Court fixes Oct 6 for alleged vote-buying suit against Tinubu, Atiku - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Court fixes Oct 6 for alleged vote-buying suit against Tinubu, Atiku

Published

on

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Friday fixed October 6 to hear a suit seeking to disqualify the presidential candidate of the All Progressive Congress, Bola Tinubu, for allegedly breaching the Electoral Act.

The suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/942/2022, which the immediate past Minister of State for Education, Chukwuemeka Nwajiuba filed alongside a non-governmental organisation under the aegis of the Incorporated Trustees of Rights for All International, is equally praying the court to disqualify the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Atiku Abubakar, over the same allegation.

Justice Inyang Ekwo ordered service of all the relevant court processes as well as hearing notices on all the Defendants in the matter.

Other Defendants in the matter are; the APC, PDP, the Attorney-General of the Federation and the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.

Nwajiuba, who is a chieftain of the APC and one of its presidential aspirants, had secured leave of the court to sue both his party’s presidential flag-bearer, Tinubu, and that of the PDP, Atiku.

The plaintiffs, in the suit they filed through their lawyer, Mr. Okere Nnamdi, alleged that the primary election that produced Tinubu as the 2023 presidential candidate of the APC was marred by corruption and massive vote buying, insisting that majority of the delegates were bought over with dollars.

To strengthen his allegation, the ex-Minister who polled only one vote at the primary election that was held on June 8, included in his proof of evidence, a video recording showing the immediate past Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, decrying that delegates at the APC primary sold their votes.

Besides, the Plaintiffs queried Tinubu’s source of income and his educational qualifications.

They urged the court to declare that the 3rd defendant (Tinubu), “who had previously sworn an affidavit in the INEC nomination form declaring that he lost his primary and secondary school documents and benefitted therefrom, cannot in a later affidavit deny and abandon same facts deposed in the previous affidavit and thus falsely contradicting his academic qualifications”.

The plaintiffs attached to the suit, copies of affidavits Tinubu deposed to while he was the governorship candidate of the Alliance for Democracy, AD, in Lagos state.

“That the entire circumstances surrounding the two depositions of the 3rd defendant points to the fact that they are false and misleading and cannot be relied upon.

“That the possession of a higher degree does not substitute the minimum requirement of law, where the minimum academic requirement is manifestly absent by an avowed fact.

“That the possession of a higher education qualification such as a first degree or master’s degree is predicated on the minimum educational qualification as provided in the Constitution”, plaintiffs averred.

Among other things, the plaintiffs prayed the court to determine; “Whether the All Progressives Congress is exempted from compliance with section 90(3) of the Electoral Act 2022, having presented the 3rd defendant (Tinubu) as its presidential candidate to the 6th defendant (INEC) and the 6th defendant accepted and published same, being the name of a person whose source of N100m contribution fee for the nomination form and expression of interest form was not verified.

“Whether the constitutional provision prescribing the academic qualification of candidates and prescribing minimum qualification of school certificate or its equivalent has been complied with by the 3rd defendant who on oath, has admitted that he does not possess such minimum qualification prescribed in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria”.

The plaintiffs equally urged the court to also disqualify Atiku who was cited as the 4th Defendant in the suit, for also engaging in vote buying.

They want the court to determine; “Whether the conduct of the 3rd and 4th defendants (Tinubu and Atiku) and their agents who by way of corrupt inducement of delegates with US Dollars, which being a foreign currency and non-legal tender in Nigeria under the CBN Act, and the possession which requires declaration under the EFCC Act, used the Dollars for inducement of votes in favour of the 3rd and 4th defendants have rendered the votes of such delegates cast in favour of the 3rd and 4th defendants at the 1st and 2nd defendant’s special conventions illegal, void and invalid and of no effect whatsoever; and thus inhibiting the 3rd and 4th defendants from benefiting from the proceeds of their own gross illegalities”.

 

Loading

Politics

2027: Fayemi Denies Galadima’s Claim He Is Coordinating Opposition Group Against Tinubu

Published

on

Former Governor of Ekiti State, Dr. Kayode Fayemi

2027: Fayemi Denies Galadima’s Claim He Is Coordinating Opposition Group Against Tinubu

Former Ekiti State Governor Kayode Fayemi has rejected a claim by Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) chieftain Buba Galadima that he is coordinating a seven-member opposition group working towards challenging President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the 2027 presidential election.

Galadima made the allegation during an appearance on Channels Television’s Politics Today, where he discussed possible strategies by opposition politicians ahead of the 2027 election.

According to Galadima, he is one of seven opposition figures meeting under Fayemi’s coordination to develop a strategy for challenging Tinubu.

“I am part of the group of the opposition candidates, seven of us meeting under the coordination of ex-Governor Kayode Fayemi of Ekiti State to try to work on that. And we are making progress,” Galadima said.

When asked what the group was working towards, Galadima responded that its objective was “defeating Tinubu.” He did not publicly identify the other members of the alleged seven-person group.

Galadima also outlined his preferred strategy for the 2027 election, arguing that opposition parties should field their own candidates rather than attempt to place a single candidate on the ballot through a joint arrangement at this stage.

He suggested that opposition supporters could subsequently be encouraged to back one candidate if, close to the election, the opposition reached a consensus about which candidate should receive broader support.

READ ALSO:

However, Fayemi has denied that he is coordinating the group described by Galadima.

Julius Ogunro, a media aide to the former governor, told TheCable that there was “no truth” in the allegation and referred to an earlier denial issued by Fayemi’s media office.

The latest denial follows a similar claim made in August by Rotimi Amaechi, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) vice-presidential candidate.

Amaechi had said he and Fayemi were involved in initial discussions that later expanded to include other political stakeholders interested in creating a broader opposition platform.

Fayemi’s media office rejected that claim at the time.

Ahmad Sajoh, head of the Fayemi Media Office, said the former governor remained a committed member and leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ekiti State.

Sajoh said Fayemi had consistently affirmed his commitment to the APC and was working within the party to address its challenges and advance what he described as its progressive ideals.

Fayemi served two non-consecutive terms as Ekiti State governor on the APC platform between 2010 and 2022. He also served as Minister of Solid Minerals Development under former President Muhammadu Buhari.

The latest controversy comes amid continuing efforts by opposition politicians and groups to explore possible cooperation ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

Political actors opposed to the APC administration have held discussions about possible alliances, cooperation and strategies for presenting a stronger challenge at the polls. Different proposals have emerged, including arrangements in which parties retain their individual candidates while coordinating support around a candidate considered acceptable to a wider section of the opposition.

Galadima’s comments form part of that broader discussion, but his claim about Fayemi’s role has not been independently confirmed.

The identities of the other six people allegedly involved in the group have also not been publicly disclosed by Galadima.

Fayemi’s position, as communicated through his media aides, remains that he is committed to the APC and that the claim that he is coordinating the alleged seven-man opposition group is untrue.

The disagreement therefore leaves two conflicting accounts: Galadima says Fayemi is coordinating a group of opposition figures working towards a common strategy against Tinubu, while Fayemi’s representatives reject the claim and maintain that he remains committed to the ruling party.

As political activities ahead of the 2027 general election intensify, further developments will determine whether the reported opposition discussions translate into a formal political arrangement or remain informal consultations among politicians and political groups.

2027: Fayemi Denies Galadima’s Claim He Is Coordinating Opposition Group Against Tinubu

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Otti Explains Why He Supports Tinubu Despite Remaining in Labour Party

Published

on

2027: Otti Explains Why He Supports Tinubu Despite Remaining in Labour Party
Abia State Governor Alex Otti and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu

2027: Otti Explains Why He Supports Tinubu Despite Remaining in Labour Party

Abia State Governor Alex Otti has clarified his position on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s 2027 re-election bid, saying his support for the President is linked to his responsibilities as a governor and member of the National Economic Council (NEC).

Otti made the clarification during a televised interview after questions emerged over his political relationship with Tinubu and his continued membership of the Labour Party (LP).

The governor said he could not reasonably oppose Tinubu while serving as a state governor and participating in the Federal Government’s decision-making process through the NEC.

According to Otti, his position is based on his role in government and should not be interpreted as an abandonment of the Labour Party or its presidential candidate for the 2027 general election.

Otti explained that he supports Tinubu as the President of Nigeria, while maintaining that he has a separate position regarding the presidential candidate he supports in the 2027 election.

When asked whether Tinubu was his preferred presidential candidate, Otti indicated that he has a candidate within the Labour Party, separating that choice from his support for Tinubu in his capacity as President.

The clarification effectively draws a distinction between Otti’s role as a governor working with the Federal Government and his political position ahead of the next presidential election.

Otti was elected Abia State governor in 2023 on the Labour Party platform and has remained associated with the party despite the departure of former Anambra State governor Peter Obi, who was the Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 election.

READ ALSO:

Obi has since left the Labour Party and is now the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) for the 2027 election.

Otti previously said he would remain in the Labour Party despite Obi’s departure, explaining that his decision to stay was independent of Obi’s political movement.

The governor’s latest comments come amid growing political realignment ahead of the 2027 presidential election, with Tinubu seeking another term and several opposition parties preparing their candidates.

The issue became particularly prominent after Minister of the Federal Capital Territory Nyesom Wike said Otti was backing Tinubu’s re-election.

At the time, Otti’s Commissioner for Information, Okey Kanu, acknowledged the governor’s cordial relationship with Tinubu but said an explicit confirmation of Otti’s political position would have to come from the governor himself.

Otti has now publicly explained that his support for Tinubu is connected to his responsibilities as governor and NEC member.

He also argued that the President has a constitutional right to seek another term and suggested that disagreements over government policies should be handled through the appropriate government channels rather than public confrontation.

The Abia governor further pointed to areas where he agrees with some policies of the Tinubu administration, including the removal of the petrol subsidy, which he said is consistent with his own economic thinking.

Despite his relationship with the Presidency, Otti has continued to identify with the Labour Party.

The party has also continued to publicly associate itself with the governor. On September 23, Labour Party presidential candidate Dr Sunday Chibuzo Okereke led a solidarity roadshow in Arochukwu, Abia State, where he mobilised support for Otti and other Labour Party candidates ahead of the 2027 elections.

The development is significant because Otti’s position could otherwise have been interpreted as a political break with the Labour Party following Obi’s departure.

However, his latest clarification does not amount to an announcement that he has defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC) or abandoned the Labour Party.

Otti remains a Labour Party governor, while maintaining a working relationship with the Tinubu administration at the federal level.

The governor has also previously ruled out seeking the presidency himself after completing his tenure in Abia, saying he does not intend to pursue another major elective political office after leaving the governorship.

His latest comments therefore place his position ahead of 2027 in two separate contexts: his institutional relationship with Tinubu as President and his stated support for a Labour Party presidential candidate in the forthcoming election.

2027: Otti Explains Why He Supports Tinubu Despite Remaining in Labour Party

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Osun APC Warns Adeleke Govt Over Alleged Victimisation of Local Govt Workers

Published

on

Osun APC Warns Adeleke Govt Over Alleged Victimisation of LG Workers
Osun State Governor, Ademola Adeleke

Osun APC Warns Adeleke Govt Over Alleged Victimisation of LG Workers

The Osun State chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has issued a fresh warning to the administration of Governor Ademola Adeleke over allegations that some local government workers are being subjected to investigation and disciplinary proceedings because of their perceived political affiliations.

The party alleged that the Osun State Local Government Service Commission had constituted a committee to investigate council employees suspected of supporting the APC during the August 15, 2026 governorship election.

The allegation was contained in a statement signed by the APC Director of Media and Information, Kola Olabisi, who accused the state government of using the ongoing exercise to target workers believed to have supported the party’s candidate, Bola Oyebamiji.

According to the APC, some affected workers have been summoned before an investigative and disciplinary panel at the Local Government Service Commission premises in the state Secretariat, Abere, Osogbo.

The party further alleged that some of the workers were questioned about their political activities and contacts before and during the election.

It also claimed that some workers were asked to submit their mobile phones for scrutiny, with the alleged objective of checking their communications with APC members and supporters.

The APC additionally alleged that some workers’ banking transactions were examined and that some employees had been threatened with suspension, dismissal or other disciplinary measures.

The party described the alleged actions as unacceptable and called on the Adeleke administration to reactivate any salary accounts that had been deactivated and dissolve the committee.

READ ALSO:

The opposition party argued that public servants should not be punished for their political choices, noting that elections in Nigeria are conducted through a secret ballot.

However, the Osun State Government has rejected the allegation that the workers are being investigated because of their political affiliations.

Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Kolapo Alimi, said the workers under investigation were being questioned over alleged double salary payments, rather than their political activities.

According to the commissioner, the investigation followed a petition alleging that some local government employees were receiving salaries from two sources.

Alimi said the government was investigating claims that some workers were allegedly collecting salaries from the state government while also receiving payments from the APC-backed local government officials involved in the prolonged council administration dispute.

He maintained that the exercise was focused on alleged financial infractions and not political affiliation.

The governor’s spokesperson, Olawale Rasheed, also dismissed the APC’s allegation of political victimisation, saying the administration had no policy of targeting local government employees because of their political choices.

The latest dispute comes amid the long-running controversy over the control of Osun’s 30 local government councils, which has pitted the Adeleke administration against APC-backed council officials.

The council dispute has also had implications for local government finances and workers’ salaries. Earlier in the year, the Osun Government said local government workers’ core salaries had continued to be paid despite what it described as the withholding or diversion of local government allocations. (Osun State Official Website)

The competing claims over the latest investigation have therefore added another layer to the broader political and administrative dispute between the APC and the Adeleke administration.

While the APC maintains that the affected workers are being targeted because of their political affiliations, the state government says the investigation concerns alleged financial misconduct, particularly claims of workers receiving salaries from more than one source.

As of the latest reports, there is no independently established evidence showing that the investigation was instituted solely because the affected workers supported the APC. The allegations remain disputed between the opposition party and the state government. (Osun)

Osun APC Warns Adeleke Govt Over Alleged Victimisation of LG Workers

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending