Your rank will be permanently withdrawn if you misbehave - AGF warns new SANs - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Your rank will be permanently withdrawn if you misbehave – AGF warns new SANs

Published

on

Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN
Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi SAN

Your rank will be permanently withdrawn if you misbehave – AGF warns new SANs

The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi SAN, has issued a stern warning to newly sworn-in Senior Advocates Of Nigeria (SANs) to uphold the highest ethical standards and adhere strictly to the 2022 Guidelines for the Conferment of the Rank of Senior Advocates Of Nigeria.

Fagbemi warned that failure to comply with these guidelines could result in the permanent withdrawal of their rank.

He stated this during the Supreme Court legal year ceremony, emphasizing that unlike the 2018 Guidelines, which allowed for the restoration of rank after a three-year withdrawal period, the 2022 Guidelines provide no such provision.

This means that once a SAN’s rank is withdrawn for misconduct, it cannot be regained.

“Whether or not you have read the paragraph, let me seize this opportunity to bring it out.

“One of the highlights of the new Guidelines is that unlike the 2018 Guidelines which contains provisions for discipline of erring holders of the rank and for the restoration of the rank after three years of withdrawal upon the fulfilment of certain conditions, the 2022 Guidelines makes no provision for the restoration of the rank after withdrawal,” Fagbemi told the new lawyers in the presence of a host of SANs, lawyers and judges both serving and retired.

READ ALSO:

The AGF maintained that once the Legal Practitioners Privileges Committee pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 26(4) of the Guidelines withdraws the rank from any holder who may have breached the provisions in sub-paragraph (a)-(h), the withdrawal is final and the rank cannot be restored afterwards.

“It therefore behoves on any Senior Advocate of Nigeria to strive to conduct himself in utmost professional standards and to avoid running foul of the Rules of Professional Misconduct for Legal Practitioners,” Fagbemi advised.

Fagbemi encouraged the new SANs to subscribe to the mentorship of the very senior elders at the Inner Bar.

“Law is a dynamic profession. We learn every day and the seniors are there to play the role of mentors. You are therefore in a unique position of still being mentored by the elders in the Inner Bar while at the same time acting as mentors to the younger colleagues at the Bar,” he said, while urging them to also serve as good mentors by showing good examples in and outside the court room.

“To the new silks, I warmly welcome you to the inner bar. It is indeed a remarkable privilege to be chosen and decorated with honour amongst your colleagues. As the name of the LPPC implies, the conferment of the rank of SAN is a privileged position for the deserving only,” Fagbemi congratulated the new silks.

The AGF leveraged the situation to call for speedy promotion of judges into the Appeal Court and Supreme Court bench, adding that vacancies in judicial offices can cause disruptions in the judiciary and rule of law.

READ ALSO:

Fagbemi said, “I am aware that the process of filling the vacancies for the Justices of the Supreme Court has begun. I would however like to use this opportunity to urge the leadership of the National Judicial Council to fast-track the process of achieving a full complement of the Supreme Court and to also concurrently put in place the process of filling the consequential vacancies that will be occasioned at the Court of Appeal to avoid undue delay and minimize disruptions at that level.”

For the president of the Nigerian Bar Association, Yakubu Maikyau SAN, he said members of the bar who claim judges/ justices collect bribes, “should quit being cowards and make bold to present the evidence to law enforcement agencies, even when the bribes are allegedly given by or through them. It is a sacrifice we must make to save the nation.”

He therefore called on the judge who alleged that a senior counsel attempted to bribe the Tribunal in Kano to forward the particulars of the counsel to the NBA for disciplinary action.

” If this cannot be done, because the allegation was unfounded, the Bar demands an apology just as I have severally done for the unwarranted hurt
caused your lordships by members of the Bar, ” he added.

Your rank will be permanently withdrawn if you misbehave – AGF warns new SANs

Loading

metro

Fatal NURTW Leadership Clash in Osun Leaves Two Dead; State Orders Park Shut Down

Published

on

Fatal NURTW Leadership Clash in Osun Leaves Two Dead; State Orders Park Shut Down

As Olalekan Oyeyemi is buried in Osogbo, authorities transfer murder probe to the State Criminal Investigation Department.

(more…)

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Govt to Produce Evidence

Published

on

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Government to Produce Evidence

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Government to Produce Evidence

Former Anambra State Governor and 2027 presidential candidate Peter Obi has rejected claims that he left the state with unpaid financial obligations when he handed over power in 2014, challenging the Anambra State Government to identify any contractor, supplier, worker or pensioner who was owed money by his administration at the time.

Obi made the statement in response to renewed claims by the administration of Governor Chukwuma Soludo that the state is still servicing loans and other financial obligations inherited from previous administrations.

The dispute has opened a fresh political debate over Anambra’s debt profile, the financial obligations inherited by successive governments and the management of the state’s resources before and after Obi left office.

Obi, who governed Anambra between 2006 and 2013 before handing over to his successor in 2014, said he paid what was due during his tenure and left the state in a financially stable position.

He challenged the Soludo administration to provide evidence of any unpaid obligation incurred by his government that remained outstanding when he left office.

According to Obi, if the state government can identify any contractor, supplier, employee, pensioner or other beneficiary who was owed money by his administration at the time of the handover, he would be prepared to address the matter.

The former governor also said his administration left funds in government accounts, including an alleged ₦2.14 billion ecological fund balance, when he handed over power.

However, the claim regarding the ecological fund is from Obi’s camp and would require confirmation from the relevant official financial records.

READ ALSO:

The response followed comments by the Anambra Commissioner for Finance, Izuchukwu Okafor, who said the state was still repaying loans inherited from previous administrations.

Okafor said the Soludo administration had not obtained any commercial bank loan since it came into office in 2022, arguing that the government’s focus had been on reducing the state’s inherited financial obligations.

He said the state’s debt burden had been substantially reduced under Soludo and that the administration had also cleared inherited liabilities relating to contracts, gratuities and pensions.

The commissioner said some loans taken by previous administrations remain subject to repayment and deductions from the state’s federal allocations.

This distinction is at the centre of the current disagreement.

The Soludo administration is not necessarily claiming that Obi personally left unpaid bills to contractors or workers. Rather, the government is pointing to loans and other financial commitments inherited from successive administrations, some of which continue to be serviced.

Obi, on the other hand, is arguing that his administration settled the obligations that were due and payable when he left office and should not be held responsible for liabilities incurred by subsequent governments.

The issue has therefore raised questions about the difference between a state’s overall outstanding debt and debts that were specifically incurred by an individual administration.

Available public debt records have shown that Anambra had outstanding formal obligations around the period Obi left office. However, the political dispute centres on when particular obligations were incurred, which administration contracted them, when repayment became due and whether they should be described as unpaid debts inherited from Obi’s administration.

The Soludo administration has maintained that it inherited financial commitments from previous governments and has been working to reduce them.

The finance commissioner reportedly said the state’s domestic debt was now close to zero and that the government had reduced its overall debt burden significantly.

He also said the Soludo administration had not resorted to commercial bank borrowing since assuming office, presenting the reduction in liabilities as evidence of improved fiscal management.

The government has simultaneously highlighted investments in infrastructure and other projects while maintaining that debt reduction remains an important part of its financial strategy.

READ ALSO:

Obi’s camp, however, has questioned the basis for attributing current financial obligations to his administration.

The former governor has repeatedly presented his tenure as one characterised by fiscal discipline, savings and investment in infrastructure, education, healthcare and other sectors.

His supporters have pointed to the savings and financial reserves accumulated during his tenure as evidence that the state was handed over in relatively strong financial condition.

Critics of the former governor, however, argue that the financial position of a state cannot be assessed solely by looking at cash balances or the absence of unpaid bills because governments can inherit long-term obligations whose repayment extends beyond the tenure of the administration that contracted them.

That distinction is particularly relevant in Anambra, where governments have succeeded one another while continuing to service financial commitments made over several administrations.

The latest exchange has consequently shifted the political conversation from whether Anambra has debt to the more specific question of which administration incurred particular liabilities and whether those obligations were outstanding at the time of each handover.

The dispute also comes at a politically sensitive period, with Obi preparing for the 2027 presidential election under the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC).

Questions about his record as Anambra governor are likely to remain part of the political debate as the election approaches, particularly because his administration’s economic management has been a central part of his political narrative.

For Soludo, who is serving as Anambra governor, the emphasis has been on the state’s current fiscal position and the steps his administration says it has taken to reduce inherited liabilities while funding development projects.

For Obi, the priority is to establish that he did not leave unpaid obligations to contractors, workers, pensioners or other beneficiaries when he left office.

The former governor has therefore challenged the state government to publish specific records showing any outstanding obligation attributable to his administration at the point of handover.

The competing claims have yet to be resolved by an independent audit or judicial determination.

What remains clear is that Anambra’s debt debate involves more than a simple disagreement over whether the state owes money. It encompasses loans contracted by successive administrations, repayment schedules, inherited liabilities, outstanding contracts and the question of how political leaders should be held accountable for financial commitments made during their tenure.

As the exchange continues, official debt records, audited financial statements and handover documents could provide the clearest basis for determining the extent of liabilities inherited by each administration.

Until such records are independently reviewed, claims that Obi either left the state completely debt-free or was solely responsible for all of its inherited obligations should be treated with caution.

The latest dispute therefore leaves two competing narratives: Obi’s insistence that he paid what was due before leaving office, and the Soludo administration’s position that Anambra continues to service financial obligations inherited from previous governments, including loans dating back to earlier administrations.

With the 2027 election approaching, the controversy is likely to remain part of the wider political contest over Obi’s record in Anambra and his claims of fiscal discipline in government.

Peter Obi Rejects Anambra Debt Claims, Challenges Soludo Government to Produce Evidence

Loading

Continue Reading

News

We Must Build Beyond the Next Elections’ — Shettima

Published

on

We Must Build Beyond the Next Elections’ — Shettima

Vice-President Kashim Shettima has called on political leaders to look beyond election cycles and leave behind institutions that can continue to benefit Nigerians.

His remarks came at the Abuja presentation of Brigadier Musa Usman (1940–1991): Service and Impact, a book documenting the life and public service of the late military governor of the former North-Eastern State.

Represented by Aliyu Modibbo Umar, Shettima said leadership should be measured by the value that remains after an administration has left office.

We must recover the spirit of selflessness in public service,” he said, urging leaders to “build beyond the next elections and think beyond political boundaries.”

He listed reconstruction, agriculture, education, transport, energy, industrialisation, jobs, environmental restoration, peace and security among areas where leaders must take a long-term approach.

The Vice-President pointed to Musa Usman’s administration as an example of how development can outlive a political tenure. Usman governed the former North-Eastern State from 1967 to 1975, and the region he once administered now covers six states in the North-East.

Shettima said Usman played a major role in developing Maiduguri and establishing infrastructure and institutions that later administrations were able to build upon.

Governor Babagana Zulum, who spoke at the event, described Usman as a leader who combined effective governance with integrity, discipline and humility.

Zulum said the late governor’s contributions included investments in education, healthcare and infrastructure, as well as efforts to strengthen the region’s economy.

The book, written by journalists Mahmud Jega and Theophilus Abbah, also traces Usman’s military career and his rise to leadership at a young age. It was published to preserve his record and the history of the former North-Eastern State.

Shettima said preserving such history could help younger Nigerians understand that lasting public service is about strengthening institutions and improving lives, rather than simply holding office.

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending