IGP bows to pressure, disbands SARS – Newstrends
Connect with us

News

IGP bows to pressure, disbands SARS

Published

on

The Inspector-General of Police, Adamu Mohammed, has scrapped the Federal Special Anti-Robbery Squad (F-SARS).

The IGP disbanded the police squad on Sunday, October 11, 2020, after Nigerian youths had protested against the police unit.

The IGP said the operatives would be redeployed to other police formations and commands.

Adamu announced this in a broadcast on Sunday afternoon.

The announcement came after days of street protests against the brutality and extrajudicial killings by the SARS operatives.

The IGP said, “The Federal Special Anti-Robbery Squad of the Nigeria Police Force otherwise known as SARS is hereby dissolved in all the 36 State Police Commands and the Federal Capital Territory.”

The briefing was followed by a statement signed by Force Public Relations Officer, DCP Frank Mba.

The statement titled, ‘IGP Dissolves The Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS)’, stated, “The IGP, while noting that the dissolution of SARS is in response to the yearnings of the Nigerian people, observes that by this dissolution, all officers and men of the now-defunct Special Anti-robbery Squad are being redeployed with immediate effect.”

News

Violent protest may lead to chaos, impede progress, Orelope-Adefulire warns

Published

on

Violent protest may lead to chaos, impede progress, Orelope-Adefulire warns

Senior Special Assistant to the President on Sustainable Development Goals, Princess Adejoke Orelope-Adefulire, has cautioned against the planned nationwide protest by individuals and groups.

She warned in a statement obtained on Saturday that it could plunge the country into chaos, impede progress, and undermine Nigeria’s commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals.

She stated, “It is imperative to note that when crises and uncertainties prevail, the focus shifts from constructive dialogue and development to managing chaos.”

The SSA to the President urged those calling for the protests to embrace dialogue with the government and offer sustainable solutions to the prevailing issues.

While emphasising that the right to peaceful protest is constitutional under Section 40 of the Nigerian Constitution, she called attention to the potential risks and unintended consequences of a leaderless and spontaneous movement.

According to her, the possibility of the protest escalating into uncontrollable crises necessitates a cautious approach.

Princess Orelope-Adefulire maintained that meaningful progress can only be achieved in an atmosphere of peace, dialogue, and stability as globally recognized and enshrined in Goal 16 of the SDGs.

She stressed that maintaining law and order was paramount.

She also noted that the planned protest lacked clear leadership and organizational structure, adding that “spontaneity may appear democratic and inclusive, it poses significant risks.”

She said, “Without designated leaders to guide and control the protest’s direction, the movement is vulnerable to infiltration by malicious elements. “History has shown that leaderless protests can quickly devolve into chaos, resulting in property damage, violence, and loss of lives.”

She pointed out the consequences of such leaderless protests, citing the #EndSARS protest, which resulted in numerous casualties, wanton destruction, and vandalism, leaving many businesses looted, leading to loss of jobs and increasing unemployment in the country.

She said Nigeria had not fully recovered from the impact of the last violent protest.

Princess Orelope-Adefulire noted that while there are challenges such as insecurity, terrorism amidst social and economic issues facing the country, the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu was aware of their reverberating effects and remained committed to addressing them even in the face of the Global economic downturn.

“What the country needs now is a continuous dialogue and the collective responsibility of the citizenry to support the government in promoting the welfare and security of the people, as stipulated in Section 24(d) of the Nigerian Constitution.

“This responsibility includes fostering an environment conducive to constructive dialogue, peaceful coexistence, and sustainable development,” she said

Princess Orelope-Adefulire sued for caution regarding the proposed protest while calling for careful consideration and positive decisions for the safety and unity of the country.

Continue Reading

News

Hardship: As more northern youths push for mass protest, elders divided

Published

on

Hardship: As more northern youths push for mass protest, elders divided

As some groups and individuals continue to push for the planned mass protest from August 1, youths from the North appear to be excited about it and have begun to warm up to the mass action.

There are therefore fears mostly from the government that it might disrupt social and economic activities.

A report by Daily Trust notes that a prominent tiktoker, Junaidu Abusalma Abdullahi, has been reported as one of those instrumental to promoting the idea among northern youth through the social media.

Only last week, another youth in Kano, Bashir Abubakar was accused of producing the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria T-shirts.

Other than that not much is known about the organisers of the planned protest.

Even the government seems uncertain about where the idea is coming from as its organs point at different directions.

While presidential spokesman, Bayo Onanuga, accuses opposition elements, the National Orientation Agency (NOA) says it is the work of some fifth columnists in the Diaspora.

The Directorate of State Service (DSS) said in a statement that it knows the organisers, but did not provide details.

The reaction in the North has led to the involvement of clerics in the issue.

But rather than douse tension, their involvement has served to divide opinions on the proposed action.

While prominent clerics such as Sheikh Kabiru Gombe, Sheikh Sani Yahaya Jingir, Sheikh Aliyu Sokoto and Sheikh Aminu Ibrahim Daurawa are rallying against the planned protest, the likes of Sheikh Ahmad Gumi and Ibrahim Khalil Danshagamu have insisted there is nothing wrong with it if done in a peaceful manner.

Sheikh Gumi supports the idea of a peaceful protest as he views it as a means of conveying the grievances of the citizenry to the government.

Sheikh Jingir, on the other hand, is against it, saying the idea is conceived to make the Muslim-Muslim ticket of President Tinubu look bad.

“Just because there is hunger now in Nigeria, Christians against a Muslim-Muslim ticket, and Shiites and hypocrites who don’t like the Muslim-Muslim ticket are now calling for you to come out and protest. May Allah undermine all planned protests,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Danshagamu said he is in support of the protest because it is an opportunity for people to claim their rights from the government due to the hunger and insecurity in the land.

Leader of Hisbah in Kano, Sheikh Daurawa, said he is against protest because Nigeria cannot allow what happened in Syria, Sudan, Libya and Iraq, where, according to him, protests were hijacked.

“There are people that want the country divided and have stockpiled arms and money waiting for the right opportunity. That’s why we are trying to prevent protests, not that we are afraid,” he stated.

As expected, the government is doing all it can to ensure that the protests do not hold, taking measures that include appealing to citizens to refrain from actions that could lead to anarchy, and involving the security agencies to caution against breaching the peace.

Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, said the president has listened to all concerns and assured that efforts are on to address the challenges.

He said, “We also discussed the issue of the country generally and Mr President has asked me to again inform Nigerians that he listens to them, especially the young people that are trying to protest.”

Opposition figures like former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, have, however, criticised the federal government and its agencies for trying to abort the planned nationwide protest.

Atiku said it was ironical that those who protested against the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan in 2012 are the ones trying to stifle other peoples’ rights to protest now.

But the government has said on several occasions that it is not against protest, but against the violence that may follow it if it is hijacked by certain elements.

An opposition lawmaker, who prefers not to be named, said given the ease with which the people were mobilised to join the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) strike a few months ago, the fear of government that the protest may be hijacked is not out of place.

“Remember that even the Endsars protest was hijacked while lives and property worth billions were lost,” he said.

It, however, remains to be seen if the protest would hold given the sharp division among major stakeholders.

Hardship: As more northern youths push for mass protest, elders divided

Continue Reading

News

Protest: APC says Tinubu can’t dump 1999 constitution

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu

Protest: APC says Tinubu can’t dump 1999 constitution

The All Progressives Congress has urged organisers of the planned August 1 nationwide protest to shelve its agitation to have President Bola Tinubu scrap the 1999 Constitution, describing it as a tall order.

The ruling party disclosed this after a closed-door meeting with the Forum of APC State Chairmen to discuss the modalities of the proposed protest at the national secretariat in Abuja on Friday.

In the last two decades, the need to change the Nigerian Constitution has become a hot debate among several state actors and elder statesmen.

On March 18, The PUNCH reported how Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, joined former Commonwealth Secretary-General, Chief Emeka Anyaoku; former governors, notable diplomats, legal practitioners and other elder statesmen to advocate that Nigeria jettison the 1999 Constitution for lack of legitimacy.

But the ruling party through its National Secretary, Senator Ajibola Basiru, insisted that the renewed agitation to have the President dump the constitution he vowed to protect would amount to a mission impossible.

Basiru’s statement was a response to one of the 15 demands of the organisers of the proposed hunger strike protest.

The protest, scheduled to hold from August 1-15, has generated tension and elicited mixed reactions among Nigerians in the past two weeks.

It also trended for weeks on social media space with hashtags like ‘EndBadGovernance’ and ‘Tinubu Must Go.’

According to the APC national secretary, Tinubu alone doesn’t have the power to dump the 1999 Constitution.

He said, “On an intellectual basis, the meeting of the National Working Committee and the chairman of our party looked at what was put forward as a charter of demands, 15 of them. We looked at it and most of the issues raised there are not matters for protest. That is because they border on the issue of politics and the issue of amendments to the constitution.

“And we took them one by one. First, they said ‘scrap the 1999 Constitution and replace it with a people-made constitution for the Federal Republic of Nigeria through a sovereign national conference followed by a national referendum. The question is this, who will scrap the 1999 constitution? Is it a president who is elected and sworn to oppose the 1999 constitution? Even the right of a protester to protest is predicated on their rights under the 1999 constitution.

“The constitutional amendments in Nigeria cannot be done by presidential fiat. The president alone cannot sack the 1999 constitution. It requires four-fifths of the members of the National Assembly and two-thirds of the State (House of) Assembly to be able to do so. The first demand is asking of the president what he does not have the power and will to do.”

The APC also frowned at the push to have the Senate sacked, leaving only the House of Representatives to take care of the business of lawmaking.

Basiru stated that even the APC state chairmen could not agree less than that it was a contradiction since what it requires was just an amendment and not a total discarding of the entire constitution.

“Again, they said the Senate should be tossed away and the House of Representatives should be in place and have a part-time endeavour. That would suppose they are no longer talking about scrapping the 1999 Constitution. They are talking about amending the 1999 Constitution because the House of Representatives was established under the 1999 Constitution.

“So, presently there is an ongoing constitutional amendment by the National Assembly. Anybody legitimately interested in cutting costs of governance by sending away the Senate and retaining the lower chamber should prepare the necessary memorandum, and mobilise the National Assembly members as well as the State Assembly so that it can be amended.

“Beyond the general statements discussed, the National Working Committee in the meeting with the State APC Chairmen also got to check what was pushed out by the so-called organisers of the protest. One, we were shocked that the title of the protest is called #EndBadGovernance. It signals that you are not protesting but want to carry out a revolution.

“Revolution is not something you use protests for, and where such occurs, it comes with immense violence. This is not a time when our country will require violence and disruption of the efforts done by the President and the administration. So we want to urge Nigerians to be alive to the fact that the government will not be in a position to sit and allow violence to be meted on hapless citizens of the country,” he stated.

Protest: APC says Tinubu can’t dump 1999 constitution

PUNCH

Continue Reading

Trending