International

Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money

Published

2 years ago

August 6, 2024

Barbara Pasa

Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money

An Iowa nurse had one final act of desperation to keep her husband from divorcing her and to cash in on life and home insurance payouts: set her house on fire — killing her husband inside.

Barbara Pasa denied murdering her husband, Timothy, but was found guilty by a jury after only three hours of deliberation.

“I think Barb was in a bad place financially,” said police chief Tom Demry on Snapped, airing Sundays at 6/5c on Oxygen. “She wanted to appear to be the perfect family. Have the perfect home. The perfect cars. And I think it got to the point where she was not going to be able to uphold that appearance and that’s why she did what she did.”

Tim and Barb met at one of Tim’s country band concerts in 1999. The two were born and raised in the small town of Centerville, Iowa. They eventually had two children together.

“Barb and Tim seemed to have a great life, and she was so proud of her home,” said Sonja Carson, a former friend of Barb, on Snapped. “She always had pictures on Facebook. It seemed to be a well-rounded family.”

But appearances were deceiving. Two weeks before her husband’s death, Barb made an eerie threat while out with friends.

“She talked about a pending divorce,” Carson said. “She said that she hated him. She said it with a lot of emotion. And that if she wanted to get rid of someone, she knew she could.”

What happened to Tim Pasa?

Around 7:30 a.m. on Saturday, May 5, 2018, a neighbor spotted a fire at a home in Centerville, Iowa and called for help. When firefighters got the flames under control, they found the body of 50-year-old Tim Pasa on the bed in the master bedroom.

Firefighters noticed a few disturbing details in the home, including two smoke detectors that were disabled, and a candle on the floor of the bedroom.

“These were some things that stuck out to me as red flags because this is not normal stuff that you usually see,” Vern Milburn, Centerville fire rescue assistant chief, said on Snapped.

READ ALSO:

Neighbors had been unable to contact Tim’s wife, Barb. When they finally reached her, she said she’d been at her children’s soccer tournament. Police said she showed little emotion when she was told her husband was dead but asked to see his body in the ambulance outside their home.

“When she came out, we were waiting for her, and she was very stoic,” Carson said. “I just thought she was in shock. She didn’t show a lot of emotion and I was concerned that when she broke, it was going to be bad.”

Barb Pasa had an explanation for the disabled fire alarms.

“She said something had burned while she was in the process of baking and set off the smoke alarms,” Demry said. “And so, she asked Tim to take the batteries out of the smoke alarms until they could get the smoke cleared out of the room.”

She also explained that she’d lit a candle in the master bedroom area to cover up the smell of dog pee on the carpet.

When Barb was told there would be an autopsy on her husband’s body, police said she grew angry.

“I thought Barb’s reaction to that was not typical,” Michael Moore, Centerville police officer, said on Snapped. “I just felt that maybe she was being overwhelmed with everything that had gone on that morning.”

Barb Pasa explained that she and her children left the house just before 7 a.m. to head to a soccer tournament and had left Tim sleeping in bed. But police and firefighters found other red flags in Tim’s death, including that he had made no attempt to get off the bed or move during the fire.

“Even if a smoke alarm didn’t go off, the smoke, the heat, and the flames would have woken somebody up,” Demry said. “And there was no indication that that happened … why wouldn’t somebody wake up when there was a roaring fire right next to them?”

But the smoking gun that turned it from an accident investigation into a murder investigation: The medical examiner found no smoke inhalation in Tim’s lungs, meaning he was dead before the fire started.

How did Barb Pasa try to deal with her money troubles and impending divorce?

Friends agreed Barb Pasa was upset at the prospect of divorce.

“I think they stayed together for the kids … and Barb, I think she did not want to have a marriage that ended in divorce,” Carson said. “In her eyes, she would have felt like she wouldn’t be accepted or that she wouldn’t be able to do things with us as couples.”

READ ALSO:

Finances were other source of tension in the family.

“Barb always wanted the kids to have the best of everything,” Carson said. “They drove nice cars, had the newest shoes — whatever they wanted. She also spent a lot of time shopping for herself … Spending money was one of her favorite things to do.”

But police learned the Pasa home was about to go into foreclosure when Tim died, and the couple was swimming in overdue credit card bills. Barb had also taken suspicious steps before Tim’s death.

“Barb had maxed out Tim’s life insurance from $50,000 to $200,000,” Moore said. “That had happened approximately five months prior to this incident. We were also able to determine she had increased the amount on the homeowner’s insurance for the residence.”

Although an initial toxicology report on Tim’s body didn’t show anything suspicious, when police considered Barb Pasa’s profession as a surgical nurse, that led toxicologists to test for an anesthetic called propofol, that’s commonly used to sedate patients before surgery. The drug was found in Tim’s blood.

“The injection of propofol is going to cause a person to sleep, and it can also affect the heart and lower blood pressure,” said Dr. Laura Labay, forensic toxicologist, on Snapped. “It can cause an individual to stop breathing, and a sufficient concentration can lead to death.”

Although Barb told police she had left the house by 7 a.m., an eyewitness proved that wasn’t true.

“As I was driving to work, I happened to notice that Barb’s vehicle was at home,” said Meghan Decena, a former co-worker of Barb, on Snapped. “I knew it was her vehicle based on the personalized plates that she had that spelled out ‘Pasa.’”

Decena used an app for work that tracked her whereabouts, and it put her by the Pasa house at 7:22 a.m.— well after Barb claimed to have left.

“Barb snapped because she didn’t want people to know the truth,” Moore said. “She didn’t want them to know that her life was not as it was portrayed.”

Barb Pasa testified in her own defense at her trial for murdering her husband.

“The tears that she was giving — all phony. The entire thing was phony,” said Rich Parker, a friend of Tim Pasa, on Snapped. “In my opinion, this woman is a psychopath. Lucky for us, she’s not a very smart psychopath. If she was as smart as she thought she was, Tim would have had smoke in his lungs. She didn’t think that part out.”

Barb was sentenced to life in prison plus 20 years. Her children now live with family and have no contact with their mother.

“These children lost a father and a mother both, and the kids will remember this forever and it’s just a very, very sad ordeal,” Milburn said.

Watch all-new episodes of Snapped on Sundays at 6/5c on Oxygen and the next day on Peacock.

Woman drugs husband, burns house in scheme to gain more money

International

US, Iran Launch High-Stakes Nuclear Talks as Tehran Threatens Global Oil Lifeline

Published

5 hours ago

June 21, 2026

Trends Admin

US, Iran Launch High-Stakes Nuclear Talks as Tehran Threatens Global Oil Lifeline

A new round of negotiations over the Middle East war is set to kick off Sunday as Iranian negotiators and US Vice President JD Vance arrived in the Swiss host city, even as Tehran said it was closing the Strait of Hormuz again over Israeli attacks in Lebanon. The talks, scheduled to take place in the Swiss resort town of Burgenstock, are meant to open a two-month negotiation period on issues left unresolved by the initial accord, notably Iran’s nuclear programme. Pakistani and Qatari mediators are also expected to participate, with Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir traveling to Switzerland for the discussions. Mediator Pakistan confirmed that technical-level talks were scheduled for Sunday.

Before boarding his flight to Europe, Vance told reporters he hoped to “make progress on the nuclear issue, make progress on the Lebanon ceasefire issue. Those are the two big things that I think we’re going to be focused on”. US negotiators Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff were already on the ground handling technical elements and had reported that “things are going well,” Vance said. However, Vance also acknowledged he could only stay for “a day or two,” raising questions about the depth of US engagement in the complex negotiations ahead.

Follow-up talks had been planned in Switzerland on Friday but were postponed at the last minute after Israel launched deadly strikes in Lebanon following the deaths of four of its soldiers in combat. Washington announced a renewed ceasefire there later Friday—a condition of its preliminary agreement with Iran—but Israeli troops clashed again with Hezbollah fighters on Saturday, with each side accusing the other of breaking the truce. An Israeli military official said the military had received updated directives from the political leadership to cease fire, adding that troops were operating defensively inside a security zone and were “not conducting proactive strikes”.

Citing a US “breach of contract” and “the Zionist regime’s continuous and relentless violation of the ceasefire in southern Lebanon,” Iran’s central military command announced that “the Strait of Hormuz will be closed to vessel traffic”. The Iranian military accused the US of violating the first clause of their 14-point memorandum of understanding, which agrees to “the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon”. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps declared the strait closed on Saturday, with state-controlled media reporting the IRGC Navy warned all vessels to refrain from any movement until further notice.

READ ALSO:

Hormuz, a key conduit for oil and gas shipments, was blockaded by Iran for much of the war, sending shockwaves through global energy markets. Tehran had agreed to reopen it under the preliminary accord signed by US President Donald Trump and his Iranian counterpart Masoud Pezeshkian, and shipping traffic had begun to recover. The agreement calls for toll-free travel during the 60-day negotiation period.

US Central Command strongly disputed Iran’s announcement, with spokesperson Capt. Tim Hawkins stating that “Iran does not control the Strait of Hormuz” and that “traffic continues to flow”. The US military said 55 merchant ships transited the strait on Saturday with more than 17 million barrels of oil for global markets, and confirmed that US forces were monitoring the situation to ensure commercial traffic continued. Vance suggested that Iran may have been directing vessels away from naval mines, noting the memorandum includes a 30-day period for mine-clearing operations.

Trump later warned that Washington could impose its own tolls on Hormuz if negotiators failed to complete the deal within the 60-day window. “There would be no tolls unless they are imposed by and for the United States of America,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding that the money would be for “services rendered as the Guardian Angel to the countries of the Middle East”. The threat underscored the fragility of the agreement and the high stakes involved in the Switzerland negotiations.

An Iranian delegation arrived in Switzerland late Saturday, state media and the Swiss foreign ministry said. Iran’s official broadcaster reported that the delegation included parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, along with central bank and oil officials, reflecting the economic dimensions of the negotiations. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the delegation would “demand implementation of the other party’s commitments” under the deal, warning that “otherwise, the entire understanding will be in trouble”. Baqaei told state TV that negotiations toward a final agreement would begin once key commitments are upheld.

Israel and Hezbollah continued trading accusations Saturday as fighting persisted in southern Lebanon, threatening to derail the broader US-Iran agreement. The Israeli military said one soldier was killed in combat, the fifth such fatality since the US-Iran deal was reached. An Israeli military official said Hezbollah launched more than 50 projectiles at Israeli forces in southern Lebanon overnight, prompting Israeli strikes on what the official described as “Hezbollah targets”. Lebanese state media reported Israeli air raids on around 20 locations, with authorities counting more than 30 dead. One of the deadliest strikes hit a three-storey residential building in the southern town of Barish, killing a father, mother and their two children, a local official said.

READ ALSO:

Hezbollah accused Israel of carrying out “under the cover of the ceasefire… an infiltration attempt towards the Ali Taher hills,” a strategic feature overlooking Nabatieh, and said its fighters had responded “with appropriate weapons”. The Lebanese army said an Israeli strike killed a soldier on the Kfarrumman-Nabatieh road, and NNA reported that an airstrike destroyed the Nabatieh branch of Lebanon’s central bank. Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Fadlallah said his group retained “the full right to confront this enemy when it attacks us” and warned that continued Israeli attacks “will not pass without a response”. A Hezbollah official told the BBC the group does not recognize the ceasefire that was announced by US officials on Friday and rejects the Israeli objective to operate freely inside Lebanon.

Israel’s US ambassador Yechiel Leiter maintained it was Hezbollah that broke the truce, saying Israel was “defending itself against terrorist attacks”. But Hezbollah said Israel bore “full responsibility” for the ongoing violence. The overall death toll from the fighting in Lebanon had surpassed 4,000, the health ministry said, while Israeli authorities report at least 32 soldiers and four civilians killed.

Fadi Zayat, who fled the southern Lebanon town of Tayr Debba, told AFP that “fear dominates” the south. “We returned to the village a few days ago, but our bags are ready to flee again,” the 53-year-old said. Many residents had returned to their villages after previous ceasefires and temporary truces, believing the worst of the fighting was behind them.

The preliminary memorandum of understanding between the US and Iran, signed electronically by Presidents Trump and Pezeshkian, established a ceasefire, reopened the Strait of Hormuz, and launched a high-stakes 60-day negotiation period on the most divisive issue between the longtime adversaries: Tehran’s nuclear program. Under the agreement, Iran committed to “downblending” its stockpile of highly enriched uranium under IAEA supervision, which a senior US official called a “significant concession”. However, all technical details must still be ironed out in the negotiations.

The agreement also calls for the US to work “with regional partners to develop a definitive mutually agreed plan with at least USD $300 billion” for Iran’s reconstruction, though a senior US official said the deal does not commit the US to paying Iran a single cent. The text is opaque and appears to leave the door open for US payments as part of a negotiated settlement.

Experts have expressed skepticism about the feasibility of reaching a comprehensive nuclear deal in just 60 days, noting that the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action took more than 18 months to negotiate. Marc Finaud, a research fellow at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, said the timeline “is realistic only if expectations remain modest and the goal is to return to something broadly resembling the JCPOA”. Critics have also questioned whether Trump envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, neither of whom had prior nuclear negotiation experience, can handle the technical complexity of the talks.

Vance has sought to defend the deal, telling Fox News that “if the Iranians are willing to change their ways and stop trying to build a nuclear weapon, stop trying to fund terrorism all over the Middle East, then we are willing to actually fundamentally transform our relationship with them”. He emphasized that “they’re agreeing right now to eliminate the enriched stockpile. And if they don’t get to a point where they agree to stop enriching, then they don’t get the other benefits of the bargain”. The agreement also leaves unresolved other issues of concern to Arab countries, Israel, Europe and the United States, including Iran’s ballistic missile program and its support for militant proxies in the region.

The announcements and ongoing fighting indicated a rough start to the talks. Iran’s negotiators had canceled plans to attend the originally scheduled Friday talks because of escalating fighting in Lebanon, and it took a personal intervention by one of Pakistan’s top mediators, who flew to Tehran, to persuade Iranian negotiators to reconsider and travel to Switzerland. A Hezbollah official told The Associated Press that Iran informed the militant group that Tehran won’t reopen the strait until Israel announces publicly that it will comply with a “comprehensive ceasefire” in Lebanon and an end to military operations there. Neither Israel nor Hezbollah are signatories to the deal between the US and Iran, complicating enforcement and raising questions about whether the agreement can hold. US officials fear that continuing tensions between Israel and Lebanon could undermine the entire US peace deal with Iran.

The 60-day deadline can be extended by mutual agreement, suggesting both sides are aware of the challenges ahead. But as Vance himself acknowledged, the US will be watching actions, not words: “I don’t trust anything that anybody says. I trust what people do. And the way this deal is structured is that as they do more, they receive more. As they do less, they receive less”.

US, Iran Launch High-Stakes Nuclear Talks as Tehran Threatens Global Oil Lifeline

International

Biden, Clinton, Bush Join Obama for Historic Presidential Centre Opening

Published

2 days ago

June 19, 2026

Trends Admin

Former President Joe Biden and former first lady Jill Biden, from left, former President Barack Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama, former President George W Bush and former first lady Laura Bush, and former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony.

Biden, Clinton, Bush Join Obama for Historic Presidential Centre Opening

Former United States President Barack Obama on Thursday welcomed a rare gathering of former American leaders and international dignitaries as he officially opened the Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, a landmark project celebrating his White House legacy and commitment to democratic values.

Among the high-profile guests at the ceremony were former Presidents Joe Biden, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, alongside former First Ladies Jill Biden, Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush. Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also attended the event, underscoring Obama’s enduring influence on the global stage nearly a decade after leaving office.

Current President Donald Trump, whose political rivalry with Obama has spanned years, was not invited to the ceremony.

Located on a 20-acre campus in Jackson Park on Chicago’s South Side, close to the neighbourhood where the Obamas lived before moving to the White House, the centre has been in development since Obama left office in 2017.

The facility serves as both a museum and a community hub, showcasing memorabilia from Obama’s presidency and Michelle Obama’s tenure as First Lady while offering amenities such as a public library, playground, basketball court and recording studio.

Addressing guests at the dedication ceremony, Obama described the centre as a living institution designed to inspire future generations rather than merely preserve history.

READ ALSO:

“We wanted it to be a vibrant, living celebration of community, where we can learn together and share the joys of art and music and sport and play,” he said.

The former president also delivered a robust defence of democratic values, declaring that “there will be no kings,” a remark widely interpreted as a veiled criticism of the current political climate in the United States.

Michelle Obama, visibly emotional at times, paid tribute to her husband and reflected on their journey from Chicago’s South Side to the White House, drawing sustained applause from guests.

The ceremony doubled as a celebration of American culture, with performances by renowned artistes including Jennifer Hudson, Christina Aguilera, John Legend, Common, Marc Anthony, Bono and The Edge of U2, Bruce Springsteen and Stevie Wonder. Pearl Jam frontman Eddie Vedder, a Chicago native, performed an original song written for the occasion.

The opening of presidential libraries and centres has long been a tradition for former US presidents, serving as repositories for official records and artefacts. However, the Obama Presidential Center seeks to go further by combining historical exhibits with educational, cultural and community-focused programmes.

Despite the celebratory atmosphere, the project has faced significant challenges. Its towering 225-foot architectural centrepiece attracted mixed reviews from critics, while plans to develop part of Jackson Park sparked legal disputes and opposition from some community groups.

The privately funded project, estimated to cost about $850 million, also experienced delays and budget increases. Some residents expressed concerns that the development could accelerate gentrification and drive up housing costs in surrounding neighbourhoods.

Supporters, however, argue that the centre will boost tourism, create jobs and generate economic opportunities for Chicago’s South Side while serving as a lasting tribute to America’s first Black president and his legacy of public service.

US presidents traditionally open libraries following their tenure in office with some serving as simple repositories for papers and key artifacts from their namesake administration, while others have grander ambitions as museums and cultural destinations.

Biden, Clinton, Bush Join Obama for Historic Presidential Centre Opening

International

UAE Announces Social Media Ban for Children Under 15

Published

3 days ago

June 18, 2026

Trends Admin

UAE Announces Social Media Ban for Children Under 15

The United Arab Emirates has set a minimum age of 15 for social media use, becoming the first Arab country to introduce such a restriction as governments worldwide seek to address growing concerns over the impact of online platforms on children. The Cabinet resolution, chaired by His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Vice President, Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, was announced on Thursday and forms part of a broader legislative framework aimed at protecting children in the digital environment. The resolution reflects the UAE’s commitment to establishing an advanced model for child protection in the digital space, reinforcing the national digital safety framework in line with the rapid evolution of technology use, and striking a balance between enabling responsible use of modern technologies and ensuring the highest standards of child protection.

Under the resolution, children under 15 are prohibited from creating, using, or operating personal social media accounts. The ban means they will not be able to post content, comment, share, or join public groups, open channels, or any large-scale interactive spaces. Crucially, parental consent does not constitute a valid exemption from the prohibition. Platforms are required to implement all necessary technical and administrative measures to enforce this ban, including monitoring personal accounts created by underage children and taking immediate action to suspend or disable such accounts. The resolution applies to all social media platforms operating in the UAE, whether free or paid, that enable users to create accounts or personal profiles, engage in social interaction, publish or share content, or that rely on algorithmic systems to display, rank or recommend content.

READ ALSO:

Teenagers aged 15 and 16 will be allowed to use social media platforms, subject to enhanced protective measures applied to their accounts. These measures include age-appropriate content classification and restriction, disabling high-risk features such as interaction with unknown users, regulation of usage time and duration, and the provision of parental control tools, allowing caregivers to configure account settings provided such configuration does not contravene prescribed prohibitions. The enhanced safeguards are designed to create a safer online environment for older teenagers while still allowing them to benefit from social media’s educational and social opportunities.

The rules apply to all social media platforms operating in the UAE and require companies to implement robust age-verification measures. Self-declaration of age will not be accepted as a valid form of verification. Platforms must adopt digital identity checks and artificial intelligence-supported technologies such as biometric tools to verify user ages, or any other mechanisms approved by the Child Digital Safety Council. They are also required to disable accounts created by children under 15, prevent users from circumventing age-verification systems, refrain from using children’s personal data for targeted advertising or behavioural profiling, and ensure data is not retained beyond the period strictly necessary. These provisions place significant compliance burdens on social media companies operating in the UAE market.

The social media age restriction is part of a wider Federal Decree-Law on Child Digital Safety (No. 26/2025) , which came into force on January 1, 2026. The comprehensive legislation establishes a new era of accountability for digital platforms operating in the UAE. The decree-law establishes the Child Digital Safety Council, chaired by the Minister of Family, tasked with proposing policies, legislation, and national awareness initiatives. It also establishes a platform classification system to assess risk and impact on children, and prohibits platforms from collecting, processing, or sharing personal data of children under 13 unless strict conditions are met. The law further mandates that platforms implement blocking and filtering tools, age-rating systems, and controls on targeted advertising, while also providing user-friendly reporting mechanisms for harmful content.

READ ALSO:

Social media companies will have up to 12 months to comply with the new regulations. The UAE’s media and telecommunications regulatory bodies have authority to take all necessary measures against platforms in the event of non-compliance. Penalties for non-compliance may include warnings, partial or full blocking of platforms, or administrative penalties. The Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority (TDRA) will oversee compliance and enforcement, supported by the Child Digital Safety Council. The phased compliance timeline gives companies time to adjust their systems and procedures to meet the new requirements.

The new law also imposes obligations on parents and caregivers, requiring them to monitor their children’s digital activities, use parental control tools, refrain from creating accounts for children on platforms that are not age-appropriate, refrain from circumventing age verification mechanisms, promote children’s awareness of digital risks and safe usage practices, and report harmful content or child sexual abuse material to the competent authorities. These provisions emphasize the shared responsibility between platforms, parents, and regulators in ensuring child safety online.

The UAE joins a growing list of countries implementing age-based restrictions on social media. Australia introduced a world-first social media ban for under-16s in December 2025, while the United Kingdom announced a similar ban this week. Greece, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Turkey have also introduced or are considering measures to regulate children’s access to social media platforms. The UAE government said the measures were designed to address concerns over children’s exposure to inappropriate content, unsafe online interactions, excessive social media use, and the collection of personal data. As governments worldwide grapple with the challenges of protecting children in the digital age, the UAE’s move represents a significant step in establishing comprehensive legal frameworks for child digital safety.