Threats, ridicule as Trump, Musk feud escalates - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Threats, ridicule as Trump, Musk feud escalates

Published

on

Elon Musk and Donald Trump

Threats, ridicule as Trump, Musk feud escalates

What happens when the richest person and the most powerful politician have a knock-down, drag-out fight?

The world is finding out – and it’s not a pretty picture. Donald Trump and Elon Musk have two of the biggest megaphones, and they have now turned them on each other, as a disagreement has ballooned into a war of words.

Trump has threatened Musk’s voluminous business dealings with the federal government, which form the lifeblood of his SpaceX programme.

“The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon’s governmental subsidies and contracts,” Trump posted menacingly on his own social media website.

If Trump turns the machinery of government against Musk, the tech billionaire will feel pain. Tesla’s stock price plunged by 14% on Thursday.

It’s not a one-way street, however. After that volley, Musk called for Trump’s impeachment and dared him to cut funding for his companies.

Musk also said he was accelerating the decommissioning of his Dragon spacecraft, which the US relies on to carry American astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. But hours later, he appeared to back down from that threat, saying in response to a post on X urging him to cool off: “Good advice. Ok, we won’t decommission Dragon.”

Musk has near limitless resources to respond, including by funding insurgent challengers to Republicans in next year’s elections and primaries. And late on Thursday afternoon, he said he was dropping the “really big bomb” – suggesting without evidence that Trump appears in unreleased files related to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

READ ALSO:

His press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, offered only a tepid pushback to Musk’s allegations and accusations.

“This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted,” she said.

Musk may not win a fight against the whole of Trump’s government, but he could exact a high political – and personal – price for Trump and the Republicans.

Trump, perhaps aware of this, appeared to tamp down the heat a bit by the end of the day. He avoided commenting on Musk during a public appearance at a White House event and posted a message on Truth Social that said he didn’t mind “turning against him”, but wishes he had quit government service months ago.

He then pivoted to boosting of his “big, beautiful” tax and spending legislation.

It’s difficult to envision an easy walk-down after Thursday’s heat, however.

Trading insults and threats

The feud started at a simmer last week, began bubbling on Wednesday and became a full-on boil on Thursday afternoon in the Oval Office. As new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz – the day’s visitor – sat in awkward silence, the president sounded a bit like a spurned lover.

He expressed surprise at Musk’s criticism of his legislation. He pushed back against the notion that he would have lost last year’s presidential election without Musk’s hundreds of millions of dollars in support. And he said Musk was only changing his tune now because his car company, Tesla, will be hurt by the Republican push to end electric vehicle tax credits.

Truth Social Trump posts on Truth Social and threatens to axe government contracts with Musk's companies

Musk quickly took to his social media site, X, with a very Generation X response for his 220 million followers: “Whatever”.

READ ALSO:

He said he didn’t care about the car subsidies, and that he wanted to shrink the national debt, which he says is an existential threat to the nation. He insisted that Democrats would have prevailed in last year’s election without his help. “Such ingratitude,” he told Trump.

The billionaire then launched a series of extraordinary attacks throughout the afternoon, and the feud was on in earnest.

Musk and Trump had formed a powerful but unlikely alliance, culminating in the tech billionaire having a key position of budget-slashing authority in the Trump administration. Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or Doge, became one of the biggest stories of Trump’s first 100 days, as it shuttered entire agencies and dismissed thousands of government workers.

It wasn’t long, however, before speculation began over when – and how – the two outsized personalities would ultimately fall out.

For a while, it seemed like those predictions were off the mark. Trump stood by Musk even as the latter’s popularity dropped, as he feuded with administration officials and as he became a liability in several key elections earlier this year.

Every time it appeared there would be a break, Musk would pop up in the Oval Office, or the Cabinet room or on the president’s Air Force One flight to Mar-a-Lago.

When Musk’s 130 days as a “special government employee” ended last week, the two had a chummy Oval Office send-off, with a golden key to the White House and hints that Musk might someday return.

It’s safe to say that any invitation has been rescinded and the locks have been changed.

“Elon and I had a great relationship,” Trump said on Thursday – a comment notable for its use of the past tense.

There had been some thought that Trump’s surprise announcement on Wednesday night of a new travel ban, additional sanctions on Harvard and a conspiracy-laced administration investigation of former President Joe Biden were all efforts to change the subject from Musk’s criticism. The White House and its allies in Congress seemed careful not to further antagonise him after his earlier comments.

Then Trump spoke out and… so much for that.

‘A zero-sum game’

Now the question is where the dispute goes next. Congressional Republicans could find it harder to keep their members behind Trump’s bill with Musk providing rhetorical and, perhaps financial, air cover for those who break ranks.

Trump has already threatened Musk’s government contracts, but he could also take aim at his remaining Doge allies in the administration or reopen Biden-era investigations into Musk’s business dealings.

Everything at this point is on the table.

Meanwhile, Democrats are on the sidelines, wondering how to respond. Few seem willing to welcome Musk, a former donor to their party, back into the fold. But there’s also the old adage that the enemy of an enemy is a friend.

“It’s a zero-sum game,” Liam Kerr, a Democratic strategist, told Politico. “Anything that he does that moves more toward Democrats hurts Republicans.”

At the very least, Democrats seem happy to stand back and let the two men exchange blows. And until they abandon this fight, the din is likely to drown out everything else in American politics.

But don’t expect this spat to end anytime soon.

“Trump has 3.5 years left as president,” Musk wrote on X, “but I will be around for 40-plus years.”

 

Threats, ridicule as Trump, Musk feud escalates

BBC

International

Strait of Hormuz Reopens as US, Iran Confirm Two‑Week Ceasefire

Published

on

Strait of Hormuz Crisis - Iran Threatens to Stop Gulf Oil Shipments

Strait of Hormuz Reopens as US, Iran Confirm Two‑Week Ceasefire

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil transit route, has reopened following a two‑week conditional ceasefire between the United States and Iran, confirmed by both countries on Wednesday. The temporary truce comes after escalating tensions in the region and is expected to ease pressure on global energy markets.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that safe passage through the strait will be allowed for the next 14 days, coordinated with Iran’s armed forces and subject to technical considerations. The reopening follows US President Donald Trump’s warning that Iran’s energy infrastructure, including bridges, would face attacks if Tehran failed to comply.

The ceasefire agreement, described by Trump as a “double-sided ceasefire”, also involves Israel, which has agreed to suspend related military operations during the two-week period. Pakistan, which mediated talks between Washington and Tehran, confirmed that an immediate ceasefire is in effect and invited delegations from both countries to Islamabad for further negotiations toward a comprehensive settlement.

READ ALSO:

Trump emphasized that Iran’s 10-point proposal provides a workable basis for negotiations, with reports indicating that it includes provisions for lifting sanctions. He hailed the temporary truce as a diplomatic victory for the United States, while Iranian officials portrayed the deal as a major step toward stabilizing the region.

The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is a significant relief for the global oil market, which had been affected by disruptions due to earlier attacks in the region. The strait handles around 20% of global petroleum trade, and its closure had caused spikes in crude prices. Following the ceasefire announcement, Brent crude and US West Texas Intermediate benchmarks fell sharply.

Despite the truce, experts caution that underlying conflicts, including nuclear and regional security issues, remain unresolved. The ceasefire offers a window for diplomatic engagement, though long-term stability will depend on successful negotiations and continued adherence to the agreement by all parties.

Strait of Hormuz Reopens as US, Iran Confirm Two‑Week Ceasefire

Continue Reading

International

Trump Accuses CNN of ‘Fake News’ Over Iran Ceasefire Victory Report

Published

on

US President Donald Trump

Trump Accuses CNN of ‘Fake News’ Over Iran Ceasefire Victory Report

US President Donald Trump has sparked a major controversy after disputing CNN’s report that Iran claimed victory following a recent temporary ceasefire agreement with the United States. Trump labeled the report “fraudulent” and accused the network of sourcing its information from a “fake news site from Nigeria.”

The dispute unfolded shortly after Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, aimed at halting hostilities, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and creating room for diplomatic negotiations. Trump insisted that the ceasefire represented a “total and complete victory” for the United States.

CNN had published a report quoting Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, claiming Tehran had achieved a “historic and crushing defeat” of the United States and forced Washington to accept portions of its proposed discussion framework. Trump rejected the report, stating that it did not reflect Iran’s official position. He demanded that CNN retract the article and issue a full apology.

READ ALSO:

In posts on his Truth Social platform, Trump asserted that CNN republished a false statement originally linked to a “trouble-making site from Nigeria”. He described the network’s coverage as dangerous and potentially inflammatory given the sensitive national security context. Trump added that authorities were investigating whether a crime had been committed in issuing the disputed report.

Brendan Carr, Chairman of the United States Federal Communications Commission, publicly defended Trump’s position, criticizing CNN for allegedly spreading a hoax headline at a critical moment. “Fake news is bad enough for the country, but pushing out a hoax headline in such a sensitive national security moment requires accountability,” Carr said.

CNN, however, has refused to retract or apologise, maintaining that its report relied on credible Iranian officials and multiple state-backed media sources. A spokesperson emphasized that the network followed standard journalistic verification procedures and accurately reported the statements made by Iranian authorities at the time.

Analysts note that the feud highlights a broader battle over narrative control in the aftermath of the US-Iran ceasefire. While Trump portrays the agreement as a strategic success for the United States, Iranian authorities and international observers point to a more complex and contested outcome.

The ceasefire, which temporarily reopened the Strait of Hormuz, has been recognized globally as a step toward de-escalation in the region, though questions remain over the long-term impact of the deal. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed the truce includes a two-week promise of safe transit through the strategic waterway, critical to global petroleum supply.

The dispute underscores ongoing tensions over media credibility, misinformation, and the portrayal of international conflicts, with both sides standing firm: Trump demanding corrections and accountability, and CNN defending its reporting based on official sources.

Trump Accuses CNN of ‘Fake News’ Over Iran Ceasefire Victory Report

Continue Reading

International

Trump Threatens 50% Tariffs on Countries Supplying Weapons to Iran

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump

Trump Threatens 50% Tariffs on Countries Supplying Weapons to Iran

The Donald Trump has warned that any country supplying military weapons to Iran will face immediate 50 percent US tariffs, escalating pressure even as diplomatic efforts to ease tensions gather pace.

In a statement posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump declared that “a country supplying military weapons to Iran will be immediately tariffed… 50%, with no exclusions or exemptions,” signaling a strict economic crackdown on nations aiding Tehran.

The warning comes at a critical moment as the US simultaneously explores “tariff and sanctions relief” in talks with Iran, reflecting a dual strategy of economic pressure and negotiation. This development follows Trump’s announcement of a two-week ceasefire agreement, temporarily halting planned US military operations in the region.

According to Trump, the ceasefire is conditional on Iran’s immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global shipping lane responsible for a significant share of the world’s oil supply. The US President described the arrangement as a “double-sided ceasefire,” noting that Washington would suspend bombing operations while monitoring Iran’s compliance.

Trump disclosed that the decision was influenced by consultations with Shehbaz Sharif and Asim Munir, who urged restraint amid fears of wider regional instability. He added that the United States has already achieved its major military objectives and is now close to securing a broader peace deal with Tehran.

READ ALSO:

The US President further revealed that a 10-point proposal submitted by Iran is being reviewed and could serve as a framework for a long-term agreement aimed at stabilising the Middle East. He expressed optimism that ongoing negotiations could lead to a comprehensive resolution of the crisis.

Reports indicate that Israel has also aligned with the ceasefire, suspending its military operations during the period, a move seen as boosting the chances of diplomatic progress.

However, conflicting claims have emerged from Tehran. Iranian authorities, including the Supreme National Security Council, have described the development as a major diplomatic victory, asserting that the United States has agreed to lift both primary and secondary sanctions. This claim has not been independently confirmed by US officials, raising questions about the exact terms of the agreement.

Iranian officials also suggested that the proposed framework includes regulated passage through the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian military supervision, a condition that could become a key point of contention in ongoing negotiations due to its global economic implications.

Analysts warn that Trump’s tariff threat could have far-reaching consequences, particularly for countries such as Russia and China, which maintain strategic and military ties with Iran. The proposed tariffs could heighten global trade tensions and complicate already fragile diplomatic efforts.

The announcement came just hours before a previously set US deadline for Iran to comply with demands, underscoring the urgency of the situation. While initial reactions to the ceasefire have been cautiously optimistic, uncertainty remains over whether the agreement will hold and how the tariff threat may reshape geopolitical dynamics.

As negotiations continue, global attention is focused on whether the temporary truce can evolve into a lasting peace agreement, or if renewed tensions could disrupt progress in the region.

Trump Threatens 50% Tariffs on Countries Supplying Weapons to Iran

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending