Media groups tackle Presidency, N'Assembly over press council act amendment - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Media groups tackle Presidency, N’Assembly over press council act amendment

Published

on

Media groups under the Nigerian Press Organisation (NPO) have kicked against the proposed amendment of the Nigerian Press Council Act over the inclusion of some clauses they described as unconstitutional.
The bill was considered at a public hearing organised by the House of Representatives Committee on Information, national orientation, ethics and values on Thursday.
Some media rights groups and other critical stakeholders in the media industry have also vowed to resist any move to infringe on press freedom through the proposed amendment of the NPC Act.
The NPO, an umbrella body of the Newspapers Proprietors Association of Nigeria (NPAN), Nigerian Guild of Editors (NGE) and Nigerian Union of Journalists (NUJ), argued that such clauses were a threat to press freedom.
A member of the NPO delegation, Azu Ishiekwene, said almost a half of the 39 clauses in the bill contained unconstitutional regulations that could stifle journalism practice.
He said the NPO had challenged the clauses up to the Supreme Court, and that continuing with the amendment would amount to preempting the court on the matter.
“It is a matter that has been pending in court since 1999 but the first decisive ruling in the matter came in 2010 when the high court ruled that 17 out of the 39 clauses in the bill were unconstitutional,” he said.
“The Federal Government appealed and got a ruling in December 2010. That ruling was again appealed by the NPO and it is pending at the Supreme Court.
“If you make a law now that binds the hands of the legislation or tilts the legislation one way or the order you are preempting the outcome of what the court is going to do.”
the International Press Centre (IPC) alongside Media Rights Agenda (MRA), Centre for Media Law and Advocacy (CMLA) and the Premium Times Centre For Investigation Journalism (PTCIJ) have also kicked against moves to infringe on press freedom and media independence in Nigeria.
Executive Director at the IPC, Lanre Arogundade, contributing, said, “The provision of 3 (d) constitutes a potential threat to press freedom and media survival as it does not provide for judicial intervention before highly punitive measures are handed down by the council and indeed could be used as a political weapon against the media.
“The section provides for penalties and fines against violation of the press code by print media houses and media practitioners, including revocation of licence.
“Section 17 (3) (a) & (b) provides that a journalist could be held liable for the offence committed by his or her organisation and can be made to pay a fine of N250,000.”
Arogundade added that another “punitive” clause is in section 21 (5) (a) whose amendment is such that “a journalist can be punished by the council even after he/she might have been found guilty by a court of law and without the council going back to the court to report continued infringement.
“Section 33 (3) and (4) does not give room for retraction or apology where a fake news is mistakenly published but recommends a blanket sanction of up to N10m or closure for a period of one year.”
A former Rep member and former Chairman of the Nigerian Union of Journalists, Sani Zorro, expressed concern over the NPC bill amendment, which he noted, was coming at a time when the government had taken some decision in regulating social media.
Zorro said the best way to go was for the NPC and critical stakeholders in the media industry to dialogue and chart way forward in the best interest of all.
He advocated that the NPC Board should be made up of professionals rather than being a “political board” which will not augur well for the interest of the media industry.
The Radio, Television and Theatre Arts Workers Union of Nigeria (RATTAWU), said Section 3 of the bill which wanted to empower the NPC to “approve penalties and fines against violation of the Press Codes by print media houses and media practitioners, including revocation of license,” should be expunged, arguing that print media houses were business ventures registered by the CAC and not NPC.
The union said any move to censor them would amount to a nullity.
National President of RATTAWU, Comrade Kabiru Garba, also pointed out that Section 9(1) of the bill which said, “the council shall establish a national press and ethical code of conduct for media houses and media practitioners, which shall come to effect and be disseminated after approval by the minister”, should be discarded.
He said the codes should rather come from the board of the council comprising all the stakeholders.
But Executive-secretary of the NPC, Francis Nwosu, commended the amendment of the bill and recommended that the council should also be empowered to regulate online media.

Loading

News

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Published

on

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’
Peter Obi

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

The 2027 presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has declared that he would release Nnamdi Kanu and engage separatist agitators in dialogue if elected president of Nigeria. Speaking during an interaction with Nigerians in Washington, the former Anambra State governor argued that Kanu should not be detained over comments he allegedly made on Radio Biafra, insisting that criticism of political leaders should not be criminalised.

“There’s no reason for keeping Nnamdi Kanu. I will free Nnamdi Kanu as President. He has done nothing wrong; the government has no reason to arrest him because he was speaking and calling people names on radio,” Obi said. The former Labour Party presidential candidate maintained that public officials are often subjected to criticism and insults, which, according to him, should not constitute an offence. “Anybody can tell you anything. I’m a politician and people call me all sorts of names and I don’t think calling me names is an offence,” he added. Obi also pledged to adopt dialogue as a strategy for addressing separatist agitations and other grievances across the country. “If I am in government today, I will discuss with all agitators because I believe that they have a reason for whatever they want to do and it’s only by engaging them that we would learn,” he said.

Obi reiterated his commitment to pursuing a political solution to the case involving the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, stating that dialogue remains the most effective path to resolving longstanding grievances and tensions. According to him, governments achieve more lasting results when they address the root causes of agitations through dialogue, justice, and inclusive governance rather than relying solely on coercive measures. The former governor maintained that national unity is better strengthened through reconciliation and mutual understanding, stressing that democratic societies should create avenues for citizens to express grievances while preserving law, order, and national stability.

READ ALSO:

This is not the first time Obi has spoken on the IPOB leader’s detention. In November 2025, following Kanu’s conviction and life imprisonment sentencing by a Federal High Court in Abuja, Obi described the development as a “failure of leadership” that risked aggravating national tension. At the time, Obi posted on his verified X handle: “I have always maintained that Mazi Kanu should never have been arrested. For years, I have consistently argued that dialogue, constructive engagement, and inclusive governance offer the path to lasting peace. Coercion becomes necessary only when reason has been exhausted.” He further argued that the government’s approach had only deepened mistrust, stating: “The handling of Kanu’s case mirrors the government as a man trapped in a hole but who, instead of looking for a way out, keeps digging deeper.” In July 2025, Obi had told Channels Television’s Sunday Politics that the continuous detention of Nnamdi Kanu “does not make sense” . Asked whether he would advocate for a political solution, Obi responded: “For every one of them, I mean, why is he still being held? It does not make sense to me.”

Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of IPOB, has remained in the custody of the Department of State Services since his controversial rendition from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021. In November 2025, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja convicted him on seven terrorism-related charges and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Kanu has since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal challenging both his conviction and sentence. According to his legal consultant, Alloy Ejimakor, the appeal process is already “live,” with multiple stages involved. Kanu has provided 22 grounds for his appeal, and the Court of Appeal has not yet fixed a date for hearing the matter. In a significant development, IPOB claimed in June 2026 that the Federal Government’s cross-appeal against Kanu’s sentencing amounts to an admission that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose life sentences. IPOB spokesperson Emma Powerful stated that the government’s filing declared that “the trial court acted without jurisdiction when it imposed life imprisonment on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6.” IPOB argued that if the court lacked jurisdiction at the sentencing phase, “the entire sentencing exercise is a nullity ab initio.”

READ ALSO:

International pressure continues to mount on the Nigerian government over Kanu’s conviction. A group of international legal experts under the banner of Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates, based in London, has issued a legal notice warning Nigeria that it would commence legal action in a UK Court if the government does not immediately and unconditionally release Kanu. The group bases its demand on Opinion No. 25/2022 issued on July 20, 2022, by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which found that Kanu’s arrest and extraordinary rendition were unlawful and ruled that his continued detention is arbitrary. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing serious terrorism and security-related charges and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course.

Meanwhile, the apex Igbo socio-cultural organization, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has called on President Bola Tinubu to grant amnesty to Nnamdi Kanu on or before June 12, 2026, as part of efforts to promote national reconciliation and strengthen unity across the country. The group emphasized that Kanu’s release, preferably timed to coincide with Nigeria’s Democracy Day, would signal a bold commitment to justice, inclusion, and healing decades-old grievances in the Southeast. Ohanaeze also dismissed fears that Kanu’s release could destabilize the country, arguing that such a move would demonstrate leadership anchored on reconciliation.

Obi’s latest comments come amid his political realignment ahead of the 2027 presidential election. After the collapse of an earlier opposition coalition, Obi secured the presidential ticket of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) at a special convention in Abuja in May 2026. He was unanimously endorsed by delegates following a motion moved by Senator Victor Umeh and seconded by former Deputy Senate President Ovie Omo-Agege. Shortly after accepting the nomination, Obi announced former Kano State Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso as his running mate. In his acceptance speech, Obi pledged a technology-driven and intelligence-led security framework, promising to address both immediate threats and root causes such as poverty and unemployment. He recently dismissed claims that he was avoiding former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, stating: “There are very few human beings who are as close as I am to Atiku. So I can’t be running from him.”

As the 2027 election approaches, Obi’s campaign continues to gain momentum, particularly among young Nigerians and diaspora communities. His message of inclusive governance, dialogue over coercion, and political solutions to national crises resonates with voters frustrated by the status quo. His pledge to release Nnamdi Kanu and engage all agitators in dialogue represents a sharp departure from the current administration’s security approach. Whether this stance will translate into electoral success remains to be seen, but it has undoubtedly positioned Obi as a candidate willing to take bold, unconventional positions on Nigeria’s most contentious issues. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing serious terrorism and security-related charges and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course. However, with international pressure mounting, an active appeal process, and major political figures like Obi calling for Kanu’s release, the case continues to be a defining issue in Nigeria’s political landscape.

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Published

on

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodimma, has approved a N300 million financial intervention for Imo indigenes studying at the Nigerian Law School and citizens of the state recently returned from South Africa.

The intervention is designed to provide relief to beneficiaries facing economic hardship, rising living costs, and reintegration challenges.

According to the Imo State Commissioner for Information, Public Orientation and Strategy, Hon. Declan Emelumba, the package will benefit two categories of people: law students and South African returnees.

Under the arrangement, 250 Imo indigenes who returned from South Africa will receive N1 million each as a reintegration fund to help them resettle and rebuild their lives after being forced to return to Nigeria.

In addition, 100 Imo students at the Nigerian Law School will receive N500,000 each to help cushion the impact of inflation and rising cost of living while pursuing their legal education.

READ ALSO:

Emelumba explained that the governor was moved to approve the intervention following appeals from the law students and concerns over the difficult circumstances facing the returnees.

“The law students made a passionate appeal to His Excellency to support them to cushion the global inflation as regards cost of living. As a caring father, he responded promptly,” he said.

He added that the support for the returnees was driven by empathy, noting that many of them went through difficult experiences that forced them to return to Nigeria.

“The governor felt that the traumatised returnees needed a helping hand from government. Hence, he approved what can be described as a re-integration fund to enable them settle down with minimal discomfort,” Emelumba stated.

The commissioner further noted that the initiative aligns with the administration’s Shared Prosperity Agenda, which focuses not only on infrastructure development but also on human capital development and social welfare.

He also recalled that this is not the first time the state government has supported law students, stating that many of them are already beneficiaries of government scholarship programmes and periodic financial assistance.

The latest intervention has been described as part of ongoing efforts by the Uzodimma administration to ease economic pressure on students and vulnerable citizens, especially in the face of national inflation and unemployment challenges.

Stakeholders say the initiative could help provide temporary relief to beneficiaries as they continue their education or reintegrate into society after returning from abroad.

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri Warns

Published

on

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri Warns 
Ambassador-designate to Mexico, Reno Omokri

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri Warns 

Former presidential aide and author, Reno Omokri, has argued that excessive publicity and global attention on terrorist activities often benefit perpetrators rather than pressure them into releasing victims.

In a detailed statement, Omokri maintained that terrorists thrive on attention and deliberately use media coverage to spread fear, attract influence, and strengthen their operations. He referenced former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s famous remark that “publicity is the oxygen of terrorism,” arguing that this principle remains relevant in modern counterterrorism strategy.

Omokri said public reactions to high-profile abductions, including global campaigns and celebrity involvement, can unintentionally increase the value of hostages in the eyes of kidnappers, making their release less likely.

He cited the case of the #BringBackOurGirls campaign following the 2014 Chibok schoolgirls’ abduction, claiming that international attention elevated the profile of Boko Haram and complicated rescue efforts. According to him, what began as a humanitarian movement eventually made the girls “high-value hostages” in the hands of their captors.

READ ALSO:

The former presidential spokesman also said he personally engaged in international advocacy efforts to secure the release of abducted Leah Sharibu, including meetings with world leaders and funding personal initiatives. However, he claimed security experts later advised that excessive publicity around her case may have inadvertently increased her value to terrorists.

Omokri further referenced guidance allegedly contained in journalism and security manuals on terrorism coverage, arguing that responsible reporting should avoid amplifying fear or giving undue attention to terrorist acts.

He insisted that government security agencies continue to work behind the scenes to secure the release of abducted victims, while urging Nigerians to avoid emotionally driven reactions that may, in his view, complicate rescue operations.

According to him, terrorists are strategic actors who benefit from attention, and reducing publicity around their actions may weaken their psychological impact and operational incentives.

Omokri concluded that counterterrorism efforts require a more rational and less emotional public response, warning that sustained global amplification of kidnapping incidents may unintentionally serve the interests of criminal groups rather than victims.

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri Warns

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending