EFCC Defends Osun Account Freeze Amid N11bn Fraud Probe, Adeleke Vows Legal Battle - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

EFCC Defends Osun Account Freeze Amid N11bn Fraud Probe, Adeleke Vows Legal Battle

Published

on

Tinubu’s order: EFCC lifts freeze on Osun government accounts

EFCC Defends Osun Account Freeze Amid N11bn Fraud Probe, Adeleke Vows Legal Battle

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has confirmed freezing Osun State Government accounts, citing an ongoing N11 billion fraud investigation and suspicious transfers detected days before the governorship election. Governor Ademola Adeleke has rejected the action as unconstitutional and vowed to challenge it in court, while the Nigerian Bar Association has also faulted the agency’s move.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has publicly defended its decision to freeze the bank accounts of the Osun State Government, insisting the action was a preventive measure to safeguard public funds and was not politically motivated. The anti-graft agency confirmed that it directed First Bank to place a “Post No Debit” (PND) order on the state government’s statutory allocation account, effectively halting all withdrawals. This development comes just ten days before the state’s governorship election scheduled for August 15, 2026, sparking fierce political backlash and raising concerns about the timing and legality of the intervention. In a statement issued on August 5, 2026, by the EFCC’s Head of Media and Publicity, Dele Oyewale, the Commission revealed that it has been investigating the Osun State Government since March 2026 over the alleged fraudulent handling of Ecology Funds, Intervention Funds, and Federal Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) allocations totaling approximately N11 billion. The statement disclosed that several state officials, including the Accountant General of the state, had already been questioned as part of the ongoing probe, demonstrating the depth and seriousness of the investigation.

According to the EFCC, the investigation alone would not have warranted freezing the account. However, the Commission said it was forced to act after detecting what it described as “precipitate and unwarranted” movement of funds beginning on August 2, 2026. Investigators observed large transfers of money from the state government’s accounts into various corporate entities deemed suspicious, prompting the swift intervention to halt further transactions. The agency maintained that it could not stand idly by while public funds were allegedly being diverted, emphasizing that the action was part of its statutory responsibility to protect public resources. “The Commission noticed huge transfers of funds into different corporate entities and had to swiftly halt the trend by freezing the accounts from which such heavy funds are being moved,” the EFCC statement read. The agency further explained that the freeze was a temporary measure designed to preserve the integrity of the investigation and prevent further dissipation of public funds.

READ ALSO:

Responding to accusations that the move was politically motivated and aimed at influencing the upcoming governorship election, the EFCC insisted that its actions were independent of the electoral process. While acknowledging the imminent election, the Commission argued that it could not use the political calendar as an excuse to neglect its legal duties and allow potential financial crimes to go unchecked. “It will be uncharitable for the Commission to allow an excuse of an upcoming election to fold its arms to perform its legally-assigned functions,” the EFCC stated. The anti-graft agency also revealed that it is monitoring the finances of several other states across Nigeria, emphasizing that Osun is not being singled out for political reasons. This assertion was aimed at countering claims that the EFCC was being used as a tool for political persecution ahead of the gubernatorial poll. “The Commission has always pointed out that it is non-partisan and non-sectarian but always working in the overall interests of Nigerians. The Osun State Government account was frozen to save public funds from being looted,” the statement added. The EFCC urged the public to disregard what it described as false narratives and attempts to discredit its operations, calling on citizens to support its efforts in combating corruption and financial crimes.

However, the EFCC’s explanation has done little to appease the Osun State Government, which has described the account freeze as unconstitutional and a threat to democracy. Governor Ademola Adeleke criticized the EFCC for acting without a court order and vowed to challenge the decision in court, setting the stage for a legal showdown between the state and the federal anti-graft agency. “This action was taken without any court order. We are supposed to be in a democracy, where the Rule of Law must always prevail. We will therefore not accept a situation where federal agencies trample on the constitutional rights of subnational governments,” Adeleke said during a press conference in Osogbo. The governor’s strong words reflected the deep frustration within his administration over what they perceive as executive overreach and political interference.

The governor further alleged that the account freeze was part of a coordinated campaign of intimidation against his administration, orchestrated by political opponents ahead of the August 15 governorship poll. He claimed that the state had experienced months of disruption to local government administration, police raids, and harassment of political supporters, with over 60 members of his party arrested and detained without charges. These allegations, if true, paint a troubling picture of political tension in the state as the election approaches. Adeleke has since instructed the state Attorney-General, Oluwole Jimi-Bada, to initiate legal proceedings against the EFCC at the Federal High Court in Osogbo. The Attorney-General argued that while the commission has the authority to investigate financial records, it cannot freeze a state government’s accounts without first obtaining a court order, which the EFCC failed to secure. “EFCC can investigate the accounts, but it can’t freeze the accounts without an order of court,” Jimi-Bada said. He warned that the restriction could hamper the government’s ability to meet its obligations and administer the state effectively, potentially affecting the payment of salaries and the delivery of essential services to citizens.

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has also faulted the EFCC over the account freeze, stating that the anti-graft agency lacks the constitutional power to impose a blanket restriction on a state’s finances without due legal process. NBA President, Afam Osigwe (SAN), warned that any directive restricting withdrawals from accounts belonging to a state government would effectively cripple governance and amount to an abuse of power. “No government agency or any person has the right or the power to restrict withdrawals from the account of any state because, first of all, the order has the effect of grounding the activities of a government,” Osigwe said. He maintained that any decision to freeze the account of an individual or government institution must be supported by sufficient legal grounds and a valid court order, emphasizing the importance of judicial oversight in such matters.

Other Senior Advocates of Nigeria also weighed in on the controversy, offering diverse legal perspectives on the issue. Isiaka Olagunju (SAN) described the freezing of the bank account as a serious violation of the 1999 Constitution and contrary to the principles of federalism, arguing that states should not be subjected to such unilateral actions by federal agencies. However, Professor Damilola Olawuyi (SAN) defended the use of account freezing as a recognized preventive tool in tackling economic and financial crimes, provided it is exercised within the limits of the law. He cautioned that such powers “should not be used as a cudgel to settle political scores,” highlighting the need for balance between anti-corruption efforts and the protection of constitutional rights. Wolemi Esan (SAN) explained that the EFCC could place a temporary stop order on a suspected account for up to 72 hours without first obtaining a court order under Section 7(6) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, but any restriction beyond that period must be backed by judicial authorization. This legal nuance adds complexity to the ongoing dispute, as both sides present arguments rooted in different interpretations of the law.

The controversy has also drawn reactions from civil society organizations, with some calling for restraint and due process while others support the EFCC’s proactive stance against corruption. The situation remains fluid, with the legal challenge and the upcoming election adding layers of political and legal uncertainty.

EFCC Defends Osun Account Freeze Amid N11bn Fraud Probe, Adeleke Vows Legal Battle

Loading

News

EFCC Recovers N140m for B4 Sail as Alleged Loan Debt Hits N2.25bn

Published

on

Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)
EFCC Recovers N140m for B4 Sail as Alleged Loan Debt Hits N2.25bn

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has returned N140 million recovered during an investigation into an alleged loan fraud to B4 Sail Limited, an investment and money-lending company in Lagos.

The funds were handed over in bank drafts on Thursday, September 17, at the EFCC’s Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 office in Ikoyi.

The Acting Zonal Director, Bawa Usman Kaltungo, presented the recovered money to representatives of B4 Sail.

How the Investigation Began

The recovery followed a petition filed by B4 Sail on April 20, 2026, concerning Jacob Oyebola Esan and companies linked to him.

According to the petition, Esan approached the company in August 2025 on behalf of Geo Fields Plc to secure a N500 million loan to support the business.

The facility reportedly carried a monthly interest rate of 15 per cent and was expected to be repaid within one month.

The EFCC said its investigation later established that Esan had obtained other loan facilities from B4 Sail, taking his total exposure to N1.065 billion.

As security for the loans, shares belonging to Esan were pledged through Calyx Securities Limited, which acted as the clearing house for the stocks. The arrangement reportedly gave B4 Sail a lien over the shares and first claim to proceeds from their sale.

However, the commission said the shares were eventually sold without B4 Sail’s knowledge.

This allegedly contributed to Esan’s failure to repay the facilities. With accrued interest, the outstanding amount subsequently rose to N2.2505 billion.

The EFCC said the N140 million recovery was being returned to the company as part of its responsibility to ensure recovered funds reach legitimate owners and victims after due process.

EFCC Recovers N140m for B4 Sail as Alleged Loan Debt Hits N2.25bn

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Soludo Pardons Native Doctor Akwa Okuko After 2-Year Jail Sentence

Published

on

Soludo Pardons Native Doctor Akwa Okuko After 2-Year Jail Sentence

Controversial Anambra native doctor Chidozie Nwangwu, widely known as Akwa Okuko Tiwara Aki, has received a pardon from Governor Chukwuma Soludo.

The governor made the announcement on Friday while visiting the Correctional Centre in Amawbia as part of an inspection of custodial facilities in the state.

Nwangwu’s release comes after the High Court in Awka sentenced him to two years in prison following his arrest by the state government.

Although the court imposed a two-year sentence, the time Nwangwu had already spent in custody was taken into account. Consequently, he was left with 11 months to complete his term.

Conditions Attached to the Court Sentence

The court had also ordered the demolition of Nwangwu’s shrine as part of the measures arising from the case.

In addition, it directed that once he completed his sentence, the native doctor should contribute to youth reorientation programmes. He was also expected to renounce Oke-ite and related charm practices and publicly speak against them.

Authorities had accused Nwangwu of involvement in fetish-related activities, including alleged preparation of charms reportedly intended for young people pursuing financial gains.

His arrest came amid the Anambra State Government’s campaign against practices it linked to criminality and fraudulent activities.

During Friday’s visit, Soludo said his pardon initiative was not solely about Nwangwu. He stressed that attention must also be given to the welfare and wellbeing of people held in correctional facilities.

The governor subsequently inspected the custodial facility at Waterside, Onitsha, as part of the exercise.

Soludo Pardons Native Doctor Akwa Okuko After 2-Year Jail Sentence

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Published

on

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Former Vice-President and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar has urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to intervene in the petroleum sector and reduce petrol and diesel prices, saying rising energy costs are putting additional pressure on Nigerian households, workers, farmers and businesses.

Atiku made the call on Friday, September 18, 2026, during a press conference in Abuja, where he also criticised the Federal Government’s reliance on palliatives and raised concerns over plans to phase out electricity subsidies.

He asked President Tinubu to use the remaining months of the administration to implement measures capable of easing the cost-of-living crisis, arguing that Nigerians need policies that reduce the underlying cost of goods and services rather than temporary relief after prices have already risen.

According to Atiku, the impact of higher petrol prices has extended far beyond filling stations, affecting transportation, food distribution, farming, manufacturing, logistics and household budgets.

He argued that when petrol becomes more expensive, transport operators face higher costs, farmers spend more moving produce, traders pay more to move and stock goods, workers spend more commuting and businesses incur higher logistics and energy expenses.

Atiku said the resulting pressure ultimately reaches consumers through higher prices for food and other essential goods.

He also questioned the effectiveness of government palliatives, including food distribution and cash-transfer programmes, arguing that such interventions may provide temporary assistance but cannot replace policies that restore the purchasing power of Nigerians.

The ADC candidate said government should concentrate on lowering production and energy costs so that households and businesses can retain more of their income.

His comments came amid another round of increases in the domestic petrol price.

READ ALSO:

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery increased its petrol gantry price from ₦1,265 to ₦1,350 per litre effective September 12, 2026. The increase represented an ₦85, or 6.7 per cent, rise and was the fourth upward adjustment in the refinery’s petrol price since August 21.

The successive adjustments have also been reflected at some filling stations, with petrol selling for as much as ₦1,395 per litre at some locations in Lagos, although prices have varied between stations and marketers.

Atiku said the government should not hesitate to adopt measures capable of lowering petrol prices simply because similar proposals originated from the opposition.

He said his concern was the effect of high energy costs on Nigerians and argued that the administration should act in the public interest.

A major part of Atiku’s argument is his proposal for a production subsidy for locally refined petroleum products.

The former vice-president has said his proposal is different from the former system of subsidising imported petrol. Under his plan, government support would be targeted at the crude feedstock supplied to qualifying refineries operating in Nigeria.

Atiku said the proposed mechanism would lower the cost of crude supplied to domestic refineries, with the reduction expected to translate into lower production costs and ultimately lower petrol prices for consumers.

He has proposed that the intervention should be transparent, capped and independently verified, with only crude refined in Nigeria qualifying for the support. Imported petroleum products, according to his proposal, would not benefit from the scheme.

Atiku has also said any such intervention should have a defined financial limit, be subject to National Assembly approval and undergo independent auditing.

He maintains that the policy would encourage domestic refining, protect investments in Nigeria’s refining industry and reduce the country’s dependence on imported petroleum products.

The proposal has generated debate because the Tinubu administration ended the long-standing petrol subsidy in May 2023, with the government arguing that the policy had become financially unsustainable and placed a heavy burden on public finances.

The subsequent removal of the subsidy resulted in a sharp increase in petrol prices and contributed to higher transportation and living costs, making fuel pricing one of the major economic issues in Nigeria.

The latest debate is taking place as Nigeria’s domestic refining capacity expands, particularly through the Dangote refinery.

The refinery has become a major supplier to the Nigerian market, but its prices continue to be influenced by factors including crude oil costs, exchange rates, refining expenses, logistics and international market conditions.

Atiku’s position is that government can intervene on the production side by lowering the cost of crude supplied to domestic refineries rather than returning to a system that subsidises imported petrol.

The former vice-president has also urged the government to reduce diesel prices, which remain important to manufacturers, transport operators, small businesses and other enterprises that depend on diesel-powered generators and equipment.

READ ALSO:

He argued that lower energy costs would help reduce the cost of doing business and could eventually moderate prices paid by consumers.

Atiku also turned his attention to the electricity sector, where the Federal Government has announced plans to phase out electricity subsidies in 2027.

The government has said the reform is aimed at improving the financial sustainability of the power sector. The planned changes have nevertheless generated concerns over their possible impact on households and businesses already struggling with high operating costs.

Atiku warned that higher electricity costs could add to the burden already being carried by Nigerians.

He pointed to small enterprises such as barbers, tailors, welders and frozen-food sellers, as well as manufacturers that rely on a combination of public electricity, diesel and other alternative power sources.

He argued that government should avoid imposing additional energy costs before adequate measures are put in place to protect consumers.

The debate over fuel subsidy and electricity subsidy has therefore become part of a broader disagreement over the direction and social impact of Nigeria’s economic reforms.

Atiku has argued that the savings and additional revenues generated by subsidy reforms should translate into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ living standards.

The Federal Government, meanwhile, has maintained that the petrol subsidy removal was necessary to reduce the fiscal burden of the old system and allow resources to be redirected towards development and other government priorities.

The issue has gained renewed prominence as petrol prices rise again.

Organised labour and opposition groups have also increased pressure on the Federal Government for measures to cushion households from the impact of higher petrol prices, while calls have continued for greater support for domestic refiners.

The latest petrol price increases have revived questions about why pump prices remain high despite the availability of locally refined fuel and Nigeria’s status as a major crude oil producer.

Market participants have pointed to the cost of crude, global oil-market volatility, exchange-rate movements, distribution expenses and other factors affecting the final pump price.

Aliko Dangote has also raised concerns about differences between Nigerian petrol prices and prices in neighbouring countries, which can create incentives for cross-border fuel smuggling.

For Atiku, however, the immediate priority is to reduce the pressure on consumers.

He has urged President Tinubu to consider his proposed local refining production subsidy, lower petrol and diesel costs, address electricity affordability and adopt broader economic policies aimed at restoring Nigerians’ purchasing power.

The intervention also comes against the backdrop of the 2027 presidential election, in which Atiku is the ADC presidential candidate.

His criticism of the Tinubu administration’s economic policies is therefore part of the wider political debate over the consequences of subsidy removal, the cost of living, domestic refining and the management of Nigeria’s energy sector.

The central policy disagreement is whether government intervention should return in some form to reduce consumer prices or whether Nigeria should continue moving towards a market-driven energy pricing system while using targeted measures to protect vulnerable households.

As petrol prices remain elevated and electricity reforms continue, the debate is likely to remain a major issue for Nigerian households, businesses and policymakers.

Atiku to Tinubu: Cut Fuel Prices, Let Nigerians Breathe

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending