Lawyers Sue Tinubu, AGF, Edo Gov Over Alleged Threat to Peter Obi's Life - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Lawyers Sue Tinubu, AGF, Edo Gov Over Alleged Threat to Peter Obi’s Life

Published

on

Presidency tells Peter Obi to stop dreaming, insists he lost 2023 presidential election

Lawyers Sue Tinubu, AGF, Edo Gov Over Alleged Threat to Peter Obi’s Life

Obident Lawyers Forum seeks court orders compelling security agencies to provide maximum protection for NDC presidential candidate and other 2027 candidates

Lawyers operating under the aegis of the Obident Lawyers Forum have filed a suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja seeking an order compelling President Bola Tinubu to direct security agencies to provide adequate protection for the presidential candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), Mr Peter Obi, ahead of the 2027 general election. The legal practitioners informed the court that their appeal has become imperative so as not to make Peter Obi a victim of political assassination before and during the 2027 electioneering process. The request was contained in a suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1648/2026, instituted against President Tinubu, the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), the Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS), and the Governor of Edo State as defendants. The plaintiffs, represented by Barristers Okere Kingdom Nnamdi and Joseph Enemona Ameh, instituted the fundamental rights suit on behalf of Peter Obi, in which they prayed the court to issue an order that Peter Obi has the fundamental right to freedom of movement without any hindrance.

The plaintiffs predicated their request on two key developments. First, a recent live podcast wherein the NDC’s presidential candidate had raised the alarm that he “may not be alive to contest next year’s presidential election”. Second, a statement credited to Edo State Governor Senator Monday Okpebholo to the effect that Obi’s life and security would not be guaranteed in Edo State if he enters the state without getting approval from the governor. In an affidavit deposed in support of the suit, the plaintiffs argued that the NDC presidential candidate has constitutionally guaranteed rights to life and to live, dwell, exist and carry out his lawful duties without any fear, discrimination, threat of assassination, intimidation or any form of harassment as guaranteed by the Constitution. They submitted that Obi has the fundamental rights to move across the 36 states of Nigeria and the Federal Capital Territory, “attend and host his political campaign rallies… without fear of assassination, threat to his life, bullying, harassment, assault, intimidation and victimization whatsoever”.

READ ALSO:

The applicants lamented that “Mr Peter Gregory Obi has been subjected to serious psychological torture and trauma by the numerous threats to his life”, adding that this is detrimental to his constitutional rights. They further submitted that no person or authority or any arm of the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, or any authority, person(s) individual or groups, agents/agencies of the Federal Government or Government of any sub-regional State, has the powers to restrict or refuse any citizen from entering and exiting any part of Nigeria to carry out his lawful activities as guaranteed in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The deponent argued that “the threats by the Edo State Governor Senator Monday Okpebholo that Mr Peter Obi’s life and security are not guaranteed in Edo State, and that Mr Peter Obi should not step into Edo State without getting a clearance from him are empty not backed by law, anti-democratic, illegal, unlawful and tantamount to executive rascality, infantile-politicking and power-drunkenness”.

Among the reliefs they are seeking in the suit, the plaintiffs asked the court to declare that Peter Gregory Obi, the 2027 Presidential Candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) , has the fundamental right to life and the right to live without any fear, discrimination, threat of assassination, intimidation or any form of harassment whatsoever, as guaranteed in section 33 (1) of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria. In addition, they urged the court to declare that Peter Obi must not be subjected to politically motivated coercion, threat to life, bullying, harassment, assault, intimidation and victimization whatsoever by any arm of the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, or any authority, person, individual or groups, agents/agencies of the Federal Government or Government of any sub-Regional State, on the grounds of his political ideology, ethnicity and religion; or for any reason whatsoever. They also sought “A declaration that Mr Peter Gregory Obi the 2027 Presidential Candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) has the fundamental rights of free ingress and egress into any of the 36 States of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the FCT, and can freely move around, enter, visit, stay, reside, inhabit and organize, attend and host his political campaign rallies, consultations, seminars, groups meetings and carryout his lawful activities in any part of Nigeria, without fear of assassination, threat to his life, bullying, harassment, assault, intimidation and victimization whatsoever, by any Arm of the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, or any authority, person(s) individual or groups, agents/agencies of the Federal Government or Government of any sub-regional State, as guaranteed in sections 39, 40, 41 and 42 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.

The plaintiffs further prayed for “A declaration that the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Commander in Chief of The Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria has the constitutional mandate/responsibility to provide adequate security of life and property to the citizens, which is the fundamental reason/purpose/objective of every government; and the President has the constitutional responsibility as Commander in Chief to direct the 3th, 4th and 5th Respondents and Heads of all Security Agencies in Nigeria to provide maximum security protection/intelligence to Mr Peter Gregory Obi and all other presidential candidates”. They also urged a declaration that the laws setting up the security agencies mandate and empower the 3rd, 4th, and 5th respondents to provide adequate security to the citizens of the Federal Republic of Nigeria against all criminal activities aimed at depriving citizens of their properties or lives. The plaintiffs asked the court to make an order “compelling, directing and mandating the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to direct the 3th, 4th and 5th Respondents and Heads of all other Security Agencies in Nigeria to provide maximum security protection/intelligence to Mr Peter Gregory Obi, the 2027 Presidential Candidate of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) and all other 2027 presidential candidates”. Additionally, they sought “An order compelling, directing and mandating the 3th, 4th and 5th Respondents to immediately provide maximum security personnel to Physically Protect and Provide Security Intelligence to Mr Peter Gregory Obi, the NDC 2027 Presidential candidate”.

The suit references a recent podcast interview with media personality Chude Jideonwo, wherein the NDC presidential candidate had expressed fears for his safety. In the interview, Obi stated: “Not even a candidate. I might not even be alive. I’m telling you”. He alleged that the current Nigerian government has been frustrating his activities and targeting opposition figures, saying “Every single thing I do for a living, this government is frustrating. Deliberately so. So, there is even a possibility that, if they have the opportunity, I will not be alive”. Obi, however, clarified that he was not making direct accusations against President Bola Tinubu’s government because the government does not act openly. “It’s not an accusation. I know. I get frustrated every day because you do things that you think would be normal – it is not normal anymore. They (the government) won’t come directly and say, ‘Oh, we’re doing this,’ but you can see their hand in everything,” he said. Giving instances of alleged attacks against him, Obi referenced an incident at an airport where officials allegedly locked his car, despite other vehicles being parked in the same area. He also alleged that some people now avoid publicly associating with him for fear of becoming targets of the government, and that some supporters had discouraged him from attending family events.

The suit also references a statement credited to Edo State Governor Senator Monday Okpebholo. The governor had earlier given a warning on July 18, 2025 during a political event in Uromi, Esan North East Local Government Area of the state. In a video that later resurfaced, the governor was heard warning Obi against coming into the state without prior notice, saying: “The man wey say he no get shishi, I am sending a direct message to him, there is a new sheriff in town. He cannot come to Edo State without telling me because his security will not be guaranteed. Whatever happens to him in Edo State, he will take it. I am serious about this”. The governor later defended his remarks during an appearance on Channels Television, insisting that he intended to ensure the opposition figure’s safety, citing security concerns. The Edo State Government had earlier distanced itself from alleged threats against opposition figures by Emmanuel Eghogho, an aide to Governor Okpebholo. The governor’s aide was captured in a viral video on social media alleging that members of the opposition, including Peter Obi, would be arrested and handed over to the Commissioner of Police for onward transfer to Abuja. Reacting to the development, the Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Kassim Afegbua, said at a news conference in Benin that the state had nothing to do with Mr Eghogho’s public outburst. He stressed that the controversial remarks credited to Mr Eghogho did not represent the administration’s position, stating: “We want to distance ourselves from that statement because it is not the position of the Edo State Government, but the voice of an individual that is answerable to existing laws of the land”.

Meanwhile, no date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit. The legal action comes as political activities ahead of the 2027 general election gradually gather momentum, with opposition figures outlining their policy alternatives to the administration of President Bola Tinubu.

Lawyers Sue Tinubu, AGF, Edo Gov Over Alleged Threat to Peter Obi’s Life

Loading

metro

Woman disguises as Muslim woman in Niqab to steal in Ado-Ekiti market, video sparks outrage

Published

on

Woman disguises as Muslim woman in Niqab to steal in Ado-Ekiti market, video sparks outrage

Woman disguises as Muslim woman in Niqab to steal in Ado-Ekiti market, video sparks outrage

By Newstrends News Desk

A viral video showing a woman allegedly wearing a Muslim woman’s Niqab as a disguise while attempting to steal at a market in Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, has sparked outrage and raised questions over the use of religious attire as a cover for criminal activity.

The woman, identified in the viral Facebook post as Alebiosu Mercy, was reportedly apprehended after she was allegedly caught in connection with theft at Agric Olope Market in Ado-Ekiti.

Woman disguises as Muslim woman in Niqab to steal in Ado-Ekiti market, video sparks outrage

Alebiosu Mercy

In the video, the woman is seen being interrogated by people who reportedly apprehended her. During the questioning, she allegedly disclosed that she is a member of the Celestial Church of Christ, despite having been dressed in a Niqab at the time of the alleged incident.

The revelation has generated strong reactions, particularly because the Niqab is widely associated with Muslim women and is worn by some Muslim women as part of their religious observance.

‘Why disguise as a Muslim woman?’

The development has raised concerns among some social media users who viewed the incident as an attempt to exploit the appearance of a Muslim woman to conceal an alleged criminal act.

The central question emerging from the video is why a woman who, according to the interrogation shown in the footage, identifies herself as a Celestial Church member would allegedly choose a Niqab as a disguise while committing an offence.

READ ALSO:

Some observers argued that such conduct could unfairly reinforce negative stereotypes about Muslim women who wear the Niqab, particularly if members of the public subsequently associate the attire with criminality.

However, Newstrends.ng cannot independently establish the woman’s motive for wearing the Niqab beyond what is shown and allegedly stated in the viral video. Her alleged confession should therefore be treated as part of the claims surrounding the incident until independently confirmed by law-enforcement authorities.

Video fuels religious controversy

The incident has quickly moved beyond an alleged market theft case, with social media users debating the religious dimension of the woman’s choice of clothing.

For many Muslims, the Niqab is a religious form of modest dress, and its use as an alleged disguise for criminal activity has been described by some commentators as particularly disturbing.

At the same time, it is important not to allow the alleged conduct of one individual to become a basis for branding an entire religious community or women who wear the Niqab as criminals.

The alleged offence is an individual matter, and the religious identity of the suspect does not establish the character or conduct of Muslim women generally.

Police confirmation still awaited

As of the time of filing this report, there was no verified statement from the Ekiti State Police Command specifically confirming the arrest of the woman, the alleged theft at Agric Olope Market or the circumstances surrounding the viral video.

It is also unclear whether the woman was subsequently handed over to the police or whether formal charges have been filed against her.

Newstrends.ng could not independently verify all the claims contained in the social media video and therefore urges caution in drawing conclusions beyond what can be established.

Nevertheless, the video has generated significant public interest because of the allegation that religious attire associated with Muslim women was allegedly used as a disguise during a suspected theft incident.

The development also underscores the dangers of using religious identity or appearance to conceal criminal conduct, as such actions can have consequences far beyond the individual involved and potentially fuel unnecessary tension between religious communities.

Newstrends.ng will update this report if the Ekiti State Police Command or other credible authorities provide an official account of the incident.

 

Woman disguises as Muslim woman in Niqab to steal in Ado-Ekiti market, video sparks outrage

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

FG Moves to Scrap Criminal Penalty for Attempted Suicide

Published

on

FG Moves to Scrap Criminal Penalty for Attempted Suicide

FG Moves to Scrap Criminal Penalty for Attempted Suicide

The Federal Government has commenced moves to remove the criminal penalty for attempted suicide in Nigeria, following the approval by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) of its position on the decriminalisation of suicide attempts.

The proposed reform represents a major shift in the government’s approach to people who survive suicide attempts, with the focus expected to move from criminal punishment to mental healthcare, psychosocial support, protection and timely intervention.

However, attempted suicide remains a criminal offence under the existing legal framework until the proposed amendments are considered and passed by the National Assembly.

The development was announced in Abuja during an event organised by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare to commemorate the 2026 World Suicide Prevention Day, themed “Changing the Narrative on Suicide,” with the call to action, “Start the Conversation.”

Minister of State for Health and Social Welfare, Dr Iziaq Salako, represented by the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Daju Kachollom, said the FEC approval followed the work of the National Task Force on Decriminalisation of Attempted Suicide.

The task force has conducted consultations, policy engagements and advocacy involving government institutions, legal experts, mental health professionals, civil society organisations, development partners and people with lived experience of mental health challenges and suicidal behaviour.

Salako described the proposed decriminalisation of attempted suicide as more than a legal reform, saying it was also a public health and human rights imperative.

READ ALSO:

He said people experiencing a mental health crisis should receive care, support and appropriate intervention rather than punishment.

According to the minister, removing the fear of prosecution could encourage people experiencing severe emotional or psychological distress to seek help without worrying that they could be arrested or prosecuted after surviving a suicide attempt.

The minister expressed optimism that the legislative process would be concluded without unnecessary delay once the proposal is transmitted to the National Assembly.

He said the Federal Government was also working to expand access to mental healthcare by integrating mental health services into other parts of the healthcare system, particularly primary healthcare.

As part of the effort, Standard Operating Procedures for integrating mental health services into HIV care are being developed, while the National Coordinator of the National Mental Health Programme has been directed to prepare a memorandum for consideration by the National Council on Health on integrating mental healthcare into primary healthcare.

The government said taking mental health services closer to communities would help people who have limited access to specialist psychiatric facilities and other dedicated mental health services.

The proposed legal reform is expected to affect provisions of Nigeria’s existing criminal laws that make attempted suicide punishable. Under the current framework, attempted suicide is criminalised under provisions including Section 327 of the Criminal Code Act and Section 231 of the Penal Code.

The Federal Government has argued that maintaining criminal sanctions for suicide attempts is inconsistent with the more supportive approach contained in the National Mental Health Act 2021, which recognises the need for protection and treatment for people experiencing mental health challenges.

The move to change the law was preceded by extensive consultations by the National Task Force, which was established to examine the legal, medical, social and human rights implications of criminalising attempted suicide.

The task force has also undertaken stakeholder engagements and advocacy involving health professionals, lawmakers, legal practitioners, civil society groups and other relevant organisations as part of efforts to build support for the proposed reform.

However, stakeholders at the Abuja event warned that decriminalising attempted suicide would not by itself solve Nigeria’s suicide crisis.

A representative of the Nigeria Suicide Prevention Advocacy Working Group, Prof. Taiwo Lateef Sheik, said criminalisation was only one aspect of the problem and called for a comprehensive national suicide-prevention strategy.

He advocated improved collection and reporting of suicide and suicidal behaviour data, crisis intervention services, dedicated funding for suicide prevention, specialised training for healthcare workers and first responders, and full implementation of the National Mental Health Act 2021.

Sheik said Nigeria had set a target of reducing suicide deaths and attempts by 50 per cent by 2030, stressing that legal reform alone could not achieve the objective.

The group also called for stronger emergency response mechanisms capable of providing immediate support to people experiencing suicidal crises.

President of the Association of Psychiatrists in Nigeria, Dr Veronica Oluyemisi Nyamali, raised concerns about the country’s mental health workforce, saying the number of available professionals remains inadequate.

She noted that the sector was being affected by the migration of healthcare professionals, while some medical residents were also abandoning psychiatric training.

Nyamali said removing the criminal penalty could make it easier for people experiencing psychological distress to seek help, but stressed that decriminalisation must be accompanied by adequate mental health services.

She said people who reach out for assistance must be able to access qualified professionals, appropriate treatment and follow-up support.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) also called for greater attention to people affected by conflict and violence, who often face additional barriers to accessing mental healthcare.

An ICRC official, Juan Carlos, noted that insecurity, distance and the cost of treatment could prevent vulnerable people from obtaining the support they need.

Civil society organisations similarly urged the government to look beyond medical treatment and address the social and economic factors that can contribute to suicidal behaviour.

Speaking on behalf of people living with HIV in Nigeria, Isah Takuma called for mental healthcare to become an integral part of HIV services rather than an optional or secondary intervention.

He urged the government to strengthen the integration of mental health support into HIV programmes as part of its wider healthcare reform agenda.

The Federal Ministry of Health said Nigeria’s suicide-prevention efforts were anchored on the National Mental Health Act 2021, the National Mental Health Policy 2023 and the National Suicide Prevention Strategic Framework 2023–2030.

The ministry has also stressed the importance of reducing stigma and encouraging open conversations about mental health and suicide.

According to the ministry, figures from the World Health Organisation (WHO) indicate that Nigeria records more than 7,000 suicide deaths and about 300,000 suicide attempts annually, highlighting the scale of the country’s mental health and suicide-prevention challenge.

The government has consequently called for greater cooperation among healthcare professionals, civil society organisations, faith and traditional leaders, the media, academia, youth organisations and other stakeholders.

The 2026 World Suicide Prevention Day campaign seeks to change public attitudes towards suicide by replacing stigma, fear and misinformation with compassion, understanding and timely support.

The proposed reform is therefore intended not only to change the legal status of attempted suicide but also to encourage people experiencing emotional or psychological distress to seek help earlier.

Until the National Assembly considers and passes the proposed amendments and they become law, however, the existing criminal provisions remain in force.

The Federal Government’s stated objective is to create a system in which people experiencing mental health crises are treated primarily as individuals requiring care, protection and support, while strengthening the country’s wider suicide prevention and mental healthcare system.

FG Moves to Scrap Criminal Penalty for Attempted Suicide

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Lagos Woman Jailed for Dumping Refuse in Drain During Rainfall

Published

on

Lagos Woman Jailed for Dumping Refuse in Drain During Rainfall

Lagos Woman Jailed for Dumping Refuse in Drain During Rainfall

LAGOS — A 53-year-old resident of Meiran in Lagos State, Nelly Monday, has been sentenced to one month in prison for dumping refuse into a drainage channel during rainfall.

The Lagos Waste Management Authority (LAWMA) said Monday was arrested on September 9 after she was allegedly caught disposing of waste into a drainage channel while it was raining.

She was subsequently arraigned before the Magistrate Court sitting at Bolade, Oshodi, where she pleaded guilty to the environmental offence.

Following her guilty plea, the court sentenced her to one month in prison.

The conviction is part of the ongoing enforcement by LAWMA and other relevant authorities against indiscriminate waste disposal across Lagos, particularly the practice of dumping refuse in drainage channels and other unauthorised locations.

The authorities have repeatedly warned that improper disposal of waste can obstruct waterways and drainage infrastructure, with potentially serious consequences during periods of heavy rainfall.

Blocked drains can prevent the free flow of stormwater and increase the risk of flooding, particularly in densely populated parts of Lagos where drainage systems come under pressure during the rainy season.

LAWMA has therefore urged residents to dispose of household and other waste through approved channels and avoid using drains, roadsides, medians and other unauthorised areas as dumping grounds.

READ ALSO:

“Residents are urged to dispose of their waste responsibly and through approved channels,” the agency said in a statement.

The authority added that it would continue to work with relevant enforcement agencies to identify and sanction people who violate environmental laws in Lagos.

The latest prosecution also highlights the government’s increasingly strict approach to illegal waste disposal, as Lagos continues efforts to improve sanitation and reduce the environmental problems associated with indiscriminate dumping.

LAWMA has consistently encouraged residents to patronise approved waste collection services and ensure that refuse is properly contained and handed over to authorised waste collectors.

The agency has also warned residents against disposing of waste in drainage channels, stressing the importance of keeping waterways and other drainage infrastructure free from refuse.

Monday’s case is not the first time that people have been sentenced to prison in Lagos over illegal waste disposal.

More than a year earlier, six people were sentenced to one month in prison after they were arrested for allegedly dumping refuse at unauthorised locations in the state.

According to LAWMA, its enforcement team apprehended two of the offenders in Egbeda for allegedly dumping refuse on a road median, while four others were arrested in Dopemu for similar environmental offences.

The six offenders, aged between 25 and 40, were arraigned before the Bolade Magistrate Court in Oshodi, where they pleaded guilty and were subsequently sentenced to one month in prison.

The repeated prosecutions demonstrate that indiscriminate waste disposal can attract criminal sanctions in Lagos and that enforcement agencies are continuing to pursue offenders.

For residents, the authorities’ latest warning is particularly relevant during the rainy season, when waste dumped in drains can be washed further into waterways, potentially obstructing the movement of stormwater.

LAWMA has consequently urged members of the public to play their part in keeping the environment clean by using approved waste disposal channels and reporting illegal dumping where necessary.

The authority said its enforcement operations would continue across the state as part of efforts to tackle illegal waste disposal, protect drainage infrastructure and promote a cleaner and healthier Lagos environment.

 

Lagos Woman Jailed for Dumping Refuse in Drain During Rainfall

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending