Politics
Courts reinstate Soludo, Uba as APGA, PDP candidates
Senator Ugochukwu Uba of the Peoples Democratic Party and Prof Chukwuma Soludo of the All Progressives Grand Alliance have been reinstated as candidates of their parties in the forthcoming Anambra State governorship election.
The court has directed Independent National Electoral Commission to list the two politicians as candidates of their respective party.
Justice Obiora Nwabunike, who adjudicated on the case involving Uba, Valentine Ozigbo and the PDP, said the party erred by using what it called ‘super delegates’ without vacating a pending order by an Abuja court.
The judge said, “With the evidence before me and having heard from parties involved in the matter, I rule that Ugochukwu Uba is the duly elected candidate of PDP.
“It’s not for nothing that court judges are called My Lords. When a court makes a pronouncement, it must be obeyed. No matter how foolish or ugly, it must be obeyed.
“So, it was wrong for the PDP to go ahead to conduct the primary election at the Dora Akunyili Women’s Development Centre that produced Valentine Ozigbo, with what they called super delegates against a live judgment of a court, without overturning the judgement.
Read Also; Anambra 2021: Ozigbo says no cause for alarm over exclusion by INEC
“That action cannot be vitiated or mitigated by the argument adduced by defence counsel that party primaries are internal affairs of political parties.
“I order that Ugochukwu Uba’s name should be enlisted by the INEC without further delay and the defendants should pay a cost of N10 million to the applicant.”
In the other case, Justice C.C. Okaa reinstated Prof Soludo as the APGA candidate and ordered INEC to publish his name immediately.
The court also ordered INEC to remove the already-published name of Chukwuma Umeoji, ordering him to stop parading himself as the candidate of APGA
Justice Okaa reaffirmed Victor Ike Oye as the indisputable National Chairman of APGA and ordered Edozie Njoku and Jude Okeke to stop parading themselves as national chairmen of APGA.
The Jude Okeke-led APGA national executive kicked against the ruling reinstating Soludo as the party’s candidate.
The faction’s National Publicity Secretary, Ikechukwu Chukwunyere, told reporters at a briefing in Abuja that an order by a High Court in Jigawa State was still subsisting.
He said, “We have invited you here today to brief you on the happenings in our party and the desperation of some anti-democratic forces to desecrate the judiciary and jettison the rule of law principle which is fundamental in a democracy.
“On Friday, 16th July 2021, the Independent National Electoral Commission published the list of candidates for the Anambra State Governorship election in line with the provisions of the Electoral Act and INEC guidelines for the election.
“In compliance with the judgment of two competent High Courts, INEC published the name of Hon. Chukwuma Umeoji, a member of the Federal House of Representatives, as the valid and duly nominated candidate of our great party.
“All institutions of state must obey the judgment of courts; that is the position of the law.
“A case was filed by the Victor Oye-camp without notifying the Jude Okeke group. We heard of it on Friday, quickly mobilised our lawyers to apply to join the case but the judge refused because allowing the joinder would mean taking an adjournment for consequential amendment of the processes to reflect the new names joined.
“The judge dismissed the motion even when no lawyer in the case filed anything in opposition.
“Having failed to deliver the judgment on Friday, the judge this morning (yesterday) in a court surrounded by over 150 policemen and soldiers and wherein every person who was not a lawyer was chased out of the court delivered a judgment and predictably granted all the prayers of the applicants and even more.
“The judgment from Awka cannot vacate the judgment from Jigawa. They are courts of coordinate jurisdiction.
“They cannot change the position of INEC with it. Hopefully, this matter will be sorted out soon and peace will return to APGA.”
![]()
Politics
Adeleke Wins Polling Unit, Boasts of Wide Margin Victory as APC Trails
Politics
2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
Former Vice President’s certificate forgery challenge may be “dead on arrival” due to choice of Originating Summons, legal experts say
The suit filed by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar seeking President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s disqualification from the 2027 presidential race met the constitutional deadline for pre-election matters, but the procedure used to bring the case may expose it to a strong legal challenge, according to a review of the filing and established case law. Atiku personally appeared at the Federal High Court registry in Abuja on Friday, August 14, 2026, to depose to an affidavit backing the suit, which he filed alongside his party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) , against Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) . The action rests on Sections 137(1)(j), 139(1)(a)(i) and 285(14)(c) of the 1999 Constitution as amended, along with relevant provisions of the Electoral Act 2026. At its core is an allegation that the NYSC discharge certificate Tinubu submitted to INEC bears a name that differs from his own—”Tinubu Bola Adekunle” rather than “Bola Ahmed Tinubu”.
Legal analyst Ekene Aninze, reviewing the timing of the filing, noted that Atiku fell squarely within the 14-day window set by Section 285(9) of the Constitution for pre-election matters. INEC had displayed the personal particulars of presidential candidates, including Tinubu’s, on Saturday, August 1, 2026, in line with its published election timetable. Counting from that date, Atiku’s filing on August 14 came on the 13th day, within the statutory limit. This timing is critical, as Nigerian courts have repeatedly dismissed pre-election cases filed outside the 14-day window. In the Edo State governorship dispute, the Court of Appeal held that a case challenging candidate credentials was statute-barred when filed beyond the stipulated period. Similarly, courts have affirmed that the reckoning date is the occurrence of the event complained of, not when the aggrieved person became aware of it.
READ ALSO:
- APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election
- Oyo Police Smash Human Parts Syndicate: 10 Arrested, Heart, Skull Recovered
- Heavy Security, Long Queues, Massive Turnout Mark Osun Governorship Election in Ede
Where the case may run into difficulty, according to Aninze, is the format in which it was brought. The suit was filed by way of Originating Summons, a procedure typically reserved for disputes over the interpretation of documents rather than contested facts. Nigerian courts have repeatedly held that allegations bordering on forgery cannot be resolved on affidavit evidence alone and require a Writ of Summons, which allows for oral testimony and cross-examination. That principle traces back to the Supreme Court’s handling of the Delta State PDP governorship tussle between Sheriff Oborevwori and David Edevbie, where the apex court held that Edevbie’s forgery allegations against Oborevwori could not be resolved through Originating Summons and ought to have been commenced by Writ of Summons, since only oral and documentary evidence tested in open court could settle such claims. Justice Tijani Abubakar, who delivered the judgment of the panel, held that the grievous allegations of supply of false information and certificate forgery brought against the Speaker cannot be proved beyond reasonable doubt with the use of Originating Summons. A similar reasoning shaped the Court of Appeal’s earlier intervention in the same dispute, which faulted Edevbie for not calling the institution alleged to have issued the disputed document as a witness. The same logic featured in the long-running feud between Godwin Obaseki and his APC rivals, where the University of Ibadan had to be drawn into proceedings to speak to the authenticity of a contested credential, and in Bashir Machina’s dispute with the APC over the Yobe North senatorial primaries, often cited as a cautionary tale on the risks of using Originating Summons for a contentious matter. Applying that pattern to the Atiku suit, Aninze argued that questions over the authenticity of the NYSC certificate would likely require testimony from the NYSC itself to confirm or deny that it issued the document, something an Originating Summons process, built on affidavits, is not designed to accommodate. Activist lawyer Maduabuchi Idam went further, describing the suit as “dead on arrival.” He explained that the judicial system lacks the courage to allow justice to be done in such a matter, adding that “whether the action succeeds or fails, it will continue to expose the weaknesses of our institutions, lampoon the system, and subject it to public scorn and ridicule.”
Atiku’s decision to personally appear at the court registry was deliberate, according to his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu. The former vice president stated: “I came here personally because the issues before the court go to the heart of our Constitution and the integrity of the office of President. I cannot ask Nigerians to respect the Constitution while treating a matter of this magnitude casually. I have therefore put my name, my signature and my oath behind the facts we are presenting to the court. Now it is President Tinubu’s turn to answer them.” Atiku emphasized that the matter should be settled through evidence rather than political arguments or social media exchanges. “We are not asking Nigerians to decide this matter on social media,” he said. “We are asking the institution holding the records to produce them and the judiciary to examine the evidence and pronounce on it.” He added: “If the certificate belongs to Bola Ahmed Tinubu, let that be established before the court. If ‘Tinubu Bola Adekunle’ and ‘Bola Ahmed Tinubu’ are one and the same person for the purpose of that certificate, let the evidence establish it. These are questions that deserve answers, not political insults or presidential silence.”
READ ALSO:
- Protest in Osogbo Over Ballot Paper Shortage, Missing Voter Names
- Osun Guber: APC Candidate Oyebamiji Casts Vote, Commends BVAS, Voter Turnout As Voting Continues
- Osun Guber 2026: Adeleke Alleges Police Aiding APC to Rig Election
Beyond the certificate dispute, Atiku and the ADC are also challenging provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 which, according to their written address, effectively restrict who may challenge the qualification of a candidate at pre-election stage and the removal of qualification as a ground for questioning an election as envisaged by Section 139(a)(i) of the Constitution. Their argument is that legislation cannot be used to shut the door against enforcement of an express constitutional provision. They contend that where an Act of the National Assembly conflicts with the Constitution, the Constitution must prevail. “This case therefore raises a fundamental question for our democracy,” Atiku said. “Can an Act of the National Assembly be used as a shield against an express provision of the Constitution? Can we write into ordinary legislation an escape route from a constitutional standard applicable to everyone seeking the Presidency? Our position is that the Constitution remains supreme.”
In a parallel development, a legal counsel and chieftain of the ADC, Kalu Agu, submitted a petition against Tinubu to the European Commission in Brussels, Belgium, for allegedly submitting a forged certificate to INEC. Agu was captured in a video shared on X by Paul Ibe, Atiku’s media aide, while submitting the petition. He alleged that Tinubu presented false academic credentials to INEC as part of the constitutional requirements for the 2027 election, asking the EU to intervene over what he described as the alleged subversion of constitutional order in Nigeria.
Reacting to the suit, the APC described it as an exercise in futility. The National Secretary of the APC, Ajibola Basiru, said: “Atiku should go and brace for another defeat in the general election. The President is qualified to contest the election; nothing is disqualifying him, and the matter has been settled by the Supreme Court.” Basiru added: “Atiku has nothing to offer Nigerians, and he knows that he will be rejected at the poll. That is why he is looking for a shortcut. But there’s no shortcut to power. He should go and mobilise for the poll, where he will be rejected by Nigerians as usual. That will end his political misadventure into the presidency.”
Neither Tinubu’s legal team nor the APC had filed a response to the suit as of the time of this report. The originating summons asks the Federal High Court to determine whether the statutory restrictions complained of can prevent the plaintiffs from invoking Section 137(1)(j), and ultimately whether Tinubu and the APC should be disqualified from participating in the 2027 presidential election if the plaintiffs’ case is established. Among the substantive reliefs sought is an order disqualifying Tinubu and the APC from participating in the 2027 presidential election on the grounds pleaded by the plaintiffs. Atiku has also placed INEC on notice to produce Tinubu’s Form CF001 submitted in connection with the 2023 and 2027 presidential elections. The affidavit states that Atiku had applied for certified true copies of the relevant form before filing the suit but had received no response at the time the processes were prepared. Atiku concluded: “Nobody should misunderstand what is at stake. Nigerian graduates cannot complete NYSC documentation with one identity and simply ask employers to ignore discrepancies. Young Nigerians seeking ordinary jobs are subjected to rigorous scrutiny of their certificates. The Presidency is not an immunity certificate against constitutional scrutiny.”
2027: Atiku’s suit seeking Tinubu’s disqualification meets deadline, faces procedural hurdle
![]()
Politics
APC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election
-
News3 days agoFG to Attach 300 NYSC Corps Members to CNG Workshops for Skills Training
-
metro2 days agoSeven Miners Killed in Plateau Mining Pit Collapse, Renewing Urgent Calls for Safety Reform
-
International3 days agoIran Had Detailed Intel on Trump’s Location Before Secret Turkey Escape
-
Politics3 days agoINEC reprints Osun ballot papers, result sheets, includes SDP candidate
-
Education2 days agoJAMB Aggregate Score 2026/2027: How Nigerian Universities Calculate Your Admission Chances
-
Politics2 days agoOsun Governorship: Accord Party Faction Withdraws Support for Adeleke, Endorses APC’s Oyebamiji
-
Sports3 days agoWAFCON: Chawinga sisters fire Malawi into historic final
-
News17 hours agoUK Opens 2026/27 Commonwealth Fellowship Applications for Nigerians – How to Apply
