Nicki Minaj cancels Amsterdam concert following arrest – Newstrends
Connect with us

Entertainment

Nicki Minaj cancels Amsterdam concert following arrest

Published

on

Nicki Minaj

Nicki Minaj cancels Amsterdam concert following arrest

Following her arrest on suspicion of possessing soft drugs, US rapper Nicki Minaj has cancelled her second concert in Amsterdam scheduled for this weekend. The arrest occurred at Schiphol airport as Minaj was about to depart for Manchester on her Pink Friday 2 World Tour. She was detained for several hours before being released after paying a fine.

Concert promoters MOJO announced the cancellation of the Amsterdam show, scheduled for June 2nd at Ziggo Dome, citing the events of last week. Ticket refunds will be provided at the point of sale, according to the promoters.

Minaj took to social media platform X to explain that authorities found weed in her luggage, which she claimed belonged to her security guard. She expressed frustration that her bags were searched without consent.

READ ALSO:

While she missed a performance in Manchester due to the delay, Minaj assured fans she would return for a second concert on May 30th.

Minaj hinted on social media that the arrest in Amsterdam was part of a plot to sabotage her tour. Cannabis is commonly misconceived to be legal in the Netherlands, where it is technically illegal but tolerated in small quantities as part of a longstanding policy. However, transporting drugs to another country remains illegal.

Nicki Minaj, known for her flamboyant costumes and chart-topping hits like “Starships” and “Anaconda,” is widely regarded as one of the most influential female artists in rap.

Nicki Minaj cancels Amsterdam concert following arrest

Entertainment

Olu Jacobs alive, wife debunks death rumour

Published

on

Olu Jacobs and wife, Joke Silva

Olu Jacobs alive, wife debunks death rumour

Wife of veteran actor Olu Jacobs, Joke Silva has debunked the rumours making the rounds about her husband’s death.

Media reports have said Jacobs who is 81 died today.

It is the third time reports of his death would fill the media only for it to be denied.

A once virile and agile actor has lost weight over the time over undisclosed illnesses.

READ ALSO:

But he is also believed to be suffering from dementia.

Amidst the growing rumours, the wife said in a statement on her Instagram story that her husband was alive and doing well.

She wrote, “Good day everyone, trust all is going well. The Jacobs Clan would love to inform you that Papa J (Olu Jacobs MFR), is alive and well; enjoying himself as always in the comfort of his home and loved ones.”

Also debunking the death rumours, Betty Irabor, a Nigerian writer wrote: “Olu Jacob is well and alive..pls ignore all rumors of his passing.”

Olu Jacobs alive, wife debunks death rumour

Continue Reading

Entertainment

NFVCB warns filmmakers against promoting same-sex, pornography

Published

on

NFVCB warns filmmakers against promoting same-sex, pornography

The National Film and Video Censors Board (NFVCB) has issued a warning to filmmakers to desist from promoting and producing films that promote same-sex relationships and pornography that contravenes the Same-Sex Marriage prohibition Act and the NFVCB Act.

The Board’s warning is coming on the heels of reported cases of clandestine activities by some filmmakers and content creators, who have been flouting the law with impunity by the production, promotion, distribution and streaming of prohibited and unapproved contents especially same- sex content on social media and other on-line platforms.

In a statement made available to NollyNow, the Board regrets that in spite of its recent sustained engagements with filmmakers and the leadership of guilds and associations in the motion picture industry for a safer and healthy screen, there are still filmmakers who indulge in producing obscene and unlawful contents.

READ ALSO:

The Board said it was working with relevant security agencies to track the filmmakers and production companies involved and would stop at nothing to ensure that those already identified face the full wrath of the law.

Although the Board assured that it would continue to engage filmmakers and content creators on the need for a safer and healthier screen, it reminded stakeholders including conventional and digital platform owners that it was illegal to distribute any film or video content, including skits and musical videos, on any platform without classification from the National Film and Video Censors Board.

NFVCB warns filmmakers against promoting same-sex, pornography

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Appeal Court upholds Nollywood actor Baba Ijesha’s five-year jail term

Published

on

Nollywood actor Olanrewaju James, also known as Baba Ijesha

Appeal Court upholds Nollywood actor Baba Ijesha’s five-year jail term

The Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal on Thursday upheld a previous ruling by a Lagos State High Court, confirming a five-year prison sentence for Nollywood actor Olanrewaju James, also known as Baba Ijesha, for the sexual assault of a minor aged 14.

The Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered by Justice Folashade Ojo, upheld the conviction of Baba Ijesha on two counts, specifically indecent touching and sexual assault of a 14-year-old minor.

Justices Abdullahi Bayero and Paul Bassi concurred with the lead judgment, aligning themselves with Justice Folashade Ojo’s decision.

Justice Folashade Ojo delivered a judgment setting aside Baba Ijesha’s conviction for indecent treatment and sexual assault, citing that the testimony of the prosecution’s witness (PW1), Damilola Adekoya, was hearsay, and therefore, unreliable.

However, Justice Ojo ruled that the testimony of Adekoya was a credible eyewitness account of the events that occurred on April 19, 2021 and that eyewitness testimony is a reliable and effective way to prove the commission of a crime.

Furthermore, the court noted that the appellant had voluntarily confessed to the crime committed on April 19, 2021, and failed to dispute or challenge Adekoya’s statement throughout the entire proceedings.

Justice Ojo observed that the appellant made two confessional statements, one at the Sabo Police Station in Lagos State on April 19, 2021, and another at the State Criminal Investigation Department, Panti on April 28, 2021, both of which were admitted as evidence in court.

READ ALSO:

The court found that in both statements, the appellant confessed to indecently touching and molesting the minor (PW2) while she was alone with him in Adekoya’s (PW1) apartment.

Justice Ojo held, “The law is certain that there is no other evidence other than admission in the commission of an offence.

“From the totality of the evidence of PW2 it can be safely inferred that as at the date of the victim’s testimony, she was at best 15 years old and a child by virtue of Section 261 of the Child’s Rights Law of Lagos State, 2015.

The judge added, “I have carefully looked at the record and unable to agree with the appellant, that he was merely acting a script. The interaction between PW2 and the appellant on the 19th of April, 2021 was not a theatrical performance of make-believe but a personal encounter between the two of them.

“Moreover, PW2’s (victim) body language supported by her oral testimony and documentary evidence clearly shows that she attempted to distance herself from the appellant. The most inference to draw from from appellant’s action in searching the entire house immediately after PW1 left with her visitors and sexually assaulting PW2 is that he intended to commit the offence, and did commit the offence.

“It’s trite that factual findings of the trial court involving the credibility of witnesses are accorded almost respect. Trial courts have the advantage of first-time observation, which allows them to assess witnesses’ demeanour and manner of testifying during the trial.

READ ALSO:

The judge concluded that the evidence presented by the prosecution before the trial court on the offence of indecent treatment of a child, and sexual assault committed by Baba Ijesha on April 19, 2021, is compelling and sufficient to justify the appellant’s conviction.

“In conclusion, I have no hesitation in affirming the appellant’s conviction for the indecent treatment of a child, and sexual assault.

“The appellant indecently touched PW2’s body in a sexual manner, in violation of Section 135 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State 2015. His actions constitute sexual assault against PW2.

“I am of the view that the respondent discharges the burden proving its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant on the allegations of April 19, 2021, and I so hold. I have no reason to interfere with the findings of the trial court on the event of April 19, 2021.

“In all, I hold that this appeal succeed in part and it accordingly allowed in part.”

The court ordered as follows, “The appellant’s conviction and sentence to 5 years imprisonment for the offence of indecently touching of a child contrary to Section 135 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 2 of the charge) is set aside.

“The Appellant conviction of 3 years imprisonment for the offence of sexual assault of a child contrary to section 261 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2011 (count 3 of the charge) is set aside.

“I affirm the conviction and sentence of the appellant to 5 years imprisonment for the offence of indecent treatment of a child contrary to section 135 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State 2015 (count 4 of the charge)

Appeal Court upholds Nollywood actor Baba Ijesha’s five-year jail term

Continue Reading

Trending