2023 elections in jeopardy over in-fighting at INEC - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

2023 elections in jeopardy over in-fighting at INEC

Published

on

Former INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu
INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu

There is palpable tension in the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, over the continued push by the All Progressives Congress, APC, leadership to ensure the participation of Senate President, Ahmad Lawan, and Godswill Akpabio, in the 2023 senatorial elections of Yobe North Senatorial District and Akwa Ibom North West Senatorial District, respectively.

Contrary to what the leadership of INEC had told Nigerians, that the commission is legally bound to stand by the monitoring reports received from “our state offices”, verified pieces of information available to Vanguard suggest that INEC may have ignored these reports in some states of the federation including Kano, Sokoto, Abia, Ogun, Oyo, Akwa lbom.

This has not gone down well with some Resident Electoral Commissioners, RECs, according to Vanguard sources.

In fact, morale of INEC staff at some of the state offices has been dampened because some of the reports of the monitoring committees are either being tampered with or ignored.

As a result of this, INEC has instigated and encouraged so many litigations in various federal high courts across the country. As at the last count, the Commission acknowledged that there are over 300 cases filed in court that it is joined as a party.

That is not all.

The Election and Political Parties’ Monitoring, EPM, and Legal Department of the Commission, under the direction and control of INEC leadership, have become theatres of intrigues, as politicians are preying on both departments to perfect their underhand ploys.

As it is for APC, so it is for PDP

APC and intrigues at INEC Hq

Vanguard was reliably informed by highly strategic sources at INEC headquarters that the Commission accepted from leadership of the APC, particulars of candidates that claimed to have conducted primaries that its State offices did not monitor.

For instance, in Kano, where the REC, Professor Risikuwa Shehu-Arabu, addressed the press recently that the only governorship primary the state office monitored produced Mohammed Abacha, son of maximum dictator General Sani Abacha, this was changed by APC leadership and INEC’s EPM Department for one Ambassador Sadiq Wali.

READ ALSO:

In Yobe State, where Senate President Ahmed Lawan has tried unsuccessfully, so far, with APC leadership, to intimidate Bashir Sheriff Machina, the winner of the senatorial election to step down, other forces have been mobilised, with a view to getting the name of the senate president on the ballot.

Vanguard was made to understand that an attempt was made to persuade the immediate past REC in Yobe, Ahmed Makama, who had served as a special adviser to former President Olusegun Obasanjo, to endorse as received, a letter dated June 7, 2022, instead of its original which had a June 22, 2022, date, when the letter allegedly got to the Yobe office of INEC from the leadership of the APC. This happened before the REC handed over upon expiration of his tenure, last month.

REC Makama rebuffed all entreaties.

The letter would have suggested that the APC leadership had earlier given indication to INEC that a fresh senatorial primary was in the offing as early as June 7, 2022, wherein the senate president may have participated in a primary monitored by INEC as stipulated by law.

But the letter itself would have created an impossible scenario as Senator Lawan was contesting for the presidential ticket at the party’s convention in Abuja at about June 7, 2022.

Under section 84(1) of the Electoral Act 2022, monitoring of party primaries by INEC is mandatory. The Act used the word, shall, twice, to underscore the importance.

It states that “A political party seeking to nominate candidates for elections under this Act shall hold primaries for aspirants to all elective positions which shall be monitored by the Commission”

Section 29(1) of the 2022 Act provides that only “candidates that emerged from valid primary” can be submitted to INEC for publication.

Section 84(13) states that where a political party fails to comply with the provision of the Act, INEC shall reject the names submitted to it by political parties.

Just as it happened in Kano, the story is same in Abia, where, in the previously published particulars of NASS candidates, INEC that monitored Abia Central Senatorial District primary won by Hon. Sam Onuigbo, who defeated his closest rival, Chief Henry Okoh, by 157 to 152 votes, INEC has, surprisingly, accepted from APC, one Emeka Atuma, who Onuigbo alleged, did not buy nomination form for senate and never participated in the process, to replace the winner.

Again in the just published particulars of candidates 48 hours ago, APC NWC first wrote a letter for the use of direct mode of primary that was monitored by INEC state office, but another parallel primary with indirect method was allegedly held at another venue not monitored by INEC, yet a former civil servant staff of INEC recently appointed as national commissioner instructed that the name of the individual from the so called indirect primary conducted without ward, LGA and state delegates should be forwarded and the primary monitored by state office ignored.

Worst still is Akwa lbom State, where out of the 26 candidates that emerged from valid primary conducted and monitored by INEC state office, only two names were taken from the report of the state office.

No APC governorship candidate, in line with the state office report.

Instead, the APC leadership chose to pick just two names from the list of primaries monitored by INEC, and uploaded to INEC 24 names of candidates not monitored by INEC.

Curiously, INEC published names of candidates not monitored by its state office. and published by the election management body remains a puzzle.

PDP and INEC’s indifference to court order

In Delta State, where there was a valid Federal High Court judgment served on INEC, with specific unequivocal orders of court that disqualified Mr. Sherrif Oborevwhori and “commanded” both PDP(2nd defendant) and INEC(3rd defendant) separately, as parties, to replace the disqualified Oborevwori with the name of Mr. David Edevbie, both PDP and INEC are yet to comply with the orders of the court.

Instead, INEC wrote a letter merely to remind PDP of the judgment.

The letter completely betrayed INEC’s reluctance to enforce the order of the court, compared to the content of similar letters circulating in the social media in respect of court orders to PDP in the past.

In its letter to the National Chairman of PDP, dated 27th June, 2022, and signed by Rose Oriaran-Anthony, Secretary to the Commission, and titled NOTIFICATION OF PENDING ORDERS IN SUIT NO. FHC/ABJ/CS/807/2022 BETWEEN DR. MICHAEL ONOLEMEMEN & 2ORS. V. INEC, SUIT NO. FHC/ABJ/808/(2022)BETWEEN BARRISTER NOSA ADAMS & 8ORS. V. INEC & SUIT FHC/ABJ/809/2022 BETWEEN CHRISTABEL O. EKWU & 23ORS. V. INEC AND THE NEED TO COMPLY WITH THEM, INEC said

READ ALSO:

“The Commission hereby draws the attention of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the Orders of Court arising from the three (3) suits listed above.

“2. In line with the Orders of Court, the Commission is restrained from accepting and recognising any list of candidates other than the list containing the names of the plaintiffs as the PDP’s duly nominated candidates for the election of the seats of:

“a. Senators representing the senatorial zones of Edo North, Edo South and Edo Central of Edo State,

“b. Nine Federal House of Representatives of Edo State, and

“c. The twenty four House of Assembly Constituencies across Edo State.

“3. Accordingly, the Commission expects the PDP to forward the nomination forms of the respective candidates as ordered by the Federal High Court, Abuja.

“4. Please accept the assurance of theCOmmission’s warm regards.”

As a reminder last week, INEC again wrote to the PDP National Chairman on 18th July, 2022.

The letter, titled, RE: SUIT NO FHC/ABJ/CS/795/2022 BETWEEN DAVID EDEV(B)IE V. OBOREVWHORI SHERRIF FRANCIS OROWEDOR AND 2ORS., stated thus:

“This is to draw your attention (to the Judgment) Order of the Federal High Court of Nigeria, Abuja, in the above mentioned suit which has been served on the Commission.

“2. While hoping your party takes note of the Judgment Order, please accept the assurance of the Commission’s warm regards.”

The letter was signed by Rose Oriaran-Anthony, Secretary to the Commission. Right now, the Commission is funtus officio in the two cases.

Pressure on INEC

However, its National Chairman, Professor Mahmoud Yakubu, has come under heavy pressure, specifically in the case of Senator Lawan and Akpabio from the leadership of the APC.

He is yet to shift ground.

Although, in a July 9, 2022, press release issued by Festus Okoye, Esq. National Commissioner and Chairman, Information and Voter Education Committee, the Commission made its position clear.

Inter alia, Okoye stated in the release, “…. In relation to the primaries for the Akwa Ibom North West and Yobe North senatorial districts, the Commission stands by the monitoring reports received from our state offices. For this reason, the Commission did not publish the personal particulars of any candidates for the two constituencies at variance with the state reports.”

Sources at INEC informed Vanguard that political parties, particularly the ruling APC, is mounting pressure on the leadership of the Commission.

Vanguard was made to understand that some of the back and forth that has gone on in recent days about names published by INEC as candidates, some of who did not participate in primaries monitored by INEC, or did not even purchase nomination forms, may not be unconnected with underhand moves going on at the Commission.Vanguad was told that some of INEC’s recent publications containing names of those whose nomination fell short of legal requirement is a “testing of the waters because the Lawan and Akpabio situations have become very notorious and delicate”.

An aggrieved INEC Commissioner at its national headquarters expressed worry that “if the Commission is allowing itself to be seen as complicit in party affairs, this will erode the confidence of the people in INEC’s own electioneering activities when it takes charge of general elections. Does it mean INEC would become unreliable?”

Femi Falana’s position

In an ARISE television interview, Femi Falana, SAN, expressed worry at the lack-lustre attitude of the political leadership in the country to obey simple laws.

According to him, Section 115(D) of the Electoral Act, 2022, which Senate President Lawan helped package “has criminalised double nomination.

“So, you can’t say that you took part in the presidential primary and you took part in the senatorial primary at the same time. Under that section of the law, double nomination attracts two years imprisonment.

“Again, I will expect INEC to draw the attention of the APC to the provision of the law that ‘you’re playing with fire’”.

Falana’s position came against the background of the moves by the APC leadership to seek to ensure that the names of Lawan and Akpabio are forwarded as senatorial candidates in Akwa Ibom and Yobe State.

Section 115(D), in respect of nomination offences, states that it is an offence when “a person…signs a nomination paper or result form as a candidate in more than one constituency at the same election”.

VANGUARD

Loading

Politics

Goodluck Jonathan Yet to Decide on 2027 Race, Associates Clarify

Published

on

Goodluck Jonathan Yet to Decide on 2027 Race, Associates Clarify
Former President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan

Goodluck Jonathan Yet to Decide on 2027 Race, Associates Clarify

ABUJA — Political associates of former President Goodluck Jonathan have declared that only the former Nigerian leader can authoritatively speak on his political future, pushing back against growing speculation over his possible involvement in the 2027 presidential election.

The clarification comes amid renewed public debate and media reports linking Jonathan to a potential return to electoral politics ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The latest controversy was triggered by comments from Jude Imagwe, a former presidential aide, who reportedly dismissed speculation about Jonathan’s possible presidential ambition. However, a pro-Jonathan political group, The Goodies Movement, has argued that such comments should not be interpreted as the official position of the former president.

In a statement issued in Abuja, the group’s coordinator, Sam Presto, stressed that only Jonathan or individuals expressly authorised by him can make definitive statements regarding his political plans.

According to Presto, supporters and stakeholders within the wider Jonathan political family have continued to question whether recent remarks attributed to former aides represent personal opinions or officially sanctioned positions.

He maintained that Nigerians should rely solely on verified and authorised communications when assessing the former president’s stance on the 2027 presidency.

“Only statements issued directly by him, through officially designated representatives, or via recognised communication channels should be regarded as definitive expressions of his political position,” Presto stated.

The group also called on journalists and media organisations to exercise caution when reporting statements made by individuals claiming to speak on behalf of prominent political figures.

READ ALSO:

According to the statement, any position purportedly reflecting the views of a former Head of State should be supported by clear evidence of authorisation and current representation.

The intervention comes at a time when political calculations and alignments ahead of the 2027 elections are gradually gathering momentum across Nigeria’s political landscape.

In recent months, several groups across different regions of the country have publicly urged Jonathan to consider contesting the next presidential election, citing his leadership experience, democratic credentials and perceived ability to unite the country.

These calls have fuelled intense speculation about whether the former president may seek a return to active politics. The debate gained further traction following reports that a faction within the opposition political space had considered endorsing Jonathan for the presidency in 2027.

Despite the growing discussions, Jonathan has remained publicly silent on the matter and has neither confirmed nor denied any intention to contest.

His associates insist that until the former president personally makes a declaration, all endorsements, denials, confirmations or speculations regarding his political future should be treated as individual opinions rather than official positions.

Presto emphasised that Nigerians deserve accurate information rather than assumptions and urged political actors and commentators to avoid attributing positions to Jonathan without his express approval.

With the race toward Nigeria’s 2027 presidential election gradually taking shape, political observers believe Jonathan’s eventual decision could significantly influence the calculations of major political parties and power blocs across the country.

For now, however, his camp maintains that only the former president can determine when and how his political future will be communicated to Nigerians.

Goodluck Jonathan Yet to Decide on 2027 Race, Associates Clarify

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Certificate of Return Delays: APC Winners Suspect Plot to Favour Akpabio’s Allies

Published

on

Certificate of Return Delays: APC Winners Suspect Plot to Favour Akpabio's Allies.
Senate President Godswill Akpabio

Certificate of Return Delays: APC Winners Suspect Plot to Favour Akpabio’s Allies

Comments by Senate President Godswill Akpabio aimed at reassuring serving senators who lost out in the recently concluded party primaries ahead of the 2027 general elections have sparked anxiety among victorious aspirants, who fear that despite winning their party tickets through the primaries, the outcome could be altered in favour of incumbent senators who are colleagues of the Senate President.

The aspirants are worried that, despite winning their party tickets through the primaries, the outcome could be altered in favour of incumbent senators who are colleagues of the Senate President. Those expressing concern are mainly members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), who fear that Akpabio could use his influence within the party to secure tickets for some of the defeated lawmakers.

Akpabio, while delivering a welcome address following the Senate’s resumption from a three-week recess and Eid-el-Kabir break, told lawmakers who failed to secure their parties’ tickets that the leadership of the National Assembly was still working to address the situation. While congratulating senators who emerged successful across party lines, the Senate President lamented the scale of defeats recorded during the primaries, noting that the losses were more substantial than anticipated.

He said: “I congratulate the political parties, one or two of which emanated from these chambers. They recently concluded their primaries and all internal democratic processes. I felicitate particularly with those who have secured their mandates to represent their parties in the next general election. I know that there will always be victories and disappointments, yet above every individual triumph stands a greater triumph, the triumph of democracy itself. In this Senate, we were promised that we would have very few disappointments. I do know that the Senate Leader and the rest of the leadership are working very hard to address these issues. So, in advance, I say congratulations to all of us across party lines.”

Following his remarks, Akpabio led senators into a closed-door executive session that lasted more than two hours. Sources told news outlets that Akpabio and other principal officers of the Senate also met with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Although details of the meeting were not made public, insiders said discussions centred on possible options for some serving senators who lost their primaries.

READ ALSO:

Before the Senate proceeded on recess, the leadership had reportedly assured lawmakers of automatic return tickets or consensus arrangements in many states. However, when the primaries were eventually conducted, only Senate President Godswill Akpabio (Akwa Ibom North-West) and Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele (Ekiti Central) secured automatic tickets. Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin (Kano North), the three senators from Borno State, and senators from Lagos State secured their return tickets through consensus arrangements.

Based on the results declared by the party, 60 of the 105 serving senators secured return tickets, while about 40 failed in their bids. Among those who lost are prominent figures including Deputy Senate Leader Lola Ashiru (Kwara South), Jibrin Isah (Kogi East), former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel (Ogun East), Ned Nwoko (Delta North), Abbas Aminu Iya (Adamawa Central), Kaila Samaila Dahuwa (Bauchi North), Titus Zam (Benue North-West), Emmanuel Udende (Benue North-East), William Eteng Jonah (Cross River Central), Neda Imasuen (Edo South), former Gombe State Governor Danjuma Goje (Gombe Central), Francis Ezenwa (Imo East), Musa Garba (Kebbi South), Adeniyi Adegbonmire (Ondo Central), Olajide Ipinsagba (Ondo North), Olubiyi Fadeyi Oluwole (Osun Central), Diket Plang (Plateau Central), and Ipalibo Harry Banigo (Rivers West).

Several senators also lost after contesting governorship primaries in their states. They include Saliu Mustapha (Kwara Central), Abdulfatai Buhari (Oyo North), Shehu Buba (Bauchi South), Onawo Mohammed Ogoshi (Nasarawa South), and Abdul Ningi (Bauchi Central), among others.

Despite the high-profile losses, the APC senatorial primaries also produced significant winners. Imo State Governor Hope Uzodimma secured the ticket for Imo West, while former Delta State Governor Ifeanyi Okowa trounced incumbent Senator Ned Nwoko in Delta North, polling 113,309 votes against Nwoko’s 2,612 votes. Ogun State Governor Dapo Abiodun prevailed in Ogun East after supporters of his main challenger and incumbent, Senator Gbenga Daniel, withdrew over alleged insecurity threats. Former Senate President Ahmad Lawan secured the Yobe ticket, while former Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole clinched Edo North through consensus arrangement. In Kogi Central, former Governor Yahaya Bello secured a landslide victory, polling 72,399 votes to defeat his challengers across the five local government areas of the district. Senate Chief Whip Ali Ndume clinched the Borno South ticket by consensus, while Senator Orji Uzor Kalu secured a landslide victory in Abia North with 65,651 votes.

Meanwhile, some winners of the APC primaries have expressed concern over the delay in the issuance of Certificates of Return, alleging that it may be part of efforts to alter the final list of candidates ahead of the 2027 elections. Some victorious aspirants told news outlets that the delay had heightened anxiety, especially following comments suggesting that the party’s national leadership retained the final authority to determine candidates.

A successful aspirant from Kwara State, who requested anonymity, said those who defeated incumbent lawmakers had become increasingly suspicious. “Some of us who defeated incumbent legislators at both the state and national levels are now suspicious of the games being played by the national leadership of the party. We were told that the President is wading in to manage any crisis that might arise after the release of the final results. Since then, we have been worried,” she said.

Another successful aspirant from Gombe State said the Senate President’s comments remained open to different interpretations. “The statement is not clear, so we cannot comment on it yet. We are trying to seek clarification before reacting,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Party officials, however, insist that the delay is in line with established procedures. Speaking through his media aide, Abimbola Tooki, APC National Chairman Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda said primary election guidelines provided for the collation of results and resolution of appeals before the formal declaration of winners. Yilwatda had previously stated that no state chapter or electoral committee of the party has the authority to announce winners of the party’s primary elections, insisting that only the National Working Committee (NWC) can ratify and officially declare results from the primaries.

“The guidelines issued for the conduct of the primaries were very clear and unambiguous. Results from the various levels were to be collated appropriately, while the formal declaration of winners would only come after the appeal processes have been concluded,” Tooki said. He added that aggrieved aspirants retained the constitutional right to seek redress through the party’s appeal mechanism.

A reliable party source confirmed that the various appeal committees had submitted their reports and that the reports are still being evaluated. Once that is completed, a final result will be sent to the party’s National Working Committee for action. “The NWC will meet on this any moment from now and once that is done the list will be announced,” the source said.

However, some aspirants argued that the delay has fuelled fears that the outcome of the primaries could still be altered administratively. They also pointed out that while many of them were yet to receive their certificates, President Bola Tinubu has already been presented with his Certificate of Return by the party following his victory at the APC presidential primary. They argued that the prompt issuance of the President’s certificate contrasts sharply with the treatment being meted out to other victorious aspirants across the country. “The President has already received his Certificate of Return, so why are the others being delayed? The party should not create the impression that some candidates are more valid than others,” one candidate stated.

READ ALSO:

Article 19 of the APC constitution states that the list of candidates elected at the party primary election, congresses, and conventions shall be forwarded, after the disposal of appeals, to the National Working Committee of the party for ratification or confirmation as candidates for national or general elections. This provision has become a source of concern for many aspirants who fear that the NWC could overturn primary results in favour of preferred candidates.

The concern is not without precedent. In Agege Local Government Area of Lagos State, party leaders have petitioned President Bola Tinubu, the APC National Chairman, the NWC, and INEC over what they described as the wrongful alteration of the outcome of the party’s primary election for Agege Constituency I. According to the petition, Mr. Egunjobi Ganiyu Kola emerged as the winner of the primary election held on 20th May 2026, polling 9,132 votes out of 10,126 votes cast, but was subsequently denied recognition as the party’s candidate after a newspaper report published a different name as the winner.

Public affairs analyst Dr. Seun Ajayi cautioned against overturning the outcome of the primaries. He warned that the party must respect the choice of its members, who selected their candidates through direct primaries. He said anything short of that would negate the principles of internal democracy and cause discord among the aspirants. “What the President can do is ensure that those who lost out, especially the serving senators, are given alternative national assignments if he still needs their services, instead of overturning the choice of the people,” he said.

Already, several lawmakers who lost out in the primary process have left the ruling party or are considering their options. They include Shehu Buba, senator representing Bauchi South, and Garba Maidoki, senator representing Kebbi South. In Kogi East, Senator Jibrin Isah rejected the outcome of the primary after losing his return ticket, accusing Governor Ahmed Ododo’s camp of hijacking materials and frustrating his supporters. “The battle line has been drawn,” he declared, vowing to challenge Ododo in the governorship race.

Akpabio, however, framed the developments as part of the democratic process, saying while some aspirants emerged victorious and others suffered setbacks, democracy remained the ultimate winner. His remark about not being “lured into another political party” also underscored growing concerns about potential defections following contentious primary contests across the country.

At the time of filing this report, no official clarification had been issued by Akpabio or the Senate leadership regarding the specific nature of the efforts being made to assist defeated senators, leaving APC primary winners across the country in a state of uncertainty as they await the final list of candidates for the 2027 general elections.

Certificate of Return Delays: APC Winners Suspect Plot to Favour Akpabio’s Allies.

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Omo-Agege Backs Obi’s 2027 Ambition, Defends Tinubu’s Economic Reforms

Published

on

Omo-Agege Backs Obi’s 2027 Ambition, Defends Tinubu’s Economic Reforms
Former Deputy President of the Senate, Ovie Omo-Agege

Omo-Agege Backs Obi’s 2027 Ambition, Defends Tinubu’s Economic Reforms

Former Deputy President of the Senate, Ovie Omo-Agege, has declared support for the 2027 presidential ambition of Labour Party candidate Peter Obi, while insisting that he still backs key economic reforms introduced by President Bola Tinubu.

Omo-Agege made the remarks during an appearance on ARISE Television’s The Morning Show, where he addressed growing public attention around his political alignment following his exit from the All Progressives Congress (APC).

He explained that his support for Obi does not amount to a rejection of the Tinubu administration’s policies, stressing that his position on major economic decisions remains unchanged.

“I was a member of the APC. I never left the APC; the party left me and left my over 230,000 supporters in Delta State,” he said during the interview.

Omo-Agege maintained that he continues to support some of the administration’s flagship economic measures, particularly the removal of fuel subsidy and the floating of the naira, which he described as difficult but necessary reforms.

READ ALSO:

“When Mr President came up with the economic policies, most especially the naira floatation and subsidy removal, these are policies I supported and continue to support,” he stated.

He further argued that his position on the reforms is consistent with his earlier stance and should not be interpreted as political contradiction.

According to him, the same policy ideas being implemented by the Tinubu administration were also previously advocated by Peter Obi, suggesting a policy convergence between both political figures despite being in different parties.

“Even though these policies were espoused by Mr President, which I support, the same policies were also supported by Peter Obi,” he said.

Omo-Agege added that his endorsement of Obi for the 2027 presidential race is rooted in his belief that Nigerians may have greater confidence in the implementation of the reforms under Obi’s leadership.

He argued that public trust and perception play a major role in the success of economic policies, especially those that have short-term social and economic impacts.

“The question is, have I changed my opinion about this? No, I have not,” he said.

“I just believe that under the new platform I’ve gone to, these policies will continue and the people… would feel more confident because they are more comfortable and trust Peter Obi that he will make these policies work more than Mr President could have done.”

He also insisted that the policies themselves should not be blamed for current economic challenges, but rather their implementation and public acceptance.

“The policies are not bad policies,” Omo-Agege added.

His comments come amid increasing political realignments and early positioning ahead of the 2027 general elections, with key figures across party lines beginning to signal shifting alliances and strategic endorsements.

Political observers say Omo-Agege’s remarks highlight the evolving and often fluid nature of Nigeria’s opposition and ruling party dynamics, particularly as debates around economic reforms, cost of living, and governance continue to shape national discourse.

Omo-Agege Backs Obi’s 2027 Ambition, Defends Tinubu’s Economic Reforms

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending