Lagos Demolition Sparks Reallocation Uproar: New Structures Emerge on Cleared Power-Line Corridor - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Lagos Demolition Sparks Reallocation Uproar: New Structures Emerge on Cleared Power-Line Corridor

Published

on

Lagos Demolition Sparks Reallocation Uproar: New Structures Emerge on Cleared Power-Line Corridor

The wave of demolitions sweeping through Lagos — dubbed “Hurricane Sanwo-Olu” by residents — has hit the Command, Aminkanle, and AIT corridors of Alagbado in Agbado-Oke-Odo LCDA, leaving thousands displaced and entire communities in ruins. More than 3,000 structures, including homes, shops, religious centres, schools and workshops, were pulled down last week as bulldozers operated non-stop for over seven days.

The demolition, which began on November 6, is part of the Lagos State Government’s ongoing enforcement to clear illegal buildings under high-tension power lines. Earlier in the year, the first phase was carried out from Command T-Junction to Atapa Market, but the exercise was temporarily halted — a pause that allegedly opened the door to misinformation and exploitation of anxious property owners by fraudsters promising to “lobby” government officials.

When Sunday Sun visited the area, many victims were seen retrieving scattered belongings from the rubble. While some residents claimed they had no prior notice, an official of the Lagos State Building Control Agency (LASBCA) insisted that occupants were given months to vacate. He said the earlier pause in demolition was specifically to allow residents relocate safely.

The Lagos State Government had, through a public statement earlier in the year, directed the removal of structures under power lines. The statement, signed by LASBCA spokesperson Adu Ademuyiwa, warned that property owners had until January 31, 2025 to comply.

READ ALSO:

But residents told stories of confusion, deception, poverty and last-minute panic. Some blamed landlords for giving false assurances. Others said financial constraints kept them from securing new accommodation in time.

Mr. Olalekan Sogade, a tenant whose building was destroyed, said he moved into his home in April 2024 and was misled to believe the demolition had been suspended. Another resident, Chigozie, explained that despite knowing the risks of living under high-tension wires, he stayed because it was the only affordable option while he struggled financially and dealt with his wife’s illness.

The affected corridor features two parallel power lines. Residents claimed one line existed before the community developed, while the second was installed later. Though some reports suggest compensation was paid during construction of the second line, many occupants allegedly stayed put and were ultimately affected.

A fresh controversy, however, is heightening tension. Residents whose properties were demolished earlier in the year in the Atapa axis accuse government officials of reallocating their cleared land to new owners. A community leader alleged that new buildings are already springing up on land from which original occupants were evicted. “The government claims to be protecting lives, but the same land now has new structures. Who owns them?” he asked.

A Sunday Sun investigation confirmed that construction is ongoing in the previously demolished Command–Atapa corridor.

Reacting to the allegations, LASBCA dismissed claims that government reallocated any demolished land, warning that anyone involved in such illegal activity would face the law. Ademuyiwa emphasised that clearing structures under high-tension lines is strictly a public-safety measure, citing risks such as electrocution, fires, power surges and major infrastructure hazards.

He added that illegal buildings also undermine urban planning and environmental sustainability, reaffirming government’s commitment to creating a safer, more resilient Lagos.

Residents are urged to comply with building regulations and voluntarily remove structures within restricted zones to avoid further sanctions.

Lagos Demolition Sparks Reallocation Uproar: New Structures Emerge on Cleared Power-Line Corridor

The Sun

Loading

metro

Osun Govt Vows to Prosecute Those Behind Recent Killings

Published

on

Adeleke withdraws EFCC suit after Tinubu’s intervention
Osun Govt Vows to Prosecute Those Behind Recent Killings

The Osun State Government has vowed to prosecute anyone found responsible for the recent killings and violent clashes across the state.

The government also denied allegations that it was protecting those suspected of killing Olalekan Oyeyemi amid a leadership dispute in the state chapter of the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW).

Speaking on Wednesday, the Special Adviser to Governor Ademola Adeleke on Security Matters, Samuel Ojo, said the administration would allow security agencies to investigate the cases without interference.

 Adeleke Summons Security Chiefs

Following the recent violence, Adeleke called an emergency security meeting attended by commanders from the police, DSS, Army, NDLEA, Immigration, Correctional Service, Civil Defence and Amotekun.

Deputy Governor Kola Adewusi represented the governor at the meeting.

Ojo said the security chiefs agreed to intensify efforts to stop further killings and restore peace across Osun.

He also dismissed claims that the government was shielding suspects in Oyeyemi’s murder, saying the police and DSS had been directed to thoroughly investigate the case.

Meanwhile, two NURTW leaders, Gbedegesin and Kareem Akeem, had alleged that Oyeyemi was killed because some union leaders opposed his proposed emergence as the next state chairman.

Transportation Commissioner Sesan Oyedele, however, denied that the government endorsed Oyeyemi for the position. He said the union leaders only informed him of their decision to choose the deceased.

About five people have reportedly been killed between August 24 and September 15 in Ikire, Ile-Ife and Osogbo in incidents linked to motor park disputes and alleged cult-related clashes.

 

Osun Govt Vows to Prosecute Those Behind Recent Killings

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

57-Year-Old Man Arrested Over Sexual Abuse of Stepdaughter in Edo

Published

on

57-Year-Old Man Arrested Over Sexual Abuse of Stepdaughter in Edo
Commissioner of Police, Patrick Daaor

57-Year-Old Man Arrested Over Sexual Abuse of Stepdaughter in Edo

The Edo State Police Command has arrested a 57-year-old man, identified as Kadiri Edenokun, over the alleged defilement of his six-year-old stepdaughter in Jattu, Etsako West Local Government Area of Edo State.

The suspect was reportedly taken into custody after the alleged abuse of the child was brought to the attention of the authorities, prompting the police to commence an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the case.

Police sources said the suspect allegedly admitted during interrogation that the incident occurred on more than one occasion. However, the allegation remains under investigation, and Edenokun has not been convicted of any offence.

The case has renewed attention on the problem of child sexual abuse in Edo State, particularly allegations involving adults who have regular access to children within homes and other familiar environments.

The Edo State Government disclosed in August that more than 70 cases of child defilement had been recorded in the state between January and July 2026. The Commissioner for Women Affairs and Social Development, Eugenia Abdallah, said children between the ages of two and 10 were among those affected.

The commissioner also said that more than half of the cases reported during the period involved fathers of the affected children, highlighting concerns over sexual abuse occurring within family settings.

The state government has continued to work with relevant agencies on cases of sexual and gender-based violence, including the provision of medical, psychosocial and protective support to survivors.

READ ALSO:

The Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development has also been involved in providing temporary protective care and other forms of assistance to children and young people affected by sexual violence.

In a separate case reported recently, the ministry provided an update on a 16-year-old girl who was allegedly sexually abused and became pregnant. The ministry said the survivor was placed in a government shelter and was receiving support while arrangements were being made for her welfare and education.

The police have also reported a number of arrests involving alleged sexual offences against minors across Edo State.

The Commissioner of Police, Patrick Daaor, said the command arrested several suspects in August in connection with sexual and gender-based violence. Some of the suspects were subsequently charged to court, while investigations into other cases continued.

Among the cases reported by the command were allegations involving girls aged 13, 15 and 11. Police also reported investigations involving alleged defilement of minors in Okpella and other parts of the state.

At its August operational review, the Edo Police Command said 12 suspects had been arrested in connection with sexual and gender-based violence during the month. The command also reported arrests linked to kidnapping, armed robbery, cultism, human trafficking and other offences.

The latest case involving the six-year-old girl is expected to be subjected to further investigation to establish the circumstances surrounding the alleged abuse and determine whether sufficient evidence exists to support criminal charges.

The child has reportedly been placed under appropriate care and is receiving medical attention with the involvement of the Edo State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development.

Child protection advocates have consistently stressed the importance of promptly reporting suspected cases of child abuse and sexual violence, particularly where the alleged perpetrator is a family member, caregiver or another adult with access to the child.

Under Nigerian law, allegations of defilement involving children are treated as serious criminal matters, with the relevant authorities responsible for investigating reported cases and presenting evidence before a court where prosecution is warranted.

The police are expected to complete their investigation and take appropriate legal steps based on the evidence gathered.

Edenokun remains an accused person at this stage, and any determination of criminal responsibility will ultimately be made through due process and, where applicable, by a court of law.

57-Year-Old Man Arrested Over Sexual Abuse of Stepdaughter in Edo

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

US-Based Nigerian Lawyers Disbarred: Full List of Fraud, Theft and Misconduct Cases

Published

on

US-Based Nigerian Lawyers Disbarred: Full List of Fraud, Theft and Misconduct Cases

US-Based Nigerian Lawyers Disbarred: Full List of Fraud, Theft and Misconduct Cases

Several Nigerian lawyers who practised in the United States have been disbarredsuspended or otherwise sanctioned following disciplinary proceedings over professional misconduct, including fraudtheftmisappropriation of client funds and unauthorised legal practice, according to court documents and disciplinary records reviewed by journalists.

The sanctions were imposed by various state and federal legal authorities, including the Supreme Court of the State of New York, the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Florida Supreme Court, the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Executive Office for Immigration Review.

The cases reveal a pattern of vulnerable clients — particularly immigrants desperate to regularise their status in the US — being targeted by lawyers who exploited their fear and lack of legal knowledge.

Among those permanently struck off the roll of attorneys, Owolabi M. Salis was disbarred by the Supreme Court of the State of New York in 2022 after a litany of complaints from immigrant clients who accused him of stealing tens of thousands of dollars. The court found that Salis had filed 1,185 fraudulent and frivolous immigration petitions over eight years, with only one approved. He also attempted to conceal his identity from immigration authorities. Salis failed to appear at his disciplinary hearing and did not notify the grievance committee, according to the disbarment records. His name was struck from the roll of attorneys. Despite being disbarred, Salis allegedly continued to practise law, meeting clients in the evenings. Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez filed seven criminal charges against him in August 2023, including third- and fourth-degree grand larcenysecond-degree criminal contemptfirst-degree scheme to defraudimmigrant assistance services fraud and unlawful practice of the law. Salis, who gained international attention in June 2025 as the first Nigerian to travel to space aboard a Blue Origin mission, had his disbarment appeal dismissed by the Board of Immigration Appeals in December 2025.

Neda B. Imasuen, now a Nigerian senator representing Edo South, was permanently disbarred by the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, on 10 May 2010. The Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh and Thirteenth Judicial Districts found that Imasuen had neglected a legal matter entrusted to him by an American client, Daphne Slyfield, after being paid substantial legal fees. Imasuen failed to respond to the petition within the stipulated 20 days and did not seek an extension. The court deemed the charges admitted and ordered that he “desist and refrain from practising law in any form.” He returned to Nigeria the same year and later entered politics. In March 2025, suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan filed a petition with the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee seeking Imasuen’s disbarment in Nigeria, alleging he failed to disclose his US disbarment when contesting for office. Imasuen has denied any criminal wrongdoing. In a June 2025 interview, he claimed the disbarment stemmed from a civil negligence issue — his former Brooklyn landlord improperly discarded confidential client files while he was on vacation in Nigeria. He stated: “It’s a civil issue of negligence, not a criminal case. If you read the ruling, it clearly states there was no stealing or misconduct — just mishandling of files left by my landlord.”

READ ALSO:

Chinyere Alex Ogoke, a Chicago-based lawyer licensed in 2005, was disbarred in 2021 after continuing to practise despite an earlier suspension by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Ogoke falsely claimed he was “not subject to any order suspending or otherwise restricting his practice of law” while filing notices of appearance on behalf of 11 immigration clients. The board ruled that his “continued intentional and knowing disregard” for its suspension order and his repeated false claims were “serious violations that undermine the integrity of the legal system.”

Ignatius Chukwuemeka Udeani, based in Bloomington, Minnesota, was disbarred by the Minnesota Supreme Court in January 2023. He had been indefinitely suspended in 2020. The disciplinary body found he failed to protect his clients’ legal interests — specifically vulnerable immigrants — failed to return unearned legal fees and client funds, and did not properly cooperate with investigations.

Chuck Odifu Egbune, a Colorado-based lawyer, was disbarred in 2025 after engaging in illegal law practice while on suspension. He represented his sister in court without a valid licence, violating Colorado law.

Taiwo A. Agbaje, based in Maryland, was disbarred at both state and federal levels. The Board of Immigration Appeals issued a final order in June 2016 based on his Maryland disbarment. The court found he took $40,000 from a client for a Baltimore real estate investment and described his conduct as “dishonest and deceitful,” involving conflict of interest, fraud and misrepresentation.

Cyril O. Chukwurah, a Texas-based lawyer, was disbarred in 2015 for multiple violations including practising while on active suspension, violating disciplinary judgments in two other cases, and failing to properly deliver clients’ funds.

Wilfred I. Aka, a Los Angeles-based attorney and Certified Public Accountant, was disbarred in 2025 by the US Tax Court and the Board of Immigration Appeals after disciplinary actions in 2019 and 2020. He was found to have failed in his duties to the court, clients and opposing counsel.

Uchechi Okechukwu Nwakanma (also known as Prince Nwakanma), based in Houston, was disbarred in 2017 by the Board of Immigration Appeals after an initial suspension in 2015 for failing to pay fees and meet continuing education requirements.

Emeka M. Uyamadu, a Houston-based lawyer, was permanently disbarred in 2010 following felony convictions in Harris County, Texas, for stealing between $20,000 and $100,000.

Alexander Osondu Akpodiete, who practised in Florida, was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court in 2010 following disciplinary proceedings between 2005 and 2008. His offences included contempt of court, failing to keep a client informed, and unauthorised withdrawal of $1,000 from a client’s credit card.

READ ALSO:

John Udo, admitted to the Massachusetts Bar in 1995, was disbarred in 2010 following a ten-count disciplinary petition accusing him of misusing and stealing client funds, neglecting immigration cases involving vulnerable clients and abandoning his professional responsibilities. The Massachusetts Clients’ Security Board later compensated 14 former clients.

In cases of temporary suspension, Aloysius O. Ejimakor was suspended from practising law in New York for nine months in 2004 after making false claims about his official qualifications. The Executive Office for Immigration Review instituted disciplinary proceedings in July 2003 after Ejimakor filed numerous notices of appearance in which he misrepresented his status as a member in good standing of the New York bar. Ejimakor failed to file a timely response to the allegations despite being granted an extension. The Department of Justice treated his silence as an admission of the charges. He has not been reinstated.

Abiola O. Adesioye, based in the District of Columbia, was suspended in July 2025 by the Board of Immigration Appeals from practising before the board, immigration courts and the Department of Homeland Security. This followed a suspension order from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals on 25 March 2025.

Michael Ozulumba, based in Massachusetts, was suspended for two years from practising before the Internal Revenue Service and the Executive Office for Immigration Review after being found guilty of professional misconductneglecting client cases and making misrepresentations.

Michael Imevbore Ojo, based in Houston, Texas, was suspended for 12 months by the State Bar of Texas for violations including neglectfailure to communicate and failure to cooperate with a state bar investigation. The Board of Immigration Appeals immediately suspended him in December 2005.

Anslem A. Efe, a Colorado-based legal practitioner, was indefinitely suspended in 2013 for unauthorised practice. Investigations found he engaged in employment as an attorney before the Executive Office for Immigration Review without authorisation and without lawful status in the United States.

Jude Chukwuma Ezeala, based in Maryland, was indefinitely suspended by the Court of Appeals of Maryland in 2017 for professional misconduct, including violations related to competence, diligence, communication, fees and safekeeping of client property.

READ ALSO:

Olayemi Isaac Falusi, based in Maryland, was indefinitely suspended in 2018 for unauthorised practice of law. He took on three clients and practised law in Maryland before he was officially admitted to the state bar.

Anthony Emeka Nze Nwosu, based in Sacramento, California, was suspended by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division in October 2023 for failure to comply with attorney registration obligations and complaints from seven clients. The board subsequently imposed an indefinite suspension from practising before US immigration courts in January 2024.

Osamwonyi E. Osagiede, based in New Hampshire, was indefinitely suspended in 2009 by the Supreme Judicial Court for Suffolk County, Massachusetts, after being found involved in unauthorised practice. He had filed dozens of official representation forms with immigration courts.

Martin E. Nwizubo, a Washington-based legal practitioner, was placed on “disability inactive” status by the Washington State Bar Association in 2016. This status applies to lawyers suffering physical or mental health challenges that incapacitate their ability to practise. The board affirmed his suspension in 2017. This is not a disciplinary sanction for misconduct.

In one notable case of posthumous discipline, Emelike Nwosuocha, a Miami-based lawyer, died on 21 July 2024 at age 64 — yet disciplinary proceedings against him continued for 508 days after his death. The case began with a medical negligence lawsuit. After Nwosuocha’s client’s case was dismissed with prejudice, the court ordered him to pay $5,310** in attorney fees to the opposing counsel. When he failed to pay, the defendant filed a grievance. Nwosuocha was suspended for **six months** in 2023 for failing to answer the grievance. In June 2024, he received a **one-year suspension** for non-compliance. A second suspension required him to file a notice affidavit by **17 July 2024**. He died four days later. On 11 December 2025, the Florida Supreme Court suspended Nwosuocha for **three years** and fined him **$1,250 — unaware he had died. The Florida Bar filed a notice of death on 16 January 2026, and the court subsequently vacated the suspension and dismissed the case.

The cases share a troubling common thread: vulnerable immigrant clients were targeted by lawyers who exploited their desperation to remain in the United States. In the Salis case, Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez noted: “Vulnerable immigrants sought his legal assistance. Instead of helping them, he allegedly defrauded his clients out of tens of thousands of dollars.” In the Imasuen case, the client paid substantial legal fees but was allegedly abandoned without representation. In the Udeani case, the Minnesota Supreme Court specifically cited his failure to protect “vulnerable immigrants.” The sanctions demonstrate that US disciplinary authorities are actively pursuing misconduct by lawyers — regardless of nationality — who betray their professional obligations. However, the cases also highlight the vulnerability of immigrant communities to exploitation by unscrupulous legal practitioners.

Several key takeaways emerge from these cases. Disbarment is the most severe sanction, permanently revoking a lawyer’s licence to practise. Cases include Owolabi SalisNeda ImasuenChinyere OgokeIgnatius UdeaniTaiwo AgbajeCyril Chukwurah and others. Suspension temporarily bars a lawyer from practice, ranging from nine months (Ejimakor) to indefinite (Efe, Ezeala, Osagiede). Common violations include client fund misappropriationfraudneglect of casesfailure to communicateunauthorised practice and false statements about qualificationsVulnerable immigrants were disproportionately targeted by sanctioned lawyers, particularly in immigration matters. Posthumous discipline occurred in the Nwosuocha case, where proceedings continued for 508 days after death before being vacated.

US-Based Nigerian Lawyers Disbarred: Full List of Fraud, Theft and Misconduct Cases

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending