International
Netanyahu Clarifies Jesus Remarks, Denies Offending Christians Amid Backlash
Netanyahu Clarifies Jesus Remarks, Denies Offending Christians Amid Backlash
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reiterated that his recent comments referencing Jesus Christ were not intended to offend Christians, following widespread criticism sparked by his remarks during a press briefing on the ongoing Middle East conflict involving Iran.
The controversy arose after Netanyahu, while addressing foreign media, cited a historical comparison attributed to American historian Will Durant, suggesting that moral superiority alone may not guarantee survival in a world shaped by power and conflict. His comments, which included a reference comparing Jesus Christ to Genghis Khan, triggered backlash from Christian communities and social media users who viewed the statement as insensitive.
In a follow-up clarification posted on X (formerly Twitter), Netanyahu dismissed the criticism as misinterpretation and “fake news,” insisting that he did not denigrate Jesus Christ in his remarks.
“More fake news about my attitude towards Christians, who are protected and flourish in Israel. Let me be clear: I did not denigrate Jesus Christ at my news conference,” he stated.
READ ALSO:
- Delta Govt Condemns Ozoro Festival Assaults, Orders Police Investigation
- Trump Slams NATO Allies as ‘Cowards, Paper Tigers’ Over Iran War
- Netanyahu Says Israel, US ‘Winning’ Iran War, Claims Tehran ‘Decimated’
Netanyahu explained that his comments were drawn from the writings of Will Durant, whom he described as an admirer of Jesus Christ. According to him, Durant’s historical analysis emphasised that morality alone is insufficient to ensure the survival of a society if it lacks the ability to defend itself.
“A morally superior civilization may still fall to a ruthless enemy if it does not have the power to defend itself. No offense was meant,” he added.
The initial remarks, made during a televised press conference, framed the argument that historical outcomes often favour strength and power over purely moral considerations. That framing, however, was widely interpreted as implying a comparison between religious teachings associated with Jesus and figures known for military conquest.
The reaction from Christian audiences was swift, with many expressing concern that the comparison diminished the religious and spiritual significance of Jesus Christ, who is regarded in Christianity as the “Prince of Peace” and central to the faith’s teachings.
Religious leaders and commentators also weighed in, urging greater sensitivity when discussing figures of deep religious importance, particularly in politically charged contexts. Among them, Munther Isaac, a Palestinian Lutheran pastor based in Bethlehem—traditionally regarded as the birthplace of Jesus—criticised the remarks as inappropriate and offensive, arguing that they could be seen as undermining Christian ethical teachings.
The debate has also highlighted broader tensions surrounding the interpretation of historical and religious references in political discourse, especially when delivered by global leaders addressing international audiences. Analysts note that such remarks can easily be taken out of context or amplified across social media, intensifying public reaction.
Despite the controversy, Netanyahu has maintained that Israel continues to uphold religious freedom and that Christian communities are protected within the country. His office has not indicated any plans to retract the statement further, maintaining that the remarks were part of a broader discussion on security, history, and geopolitical realities rather than a commentary on religious beliefs.
The episode underscores how remarks by political leaders can quickly generate global attention, particularly when they involve sensitive religious comparisons, and how clarifications are often required to manage diplomatic and public perception fallout.
Netanyahu Clarifies Jesus Remarks, Denies Offending Christians Amid Backlash
![]()
International
Iran Threatens US Forces Over Trump’s Strait of Hormuz Escort Plan
Iran Threatens US Forces Over Trump’s Strait of Hormuz Escort Plan
Tensions between Iran and the United States have escalated sharply after Iran’s military warned that US forces would be attacked if they entered the Strait of Hormuz, following President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new maritime operation aimed at escorting commercial vessels through the strategic waterway.
The warning came after Trump unveiled what he called “Project Freedom”, a US-led maritime initiative designed to guide and protect ships passing through the Gulf amid growing regional instability and disruptions to global shipping routes. Trump said the operation would assist vessels from countries not involved in the conflict, describing it as a humanitarian effort to help stranded crews and restore safe navigation in one of the world’s most critical oil transit corridors. “For the good of Iran, the Middle East, and the United States, we have told these countries that we will guide their ships safely out of these restricted waterways,” Trump said, adding that operations would begin immediately.
US media reports indicate that the operation does not involve US warships directly entering the strait but positions naval assets nearby to provide escort, surveillance, and deterrence support for commercial vessels. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) is reportedly deploying guided-missile destroyers, aircraft, unmanned systems, and around 15,000 personnel as part of the wider maritime security mission, while maintaining a significant presence in surrounding waters. As of late April, maritime intelligence sources estimated that more than 900 commercial vessels were trapped or operating in the Gulf region due to heightened tensions and security risks.
READ ALSO:
- Three Arrested Over Fake Divorce Story About Tony Elumelu – UBA
- Doctor Urges Portable to Take Brain Scan After Celebrity Boxing Fight With Carter Efe
- JUST IN: PDP Crisis Deepens as Makinde-Led Faction Appoints Kabiru Turaki as Interim Chairman
In response, Iran’s military leadership warned that any foreign military presence in the Strait of Hormuz would be treated as hostile. Senior Iranian commander Major General Ali Abdollahi said that all shipping through the strait must be coordinated with Iranian forces, stressing that Iran would defend what it considers its strategic maritime territory. “We warn that any foreign armed force—especially the aggressive US military—if they intend to approach or enter the Strait of Hormuz, will be targeted and attacked,” he said in a statement carried by Iranian state media.
Shortly after the warning, Iran’s Fars News Agency reported that a US naval vessel in the area had been targeted and forced to retreat after a missile strike. However, the claim was not independently verified. The US military strongly denied the report. CENTCOM stated that no US Navy ships had been struck, adding that American forces were supporting maritime operations to ensure safe passage for commercial shipping.
Tensions were further heightened after reports from the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) of an attack on a commercial tanker near the UAE involving unidentified projectiles. Iranian state media later claimed drones had been launched toward vessels linked to regional energy operations. These incidents have fueled fears of a broader escalation in the Gulf, where both sides continue to accuse each other of destabilising maritime security.
The confrontation comes after weeks of stalled negotiations between Tehran and Washington following a ceasefire tied to earlier US-Israeli hostilities involving Iran. Diplomatic progress has remained limited, with both sides maintaining firm positions over control and access to the Strait of Hormuz. Iran continues to insist that safe passage must be coordinated with its military, while the United States maintains that freedom of navigation for international shipping must be protected.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the country’s priority remains ending the conflict, but accused Washington of delaying progress by making excessive demands. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have reportedly presented a multi-point proposal aimed at de-escalation, though US authorities have not publicly confirmed receiving or accepting the plan.
The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoints, and any disruption significantly affects global energy markets. Oil prices have already risen by about 50% above pre-conflict levels, putting pressure on economies worldwide. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington’s strategy includes both military positioning and economic pressure, describing it as part of a broader effort to restrict Iran’s financial capacity.
As tensions persist, analysts warn that any direct military clash in the strait could have severe consequences for global oil supply, maritime trade, and regional stability, given the strategic importance of the waterway.
Iran Threatens US Forces Over Trump’s Strait of Hormuz Escort Plan
![]()
International
US Lifts Visa Ban for Foreign Doctors, Boosts Opportunities for Nigerian Physicians
US Lifts Visa Ban for Foreign Doctors, Boosts Opportunities for Nigerian Physicians
Nigerian doctors are set for renewed global career prospects following a policy shift by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which now allows foreign physicians to resume visa applications, renewals, and processing after months of disruption.
The earlier restriction, introduced in 2026 and backed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), affected several countries including Nigeria. It halted visa renewals and slowed immigration processing for thousands of foreign professionals, particularly doctors relying on US work and training programmes.
The decision had a major impact on international medical graduates, with Nigerian doctors among the hardest hit. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), international medical graduates make up 25.6% of the US physician workforce, underlining their critical role in the healthcare system. Further global workforce data shows that Nigerians rank among the top foreign doctors under the J-1 visa programme, which is widely used for medical residency and specialist training in the United States. Many of these doctors serve in rural and underserved communities, where healthcare shortages are most severe.
READ ALSO:
- First Ogun Pilgrims Arrive Saudi Arabia as Gateway Airport Begins Hajj Operations
- NRC worries over stone attacks on Abuja-Kaduna trains
- Jetour X70 Plus storms Nigerian market with luxury features, advanced tech
In a recent update, USCIS confirmed that physicians are no longer subject to the visa processing hold, effectively lifting restrictions that had stalled applications. Although the change was not formally announced at first, DHS later clarified that visa applications linked to medical doctors would continue to be processed without interruption. This means affected doctors can now resume US visa applications and renewals, continue participation in medical residency and fellowship programmes, and maintain employment in US hospitals and healthcare institutions.
The reversal follows mounting pressure from major US medical bodies, including the American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Neurology, and American Academy of Pediatrics. In April, the groups warned that restrictions were blocking “qualified, vetted physicians” from entering or remaining in the country and urged the government to prioritise healthcare workforce needs through faster visa processing and exemptions.
The United States is currently grappling with a growing shortage of doctors. The AAMC estimates a deficit of about 65,000 physicians, with projections indicating the gap will widen due to population growth, ageing demographics, and physician retirements. Foreign-trained doctors, including Nigerians, are seen as essential to addressing this shortage, particularly in primary care and underserved regions.
The latest development presents significant opportunities for Nigerian doctors seeking international medical careers, higher earnings, and advanced training. It restores access to critical pathways such as residency placements and specialist programmes in the US. However, analysts warn that the move could worsen Nigeria’s brain drain in the healthcare sector, as more skilled professionals may leave in search of better working conditions abroad.
The policy shift ultimately highlights the balance between immigration control and economic necessity. While the initial visa restrictions were tied to security concerns, the latest adjustment reflects the urgent demand for skilled professionals in critical sectors like healthcare. For now, the decision provides relief for foreign doctors while helping the US healthcare system maintain essential staffing levels.
US Lifts Visa Ban for Foreign Doctors, Boosts Opportunities for Nigerian Physicians
![]()
International
Trump Rejects Iran’s Strait Proposal, Opts for Diplomatic Path
Trump Rejects Iran’s Strait Proposal, Opts for Diplomatic Path
The United States has signalled cautious openness to diplomacy despite rejecting a fresh proposal from Iran aimed at easing tensions in the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a vital global oil transit route.
Iran’s offer, according to emerging details, centres on reopening the strait and de-escalating the ongoing maritime standoff. In return, Tehran is seeking the removal of U.S. naval restrictions, assurances against future military strikes, and a delay in addressing its nuclear programme within broader negotiations.
However, U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed dissatisfaction with the proposal, insisting that any agreement must directly address concerns over Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The U.S. administration maintains that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains a non-negotiable priority.
READ ALSO:
- Kano Politics: Kwankwasiyya Figure Dumps ADC in Surprise Move
- ADC Crisis Deepens as Obi, Kwankwaso Linked to Possible Defection
- Tinubu Declares Poverty, Insecurity National Emergencies
Despite rejecting the terms as insufficient, Trump indicated a preference for a non-military resolution, underscoring the human and economic costs of armed conflict. His stance reflects a delicate balance between maintaining pressure on Tehran and avoiding further escalation in an already volatile region.
The Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes, has been at the centre of rising geopolitical tensions in recent weeks. Disruptions in the corridor have triggered fluctuations in global energy markets and heightened international concern.
Although a ceasefire has largely reduced active hostilities, the situation remains fragile. U.S. naval measures are still in place, and both sides appear divided on key issues, particularly the sequencing of security guarantees and nuclear negotiations.
Diplomatic observers note that while Iran’s proposal may serve as a starting point for dialogue, substantial gaps remain. The coming days are expected to test whether backchannel negotiations can bridge these differences or whether tensions will persist.
Trump Rejects Iran’s Strait Proposal, Opts for Diplomatic Path
![]()
-
Sports3 days agoCarter Efe Defeats Portable in Celebrity Boxing Showdown
-
Politics2 days agoBREAKING: Peter Obi Resigns from ADC, Gives Reasons
-
Politics2 days agoNo Final Decision Yet — Kwankwaso Speaks On ADC Exit Rumours
-
metro3 days agoOsogbo United Youth Forum Calls for Peace, Facts in Boundary Dispute, Rejects Divisive Claims
-
News3 days agoRejoinder: Criticism Is Not Campaigning — The Real Gap Is the Opposition
-
Health18 hours ago5 Early Signs of Stomach Cancer You Should Not Ignore
-
metro1 day agoTragedy in Minna as Choir Member Dies During Church Service
-
Entertainment1 day agoFunke Akindele Explains Why She Stopped Attending Church
