Gaza ceasefire deal to start on Sunday despite ‘lose ends,’ U.S. insists - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Gaza ceasefire deal to start on Sunday despite ‘lose ends,’ U.S. insists

Published

on

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken

Gaza ceasefire deal to start on Sunday despite ‘lose ends,’ U.S. insists

The deal between the Israeli government and Hamas for a ceasefire in Gaza is expected to commence as planned on Sunday, despite a last-minute “loose end” in negotiations, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated on Thursday.

Israel had planned to hold a security cabinet meeting on Thursday to vote on the acceptance and approval of the deal but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delayed the meeting, accusing Hamas of making last-minute demands.

“The Israeli cabinet will not convene until the mediators notify Israel that Hamas has accepted all elements of the agreement,” Netanyahu’s office said in a statement on Thursday.

Despite the reported setback, Hamas official Izzat el-Reshiq reaffirmed the group’s commitment to the deal, aimed at bringing to an end the 15-month conflict.

Speaking at a news conference on Thursday in Washington, Blinken said he was not surprised the deal has some challenges left but expressed optimism that it will be sorted out.

“It’s not exactly surprising that in a process and negotiation that has been this challenging and this fraught, you may get a loose end,” Blinken said

READ ALSO:

“We’re tying up that loose end as we speak,” he added.

A U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to Reuters, said the last remaining dispute was over the identities of some prisoners Hamas wanted to be released.

U.S. President Joe Biden’s envoy, Brett McGurk, and US President-elect Donald Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, were both in Doha with Egyptian and Qatari mediators working to resolve the issue, which should be cleared up soon, the official said.

The Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal were reached on Wednesday, following the Qatari PM’s meeting with Hamas negotiators and separately Israeli negotiators in his office, CNN reported, citing a source.

The deal would see Hamas release 33 hostages during the first phase, while Israel would release hundreds of Palestinians in its prisons.

The release of the hostages would be the first phase of the deal being finalized, CNN reported, adding that negotiations to reach the second phase, which is intended to end the war, would begin on the 16th day of the implementation of the deal.

The war in Gaza escalated after Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1208 and kidnapping 251 persons.

Since then, Israel’s campaign in Gaza has left over 46,000 casualties, the Palestinian health ministry said—a report considered reliable by the United Nations.

Gaza ceasefire deal to start on Sunday despite ‘lose ends,’ U.S. insists

International

Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks

Published

on

Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin

Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks

Russian President Vladimir Putin has offered diplomatic support to Iran following the collapse of high-level negotiations between Tehran and the United States, as tensions continue to escalate across the Middle East.

According to a Kremlin readout reported by AFP, Putin held a phone conversation on Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, during which he expressed Russia’s readiness to help facilitate a political and diplomatic settlement to the crisis.

The Kremlin said Putin emphasized Moscow’s willingness to support efforts aimed at achieving what he described as a “just and lasting peace” in the region, including acting as a mediator if required.

The call came shortly after the breakdown of US–Iran talks, which had been aimed at resolving long-standing disputes over Iran’s nuclear programme and wider regional security issues but ended without agreement.

US–Iran Negotiations Collapse After Months of Tension

The negotiations reportedly involved senior US officials, including lead negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, but collapsed after prolonged discussions failed to produce meaningful progress.

READ ALSO:

A US official said the delegation withdrew following what it described as unproductive talks, while confirming that no immediate follow-up meeting had been scheduled.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf blamed Washington for the breakdown, saying US negotiators failed to build trust during the discussions. He added that Iranian proposals were constructive but were not properly considered.

Diplomatic Breakdown Raises Regional Tensions

The collapse of the talks has further deepened uncertainty in the Middle East, where tensions have already been heightened by recent military and political disputes involving Iran, the United States, and Israel.

Analysts warn that continued failure to reach diplomatic compromise could worsen instability in the region and increase pressure on global energy markets, particularly oil and gas supply routes.

Russia Seeks Greater Role in Mediation Efforts

Putin’s engagement with Iran is being viewed as part of Russia’s broader effort to position itself as a key diplomatic actor in the crisis.

The Kremlin said Russia remains open to supporting dialogue between all sides, suggesting Moscow could play a more active role in future mediation efforts if both parties agree.

For now, no new date has been announced for the resumption of US–Iran negotiations, leaving diplomatic efforts at a standstill as international calls for restraint continue.

Putin Offers Iran Diplomatic Support After Collapse of US–Iran Talks

Continue Reading

International

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Published

on

US President Donald Trump

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Donald Trump has ordered the United States Navy to begin an immediate blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions with Iran after the collapse of critical peace talks in Islamabad.

The directive, announced Sunday via Truth Social, signals a major shift from diplomacy to military pressure in one of the world’s most sensitive geopolitical flashpoints. Trump said U.S. naval forces would intercept all vessels attempting to enter or leave the Strait of Hormuz, particularly those suspected of paying transit tolls to Iran, which he described as “extortion.”

The move follows the breakdown of high-level negotiations between Washington and Tehran, widely seen as a rare attempt to de-escalate tensions. Although Trump acknowledged that discussions were partly productive, he insisted that the core issue—Iran’s nuclear programme—remained unresolved.

Sources familiar with the talks revealed that the مذاکرات collapsed over Iran’s refusal to give up its enriched uranium stockpile and its insistence on maintaining control over shipping activities in the strategic waterway. The Iranian delegation, led by Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, blamed the United States for failing to build trust during the negotiations.

The Strait of Hormuz blockade carries enormous global implications. The narrow waterway handles roughly 20% of global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, making it one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world. Any disruption threatens to send shockwaves through global markets.

READ ALSO:

Indeed, oil prices have already surged amid the crisis, with Brent crude and WTI climbing above $115 per barrel at peak levels. Analysts warn that the blockade could push prices even higher, worsening inflation and straining economies heavily dependent on energy imports.

The escalation comes just a day after the U.S. military intensified operations in the region. The United States Central Command confirmed that American forces had begun mine-clearing operations in the Strait of Hormuz, amid allegations that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps deployed naval mines to restrict shipping.

Two U.S. Navy destroyers, USS Frank E. Peterson and USS Michael Murphy, were spotted transiting the strait as part of efforts to secure maritime routes and ensure safe passage for commercial vessels.

Trump framed the blockade as a defence of global shipping freedom, warning that any Iranian attack on U.S. or allied vessels would be met with overwhelming force. However, the Pentagon has yet to release full operational details, leaving uncertainty around how the blockade will be enforced.

The situation is further complicated by developments involving Israel. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently signalled that Israeli military operations against Iran are ongoing, despite ceasefire discussions. He stressed that Israel would act independently to protect its national interests.

Experts warn that the U.S.-Iran conflict escalation could rapidly spiral into direct military confrontation, with far-reaching consequences for global security. Shipping companies have already begun rerouting vessels, while insurers are raising premiums due to heightened risks in the Gulf.

As of now, Iranian authorities have not issued an official response to the blockade order. Meanwhile, global markets are bracing for volatility as trading resumes, with investors closely monitoring developments in the region.

The unfolding crisis highlights the fragile state of U.S.-Iran relations and underscores the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz to global energy supply and economic stability.

Trump Orders US Navy to Blockade Strait of Hormuz After Iran Talks Collapse

Continue Reading

International

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Published

on

𝗘𝗹𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗸
𝗘𝗹𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗸

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Elon Musk has escalated his criticism of South Africa, accusing the government of racial discrimination following the continued refusal to grant an operating licence to his satellite internet service, Starlink.

In a strongly worded post on X (formerly Twitter) on Sunday, the SpaceX founder claimed that Starlink’s application had been blocked because he is not Black, despite being born in South Africa. The billionaire further alleged that the company was informally offered a workaround involving the appointment of a Black executive to satisfy ownership requirements, a move he said he rejected on principle.

The controversy centres on South Africa’s Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy, which requires companies operating in sectors like telecommunications to meet equity thresholds, typically mandating at least 30 percent Black ownership. The policy was introduced to correct deep economic imbalances created during apartheid, but it has increasingly become a point of friction for foreign investors.

South African regulators, including the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, have consistently maintained that the rules apply uniformly to all operators and are a legal requirement for licensing. Authorities have pushed back against claims of discrimination, insisting that the policy is aimed at economic redress rather than racial exclusion.

READ ALSO:

Musk has repeatedly criticised the framework, describing it as “unashamedly racist” and claiming that such policies contradict the legacy of Nelson Mandela. He has also alleged that numerous laws in the country unfairly disadvantage non-Black citizens, further fuelling the ongoing debate.

Despite the standoff, Starlink has continued its rapid expansion across Africa, now operating in nearly two dozen countries where it provides high-speed internet access to underserved communities, including schools and healthcare centres. South Africa, however, remains one of the few major economies on the continent where the service is unavailable.

Musk had previously proposed initiatives to support connectivity in rural South African communities, including offers to provide internet access to thousands of schools, but those plans have stalled due to regulatory hurdles tied to ownership compliance.

As of now, the South African government has not issued an official response to Musk’s latest remarks. However, previous statements suggest that there is unlikely to be any regulatory concession without full adherence to B-BBEE requirements.

The dispute highlights a broader tension between South Africa’s post-apartheid transformation policies and the expectations of global technology investors. Analysts say the outcome could shape future investment decisions and influence how African nations balance economic redress with the need to attract international business.

Elon Musk Slams South Africa Over Starlink Ban, Calls Policy ‘Racist’

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending