threw new conditions into talks that seemed to be making progress.

The prime minister has been accused of bowing to pressure from two far-right cabinet ministers who’ve threatened to bring down his government if he makes concessions to Hamas.

These perceptions have added to frustrations in the White House, which announced the latest formula for talks and had been expressing optimism an agreement could be achieved.

READ ALSO:

Mr Biden remains one of the most pro-Israel presidents to sit in the Oval Office, a self-declared Zionist who’s been lauded by Israelis for his support and empathy, cemented by his flight to Israel just days after the Hamas attacks on 7 October.

But since then, he’s grown alarmed at the cost of Mr Netanyahu’s demand for a “total victory” against Hamas in Gaza.

The administration is frustrated with the Israeli prime minister for rejecting a post war solution that involves pursuing a Palestinian state.

It’s angry with him for resisting appeals to do more to protect Palestinian civilians and increase the flow of aid to them. It’s facing a domestic backlash over the mounting death toll in Gaza. And it’s worried that the conflict is spreading to the region.

As Joe Biden’s presidency weakened in the swirl of controversy over his abilities, analysts said there might be less room for him to keep up the pressure on the Israeli prime minister.

But Mr Biden’s decision to drop out of the race could actually have strengthened his hand, says Ehud Barak, a former Israeli prime minister and a critic of Mr Netanyahu.

“He is not a lame duck in regard to foreign policy, in a way he’s more independent (because) he doesn’t have to take into account any impact on the voters,” Mr Barak told the BBC.

“With regard to Israel probably he feels more of a free hand to do what really needs to be done.”

Mr Barak believes it was a mistake for Congress to invite Mr Netanyahu to speak, saying that many Israelis blame him for policy failures that allowed the Hamas attack to happen, and three out of four want him to resign.

“The man does not represent Israel,” he said. “He lost the trust of Israelis…And it kind of sends a wrong signal to Israelis, probably a wrong signal to Netanyahu himself, when the American Congress invites him to appear as if he is saving us.”

Whatever politics he may be playing, Mr Netanyahu insists military pressure must continue because it has significantly weakened Hamas after a series of strikes against the military leadership.

READ ALSO:

In comments before departing Israel, he suggested that would be the tone of his meeting with President Biden.

“It will also be an opportunity to discuss with him how to advance in the months ahead the goals that are important for both our countries,” he said, “achieving the release of all our hostages, defeating Hamas, confronting the terror axis of Iran and its proxies and ensuring that all Israel’s citizens return safely to their homes in the north and in the south.”

He’s expected to bring the same message to congress, “seeking to anchor the bipartisan support that is so important to Israel”.

The reality is that Mr Netanyahu’s polices have fractured that bipartisan support. The Republicans are rallying around him, but criticism from Democrats has grown.

The Democratic Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer caused a small earthquake in Washington recently when he stood up in the chambers and said Mr Netanyahu was one of the obstacles standing in the way of a lasting peace with Palestinians.

“I hope the prime minister understands the anxiety of many members in congress and addresses them,” the former US ambassador to Israel, Thomas Nides, told the BBC at the weekend. He’d been addressing one of the many rallies demanding a hostage release.

That includes “on humanitarian issues and to articulate that this fight isn’t with the Palestinian people, it’s with Hamas.”

It’s a message that Kamala Harris would repeat if she were to become the Democratic nominee. There’d be no change in US policy: a commitment to Israel’s security while pushing for an end to the Gaza conflict and a plan for the Day After embedded in a regional peace with Arab states.

READ ALSO:

But there might be a difference in tone.

Ms Harris does not share Mr Biden’s long history with and emotional ties to Israel. She’s from a different generation and “could more closely align with the sentiments of younger elements of the Democratic party,” says Mick Mulroy, a former deputy assistant secretary of defence for the Middle East.

“That’s a stance more likely to include restrictions on weapons, on munitions from the United States for use in Gaza,” he said.

Mr Netanyahu could very well use the visit to steer the conversation from the controversy over Gaza to the threat from Iran, a topic with which he’s far more comfortable, especially after the recent escalation with Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.

But his main audience will be domestic, says Tal Shalev, the diplomatic correspondent at Israel’s Walla News.

He wants to revive his image as “Mr America,” she says, the man who can best present Israel to the US, and to restore his image which was shattered by the October 7 attacks.

“When he goes to the US and speaks in front of Congress and [has] a meeting in the White House, for his electoral base, it’s the old Bibi is back again,” she says, referring to the prime minister by his nickname. “This is not the failed Bibi who was responsible for the seventh of October. This is the old Bibi who goes to the Congress and gets the standing ovations.”

It also gives him an opportunity to pursue connections with the former President Donald Trump at a time of great political flux in Washington.

“Netanyahu wants President Trump to win,” she says, “And he wants to make sure that he and President Trump are on good terms before the election.”

There is a widespread view that Mr. Netanyahu is playing for time, hoping for a Trump win that might ease some of the pressure he’s been facing from the Biden administration.

“There is a near-universal perception that Netanyahu is eager for a Trump victory, under the assumption that he will then be able to do whatever he wants,” writes Michael Koplow of Israel’s Policy Forum.

“No Biden pressuring him on a ceasefire or on West Bank settlements and settler violence… There are many reasons to doubt this reading of the landscape under a Trump restoration, but Netanyahu likely subscribes to it.”

The question is whether that pressure from Biden will ease as he steps away from the presidential race, or whether he will in fact use his remaining months in office to focus on achieving an end to the Gaza war.

Netanyahu faces delicate balancing act in US after Biden exits race

BBC

International

Houthis Launch Missile at Saudi Arabia as Regional Tensions Escalate Amid US-Iran Strikes

Published

5 days ago

July 25, 2026

Trends Admin

Houthis Launch Missile at Saudi Arabia as Regional Tensions Escalate Amid US-Iran Strikes

Iran-backed Houthi rebels have claimed responsibility for a missile attack targeting Saudi Arabia, hours after Saudi forces carried out air strikes against Houthi-linked positions in western Yemen, marking a significant escalation in cross-border hostilities amid broader regional tensions in the Middle East. According to the group’s Ansarollah media outlet on Telegram, the missile attack early Saturday triggered fires in the Saudi city of Jizan, with Saudi authorities reportedly issuing emergency alerts across the province following the incident, sending residents scrambling for safety as air raid sirens sounded through the night. The attack followed Friday’s Saudi air raids on Houthi targets in the Yemeni port city of Hodeida and the nearby Kamaran Island, which the Houthis had vowed to retaliate against, demonstrating the rapid cycle of escalation that has come to characterise the conflict. The exchange of fire underscores the fragility of the ceasefire that had previously reduced hostilities but failed to produce a lasting political settlement, leaving both sides poised for further confrontation.

The latest exchange of hostilities came as the broader Middle East experienced its first night in two weeks without reported air strikes by either the United States or Iran, raising hopes of a potential de-escalation after weeks of intense military confrontation that had pushed the region to the brink of all-out war. The US military refrained from announcing fresh attacks on Iran after carrying out 13 consecutive nights of strikes, during which it hit dozens of Iranian military targets including coastal surveillance and air defence sites, military logistics infrastructure, and maritime capabilities, inflicting significant damage on Tehran’s military assets across the region. During the same period, Iran launched drone attacks against US military installations and bases across the region, and largely halted traffic through the Strait of Hormuz after the re-escalation of attacks, crippling one of the world’s most vital maritime chokepoints and disrupting global oil supplies. Tehran has signalled it could prod its Houthi allies in Yemen to close the Bab al-Mandeb strait at the mouth of the Red Sea if Washington attacks Iran’s infrastructure, according to sources cited by Reuters, further complicating the security landscape in the region and threatening to expand the conflict into a wider maritime confrontation.

READ ALSO:

Meanwhile, an Omani delegation arrived in Tehran for discussions on the security of the Strait of Hormuz, according to Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency, signalling ongoing diplomatic efforts to address the crisis even as military tensions escalate on multiple fronts. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held telephone talks with Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi to discuss recent regional developments and the security of commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, exploring potential avenues for de-escalation through backchannel diplomacy. Oman, which oversees the southern coastline of the strategic waterway, has historically served as a mediator between Iran and Western nations, and its involvement suggests a potential opening for dialogue amid the escalating tensions, offering a glimmer of hope that a diplomatic solution might still be possible.

Speaking at the White House on Friday, US President Donald Trump said diplomatic engagement with Iran was ongoing while warning that military action remained an option, striking a dual-track approach to the crisis that reflected the complexity of the situation facing his administration. “We are talking to them. I think they’re being serious. I think … they are being by far the most serious that we’ve seen them, but that doesn’t mean we get there,” he said, expressing cautious optimism about the prospects for a negotiated settlement while acknowledging the significant hurdles that remain. Responding to questions about his strategy for ending the conflict, Trump outlined two possible paths forward: “There’s a military exit where we just keep going just the way we are, and we can even make it a heavier dose, and it’s knocking out everything they have. Or there’s a smarter strategy that you make a deal,” he said, adding emphatically: “We’re locked and loaded. We’re ready to go.” The president’s remarks reflect the delicate balance Washington is attempting to strike between applying military pressure and pursuing diplomatic resolution, with both options remaining firmly on the table.

Elsewhere, the US military disclosed that it disabled a tanker in the Gulf of Oman on Friday after the vessel allegedly attempted to evade Washington’s blockade on Iranian ports, intensifying the maritime dimension of the conflict and underscoring the growing risks to commercial shipping in the region. Navy Captain Tim Hawkins, spokesman for US Central Command, told AFP that the crew repeatedly ignored warnings after attempting to run the blockade at least four times prior, demonstrating a pattern of defiance that ultimately led to the military response. “US forces on scene disabled the ship after firing into its engine room,” Hawkins said. “The ship is no longer transiting to Iran,” he confirmed, indicating that the vessel had been rendered inoperable and turned back from its intended destination. The ship became the second commercial vessel disabled by US forces since the blockade was reinstated earlier this month, with the US military also forcing 12 other vessels to change course, signalling a determined effort to enforce economic pressure on Tehran through maritime interdiction operations. The incident highlights the escalating confrontation at sea, where Washington is seeking to enforce strict economic pressure on Tehran through maritime interdiction operations, raising the stakes in an already volatile region.

READ ALSO:

Growing concerns over threats to commercial shipping in the Red Sea linked to Houthi activities had pushed crude oil prices above $100 per barrel earlier in the week, marking their highest level since May and raising fears of global economic disruption as energy markets reacted nervously to the escalating tensions. However, prices retreated on Friday, with Brent crude futures falling by more than $4 to just above $96 per barrel, as markets reacted to the successful transit of two Chinese-chartered supertankers through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, alleviating some of the immediate supply concerns that had driven prices higher. The volatility in oil markets underscores the fragility of global energy supply chains amid the ongoing conflict, with traders remaining on edge as they monitor developments in the region closely.

Following the reported missile exchange, Ansarollah media condemned Saudi operations in Yemen, accusing Riyadh of targeting civilian facilities and vowing further retaliation in a statement that signalled the conflict was far from over. “The Saudi enemy’s targeting of civilian facilities in Hodeida and Kamaran island constitutes a dangerous escalation,” the group said, adding: “We affirm that these recent crimes will not go unanswered,” indicating that further attacks against Saudi targets could be expected in the coming days. Saudi officials had not issued an immediate response to the Houthi claims at the time of this report, leaving the situation on the ground unclear and the international community anxiously awaiting further developments.

The United States and the United Kingdom are expected to host a conference in London next week focused on security in the Strait of Hormuz, according to sources cited by Reuters, as Western nations seek to coordinate a response to the growing maritime threat and build an international coalition to protect commercial shipping in the region. The meeting is expected to be attended by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine, underscoring the high-level attention being devoted to the crisis and the urgency with which Western powers are treating the situation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is also scheduled to meet President Trump at the White House on Tuesday as diplomatic efforts continue amid persistent regional tensions, with the Israeli leader expected to discuss coordination on Iran policy and regional security arrangements.

Analysts suggest the proposed London conference reflects US efforts to secure international backing for its position, as Washington finds itself at a disadvantage in the ongoing confrontation with Tehran, having failed to rally broad international support for its maximum pressure campaign. However, European nations have expressed concerns about being drawn into direct conflict, with some insisting that any successful maritime security arrangement requires the cessation of hostilities between the US and Iran, a condition that remains elusive given the current trajectory of the conflict. The reluctance of key European allies to fully commit to Washington’s approach highlights the diplomatic challenges facing the United States as it seeks to build a coalition to address the maritime security crisis.

The renewed hostilities come despite a 14-point Memorandum of Understanding signed by the United States and Iran in June, which sought to halt military operations, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and pave the way for ending the conflict within 60 days, representing a brief window of hope for a peaceful resolution. The agreement later collapsed after renewed Iranian attacks on shipping in the strait and subsequent US military strikes, leaving both sides back at square one and raising questions about the prospects for a durable resolution to the crisis as trust between the parties evaporated. As of the time of this report, the situation remains highly volatile, with all parties maintaining their military postures while diplomatic channels continue to operate in the background, offering no clear path forward. The international community watches with bated breath as the Middle East teeters on the edge of a wider conflagration that could have profound implications for global security and energy markets, with the coming days likely to determine whether the region can step back from the brink or plunge deeper into conflict.

Houthis Launch Missile at Saudi Arabia as Regional Tensions Escalate Amid US-Iran Strikes

International

166,000 Evacuated as Unprecedented Wildfires Rage Across France, Spain

Published

5 days ago

July 25, 2026

Trends Admin

166,000 Evacuated as Unprecedented Wildfires Rage Across France, Spain

More than 166,000 people have been forced to flee their homes and holiday destinations as unprecedented wildfires, fueled by extreme heat, drought, and strong winds, continue to ravage vast areas across France and Spain. The blazes have threatened major cities, including Bordeaux and Madrid, destroyed hundreds of homes, and prompted the deployment of military personnel and European Union emergency assistance. French President Emmanuel Macron has ordered the army to mobilise in response to what officials have described as the worst wildfire France has ever seen, while Spanish authorities have declared a national emergency for only the second time in the country’s history as flames approach the capital, Madrid.

In southwestern France, more than 141,000 people have been evacuated as wildfires tear through the Gironde and Landes regions. The Gironde blaze, described by local prefect Sophie Brocas as an “XXL fire”, has burned through more than 19,000 hectares of forest and destroyed approximately 80 homes. Around 44,000 people fled the up-market Cap Ferret peninsula south of Bordeaux, where the only road was threatened by flames. Hundreds were evacuated by boat, while others drove off the peninsula, known for its millionaire residences. More than 50 houses there have been destroyed. Authorities ordered the evacuation of towns near Bordeaux “as a precaution” against the approaching inferno, while traffic information website Bison Futé urged drivers to avoid roads in the area to free up access for emergency services.

French Interior Minister Laurent Nunez said the country had never before seen such fires on this scale and pledged to “do everything” to protect Bordeaux. “We are going to reorganise our response so we can fight it from the ground and prevent it from advancing toward Bordeaux,” Nunez told French broadcaster TF1, warning that the fire was “self-sustaining” and changing direction. Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu called a crisis meeting of key ministers late Friday and said a total of 1,000 military personnel would be deployed to confront the flames. In addition, “1.5 million FFP2 masks will be delivered as of tonight to Gironde in order to protect the personnel involved and the populations exposed to smoke that is harmful to health,” he said on X. About 40 of the 1,000 firefighters battling the Cap Ferret blaze have been injured, authorities confirmed. Three firefighters have died in wildfires in France and Italy this week.

READ ALSO:

The situation in Spain is equally dire, with at least 25,000 people evacuated in the Madrid region and another 40,000 told to lock themselves indoors. Spain’s government has declared a national emergency for only the second time in the country’s history, allowing the central government to assume overall command and coordinate national and regional emergency resources. Carlos Novillo, the Madrid regional government’s emergency management chief, said the wildfire near the capital was “at its peak and is currently beyond the capacity of firefighters to contain”. “It’s not possible to attack the fire in that area, so defensive measures are being taken,” he added.

Two of the three major wildfires west of Madrid have merged into one, threatening suburban towns. The fire is heading towards Navas del Rey, around 50 kilometres from the capital, and officials fear the blaze could combine with another wildfire in the neighbouring Castilla y Leon region, creating an even larger catastrophe. Madrid’s regional president Isabel Díaz Ayuso described it as the “worst fire in the history of the region”, with the area facing a “perfect storm” of high temperatures, relentless wind, and merging fire fronts. The Military Emergency Unit has been mobilised to try to halt the advance of the flames, with its main focus protecting areas near the town of El Escorial. “The smoke was incredibly thick,” Jose Cobos, who fled his home southwest of Madrid with his wife and three dogs, told Antena 3 television. “You couldn’t breathe.” In the village of Chapinería, 33-year-old Joaquin Espinosa told The Associated Press: “All around the town was smoke and fire, I was scared. Everything was fire and smoke, people were nervous.”

Madrid and Paris have called in EU emergency assistance as flames whipped up by strong winds and drought tore through tinder-dry forests. Following appeals for assistance, the European Commission said it was sending four water-bombing planes to Spain and three to France. Macron said France would receive reinforcements including two Croatian Canadair firefighting aircraft, two Portuguese Air Tractor aircraft, and two heavy-lift Black Hawk helicopters from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Spanish Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska said Italy and Greece are each sending two Canadair water-dumping aeroplanes. Emergency shelters were set up in schools and gymnasiums in southwestern France for tourists and residents left wondering what they would return to. In the village of Andernos, Maria Lalanne, a 90-year-old from Lege Cap Ferret, sat on a camp bed in a gym without her glasses or hearing aid, which she had left behind. “I have heart disease, high blood pressure and problems with my eyes,” she said. “I don’t know how long all this will last. I don’t know how my house is, whether it has burnt.”

Some European regions have suffered at least two heatwaves since May. Drought blamed on human-fuelled climate change has heightened the threat from wildfires this year, the World Weather Attribution group said in a study published this week. Southern Europe has seen multiple large fires this summer, with Europe being the world’s fastest-warming continent, with temperatures increasing twice as quickly as the global average since the 1980s. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has called for a pact between political parties to fight climate change, which he said is key to adapting to a more fire-prone climate. So far this year, 44,000 hectares have been burned in France, more than the average, Nunez said. In Spain, more than 1,140 square kilometres have already burned this year, more than five times the burned terrain through the first half of 2025. The unprecedented scale of these wildfires serves as a stark reminder of the growing impact of climate change on Europe’s fire seasons, with experts warning that such extreme events are likely to become more frequent and severe in the coming years.

166,000 Evacuated as Unprecedented Wildfires Rage Across France, Spain

International

UN calls for urgent evacuation of 6,000 sailors stranded in Strait of Hormuz

Published

5 days ago

July 25, 2026

Trends Admin

Iran declares Strait of Hormuz closed as fresh US strikes deepen Gulf conflict

UN calls for urgent evacuation of 6,000 sailors stranded in Strait of Hormuz

The United Nations has called for the urgent evacuation and repatriation of about 6,000 sailors stranded aboard commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, warning that the prolonged crisis poses serious humanitarian, human rights and maritime safety concerns as conflict in the Middle East continues to threaten one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

The appeal was made by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk, who urged all parties involved in the conflict to prioritise the safety of civilian seafarers and facilitate their immediate evacuation. He stressed that thousands of crew members have remained trapped aboard vessels for weeks despite the announcement of a ceasefire, with many unable to disembark or safely return home because of persistent security threats.

Speaking in Geneva, UN human rights spokeswoman Shabia Mantoo said estimates from the International Maritime Organization (IMO) indicate that approximately 6,000 seafarers remain stranded on hundreds of ships operating in or around the Strait of Hormuz.

She said all parties to the conflict must urgently ensure safe passage for the affected crews, guarantee access to essential humanitarian supplies and respect international humanitarian law, which prohibits attacks on civilian vessels.

According to the UN, stranded sailors require immediate access to food, clean water, medical care, communication facilities, mental health support and consular assistance while arrangements are made for their evacuation and repatriation.

Türk also appealed to governments, shipping companies, flag states and international maritime organisations to work together to protect seafarers whose safety has been endangered by the escalating regional conflict.

READ ALSO:

The humanitarian appeal comes amid renewed military tensions involving the United States, Iran and Iran-backed Houthi fighters following attacks on commercial oil tankers and other merchant vessels operating in the Red Sea and surrounding waters.

Although U.S. military officials have maintained that the Strait of Hormuz remains open to international commercial shipping, security risks have continued to disrupt maritime operations, forcing several shipping companies to suspend or reroute voyages while others delay sailings until the security situation improves.

The renewed conflict has also triggered sharp increases in global oil prices, with Brent crude climbing above $100 per barrel, raising fresh concerns about global energy supplies, inflation and the cost of international freight.

Industry analysts say the rising geopolitical tension has led to higher war-risk insurance premiums, increased shipping costs and greater uncertainty for global supply chains that depend heavily on uninterrupted maritime trade through the Gulf.

The Strait of Hormuz, located between Iran and Oman, remains one of the world’s most strategically important maritime chokepoints. Before the latest escalation, nearly 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply and significant volumes of liquefied natural gas passed through the narrow waterway each day, making any disruption a major threat to international energy markets and global commerce.

The International Maritime Organization has repeatedly warned that civilian seafarers should never become casualties of armed conflicts, stressing that shipping crews perform essential services that keep global trade moving and deserve protection regardless of geopolitical disputes.

Maritime labour organisations have also expressed concern over the welfare of stranded crews, reporting that many sailors have remained onboard far beyond the expiration of their employment contracts while facing shortages of supplies, delayed crew changes and growing psychological stress caused by prolonged uncertainty.

The International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) has urged governments to accelerate diplomatic efforts to secure humanitarian corridors that would allow stranded crews to leave the conflict zone safely.

Shipping experts warn that prolonged instability in the Strait of Hormuz could have far-reaching economic consequences, including higher fuel prices, increased transportation costs, supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures across many economies.

The UN has reiterated that protecting civilian shipping remains a legal obligation under international law and urged all parties to exercise maximum restraint to prevent further escalation while ensuring the safe evacuation of thousands of sailors caught in the conflict.