IBB book: More Igbo leaders demand apology, compensation over civil war - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

IBB book: More Igbo leaders demand apology, compensation over civil war

Published

on

Niger Gold Mine Scandal: IBB Breaks Silence, Rejects Ownership Claim

IBB book: More Igbo leaders demand apology, compensation over civil war

Following the recent revelation by former military president, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida (IBB), that absolved the Igbo ethnic group from any blame for the 1966 coup, prominent Igbo leaders and groups have backed the call for an apology and compensation from the Federal Government.

IBB, in his book, ‘A Journey In Service’, had clarified that the coup was not driven by ethnic motivations, highlighting the role of Major John Obienu, an Igbo officer, who played a key role in quelling the mutiny. He equally revealed that many senior Igbo officers were also tragically killed during the uprising.

The Igbo have long sought recognition and restitution for the injustices they suffered during the Nigerian Civil War, also known as the Biafran War, which lasted from 1967 to 1970.

However, IBB’s revelation has ignited a fresh wave of demands by the Igbo apex socio-cultural organization, Ohanaeze Ndigbo.

Ohanaeze, had last Sunday, demanded an apology and N10 trillion as compensation from President Bola Tinubu noting that the coup unleashed disastrous repercussions on the Igbo people, among other factors, which ultimately led to the cataclysmic horrors of the Biafra War.

READ ALSO:

A statement by the Deputy National President of the Ohanaeze faction, Okechukwu Isiguzoro, noted that the apology and compensation had become necessary due to the staggering loss of life, with approximately three million Igbo-predominantly innocent women and children-slaughtered during the conflict.

Expectedly, Igbo leaders and organizations have backed Ohanaeze, lending their voices to the growing chorus of demands for an official apology and compensation from the Nigerian government.

They described the demands as a crucial step towards healing the deep-seated scars of the past and promoting national reconciliation.

Time to pay

Lending his voice, former President of an Igbo socio-cultural organisation, Aka Ikenga, Chief Goddy Uwazurike, said the nature of the compensation should be in the form of massive repair of public infrastructure in the region damaged during the war.

He said: “You won’t believe it but most of that public infrastructure like schools, hospitals, and roads still carry evidence of that war. Remember that many people were killed and some families were wiped out based on falsehoods perpetrated and perpetuated by a cabal. So there must be something that must be given and that thing is called compensation and the form as far as I know must be in kind.

“We are not asking anybody to give us cash, no. We want reputable contractors to go and start rebuilding some of those structures destroyed during the war. Our people have been doing what I’ll call self-help since 1970. It’s for the federal government to come in. After all, the United Nations gave them money, so It’s time to pay.”

Demand worthwhile

Also, founder and Chairman of Board of Trustees of the All Progressives Grand Alliance, APGA, Chief Chekwas Okorie, described the demand as worthwhile.

“The demand in itself is worthwhile. I support it”, Okorie stated. “However, it’s not really in making the demand that is the issue, it is in pushing it to the appropriate quarters for it to be given attention.

READ ALSO:

“The issue of compensating the Southeast when the war ended was started by Gowon in his proclamation of the 3R, but 3R was observed in the breach. Today, President Tínubu has enacted a law, the South East Development Commission. This is the very first time that the federal government is addressing any aspect of the 3R that was promised over 50 years ago.

“I think that it would be a good thing for the leadership of Ohanaeze, the governors of the South East and the National Assembly members from the region, to go as a group and thank the president formally and secondly, being that this is a development commission that is different from any other development commission because of what it has come out to address, therefore the funding must be substantially different if the purpose of setting it up was to be met. That is what ought to be done”

Similarly, Dr. Chike Obidigbo, an elder statesman, argued that IBB’s memoir highlighted Nigeria’s historical injustices, including political banditry and corruption that have impeded national progress and unity.

According to Obidigbo, “The time has come for Nigeria to formally apologise to the Igbo for the genocidal war and the ongoing animosity that has led to their marginalisation and renewed calls for secession.

“If the call for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission remains relevant, it should be implemented to allow Nigerians to determine whether to remain united or consider separation for national harmony.”

Legitimate pursuit

Convener, IkoroNdigbo Assembly, Ugochimereze Chinedu Asuzu, noted that the demand for reparations is a legitimate pursuit.

“Demanding reparations for the Igbos is a legitimate pursuit, but relying solely on Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida’s (IBB) revelation in his biography oversimplifies the issue”, Asuzu pointed out.

“IBB’s assertion that the 1966 coup was not an Igbo coup isn’t entirely new information. Notable statesman, Olusegun Obasanjo, had previously made similar statements, and the late Odumegwu Ojukwu, also known as Ikemba, explicitly expressed the same sentiments in various interviews.

“The Igbo have more substantial reasons to seek reparations from the Nigerian state beyond IBB’s validation. His statement merely adds credence to the already well-known facts surrounding the 1966 coup. The pursuit of reparations should be grounded in a comprehensive examination of the historical events and their lasting impact on the Igbo people.

“In seeking reparations, it’s essential to consider the broader context of Nigeria’s complex history, including the devastating effects of the Biafran War and the ongoing struggles for equality and justice. By doing so, the Igbos can build a stronger case for reparations, one that’s founded on a thorough and multifaceted understanding of the past and its continued influence on the present.”

False narrative

In the same vain, President General, Coalition of South East Youth Leaders, COSEYL, Comrade Goodluck Ibem, Sa’id: “The call for apology and compensation is necessary because the false narrative that the 1966 coup was an Igbo coup led to a situation where over five million Igbo were killed, their means of livelihood destroyed and the Igbo denied full political benefits in the Nigerian project.

“So the revelation by General Babangida in his book truly calls for apology and compensation to the Igbo for being seen and treated like enemies and outcasts in their own country.

“True healing and reconciliation requires and demands that there should be an apology and compensation of the Igbo for what happened in 1966.”

IBB book: More Igbo leaders demand apology, compensation over civil war

Loading

metro

Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones

Published

on

Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones
Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones

Phone traders in Kano State have confronted Chinese nationals accused of selling mobile phones directly to consumers at lower prices, reigniting concerns over foreign competition and the survival of local retail businesses in Nigeria.

The confrontation, reportedly captured in a video circulating on social media on Saturday, October 10, 2026, saw aggrieved traders challenge a Chinese national over alleged direct sales in a local market.

In the footage, some traders warned the foreign sellers against continuing the disputed business activities, insisting that their presence and pricing practices were undermining local dealers.

The traders alleged that Chinese sellers were bypassing established distribution channels by selling phones directly to consumers rather than supplying Nigerian retailers, who traditionally buy from importers and wholesalers before reselling to the public.

They argued that foreign suppliers with direct access to manufacturers could offer lower prices, making it difficult for local dealers to compete and maintain their businesses.

The traders expressed concern that the alleged practice could reduce their sales, threaten jobs and undermine the livelihoods of people who depend on the mobile phone retail business.

However, the circumstances surrounding the confrontation remain unclear. The identities of those involved, the precise location of the incident and whether any formal complaint was filed have not been independently established. There was also no confirmed information about arrests or police intervention.

The Kano dispute comes amid growing tensions between Nigerian traders and Chinese business operators over the boundaries between wholesale distribution and direct retail sales.

READ ALSO:

A similar disagreement emerged in September at the Lagos International Trade Fair Complex, where members of the Auto Spare Parts and Machinery Dealers Association of Nigeria (ASPMDA) protested against what they described as direct retail activities by Chinese business operators.

The Lagos traders alleged that some foreign businesses were selling goods directly to consumers, putting local retailers at a disadvantage because of differences in purchasing power, supply chains and access to manufacturers.

The disagreement prompted discussions involving market representatives, the trade fair management board and security officials, who sought to prevent the dispute from escalating.

During efforts to resolve the Lagos disagreement, stakeholders called for clearer rules defining the respective roles of wholesalers and retailers. Representatives of the Chinese business community also indicated that businesses found engaging in prohibited activities should be reported for appropriate action.

The dispute has since highlighted wider concerns about foreign investment, fair competition and the protection of Nigerian small businesses.

Local traders argue that they need a level playing field to compete with businesses that source products directly from manufacturers. They also want authorities to clarify the conditions under which foreign operators can participate in Nigeria’s retail sector.

However, selling products at lower prices does not automatically establish wrongdoing. Determining whether a business has breached the law requires evidence of the relevant activities and the regulations governing its operations.

Consumers, meanwhile, may benefit from lower prices and greater choice when competition increases. The challenge for regulators is to ensure that competition remains lawful and fair while protecting consumers and supporting sustainable local enterprise.

The Kano confrontation has renewed calls for government agencies and market authorities to clarify Nigeria’s foreign trade and retail regulations, investigate credible complaints and provide mechanisms for resolving commercial disputes peacefully.

Authorities will also need to ensure that disagreements over business practices do not lead to intimidation, threats or violence against traders of any nationality.

For now, the central issue remains whether the alleged direct sales in Kano violate applicable regulations or market rules. An official response clarifying the circumstances of the incident would help establish the facts and determine whether further action is necessary.

 

Tension in Kano as Phone Traders Confront Chinese Sellers Over Cheaper Phones

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

EFCC Wins ₦132m Money Laundering Case as Court Orders Forfeiture of Lagos Properties

Published

on

EFCC Wins ₦132m Money Laundering Case as Court Orders Forfeiture of Lagos Properties
Lagos-based businessman Onatayo Pelumi
EFCC Wins ₦132m Money Laundering Case as Court Orders Forfeiture of Lagos Properties

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has secured the conviction of Lagos-based businessman Onatayo Pelumi over alleged money laundering involving approximately ₦132 million, with the Federal High Court in Lagos ordering the forfeiture of two properties and ₦8 million to the Federal Government.

Justice Osiagor of the Federal High Court, Lagos, convicted Pelumi on five counts relating to the retention of proceeds of unlawful activities in bank accounts maintained with Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank) and Zenith Bank.

According to the EFCC, the charges covered various sums allegedly retained in the accounts between January 2023 and June 2026, despite the defendant’s knowledge that the funds were proceeds of unlawful activities.

The commission did not provide further details about the specific unlawful activities from which the money was allegedly derived.

In his judgment, Justice Osiagor sentenced Pelumi to three years’ imprisonment, with an option of a ₦300,000 fine, on the first count.

READ ALSO:

For each of the remaining four counts, the court imposed five years’ imprisonment, with an option of a ₦300,000 fine per count.

However, the judge directed that all the prison terms run concurrently, meaning they are served at the same time rather than consecutively.

The court also ordered the forfeiture of two half-plots of land in Lagos and ₦8 million held in Pelumi’s Zenith Bank account to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

The properties covered by the forfeiture order are a half-plot of land at No. 23 Michael Ayorinde Street, Abule-Egba, and another half-plot at No. 1 Yisa Street, Meiran, both in Lagos State.

In addition to the prison sentences and forfeiture orders, Pelumi was directed to undertake seven days of community service.

The conviction followed prosecution by the EFCC’s Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 as part of its efforts to investigate and prosecute financial crimes involving the retention of funds linked to unlawful activities.

The case also highlights the commission’s use of asset-forfeiture proceedings to recover money and property connected to financial crime cases.

The EFCC did not disclose additional details about the source of the funds beyond the allegations contained in the five-count charge.

 

EFCC Wins ₦132m Money Laundering Case as Court Orders Forfeiture of Lagos Properties

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Hardship: ACF Gives Tinubu Three Months to Deliver Relief, Demands Clear Timelines

Published

on

Hardship: ACF Gives Tinubu Three Months to Deliver Relief, Demands Clear Timelines
ACF’s Publicity Secretary, Professor Tukur Mohammed-Baba
Hardship: ACF Gives Tinubu Three Months to Deliver Relief, Demands Clear Timelines

The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to introduce measures to ease the economic hardship facing Nigerians within three months, while demanding clear timelines and measurable targets for improving living conditions.

The forum said the Federal Government should move beyond repeated assurances that economic conditions would improve and provide specific commitments showing when Nigerians could begin to experience meaningful relief.

The ACF’s Publicity Secretary, Professor Tukur Mohammed-Baba, made the call during an interview with ARISE News on Thursday, October 8, 2026, according to media reports.

Mohammed-Baba said the administration needed to be more transparent about the effects of its economic reforms and acknowledge areas where the outcomes had fallen short of expectations.

He argued that government policies should be assessed not only by their stated objectives but also by their effects on households, businesses and the wider population.

The ACF spokesman cited the rising cost of living, declining purchasing power, increasing rents, higher transportation expenses and electricity bills as some of the pressures confronting Nigerians. He also identified poor road infrastructure and persistent insecurity as challenges affecting citizens’ welfare.

READ ALSO:

According to him, the government should explain how it intends to address these problems and establish clear benchmarks against which its performance can be measured.

Mohammed-Baba called on the Tinubu administration to outline what it expects to achieve within one, two and three years, arguing that measurable targets would enable Nigerians to assess progress rather than rely solely on official assurances.

He also urged the government to acknowledge the difficulties associated with its economic policies and communicate more openly with citizens about the challenges and expected outcomes.

The ACF spokesman maintained that the government should not expect Nigerians to endure prolonged hardship without a clear indication of when relief measures would take effect.

He said three months should be enough for the administration to introduce measures capable of reducing some of the immediate pressures on households, even if broader economic recovery would require more time.

The forum also called for greater accountability from political leaders, arguing that the sacrifices demanded of citizens should be matched by a commitment from public officials to responsible governance and improved service delivery.

Mohammed-Baba’s comments add to the ongoing debate over the impact of the Tinubu administration’s economic reforms, particularly the pressure that higher living costs have placed on households and small businesses.

The government has defended its reforms as necessary to address longstanding economic challenges. However, the ACF’s position underscores the need for clear communication about the expected benefits of the policies and practical measures to cushion their immediate effects.

On the 2027 general elections, Mohammed-Baba said the ACF would assess political parties and candidates based on their commitment to good governance, accountability, anti-corruption, equity and fairness.

He said the forum’s position would be guided by the quality of leadership and the ability of political actors to promote responsible governance rather than automatic support for any particular political party.

The ACF’s central demand is for the Federal Government to establish clear deadlines, measurable objectives and practical steps for reducing hardship, enabling Nigerians to judge progress by tangible improvements in their daily lives.

 

Hardship: ACF Gives Tinubu Three Months to Deliver Relief, Demands Clear Timelines

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending