Coup Plot: How conspirators planned to cut power to Aso Rock – Witness tells court - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Coup Plot: How conspirators planned to cut power to Aso Rock – Witness tells court

Published

on

Coup Plot: How conspirators planned to cut power to Aso Rock – Witness tells court
Two of the suspected coup plotters: Brigadier General Musa Abubakar Sadiq (right) and Col. M. A Ma’aji

Coup Plot: How conspirators planned to cut power to Aso Rock – Witness tells court

ABUJA — Zekeri Umoru, one of the suspected coup plotters, on Wednesday told a Federal High Court in Abuja that discussions were held on switching off electricity supply to the Presidential Villa, Abuja, to aid the alleged coup against President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

Umoru, a Julius Berger Nigeria Plc employee in the Maintenance Department at the Presidential Villa, spoke in video evidence played before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja. He said he warned that such an action would immediately trigger investigations and the detention of workers on duty if carried out. The 4th defendant stated this in the video while being questioned by members of the Special Investigative Panel (SIP) that first investigated the case.

Umoru alleged that Colonel Mohammed Ma’aji, the alleged coup mastermind who is currently at large, offered him money through Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim (the 3rd defendant) to recruit between 18 and 19 persons working inside the Villa. Those to be recruited included soldiers, officials of the Department of State Services (DSS) , and fellow Julius Berger staff. He also told investigators that Ma’aji allegedly said he wanted access into the Presidential Villa and could achieve it “with force,” even if those recruited from inside declined to cooperate.

Umoru further claimed that Inspector Ibrahim later demanded N100 million from Ma’aji to facilitate the operation through an ambulance route into the Villa. However, Ma’aji refused on the grounds that the amount was excessive. He said Ma’aji insisted that he could still gain access into the Presidential Villa by force, though “there would be bloodshed.” Umoru said at one point he became uncomfortable with the alleged plan and repeatedly attempted to return the money given to him, adding that he felt accessing the Presidential Villa “was not a child’s play.”

He denied ever having access to the Villa’s solar power plant, despite allegations that he planned to sabotage electricity supply within the complex. On why he failed to immediately report the alleged discussions to authorities, Umoru claimed he was discouraged by Ibrahim, who allegedly asked him to delete messages and avoid contacting Ma’aji due to an ongoing audit in their office.

READ ALSO:

The alleged coup plot, which was uncovered in September 2025, involved far more elaborate planning than previously reported. A prosecution witness, an army officer from the Nigerian Army Corps of Military Police who was codenamed “AAA” for security reasons, testified before the same court on April 29 about the full scope of the alleged conspiracy. The witness told the court that intelligence reports linked Colonel Ma’aji to an alleged conspiracy involving serving and retired military officers, as well as former Bayelsa State governor and ex-Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva. He said the intelligence was assessed, found credible, and formed the basis for the investigation.

According to the witness, when Ma’aji was arrested, a Samsung Galaxy Z series phone was recovered from him. A search of his residence also yielded a jotter containing “operational plans, names and designation of ranking members of the current regime as well as officers that were to assassinate them.” The jotter also allegedly contained “political and structural changes to be made upon execution of the coup.” The witness further testified that meetings were held at Green Land Apartment and Brookville Hotel in Abuja, where participants discussed regime change, identified government officials to be assassinated, and assigned officers to carry out the plan. Hotel receipts and reservation records were recovered as evidence.

The prosecution witness also detailed substantial financial transactions linked to the alleged coup plot. Forensic analysis revealed that Purple Waves Limited was used as a conduit to sponsor the alleged coup. Bank statements showed multiple debit entries running into hundreds of millions of naira between September 19 and October 2, 2025, including N100 million, N80 million, N90 million, N70 million, and N50 million transfers. The witness said these transactions carried different narrations but were traced to funding the coup plot under investigation. He also confirmed financial links between Colonel Ma’aji, Timipre Sylva, and other defendants before the court.

The alleged coup plot first came to public attention when the federal government abruptly cancelled a planned military parade to mark Nigeria’s 65th Independence Anniversary on October 1, 2025. Officials cited security threats, though speculation immediately linked the cancellation to a possible coup attempt. The military initially denied the reports, but in January 2026, it announced that 16 officers would be tried before a military court for attempting to oust the president. Those facing trial at the Federal High Court are civilians or retired military personnel alleged to have been part of the conspiracy.

The charges were filed by Attorney General of the Federation Lateef Fagbemi, and the six defendants were arraigned on April 22, 2026, before Justice Abdulmalik on a 13-count charge marked FHC/ABJ/CR/206/2026. Those named in the charge are: Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana (retired) as 1st defendant; Captain Erasmus Ochegobia Victor (retired) as 2nd defendant; Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim as 3rd defendant; Zekeri Umoru as 4th defendant; Bukar Kashim Goni as 5th defendant; and Abdulkadir Sani as 6th defendant, an Islamic cleric based in Zaria, Kaduna State.

READ ALSO:

A former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources and former Governor of Bayelsa State, Timipre Sylva, who is alleged to be part of the plot, is listed as being at large. Court documents suggest he fled the country before the plot was exposed. After the allegations emerged last October, Sylva denied links to a coup plot after his house was ransacked by investigators. An arrest warrant was issued for him the following month in a separate case launched by the anti-corruption agency. At the time, his spokesman said the former minister was in the UK for a medical check-up and that the allegations were politically motivated.

The defendants face charges ranging from treason and terrorism to failure to disclose security intelligence and money laundering linked to terrorism financing. The Federal Government alleged that the defendants, sometime in September 2025, conspired to levy war against the state to overawe President Tinubu, an offence punishable under Section 37(2) of the Criminal Code. It was further alleged that the defendants had prior knowledge of a planned treasonable act involving Colonel Ma’aji and others but failed to alert the appropriate authorities, and also failed to use reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence. All six defendants pleaded not guilty when the charges were read in court.

Justice Abdulmalik adjourned the matter until May 21 for the continuation of the trial-within-trial being conducted to ascertain the voluntariness or otherwise of the statements made by the six defendants. The trial-within-trial was initiated after the six defendants challenged the voluntariness of their statements, with defence lawyers arguing that their clients made the statements under duress. Defence lawyers also complained of restricted access to their clients, claiming they had been unable to meet them since September 2025, which would mean they were arrested ahead of the Independence Day parade. The prosecution has maintained that the defendants gave confessional statements voluntarily, were calm during interrogation, and were fully aware of their constitutional rights before making their statements.

In a controversial move, Justice Abdulmalik barred journalists from covering the trial on April 26. Although the prosecution made no application for a secret trial, security officers attached to the trial judge escorted journalists out of the courtroom before proceedings began. Journalists who arrived as early as 8 a.m. to secure seats were ordered to vacate them and leave immediately. When reminded that the trial of alleged coup plotters was a matter of public importance, the security officers insisted they were simply following the judge’s orders.

Colonel Mohammed Alhassan Ma’aji, the alleged mastermind of the coup plot, was arrested along with other alleged accomplices and is due to go on trial at a military court along with 16 other serving officers, separate from the civilian defendants appearing before the Federal High Court. The trial is scheduled to continue on May 21, 2026, with the judge expected to rule on the admissibility of the defendants’ statements following the conclusion of the trial-within-trial. If the judge finds that the statements were made voluntarily, they will be admitted as evidence in the main trial. The Federal Government has indicated that it will continue to present witnesses and evidence, including the video testimony of Umoru and the forensic analysis of Ma’aji’s phone and jotter, as it seeks to prove the 13-count charge against the accused persons. For the six defendants who have pleaded not guilty, their legal teams are expected to continue challenging the prosecution’s evidence while seeking bail for their clients, who remain in the custody of the Department of State Services pending the determination of the case.

Coup Plot: How conspirators planned to cut power to Aso Rock – Witness tells court

Loading

metro

Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military’s Position on Alleged Hostel Assault

Published

on

Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military's Position on Alleged Hostel Assault

Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military’s Position on Alleged Hostel Assault

OSOGBO – The management of Osun State University (UNIOSUN) has publicly rejected the position of the Depot Nigerian Army, Osogbo, regarding allegations of sexual assault involving military personnel and students, insisting that survivors of sexual violence should never be compelled to report directly to institutions linked to alleged perpetrators .

The disagreement stems from allegations that military recruits from the Nigerian Army Depot in Osogbo invaded private student hostels on June 29, assaulting students, sexually harassing female students, and carting away mobile phones and other valuables . The Vice Chancellor, Professor Odunayo Clement Adebooye, described the incident as one of the “darkest moments” in the institution’s recent history and referred to the perpetrators as “misfits” unfit to serve in the Nigerian Army . The university’s response follows an earlier statement by the Depot Nigerian Army, which said it had not received any formal complaint or credible evidence to substantiate rape allegations linked to recently passed-out personnel, even as it reaffirmed that an ongoing investigation would be thorough and transparent .

In a statement issued on Friday by the Assistant Director, Army Public Relations, Depot Nigerian Army Osogbo, Major Ibrahim Yahaya, the Army stated that the allegations had been attributed to the Vice Chancellor and amplified on social media platforms . The Army appealed to victims and witnesses of the alleged assault at the UNIOSUN hostels to provide evidence to assist its ongoing investigation into allegations of misconduct involving some recently passed-out military personnel . The Army stated that the Board of Inquiry, which was formed earlier to probe charges against its personnel, is still in operation and would “leave no stone unturned” . It assured that any personnel found culpable would be dealt with in accordance with the Armed Forces Act and other extant laws . The military also disclosed that some personnel involved have been apprehended and are undergoing disciplinary procedures .

READ ALSO:

In a statement issued on Friday by the university’s Public Relations Officer, Ademola Adesoji, the institution welcomed the Army’s decision to establish a Board of Inquiry but expressed concerns about the expectation that alleged victims should report directly to the same institution whose personnel are under investigation . According to the university, such an approach ignores the trauma, fear, intimidation, and psychological barriers that frequently prevent survivors of sexual violence from reporting directly to organisations affiliated with the alleged offenders . The institution also rejected any suggestion that it should reveal the identities of affected students or compel them to appear before military authorities . “Osun State University owes every student a duty of care, confidentiality and protection. The University will not compromise the privacy, dignity or safety of any student by disclosing identities without their informed consent or in contravention of applicable laws,” the statement said .

UNIOSUN stressed that the welfare and safety of its students remain its top priority, adding that the Vice-Chancellor would continue to support students who report harassment, assault, or abuse . According to the statement, “The Vice-Chancellor’s earlier comments were not intended to prejudge the outcome of any investigation or sensationalise the matter but were made in fulfilment of the University’s responsibility to address concerns affecting the safety and well-being of its students” . The university maintained that investigations into sexual assault charges should be victim-centred, independent, transparent, and capable of inspiring public trust . “The University believes that survivors of sexual violence should never be placed in circumstances where they may reasonably fear intimidation or victimisation by being required to report directly to those connected with the subject of an investigation,” the statement added .

UNIOSUN also disagreed with the Depot Nigerian Army’s characterisation of the Vice-Chancellor’s comments as unconfirmed or potentially misleading, insisting that the remarks were made responsibly, in good faith, and in accordance with the institution’s statutory and moral obligation to protect its students . The university further announced that it had instructed its legal advisers to commence appropriate legal proceedings to safeguard the integrity of the institution, the reputation of the Vice-Chancellor and the interests of its students . “The appropriate judicial process provides the proper forum for resolving the issues arising from this unfortunate development,” the statement said .

Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military’s Position on Alleged Hostel Assault

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community

Published

on

Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community

Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community

NASARAWA – Suspected gunmen have killed a retired Nigerian Army officer and abducted a woman during a midnight attack on a residential community in Nasarawa State bordering the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , heightening security concerns along the Abuja outskirts .

The attack occurred at approximately 12:45 am on Friday at Plot 038, PGC Community, located along the Nasarawa-FCT border near Jikwoyi . Police sources confirmed that the assailants invaded the residence of Silas Orite, 46, and forcibly abducted his wife, Bukola Oluwatoyin Silas, 40, taking her to an unknown destination . During the attack, the Community Chief Security Officer, Master Warrant Officer Reuben Yelwa, 61, a retired Nigerian Army personnel, responded in an attempt to assist the family but was shot dead by the assailants . The retired officer’s intervention came as the attackers were carrying out the raid.

READ ALSO:

Police officers visited the scene after the attack, documented evidence, and commenced investigations into the incident . According to security sources, security operatives have intensified efforts to rescue the abducted woman unharmed and track down those responsible for the attack . Area domination operations have been reinforced in and around the community to prevent further criminal activities, while patrols have been stepped up along the FCT-Nasarawa border . Authorities have called on residents to remain vigilant and cooperate with security agencies.

The incident adds to growing concerns over insecurity in communities located along the Nasarawa-FCT border, where residents have repeatedly called for stronger security measures to curb kidnappings and violent crimes . The area has experienced increasing criminal activities, with kidnappers and bandits exploiting the porous boundaries between the FCT and Nasarawa State to evade security forces . This latest attack follows a pattern of violence in border communities, where criminal elements have targeted residents for abduction and robbery . In recent months, police have arrested several armed robbery suspects operating between Jikwoyi and Nasarawa State, highlighting the security challenges facing the region . The police have urged residents to report suspicious persons or activities through the command’s emergency lines as investigations continue.

Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution

Published

on

MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution
MURIC Oyo State General Secretary, Mallam Ibrahim Agunbiade

MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution

The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), Oyo State Chapter, has filed a notice of appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal on the International School, University of Ibadan (ISI) hijab case and urged the school management not to enforce its directive banning the use of hijab pending the determination of its application for a stay of execution.

The organisation disclosed this in a statement issued on Friday by its General Secretary, Mallam Ibrahim Agunbiade, following a notice reportedly issued by the management of ISI directing that, with effect from Monday, July 6, 2026, female students would no longer be permitted to wear the hijab with the school uniform.

According to MURIC, the directive was based on the judgment delivered earlier on Friday by the Court of Appeal, Ibadan, which overturned the May 22, 2024, ruling of the Oyo State High Court that had recognised the right of 11 Muslim female students to wear the hijab as part of their school uniform.

The group, however, said it had immediately commenced the appellate process by filing and serving a Notice of Appeal, alongside a Motion for Stay of Execution/Injunction Pending Appeal before the appropriate court.

MURIC argued that the filing of the appeal means the legal dispute has not been concluded and that the rights of the affected Muslim students remain subject to further judicial determination.

READ ALSO:

“The filing and service of these processes signify that the legal contest is far from concluded,” the organisation said.

It maintained that implementing the Court of Appeal judgment before the pending application for a stay of execution is determined would be inappropriate and could prejudice the judicial process.

The group therefore called on the management of the International School, University of Ibadan, to exercise restraint and refrain from enforcing the directive pending the court’s decision on its application.

According to MURIC, taking steps to implement the judgment at this stage could render the pending application ineffective and heighten tensions within the school community.

The organisation reiterated its commitment to resolving the dispute through lawful means, stressing that the protection of fundamental rights and peaceful coexistence can only be guaranteed through respect for due process and judicial proceedings.

MURIC also appealed to Muslim parents, guardians, students and members of the Muslim community to remain calm, peaceful and law-abiding while the legal process continues.

It urged stakeholders to avoid any action capable of disrupting public peace, expressing confidence that the courts would ultimately determine the matter in accordance with the Constitution and the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

The organisation reaffirmed its commitment to pursuing all available legal remedies in defence of what it described as the constitutional rights of Muslim students.

The latest development comes hours after the Court of Appeal, in a split decision, held that ISI is a private school because it does not receive direct government subventions and ruled that the Supreme Court’s earlier judgment recognising the right of Muslim students to wear the hijab applies only to publicly funded schools.

The appellate court also held that the affected students voluntarily accepted the school’s dress code upon admission. However, it upheld the finding that confining the students to the school library over their use of the hijab violated their rights, although it reduced the damages awarded by the High Court.

The case is expected to proceed to the Supreme Court, where the final determination on the dispute over the use of the hijab at ISI will be made.

 

MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending