UK Tightens Immigration Rules, Threatens Universities Over Foreign Student Recruitment

The United Kingdom has introduced tougher immigration measures that could restrict universities from recruiting international students if they fail to meet stricter compliance requirements under a revised visa monitoring system.

The new rules, announced by the UK Home Office, form part of broader efforts to reduce rising asylum claims linked to study, work and tourist visas, with foreign students identified as the largest group associated with such applications in recent data.

Under the updated framework, universities risk losing their student sponsor licence if more than 5 per cent of visa applications linked to their institution are refused, compared to the previous threshold of 10 per cent.

The Home Office said it will now use enhanced monitoring systems to track both visa refusal rates and the performance of individual institutions, allowing authorities to identify universities that fail to properly vet or support applicants.

Officials also warned that institutions could face sanctions if large numbers of international students either fail to enrol after securing visas or fail to complete their academic programmes.

In addition, the government has raised compliance benchmarks for universities recruiting foreign students. The required enrolment rate has been increased to 95 per cent, up from 90 per cent, while the course completion rate threshold has risen from 85 per cent to 90 per cent.

READ ALSO:

• He forced himself on me every night: Anambra Teenager Gang-Raped by Guardian, Seven Others
• Emir of Argungu Urges Communities to Legally Acquire Weapons for Self-Defence
• FCT Police Begin Enforcement of Tinted Glass Ban, Seize Over 30 Vehicles

According to the Home Office, poor enrolment or high dropout rates may indicate abuse of the student visa route, including cases where applicants use study visas as a pathway to seek work or remain in the UK irregularly.

The government also linked the tightening measures to concerns about abuse of the immigration system, saying it is working to ensure that the student visa route is used strictly for genuine education purposes.

The reforms follow a series of earlier restrictions, including an “emergency brake” introduced on study visas for nationals of countries such as Afghanistan, Cameroon, Myanmar and Sudan, after officials reported increased asylum applications from some student visa holders.

UK authorities said asylum claims from individuals on student visas have fallen significantly following recent enforcement actions, which include stricter scrutiny of visa applications and compliance checks.

The Home Office also confirmed that it has contacted more than 300,000 international students whose visas are nearing expiry, warning them against submitting unfounded asylum claims and urging those without legal status to either regularise their stay or leave the country.

The latest policy shift is expected to increase pressure on UK universities, many of which depend heavily on international student tuition fees to support funding, research and institutional budgets.

Education stakeholders have previously warned that tighter immigration controls could affect the UK’s attractiveness as a destination for global students, particularly as countries such as Canada and Australia continue to expand international student pathways.

The UK government has not yet confirmed full implementation timelines, but said consultations and enforcement planning are ongoing across education and immigration agencies.

UK Tightens Immigration Rules, Threatens Universities Over Foreign Student Recruitment

Trump Confirms Calling Netanyahu ‘Fucking Crazy’ in Explosive Phone Call

United States President Donald Trump has confirmed that he called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “fucking crazy” during a heated phone call on Monday, while insisting the two leaders continue to maintain a close working relationship. Speaking on the “Pod Force One” podcast with New York Post host Miranda Devine, Trump acknowledged his frustration over Israel’s escalating military campaign in Lebanon, which he said was complicating broader diplomatic efforts with Iran.

Trump told the podcast that he was “a little bit perturbed at his constantly fighting with Lebanon.” When asked directly whether he had used the explicit language against Netanyahu, Trump replied simply: “I did.” Despite confirming the heated exchange, Trump stressed that his personal rapport with Netanyahu remains intact. “We’ve worked very well together. I like Bibi a lot. And I work very well with him,” he said, adding that he believed a resolution to broader regional tensions would come “fairly quickly.”

Trump’s confirmation followed an explosive report from Axios on Monday, which cited two U.S. officials and another source briefed on the conversation. According to the report, Trump launched into a profane tirade against Netanyahu over Israel’s threatened strikes on Hezbollah targets in Beirut. The Axios report quoted Trump as telling Netanyahu: “You’re fucking crazy. You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me. I’m saving your ass. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.” Another source briefed on the conversation said Trump was “furious” and at one point shouted: “What the fuck are you doing?” According to the report, Trump also referenced his support for Netanyahu during the Israeli leader’s ongoing corruption trial, claiming he had helped keep him out of prison.

READ ALSO:

• US Publishes Photos of 110 Nigerians Facing Deportation
• Five Suspects Face Judgment Today Over Owo Church Massacre
• Owo Church Massacre: Court Sentences Four Terrorists to Death, Acquits One

The reported outburst was linked to Netanyahu’s plans for major strikes on Hezbollah targets in Beirut. U.S. officials told Axios that Trump recognized Israel’s right to defend itself against Hezbollah rocket and drone attacks but believed Netanyahu’s response had become disproportionate. Trump was particularly concerned about civilian casualties in Lebanon and objected to Israeli operations that reportedly involved destroying entire buildings to target individual Hezbollah commanders. The timing of the call proved critical. Earlier on Monday, Iran had threatened to walk away from negotiations with the United States over Israel’s actions in Lebanon. Tehran has made clear that it will not agree to a deal to end the war unless a ceasefire also covers Lebanon, where Israel invaded in March to pursue the Iran-aligned Hezbollah militia. One U.S. official described the exchange as among the “most difficult” conversations between the two leaders since Trump returned to office.

Despite the tense exchange, the phone call produced tangible results. Trump announced on Truth Social that Netanyahu had agreed to call off a “major raid of Beirut, Lebanon. He turned his Troops around. Thank you Bibi!” An Israeli official told Axios that Israel no longer plans to strike Hezbollah targets in Beirut. According to understandings reached between the two leaders, Israel would refrain from striking Beirut provided that Hezbollah does not attack Israeli territory. However, Israel’s expanded ground operation in southern Lebanon would continue. One U.S. official told Axios that Trump “steamrolled” Netanyahu on the call, and the prime minister responded by saying, “OK, OK, just make sure everything is taken care of.”

Adding complexity to the story, Israeli media and officials have disputed key aspects of the Axios report. An unnamed Netanyahu staffer denied that Trump cursed at or personally attacked the prime minister. While acknowledging the call was “tense,” the Israeli source claimed Trump did not say that Netanyahu would be in prison or that everyone “hates Israel.” A senior Israeli official briefed on the call later told The Times of Israel that the Israeli account disputing the more dramatic elements was “accurate.” However, Axios reporter Barak Ravid, who broke the story, stood by his reporting, telling Channel 12 that Trump twice used the f-word during the first of two calls between the leaders Monday night.

READ ALSO:

• Poor Nigerians Are Primary Beneficiaries of Tinubu’s Reforms — Presidential Aide
• Portable Rejects EFCC Invitation Over Alleged Naira Abuse at Son’s Naming Ceremony
• Nnamdi Kanu: US Congress Calls for Diplomatic Engagement with Nigeria

In the same podcast interview, Trump dismissed suggestions that Netanyahu had manipulated him into starting the war with Iran, a claim made by some Democratic critics. “He tricked me? I’m the one that started it,” Trump told the New York Post. “I don’t want to bore anybody, but I started [the war with Iran] because we can’t let them have a nuclear weapon. Now, that pertains to Israel because they probably would have been the first one to get hit.” Trump went further, asserting his critical role in Israel’s survival. “I’ll tell you what, if it wasn’t for me there would be no Israel right now,” he said. The president dismissed his critics as “Dumbocrats” and rejected accusations that he was doing Israel’s bidding in the Iran war.

The strained exchange underscores the increasingly shaky ties between two right-wing allies who both face significant political pressures at home. Trump wants a way out of a war that has badly hit the U.S. economy less than six months before midterm elections, which will determine whether his Republican party keeps control of Congress. Netanyahu, meanwhile, faces the possible collapse of his right-wing coalition and is under fire for bowing to Trump on matters of security after calling off the plan to attack Beirut. This is not the first time Trump has expressed frustration with Netanyahu. In September 2025, Trump reportedly told top aides that Netanyahu was “fucking me” regarding ceasefire violations in Gaza. Former ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro, now a distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council, noted that tensions between Netanyahu and U.S. presidents are not unusual. “In fact, he has a perfect record of reaching that point of frustration with every U.S. president he’s worked with,” Shapiro told AFP.

Trump used the podcast interview to make several bold claims about ongoing negotiations with Iran. He said Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is directly involved in talks to end the war and that he would “like to meet him.” When asked about Khamenei’s condition—U.S. officials have previously claimed the Iranian leader was seriously injured in the same bombing that killed his father, Ali Khamenei, on the first day of the war—Trump said: “If you believe the stories, he’s, you know, missing a lot of different parts.” Trump also claimed that Iran has agreed it will not obtain a nuclear weapon, saying: “We’re not going to have a nuclear weapon and lots of other good things are going to happen.” According to Trump, a memorandum of understanding between the U.S. and Iran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz as early as this week, easing pressure on global energy markets. Despite expressing optimism, Trump acknowledged that negotiations have faced multiple setbacks, but maintained that “this will resolve itself fairly quickly.”

Despite the diplomatic maneuvering, fighting resumed in southern Lebanon as clashes broke out again between Israeli forces and Hezbollah fighters on Monday night. Drone strikes killed eight people, including a father and his two children. Trump’s office has not provided additional comment beyond the president’s Truth Social posts and podcast interview. Netanyahu’s office has not publicly responded to either the Axios report or Trump’s subsequent confirmation of the remarks. The White House referred AFP to Trump’s Truth Social posts from Monday when asked to confirm the Axios account, where the president thanked Netanyahu for agreeing to pull troops back from Beirut.

Trump Confirms Calling Netanyahu ‘Fucking Crazy’ in Explosive Phone Call

Nnamdi Kanu: US Congress Calls for Diplomatic Engagement with Nigeria

The United States Congress has stepped into the ongoing legal controversy surrounding Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), after the U.S. House of Representatives adopted a resolution calling for formal diplomatic engagement with the Nigerian government over his trial and detention.

The resolution, tagged H.Res. 1321, was adopted on May 22, 2026, following its introduction by Congressman John James. It urges the U.S. Department of State to open discussions with Nigerian authorities regarding concerns about Nnamdi Kanu’s detention, trial process, and access to fundamental human rights.

US lawmakers expressed concern about the handling of Kanu’s case, urging that all judicial proceedings in Nigeria comply with constitutional safeguards and internationally accepted standards of due process, fair hearing, and human rights protection. They also called for improved attention to Kanu’s detention conditions, including access to legal representation, medical care, and humane treatment in custody. Lawmakers further urged the U.S. Secretary of State to engage Nigerian officials in dialogue aimed at addressing concerns around judicial fairness and respect for civil liberties.

Kanu, who leads the proscribed IPOB movement, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on November 20, 2025, by the Federal High Court in Abuja. Justice James Omotosho delivered the judgment after finding him guilty on terrorism-related charges brought by the Federal Government. He is currently serving his sentence at a correctional facility in Sokoto State.

READ ALSO:

• Five Suspects Face Judgment Today Over Owo Church Massacre
• Real Madrid Reach €20m Agreement for Inter Milan Star Denzel Dumfries
• Enugu Police Kill Two Kidnappers, Recover AK-47 Rifle, Beretta Pistol in Separate Raids

However, Kanu and his legal team have consistently rejected the ruling, arguing that parts of the prosecution’s case relied on laws they claim were no longer valid. His lawyers have since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal, though proceedings are yet to commence.

The US Congress also referenced findings by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which in 2022 concluded that Kanu’s detention violated international human rights standards and recommended corrective measures, including his release and compensation. Lawmakers said these findings highlight broader concerns about arbitrary detention, political freedoms, and the treatment of dissenting voices under international law.

While the United States government has historically maintained respect for Nigeria’s sovereignty and judicial independence, Congress members emphasized Washington’s global commitment to promoting human rights, rule of law, and fair judicial processes. The resolution encourages continued engagement between the U.S. State Department and Nigerian authorities to ensure compliance with international legal standards while maintaining diplomatic relations.

Analysts say the move could increase international scrutiny of Nigeria’s handling of sensitive political and security-related cases, though any formal diplomatic action will depend on the U.S. executive branch. For now, the resolution adds a new layer of global attention to one of Nigeria’s most high-profile and politically sensitive legal cases.

Nnamdi Kanu: US Congress Calls for Diplomatic Engagement with Nigeria