Curbing police excesses, detention without investigation - Newstrends
Connect with us

Opinion

Curbing police excesses, detention without investigation

Published

on

Luqman Soliu

It is not new that some bigots who have held the nation to ransom for decades with their bigotry have transferred the venom to their offsprings who have continued the oppression at the official quarters wherever they hold sway. But it becomes worrisome when security officers especially the police who are to protect the nation’s unity in diversity become devilish agents oppressing other citizens.
What happened at Fadage Police Station,Bode-Olude, Abeokuta on Tuesday October 25, 2022 was nothing but police rascality that must not be allowed to go unpunished.
A woman who was almost weeping while narrating her ordeal in the hands of the bigot police officers identified as Iya Ibeji and Toyin of Fadage Police Station, Abeokuta who masterminded the dastard act revealed what transpired at the Station on the fateful day. The innocent woman was an intermediary to a rice seller and a buyer. A creditor who wanted to buy three bags of rice approached the victim (intermediary) that she wanted to buy rice and the victim directed her to someone selling rice who requested that advance payment should be made to facilitate early delivery.
The seller (debtor) reneged on her promise and started evading the intermediary and the creditor. On the fateful day when the intermediary got wind of the creditor arrival at home as she was reported to be sneaking in and out since then, the victim promptly invited the creditor and the three of them went to Fadage Police Station for Police intervention only for police officers to exhibit their bigotry by sending the intermediary to cell naked on the allegation that they were rowdy at the Station even though she was, reportedly, not the one shouting. In the process, the intermediary qimar (long veil), her scarf and the bra that cover her human dignity were removed as she was thrown to cell. Actually, RIFA understands that those who walk half-nude as a fashion may not exhibit any respect for those who chose to cover themselves and honour their body. The police women act is nothing but official terrorism. And the culprits must be made to pay for it dearly to serve as deterrent to other reckless bigots in public service especially the Police Force.

READ ALSO:

It was worrisome that security officers would allow their bigotry to conflict with their official roles when FRN 1999 Constitution Fifth Schedule Part 1 Section 9 provides that “A public officer shall not do or direct to be done, in abuse of his office, any arbitrary act prejudicial to the rights of any other person knowing that such act is unlawful or contrary to any government policy”. So, the policewomen cruelty is height of police banditry, bigotry, callousness and naughtiness by those engaged to protect the laws who have now turned to law breakers. Anyone who commits a crime is a criminal. So, those police officers at Fadage Police Station, Abeokuta who molested, humiliated, dehumanized and traumatized a law abiding citizen who mistook them for defenders of the oppressed must be made to pay for their criminality.
For clarity, Section 37 of Nigeria Police Act (NPA) 2020 states-“ a suspect shall (a) be accorded humane treatment, having regard to his right to the dignity of his person; and (b) not be subjected to any form of torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’, Also, NPA (2020) states in Section 51(6) “Where it is considered necessary to conduct a more thorough search that requires a person to take off his cloth or headgear, it ; (a) shall be done out of public view and by officer of the same sex with the person being searched; and (b) may not be made in the presence of anyone of the opposite sex unless the person being searched requests it” In this case, there was nothing to warrant search as the victim was the one that actually dragged the debtor and the creditor to the Police Station for settlement of the impasse. But can one blame them when most of them do not even know the basic expectations of them according to the laws except to extort and exploit the citizens after their godfathers have manipulated them into the Force
Specifically, Section 35 (6) of 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) provides “Any person who is unlawfully arrested or detained shall be entitled to compensation and public apology from the appropriate authority or person; and in this subsection, “the appropriate authority or person” means an authority or person specified by law”. So, the Nigeria Police Force must denounce the unruly officers and publicly apologize to the victim as well as compensate her except they want to claim they are now against the Nation constitution. Section 42 of same constitution provides “42. (1) A citizen of Nigeria of a particular community, ethnic group, place of origin, sex, religion or political opinion shall not, by reason only that he is such a person:- (a) be subjected either expressly by, or in the practical application of, any law in force in Nigeria or any executive or administrative action of the government, to disabilities or restrictions to which citizens of Nigeria of other communities, ethnic groups, places of origin, sex, religions or political opinions are not made subject’ Or could those bigots could have done so to their brethren whom they always cover their evils? Section 96 (2b) of Nigeria Police Act 2020 also provides “a police officer shall not, in discharging his duty use a language, or act in such a way that suggests a bias towards a particular group” It was clear that the victim modesty was the headache of the bigot police officers to the extent Iya ibeji and Toyin were alleged of unrepentantly saying they had disrobed and naked many purdah (eleha) at their Station without any hullabaloo.

READ ALSO:

Actually, Anti-Torture Act, 2017 provides in section 2—“(I) Torture is deemed committed when an act by which pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person to-(a) obtain information or a confession from him or a third person ; (b) punish him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed (applicable in this case) ; or (c) intimidate or coerce him or a third person for any reason based on discrimination of any kind (this is exactly what the Police women Iya Ibeji and Toyin did). when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity provided that it does not include pain or suffering in compliance with lawful sanctions”. Section 3 of same Anti-Torture Act provides also thus “3—(1) No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war. Internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification for torture…” Section 5 provides “—(1) A person who has suffered or alleges that he has been subjected to torture shall have the right to complain to and to have his case promptly and impartially examined by a competent authority ( in this case Ogun State Police command and or RIFA/NHRC or other authorities) (2) The competent authority under subsection (I) shall take steps to ensure that the complainant is protected against all ill-treatment or intimidation as a consequence of his complaint or any given evidence.” So, there is no legal justification for the bigot policewomen cruel acts and they must be subjected to disciplinary action fast to assuage the Muslim community in the State that the Police is not engaging in clandestine war against them as revealed by the policewomen confessions.

READ ALSO:

In line with Section 6 of Anti-Torture Act, 2017 RIFA would pursue the case to a logical conclusion to ensure justice is served on the culprits.
It should be noted that on same Tuesday, another police officer of the Station identified as Amasowa Gold copied a message meant for DPO to another hoodlum in the area with whom he oppressed citizens in the area and whose connivance was officially reported to the DPO but in the absence of the DPO he divulged official information to his cronies. This contradicts Section 96(1e) of NPA 2020 and is nothing but serious dereliction of duty and insubordination for message meant for the DPO to be given to hoodlum by a police officer. So, is it not lie if the nation claim not to know why there is ravaging insecurity when police to whom security reports are made also made such details available to the criminals fomenting trouble in the society? But can we feign ignorance to the fact that some police officers have become partners and spokespersons to criminals just because they are being bribed regularly from the proceeds of crimes?
In the meantime, Section 8 of the Anti-Torture Act states’ —(1) A person who actually participates in the infliction of torture or who is present during the commission of the act is liable as the principal.(2) A superior military, police or law enforcement officer or senior ’ government official who issues an order to a lower ranking personnel to torture a victim for whatever purpose is equally liable as the principal….(4) The immediate commanding officer of the unit concerned of the security or law enforcement agencies is held liable as an accessory to the crime for any act or omission or negligence on his part that may have led to the commission of torture by his subordinates”. Section 9 of th Act continues “—(1) A person who contravenes section 2 of this Act commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 25 years”. So, those police women should be accordingly made to face the wrath of the law without further delay.
RIFA calls on all Nigerians to resist and report promptly police officers and other public servants’ indiscipline or torture so as to nib their lawlessness in the bud as soon as possible while calling on the Nigeria Police Force to act swiftly against erring officers involved in this case so as to restore public confidence that there is no subtle agenda in the force against some section of the country or that some people are above the laws of the land because of their faith or tribe.

Luqman Soliu is the President,
Rights and Freedom Advocates (RIFA)

Loading

Opinion

Case for replicating the Oyo kidnap-rescue template nationwide, By Farooq Kperogi

Published

on

Case for replicating the Oyo kidnap-rescue template nationwide, By Farooq Kperogi
Farooq Kperogi

Case for replicating the Oyo kidnap-rescue template nationwide, By Farooq Kperogi

Because human beings are prone to perceive nonexistent patterns, connections and intentional design even in random or unrelated events, a cognitive tendency called apophenia, and because Nigerians have an enduring and justified mistrust of government, I have seen many people question whether the abduction and rescue of pupils and teachers from three schools in the Yawota and Ahoro-Esinele communities of Oriire Local Government Area in Oyo State really happened.

The mistrust is legitimate, but I find the apophenic leap from mistrust to the conclusion that the entire episode was staged a little unsettling.

I am convinced by the available evidence that pupils and teachers were indeed abducted by despicably homicidal terrorists. I have seen no credible evidence that any government paid criminals to stage the spectacle of an abduction and rescue.

Contemporary reporting documented the May 15 attacks, identified abducted children and teachers, interviewed their relatives and recorded the killing of two teachers before the surviving captives regained their freedom.

Terrorist groups have been abducting and killing innocent students for more than a decade and have never needed prompting from politicians to do so. Attributing their heinous crimes to sponsorship by rival factions within the Nigerian political class unintentionally exculpates these scoundrels and converts murderers into mere instruments of political intrigue.

That said, there is no complete clarity about how the pupils and teachers regained their freedom. Government critics have alleged, without evidence, that a huge ransom was paid as a precondition for their release. As I will show later, I doubt this.

But the government’s version of how the pupils and teachers were rescued is not entirely coherent, either.

READ ALSO:

The Presidency initially described the rescue as the outcome of a successful joint military, police and intelligence operation. It said eight suspected kidnappers were arrested, other members of the group were killed and neither ransom nor a prisoner exchange was involved. The abductors had allegedly demanded the release of a detained terrorist leader, but the government said he remained in custody and was being prosecuted.

The Army’s subsequent account was less dramatic than the Presidency’s early language suggested. It did not say troops stormed the camp and physically extracted the hostages during a firefight. Instead, it said a month-long intelligence operation identified the group’s leaders, informants, logistical networks and hideouts. According to the Army, arrests disrupted the group and exerted pressure that “ultimately led the terrorist group to unconditionally release the pupils and teachers.”

In a July 10 interview with Tinubu-owned TVC News, former DSS operative Seyi Adetayo offered a more specific but as yet uncorroborated explanation of the operational modalities of the rescue. He claimed that government security operatives identified and detained some kidnappers’ mothers, wives, children and other associates, sent recordings of those arrests to the abductors and combined coercive pressure with intelligence operations. He also claimed that the terrorists were warned that harm to their captives would bring harm to their relatives.

Based on the available evidence, the most defensible interpretation of what happened is that this was an unusually collaborative, intelligence-driven and coercively negotiated release. It was probably not a conventional battlefield rescue. Nor does it appear to have been a ransom-propelled release.

This actually fills me with hope. It means the government may have found a potentially effective template for disrupting terrorist networks and rescuing their victims without exposing abductees to the indiscriminate violence of a frontal military assault.

But the part of the template worth replicating is its lawful core: interagency cooperation, careful intelligence gathering, the identification of terrorist networks, the disruption of their supply routes and the arrest of culpable collaborators.

There would be no greater evidence for the truth of the government’s account of the Oriire rescue than the successful replication of its methods in unresolved mass-abduction cases nationwide.

READ ALSO:

The February 3-4 terrorist assault on Woro and neighboring Nuku communities in Kaiama Local Government Area of Kwara State not only killed scores of people but also led to a mass abduction. UNICEF reported that around 176 women, including pregnant women, and children were kidnapped from Woro.

More than five months later, the victims have not been released, according to the latest public reports. The terrorists have released videos showing women and small children appealing desperately for intervention. They, too, need the collaborative intelligence-gathering energies that security agencies deployed in Oyo.

On May 15, suspected militants abducted 42 children from Mussa Primary and Junior Secondary School and surrounding homes in Askira-Uba Local Government Area of Borno State. Some of the abductees were extremely young. According to the latest available reporting, all 42 remain missing.

There was a separate school attack in Lassa town in the same local government area in Borno on June 29. Gunmen attacked Government Day Secondary School while students were taking examinations. Eight people were rescued, but 36 students and one staff member remain captive. The students comprised 25 girls and 11 boys.

On June 7, in Magamin Diddi village in Maradun Local Government Area of Zamfara State, bandits reportedly invited villagers to what was presented as a peace meeting and then abducted them. The police confirmed that 39 people were taken, although community estimates were as high as 50. The kidnappers reportedly demanded ₦125 million and released some captives to communicate the demand. There has been no authoritative public account of the remaining captives’ release.

Nor should the passage of time cause older victims to disappear from the national conscience. Eighty-nine of the Chibok schoolgirls abducted in 2014 remain officially unaccounted for. Their families have endured more than a decade of promises, occasional discoveries and prolonged uncertainty.

There are many more cases than I have the space to chronicle in this column. Security forces presumably have records of mass abductions, including many that never made the national news. Yet Nigeria has developed a disturbing ritual in which outrage follows an abduction, officials promise decisive action and public attention eventually moves elsewhere while families remain imprisoned in terrifyingly crippling uncertainty.

The true test of the Oyo operation is not the applause it generated after one dramatic success but the number of forgotten captives its methods can bring home. If its intelligence model worked as the government says it did, it should become a national operational doctrine rather than a self-contained public-relations trophy.

Replicating it in Woro, Mussa, Lassa, Magamin Diddi and other communities would simultaneously rescue imperiled citizens, restore public faith in the capacity of the government to perform its primary duty and begin to extirpate a kidnapping economy that has destroyed communal peace and individual peace of mind across Nigeria. Until that happens, Oyo remains an encouraging breakthrough, but not yet a proven national template.

 

 

Case for replicating the Oyo kidnap-rescue template nationwide, By Farooq Kperogi

Kperogi is a renowned columnist and United States-based professor of journalism 

Loading

Continue Reading

Opinion

Shettima’s final test, by Azu Ishiekwene

Published

on

Azu Ishiekwene
Azu Ishiekwene

Shettima’s final test, by Azu Ishiekwene

Shettima’s final test, by Azu Ishiekwene

•Ishiekwene is the Editor-In-Chief of LEADERSHIP and author of the book, Writing for Media and Monetising It. 

Loading

Continue Reading

Opinion

STATE OF THE NATION: INSECURITY IN NIGERIA AND MATTERS ARISING

Published

on

BREAKING: Kidnapped Oyo Pupils, Teachers Regain Freedom After 55 Days + VIDEO

STATE OF THE NATION: INSECURITY IN NIGERIA AND MATTERS ARISING

THE OGBOMOSO RESCUE: CELEBRATE THE VICTORY, PRESERVE THE LESSONS

By Group Captain Sadeeq Garba Shehu Rtd

Amplified by the Good Governance Group (GGG)

ABUJA – The safe recovery of the remaining pupils and teachers abducted from schools in Oriire Local Government Area of Oyo State has been met with nationwide relief and celebration. After 56 days in captivity, the children and teachers have been reunited with their families, marking the conclusion of a tense hostage crisis that gripped the nation.

According to the Presidency, the victims were recovered through a sustained military, police and intelligence-driven operation. Eight suspected kidnappers have been arrested and placed in DSS custody, while some members of the group were reportedly neutralised. The Presidency has also stated that no ransom was paid and no prisoner exchange took place, with the terrorist kingpin demanded by the abductors remaining in custody and facing prosecution.

OPERATIONAL SUCCESS OR PROFESSIONAL RESTRAINT?

Security expert Group Captain Sadeeq Garba Shehu Rtd has offered a comprehensive analysis of the operation, emphasising the professional dilemmas inherent in hostage rescue missions.

“Knowing where hostages are located is not the same as possessing a safe opportunity to rescue them,” Shehu stated. “Before action can be taken, commanders must understand the disposition of the captors, the exact location and condition of the hostages, the terrain, and whether an assault is likely to trigger the execution of the hostages.”

The retired officer stressed that hostage rescue operations frequently involve prolonged surveillance, human intelligence, communications interception, and meticulous preparation before force is finally employed.

“The objective is not merely to reach the kidnappers. The objective is to recover the hostages alive,” he added.

INTELLIGENCE: THE DECISIVE WEAPON

Perhaps the most significant feature of the operation, according to Shehu, is the apparent success of intelligence gathering.

“Popular imagination often credits hostage rescues to the soldiers seen during the final assault. Professional practitioners know differently. The visible rescue is merely the final phase. The decisive work usually begins much earlier,” he explained.

Shehu noted that intelligence officers identify patterns, communities provide information, technical surveillance tracks movement, and communications are analysed before any tactical commander can intervene with an acceptable level of risk.

“Firepower may conclude an operation. Intelligence makes it possible,” he said.

INTER-AGENCY COOPERATION

The reported cooperation among the Armed Forces, the DSS and the Nigeria Police Force has also been highlighted as a critical success factor.

“No single institution possesses every capability required to resolve a complex hostage crisis,” Shehu noted, pointing out that Nigeria lacks a dedicated Hostage Rescue Unit comparable to France’s GIGN.

“The Armed Forces contribute operational reach, tactical capability and specialised combat assets. The Police contribute investigative powers, local policing structures and criminal justice responsibilities. The DSS contributes specialised intelligence capabilities. Each institution performs a distinct but complementary function,” he explained.

THE HUMAN COST

Despite the successful rescue, Shehu emphasised that the incident was not casualty-free.

“From official snippets, a couple of security personnel were lost. Lives were lost during the initial attack. Most painfully, Mr. Oyedokun, one of the abducted teachers, was murdered while in captivity. His death reminds us that this was never simply a kidnapping. It was a brutal act of terrorism against innocent civilians,” he stated.

“Our celebration must therefore be accompanied by remembrance. Our relief must be accompanied by compassion.”

SAFE SCHOOLS: FROM POLICY TO PRACTICE

Perhaps the most critical lesson emerging from the Ogbomoso incident, according to Shehu, is the urgent need to strengthen Nigeria’s Safe Schools Programme.

“The 3 affected schools—Community Grammar School, Baptist Nursery and Primary School, and L.A. Primary School in Oriire Local Government Area—like most schools in Nigeria, were in every practical sense UNSAFE SCHOOLS right from the beginning,” he asserted.

Shehu argued that the ultimate objective of security policy is not to rescue children after they have been abducted but to prevent schools from becoming targets in the first place.

“A nation that continually celebrates successful hostage rescues without making its schools safer has addressed the symptom while leaving the underlying vulnerability intact,” he warned.

A CALL FOR COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW

The security expert has called for a thorough after-action review of the Ogbomoso incident, examining intelligence indicators, emergency response procedures, and security architecture around vulnerable schools.

“These questions are not criticisms. They are the foundation of professional improvement. Security institutions that refuse to learn eventually repeat their mistakes. Those that institutionalise learning become progressively stronger,” Shehu stated.

PSYCHOSOCIAL RECOVERY

Shehu also emphasised that the Government’s responsibilities continue beyond the rescue operation.

“The rescued pupils and teachers are survivors of a traumatic experience. They now require protection of a different kind: medical examinations, psychological first aid, trauma-informed counselling, family reunification, educational reintegration, and long-term psychosocial support,” he said.

“Children emerging from prolonged captivity should never become media spectacles.”

THE ENDURING VICTORY

“Recovering the remaining children and teachers was the immediate victory. Making every Nigerian school a genuinely safe school will be the enduring victory,” Shehu concluded.

“That is the lesson we must preserve.”

 

 

STATE OF THE NATION: INSECURITY IN NIGERIA AND MATTERS ARISING

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending