News
Reps probe NYSC over advice of ransom payment to kidnappers by corps members
House of Representatives, Tuesday, resolved to investigate the National Youth Service Corps, NYSC over alleged insertion of the advice for Payment of ransom to kidnappers into its pamphlets containing security tips to serving corps members.
It will be recalled that the matter which went viral especially on social media became controversial with the NYSC authorities initially denying the insertion but later backtracked.
The insertion read thus: “When travelling on high risks roads such as Abuja-Kaduna, Abuja-Lokoja-Okene or Aba-Port Harcourt roads, then alert your family members, friends and colleagues, in order to have someone on hand to pay off the ransom that could be demanded.”
Also, in another section of the handout, the NYSC also warned serving corps members against travelling with communication gadgets like laptops and cell phones so as not to be charged according to their worth.
The section reads, “In this period of ICT, do not travel with communication gadgets like laptops, iPad, handsets, and other electronic facilities that you stored personal information such as finances, net worth, investment, and business dealings as kidnappers will charge according to your worth.”
Considering and adopting a motion titled “Need to Investigate the Alleged Insertion of the Advice for Payment of Ransom into the National Youth Service Corps Pamphlets Containing Security Tips”, sponsored by the Minority Leader, Hon. Ndudi Elumelu at Tuesday plenary, the House of Representatives mandated its Committee on Youth Development to investigate the insertion of item 65(e) in the NYSC Security Awareness and Education Handbook to ensure that adequate measures were put in place to provide safety of Corps Members across the country.
Presenting the motion earlier, Elumelu recalled that the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) was created on 22 May 1973 as an avenue for reconciliation, reconstruction and rebuilding of the nation after the civil war.
He noted that the programme was set up, primarily for Nigerian graduates below the age of 30 who intend to work in Nigeria to be at the forefront of national developmental efforts as well as a means to impart values of nationalism, patriotism, loyalty and accountable leadership in Nigerian youths.
“The programme requires that participants be posted to States other than their States of origin where they are expected to mix with people from other ethnic groups, social and family backgrounds and learn the culture of the indigenes they are posted to, to bring about unity in the country regardless of cultural diversity
“The security challenges in the country affect Corps Members as some of them, on their way to respective places of posting, have fallen victim to kidnap-for-ransom, some have lost their lives to insurgents and other mishaps.
“In the last few days, reports have surfaced with picture evidence of an embarrassing provision under section 65(e) of the NYSC security tips pamphlet, advising Corps Members to tell their families to make ransoms available in case they are kidnapped on the road.
“The inclusion of the said section shows a complete collapse in the architectural system of the country’s security forces and a major worry for friends and family as to why their children should be allowed to participate in this compulsory exercise.
“The provision shows a lack of concern for the safety of Corps members as against the provisions of Section 19 of the Public Officers Protection Act which places the welfare and security of Corp members on the Federal Government Disturbed that the insertion of such a clause by the NYSC in its security tips manual portrays the inability of the government to provide security on the highways as well as a surrender by the government to kidnappers and bandits”, he said.
Reacting to the motion, the Speaker, Femi Gbajabiamila reminded Elumelu that the NYSC denied the praise.
“I thought NYSC denied it”, he said.
In response to Gbajabiamila’s question, Elumelu read the lines in the pamphlet.
“I am aware that NYSC denied it but Mr. Speaker, I have before me the pamphlet. This is the pamphlet they are using everywhere”, he said and proceeded to read the lines.”
But Gbajabiamila still expressed fear there could be another version of the booklet especially with the NYSC denying the insertions.
He however asked the Committee to verify the authenticity of the insertions, saying there will be a problem if it was real.
“During the course of your investigation, verify the authenticity. If it is authentic, then, there is a problem”, he said.
The motion was eventually adopted after securing the votes of the majority of the House.
![]()
News
Xenophobic Attacks: FG Advises Nigerians in South Africa to Close Businesses
Xenophobic Attacks: FG Advises Nigerians in South Africa to Close Businesses
The Federal Government of Nigeria has advised Nigerian nationals operating businesses in South Africa to temporarily suspend operations following a fresh wave of xenophobic violence, protests, and targeted attacks on foreign-owned shops across several parts of the country.
The advisory was issued through the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM) after reports confirmed rising tensions, looting, and destruction of properties belonging to foreign nationals in multiple South African cities.
NiDCOM said the directive followed an official security circular from the Consulate General of Nigeria in Johannesburg, which warned of escalating unrest in areas including East London, Cape Town, Durban, Gauteng Province, and parts of KwaZulu-Natal. According to the circular, recent protests in these regions have degenerated into violent confrontations, resulting in injuries and widespread vandalisation of foreign-owned businesses in South Africa. Intelligence reports also indicated that additional protests were planned between April 27 and 29, 2026, raising concerns over possible escalation of violence during the period.
Speaking on the development, NiDCOM spokesperson Abdur-Rahman Balogun said the advisory to shut down businesses is a precautionary step aimed at safeguarding Nigerians amid rising insecurity. He urged Nigerian nationals to remain law-abiding, avoid confrontation, and comply with local laws while the situation is being monitored. Balogun stressed that the directive is temporary and designed strictly to protect lives and property during the period of unrest.
READ ALSO:
- Obasanjo, Atiku, Kwankwaso Lead Opposition Unity Talks in Ibadan Summit
- US, AU Condemn Coordinated Terror Attacks on Military Bases Across Mali
- Adelabu Resigns as Power Minister Despite Tinubu’s Opposition
NiDCOM clarified that there is currently no evacuation plan for Nigerians living in South Africa, noting that such action would only be considered if the situation worsens significantly. The commission added that Nigerian diplomatic missions remain active and are working closely with South African authorities and police to ensure the safety of citizens. Officials also confirmed that diplomatic engagement is ongoing between Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and South African counterparts over the rising tensions.
The President-General of Nigerians in South Africa, Smart Nwobi, expressed concern over what he described as increasing hostility toward migrants, especially during protests linked to unemployment and economic hardship. He urged the Nigerian government to intensify diplomatic intervention and ensure stronger protection for citizens abroad. Community leaders have also advised Nigerians to avoid protest hotspots, remain indoors where necessary, and prioritise personal safety until tensions subside.
South Africa has experienced repeated incidents of xenophobic attacks, often triggered by socio-economic grievances such as unemployment and competition for informal trade. Foreign nationals, including Nigerians, have frequently been targeted in incidents involving shop looting, property destruction, harassment, and physical assaults.
Videos circulating on social media show confrontations between local residents and foreign nationals, with some individuals demanding that migrants leave South Africa. In several cases, people were reportedly questioned over their immigration status, while others were harassed or attacked during chaotic protest scenes. Authorities have yet to issue a comprehensive nationwide response, although increased police deployment has been reported in affected areas.
Nigeria’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, is reportedly engaging South African authorities to address the situation and ensure the protection of Nigerian citizens. The Nigerian Consulate in Johannesburg continues to coordinate with local security agencies to monitor developments and provide updates to affected nationals.
Xenophobic Attacks: FG Advises Nigerians in South Africa to Close Businesses
![]()
News
‘Nigeria’s Breakup Likely Inevitable,’ Ex-US Mayor Tells Congress
‘Nigeria’s Breakup Likely Inevitable,’ Ex-US Mayor Tells Congress
A former United States mayor, Mike Arnold, has told members of the US Congress that the breakup of Nigeria is “likely inevitable and just,” citing what he described as deep-rooted structural, historical, and humanitarian crises confronting the country.
Arnold made the remarks during a presentation titled “Nigeria at the Crossroads: The Case for Action,” where he argued that the country’s challenges are rooted in its colonial formation and long-standing governance issues. He called for a referendum that would allow Nigerians to determine their preferred constitutional future, including the possibility of restructuring or separation.
According to him, Nigeria’s federal system—shaped during British colonial rule—has continued to generate tensions around power distribution, ethnicity, and governance. He maintained that a referendum in Nigeria could offer a peaceful and democratic pathway to resolving these challenges.
READ ALSO:
- Army Dismantles IPOB Camp, Recovers Remains of Slain Soldier Couple in Imo
- Nigerian Union Demands Autopsy After Member Dies in South African Police Custody
- A coup trial without precedent, By Farooq Kperogi
Arnold, who has previously expressed support for the Biafra movement, revisited the history of the Nigerian Civil War, describing the former Eastern Region as one of the fastest-growing economies in Africa before the conflict under the leadership of Michael Okpara.
He also raised allegations about the role of foreign powers during the war, particularly Britain’s support for the Federal Military Government, and the humanitarian consequences of the conflict, including widespread famine and civilian casualties.
On contemporary issues, Arnold expressed concern over insecurity in Nigeria, including religious and communal violence, claiming that conditions have worsened despite international attention. He referenced Nigeria’s designation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act, noting ongoing attacks in parts of the country.
He further criticised the handling of internally displaced persons, raising concerns about gaps in recognition and humanitarian support. According to him, such issues point to broader governance and human rights challenges.
However, analysts stress that Arnold’s views do not reflect official US government policy. Nigeria remains constitutionally a united country, and successive administrations have consistently rejected calls for secession, instead promoting national unity and reforms.
The remarks are expected to spark renewed debate around Nigeria restructuring, Biafra agitation, and the country’s political future, both domestically and internationally.
‘Nigeria’s Breakup Likely Inevitable,’ Ex-US Mayor Tells Congress
![]()
News
Falana Challenges Lagos Govt, Says No Law Backs Sanitation Movement Restriction
Falana Challenges Lagos Govt, Says No Law Backs Sanitation Movement Restriction
Human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) has urged residents of Lagos State to ignore government-imposed movement restrictions during the monthly environmental sanitation exercise, insisting that there is no law backing such limitations.
Falana maintained that Lagosians are legally free to go about their normal activities during the exercise, stressing that any restriction of movement remains voluntary and not enforceable under Nigerian law. His position comes amid renewed enforcement of the sanitation programme scheduled for Saturday, April 25, between 6:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m.
However, the Lagos State Government has doubled down on its stance, insisting the sanitation exercise remains valid and binding. In a statement issued ahead of the exercise, the Commissioner for the Environment and Water Resources, Tokunbo Wahab, dismissed claims that the programme had been nullified by any court ruling.
According to Wahab, the state government had secured a favourable judgment at the Court of Appeal, which affirmed that laws supporting the implementation and enforcement of environmental sanitation are constitutional. He urged residents to disregard what he described as misinformation and to fully comply by staying indoors to clean their surroundings.
READ ALSO:
- Gunmen Kill Traditional Ruler, Family, Two Others in Fresh Benue Attack
- Ex-Super Eagles Striker Dies After Collapsing During Training
- Oyedepo Sparks Debate, Tells Members to Give Kidnappers His Phone Number if Abducted
The sanitation exercise was formally reintroduced by Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu on March 14, when he, alongside Deputy Governor Obafemi Hamzat and other officials, monitored cleanup activities in Agege Motor Road, Mushin. The move marked a return to a policy that had been largely inactive for years.
Despite this, Falana argued that the reintroduction of movement restrictions contradicts constitutional provisions on freedom of movement and revives outdated, military-era practices. He emphasized that, based on information available to him, the government had not legally reinstated compulsory sanitation with enforceable restrictions.
“For the avoidance of doubt, the restriction of movement is voluntary and not compulsory,” Falana stated, adding that residents remain at liberty to conduct legitimate activities during the exercise.
He acknowledged that the government continues to encourage voluntary participation, urging residents to clean their environments and cooperate with waste management authorities, particularly the Lagos State Waste Management Authority (LAWMA), for proper waste collection and disposal.
Falana also pointed to the state’s significant budgetary allocation—reportedly about N236 billion in the 2026 fiscal plan—for waste management, drainage infrastructure, and environmental protection. He argued that such investments should be sufficient to drive compliance without infringing on citizens’ rights.
The disagreement highlights a broader legal and civic debate over movement restriction during sanitation in Lagos, with stakeholders divided on whether public health measures should override constitutional freedoms.
Residents across the state remain caught between official directives and legal interpretations, as the sanitation exercise continues to generate controversy over enforcement and compliance.
Falana Challenges Lagos Govt, Says No Law Backs Sanitation Movement Restriction
![]()
-
metro3 days agoBREAKING: Power Minister Steps Down, Eyes Oyo 2027 Election
-
metro2 days agoPanic in Oyo as Stray Elephant Invades Community, One Dead
-
metro2 days agoKidnappers Invade Lagos Home, Abduct Woman, Demand ₦60m Ransom
-
Sports1 day agoEx-Super Eagles Striker Dies After Collapsing During Training
-
International3 days agoIran Blocks Strait of Hormuz Indefinitely Over US Naval Blockade
-
Entertainment1 day agoVIDEO: Sirbalo’s Car Damaged by Agberos in Lagos After Refusing ₦200,000
-
Insurance2 days agoStanbic IBTC Insurance Wins Top Honour at CRe Africa Awards 2026
-
metro3 days agoCBN Raises Alarm Over Fake Messages, Cyber Hack Attempts on Nigerians’ Accounts


