US indicts 17 Iranians over $20m cyber-theft campaign targeting 322 global institutions

Justice Department Unseals 14-Count Superseding Indictment Alleging Massive Hacking Operation Conducted on Behalf of Iranian Government and IRGC

The United States has charged 17 Iranian nationals in connection with an alleged massive cyber-theft campaign that targeted hundreds of universities, private companies, government agencies, and non-governmental organisations across the globe. The US Department of Justice announced on Tuesday that a 14-count superseding indictment had been unsealed against members of the Mabna Institute, an Iran-based company accused of conducting coordinated cyber intrusions since at least 2013, according to multiple reports.

The indictment, which has been assigned to US District Judge Jesse M. Furman in the Southern District of New York, represents one of the most extensive cyber-related prosecutions ever brought against Iranian actors. Nine of the 17 defendants were previously charged in a seven-count indictment announced in March 2018, while Tuesday’s superseding indictment adds eight additional defendants to the case, expanding the scope of the alleged criminal enterprise.

Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Eisenberg stated that the defendants allegedly hacked universities and research institutions worldwide at the behest of entities including Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), stealing large volumes of information and intellectual property. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) also stated that the defendants allegedly operated a “hacking-for-hire” network targeting intellectual property belonging to American and allied universities, companies, and government agencies for the benefit of the Iranian government. The US authorities stressed that an indictment is merely an allegation and that all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

READ ALSO:

• Police Nab 49-Year-Old With Pump-Action Rifle, 50 Ammunition Rounds In Anambra
• WMotors takes Jetour Africa Expedition to Lagos, Puts SUVs to Off-Road Test
• ‘No Electoral Agreement with ADC’ – Adeleke Rejects Collaboration Claims, Credits God

The alleged hacking campaign targeted a staggering number of victims globally, including 144 US-based universities and 178 foreign universities, totalling 322 academic institutions worldwide. The hackers are alleged to have targeted more than 100,000 university professor accounts globally and successfully compromised about 8,000 accounts across the identified universities. The campaign, which began around 2013 and continued through at least December 2017, targeted academic research and intellectual property across fields including science and technology, engineering, social sciences, and medicine.

The Justice Department said the hackers stole at least 31.5 terabytes of academic data and intellectual property, including journals, theses, dissertations, and electronic books. Some of the stolen material was allegedly sold through websites operated or affiliated with members of the conspiracy, transforming stolen academic resources into a profitable underground enterprise. Beyond universities, the defendants allegedly compromised employee email accounts at at least 42 US-based private companies, 11 foreign companies, and several government agencies and non-governmental organisations.

The alleged hacking campaign extended beyond academic institutions to include several high-profile government and non-governmental organisations. The Justice Department identified the following entities as among those targeted: the US Department of Labor, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the states of Hawaii and Indiana, the United Nations, and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The superseding indictment also alleges that members of the group targeted HBO and were involved in hacking private companies and government entities, causing victims to incur more than $20 million in investigation and remediation costs.

A central element of the indictment is the alleged connection between the Mabna Institute and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The Justice Department alleged that many of the cyber intrusions were conducted on behalf of the IRGC and other Iranian government and university clients. The Mabna Institute was founded around 2013 by Gholamreza Rafatnejad and Ehsan Mohammadi, according to the Justice Department. The organisation allegedly assisted Iranian universities and research institutions in obtaining unauthorised access to scientific resources outside Iran while also providing hacking services to Iranian government and private entities.

This mirrors actions taken by the US Treasury Department in March 2018, when it announced sanctions against the Mabna Institute and 10 individuals, stating that the group had been acting at the behest of the IRGC. The Treasury Department had also noted that one of the hackers involved had attempted to extort $6 million from a US media company and was previously indicted in November 2017, demonstrating a pattern of aggressive cyber-operations and financial extortion.

The US Department of State’s Rewards for Justice programme is offering up to $10 million for information leading to the location of five of the defendants: Behzad Mesri, Mojtaba Galekuhi, Arman Kahzadian, Keyvan Fayaz, and Saber Shahbazi Ballojeh. This substantial reward reflects the seriousness with which US authorities view these alleged cyber-operations and their commitment to bringing the perpetrators to justice.

The case highlights the persistent challenge of state-sponsored cyber-operations and the ongoing efforts by US authorities to hold perpetrators accountable through legal and financial measures. With the charged individuals believed to be outside the United States and no extradition treaty with Iran, their apprehension remains uncertain. However, the US continues to pursue international cooperation and legal avenues to bring them to justice, signalling that such cyber-operations will not go unanswered.

US indicts 17 Iranians over $20m cyber-theft campaign targeting 322 global institutions

Trump Declares Strait of Hormuz ‘New US Territory’ on Truth Social as Iran Vows to Keep Waterway Closed

United States President Donald Trump has escalated tensions with Iran by posting an image on his social media platform, Truth Social, that labels the strategic Strait of Hormuz as “NEW U.S. TERRITORY.” The graphic, posted on Tuesday, shows a map of the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman, with the strait circled beneath a banner reading “NEW U.S. TERRITORY.” The provocative post comes just days after Trump first raised the idea of a US takeover, saying at a political rally in New York state that “pretty soon I’ll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States.” Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of American control over Hormuz since the conflict began, earlier proposing a 20 per cent fee on all cargo shipped through the strait under what he described as the United States’ role as “Guardian of the Hormuz Strait.” The UN shipping agency said it strongly opposed any such fees and that there was no legal mechanism to impose them. The claim has no basis in international law. The Strait of Hormuz lies within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman and is governed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which guarantees the right of transit passage through international straits to all nations. However, legal experts note that neither Iran nor the United States is a party to the convention, stripping those provisions of binding force in this context, creating a legal vacuum where the principle of “transit passage” cannot be invoked legally.

Iranian officials have reacted swiftly and forcefully to Trump’s latest provocation. Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister, dismissed Trump’s comment as a “delusion,” warning that Tehran would “correct the delusions of this deluded man.” “The Strait of Hormuz has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian,” Gharibabadi said on X. “This strait will only be closed and opened under Iran’s command.” In a separate post, Gharibabadi also drew attention to the fact that Trump had “correctly” written the name of the “eternal Persian Gulf” rather than using the term “Arabian Gulf” preferred by US-allied Arab states. “Soon, his mistake regarding the Strait of Hormuz will either be corrected, or we will correct the delusions of this man who lives in illusions,” he wrote.

READ ALSO:

• Georgina Rodríguez reveals why she, Ronaldo married in their living room
• Nobody Should Invite My Husband Without Inviting Me — Jarvis Issues Stern Warning
• Zamfara: Troops rescue seven women, children from terrorists

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s Parliament Speaker and chief negotiator, told parliament on Tuesday that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed until the United States meets Tehran’s demands. “I want to state clearly that the Strait of Hormuz will not be opened until the American commitments stipulated in the memorandum of understanding are implemented,” Ghalibaf said. Tehran’s four conditions include lifting the US naval blockade of Iranian ports, lifting oil sanctions, freeing up frozen Iranian assets abroad, and ending military threats and operations on all fronts. These conditions were outlined in a June 17 memorandum of understanding signed by both parties, which set a 60-day timeframe for a final peace agreement. However, the process quickly stalled over disagreements about control of the Strait of Hormuz, and Trump declared the agreement “over” on July 7.

The US president has also threatened to bomb Oman if the Gulf state interferes with American efforts over the strait. In a phone interview with Fox News, Trump said that if “Oman gets in the way we’ll bomb the s— out of them.” The threat came as Iran and Oman have been negotiating an agreement on managing the strait, with Tehran saying the two sides had reached an understanding on the route that ships would use. Trump later addressed the remarks while speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, saying of Oman: “I don’t think they behaved very well, but we’d handle them very easily, just like we do other things.” Oman, through whose territorial waters the contested Strait of Hormuz also flows, has positioned itself as a neutral party in the US-Iran war and is currently negotiating with Iran over the reopening of the critical waterway.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints, through which roughly 20 per cent of the global oil and gas supply normally passes. Before the war, approximately 110 ships passed through the waterway daily. Since the US-Israel-Iran war began on February 28, traffic through the strait has fallen dramatically. Only one ship crossed the Strait of Hormuz on August 16, down from eight ships on August 15 and marking a record low, according to S&P Global Commodities at Sea. The average number of ships transiting the strait over the last week was about 12 vessels per day, down from more than 130 a day before the United States and Israel attacked Iran in late February. The closure of Hormuz has driven up energy prices, creating a political headache for Trump as November’s midterm elections near. The national average price of gasoline in the United States have been at their highest recorded levels for the month of August, according to the AAA motor club, while Brent crude was at about $91 a barrel, up from $72 just before the start of the war.

Maritime law experts have questioned the legitimacy of Trump’s claim. Jason Chuah, Professor of Maritime Law at City, University of London, told CNN that a US claim to the territory could not be established simply through a presidential declaration. “Under US law, claiming territory by a Presidential declaration is not enough. There are important constitutional requirements that must be cleared first,” Chuah said. “Under international law, annexation is contrary to the United Nations Charter. Territories including bodies of water can only be taken through agreement or cession.” Simon Baughen, Professor of Shipping Law at Swansea University, said Washington’s claim over the strait was highly unlikely to ever come to fruition, describing such a scenario as “very unlikely.” Chuah stressed that neither Iran nor Oman has unrestricted rights over the entire Strait of Hormuz. “Freedom of navigation prevails. That is the law,” he said. “The Strait is neither Iranian property nor Omani property in the ordinary sense of a piece of real estate. It is sovereign territory very much subject to an international regime of maritime navigation.” “A navy can control a waterway. It cannot, merely by controlling it, rewrite the law of title.”

Trump Declares Strait of Hormuz ‘New US Territory’ on Truth Social as Iran Vows to Keep Waterway Closed

Trump Threatens to Bomb Oman Over Strait of Hormuz as US-Iran Deadline Expires

President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to Oman, threatening military action if the US ally interferes with American efforts to secure control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, as a crucial 60-day deadline for US-Iran negotiations expires without resolution. In a phone interview with Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst on Monday, Trump declared: “If Oman gets in the way, we’ll bomb the s—- out of them” . The threat comes as tensions over the vital maritime waterway escalate and the June 17 Memorandum of Understanding between Washington and Tehran officially lapses .

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office later on Monday, the president was asked to elaborate on his earlier remarks and did not walk back the threat, instead saying: “I don’t think they behaved very well, but we’d handle them very easily, just like we do other things” . When questioned about his recent suggestion that he would declare the Strait of Hormuz a US territory, Trump responded: “We have total control over the strait” . This is not the first time Trump has targeted Oman with aggressive rhetoric, as CNN reports that the president previously threatened Oman at a meeting in May, saying “Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we’ll have to blow ’em up” . The White House has yet to issue an official comment on the latest threats against Oman, according to NBC News . Oman, a longstanding US ally that borders Yemen, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, has been engaged in separate negotiations with Iran over the status of the strategic waterway, and last Saturday, Iran’s semi-official Mehr News Agency disclosed that Tehran had reached an agreement with Oman on a plan for traffic through the strait .

READ ALSO:

• Osun guber: APC rejects Adeleke’s victory, begins audit of INEC results
• Court Freezes 71 Banks’ Accounts Over N1.34bn Access Bank Cyber Fraud
• Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport

Monday marked the end of a 60-day Memorandum of Understanding signed on June 17, 2026, under which both countries agreed to cease hostilities and negotiate an end to the war while addressing Iran’s nuclear programme. However, talks have stalled over the issue of control of the Strait of Hormuz, and neither side appears willing to extend the agreement. The impasse has had immediate consequences for global shipping, with maritime traffic tracker MarineTraffic reporting that shipping through the Strait of Hormuz nearly ground to a halt over the weekend, with just 13 ships passing through, including only three on Sunday. Meanwhile, international benchmark Brent crude oil broke above $90 per barrel, rising 2.7% to its highest level of the day, reflecting market anxiety over the potential disruption to one of the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoints, through which approximately 20% of global petroleum passes .

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmaeil Baghaei, has dismissed the 60-day timeframe, stating that “gross” US violations rendered the deadline “entirely moot” and insisting that “there is no such thing as a 60-day deadline in the text of the memorandum of understanding, and the Islamic Republic of Iran never formulates its policies under pressure, ultimatums, or time constraints” . He further explained that the memorandum merely provided a “60-day window for talks on two axes—sanctions relief and the nuclear issue—which could be extended if no result was reached” . However, due to what he described as “the blatant and widespread violation of the June 18 memorandum of understanding by the United States just a few weeks after its signing, no talks were initiated,” rendering the timeframe irrelevant . Baghaei also emphasised that Iran’s armed forces are “closely monitoring all movements with full vigilance” and that the country is prepared to respond if attacked, while Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi confirmed that messages are being exchanged through mediators but clarified that “this does not mean negotiations at all” .

READ ALSO:

• Osun guber: APC rejects Adeleke’s victory, begins audit of INEC results
• Court Freezes 71 Banks’ Accounts Over N1.34bn Access Bank Cyber Fraud
• Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport

In a separate development, Trump has demanded that Tehran “put up the white flag of surrender” and stated that the United States is “in no hurry” to make a deal, despite a backchannel remaining open with Tehran . The president also floated the idea of declaring the Strait of Hormuz a US territory, telling reporters: “After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated, I’ll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States” , later adding: “I like the idea of declaring it a territory” . However, analysts have largely dismissed the declaration as a pressure tactic rather than a serious policy proposal, with Adel al-Ghurairi, an Iraqi political analyst and professor at Baghdad University, telling Xinhua that the statement “could put political pressure on Tehran, strengthen Washington’s position in talks, and send a message to countries concerned about energy security” . Similarly, Ahmed Al-Mufti, a Sudanese international relations expert, described it as “a negotiating tactic aimed at raising US demands before moving toward more realistic arrangements” .

With the MoU expired and both sides hardening their positions, the Strait of Hormuz remains a critical flashpoint, with Qatar, Pakistan, and Oman continuing diplomatic efforts to mediate, though the end of the agreement could determine whether the conflict moves toward renewed negotiations or another dangerous escalation. Analysts note that while the United States has strong naval, air, and intelligence capabilities in the region, maintaining permanent control over the waterway would face significant challenges, as Mustafa Ibrahim, a Palestinian political analyst, observed that “if Washington truly wants to end the confrontation, it must shift from coercion and maximum pressure to negotiations that address Iran’s security and political interests” . The real question, he added, is not whether Washington can project military power, but whether that power can deliver a political settlement that ensures the stability of one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints.

Trump Threatens to Bomb Oman Over Strait of Hormuz as US-Iran Deadline Expires