How Nigerian Army Uncovered Alleged Plot to Overthrow Tinubu

The Nigerian Army has told a Federal High Court in Abuja how intelligence operatives uncovered an alleged plot to overthrow the administration of President Bola Tinubu, leading to the arrest and prosecution of several suspects accused of terrorism-related offences and conspiracy against the state.

During proceedings before the court on Wednesday, a military witness explained that security agencies intercepted communications and gathered intelligence suggesting that a group of individuals was allegedly planning to destabilize the government through coordinated actions aimed at inciting unrest and undermining national security.

According to the Army witness, investigations began after security agencies received intelligence reports indicating suspicious meetings and movements involving some of the defendants.

The witness told the court that surveillance operations, digital evidence, and intelligence analysis later uncovered alleged plans linked to efforts to unlawfully challenge the authority of the Federal Government.

The prosecution further alleged that some of the accused persons held secret meetings where discussions bordering on unconstitutional change of government and attacks on strategic institutions were allegedly made.

READ ALSO:

• FG Declares Friday Public Holiday for 2026 Workers’ Day Celebration
• Trump Triggers Global Reactions After Calling Strait of Hormuz ‘Strait of Trump’
• 2027 Lagos Race: Tinubu, GAC Endorses Obafemi Hamzat

Military prosecutors informed the court that items recovered during investigations included communication devices, documents, and electronic materials believed to be connected to the alleged conspiracy.

The Army maintained that the actions of the defendants posed a serious threat to national security and democratic stability, especially amid ongoing security challenges across parts of the country.

Defense lawyers, however, challenged the prosecution’s claims, arguing that the allegations were politically motivated and lacked credible evidence directly linking their clients to any coup plot.

Counsel to some of the defendants urged the court to dismiss portions of the prosecution’s testimony, insisting that mere association or political criticism should not be interpreted as an attempt to overthrow the government.

The presiding judge subsequently adjourned the matter to a later date for continuation of hearing and cross-examination of witnesses.

The case has attracted nationwide attention due to growing concerns over national security, political tensions, and the increasing scrutiny of alleged anti-government activities.

Authorities have repeatedly warned against actions capable of undermining constitutional democracy, stressing that security agencies would continue monitoring threats against the state and democratic institutions.

How Nigerian Army Uncovered Alleged Plot to Overthrow Tinubu

Mo’Afrique targets Nigeria’s mass fashion market with Modish launch in Abuja

In a bold pivot from bespoke elegance to industrial-scale fashion, Nigerian fashion house Mo’Afrique has unveiled a multi-million-naira garment factory in Abuja.

The company also commissioned a new mass-market brand, Modish Formals—signalling strategic move to capture Nigeria’s vast, underserved apparel segment.

Specifically, Modish Formals will focus on producing professional wear, uniforms, and related apparel.

Founder and Creative Director of Mo’Afrique, Omobolanle Olawole, speaking with newsmen, said the company also used the occasion to mark 10 years of operations.

Olawole stated that the expansion from bespoke tailoring into the mass market was driven by evolving customer needs and the existence of a large, untapped segment in Nigeria’s garment industry.

“This expansion is a direct response to market demand. Over the years, our corporate clients have required more than bespoke fashion—they need structured, high-quality garments that reflect their brand identity and can be delivered at scale. Modish is our answer to that need,” she said.

The Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, Mrs. Jumoke Oduwole, who commissioned the facility, commended Mo’Afrique for boosting local manufacturing capacity.

She described the anniversary and factory launch as a “double celebration” that reflects both achievement and a new phase of growth, urging the company to extend its footprint beyond Nigeria.

“We expect you to have your garments across Africa and the rest of the world using the African Continental Free Trade Area. This is a pride for the ministry and the administration. This is what generates jobs, employment, and contributes to GDP,” she said.

Oduwole also encouraged the company to leverage opportunities under AfCFTA to scale exports, noting that the government remains committed to supporting entrepreneurs in overcoming business climate challenges.

Highlighting the company’s journey, she added that Mo’Afrique’s growth from a bedroom startup a decade ago to a full-scale manufacturing operation underscores the resilience of Nigerian entrepreneurs.

According to the minister, initiatives such as the factory will drive job creation, boost employment, and strengthen Nigeria’s industrial base.

She described Modish as part of a broader solution to deepen the textile and clothing value chain, positioning Nigeria as a competitive force in global garment manufacturing.

She added that the facility represents more than a production hub, serving as a model for innovation, sustainability, and locally driven industrial growth.

“You Lack Power To Revoke My Certificate” — Kalu Tells Legal Education Council

The Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Benjamin Kalu, has challenged the Council of Legal Education (CLE), insisting that the body lacks the legal authority to revoke his Nigerian Law School qualifying certificate amid an ongoing investigation into allegations surrounding his academic records and NYSC participation.

The controversy followed a petition alleging inconsistencies in Kalu’s academic timeline, particularly claims that he combined the Nigerian Law School programme with National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) service. The CLE had directed him to respond to the allegations within seven days as part of its internal review process.

In a formal response through his lawyers dated April 28, 2026, and signed by Chukwuebuka S. Okeke of Olaniwun Ajayi LP Chambers, Kalu described the petition as “fundamentally deficient in law” and urged the council to dismiss it. His legal team insisted that no law prohibits simultaneous participation in the Nigerian Law School and NYSC programme.

Kalu’s lawyers also argued that the Council of Legal Education has no express statutory power to revoke or cancel a qualifying certificate once issued. They maintained that any disciplinary authority available to the council is limited and can only apply in cases involving proven criminal conduct or clear legal violations, none of which they said had been established.

READ ALSO:

• Nigeria Clears 33 Ambassadors as 32 Await Host Country Approval
• “Hamzat Is Scared of Primaries” — Lagos APC Aspirant Rejects Consensus Plan
• Police Officer Arrested After Shooting Handcuffed Suspect Dead in Viral Video

The legal team further referenced provisions of the Legal Education (Consolidation, etc.) Act, explaining that the CLE’s mandate is to oversee legal education and certify candidates who meet the requirements for admission to the Bar, but not to withdraw certificates retrospectively. They cited Section 5 of the Act, which outlines eligibility criteria for Law School graduates to be called to the Bar.

Despite Kalu’s objections, the Council of Legal Education has set up a three-member investigative panel to examine the petition and related allegations. In a letter dated April 21, 2026, the council instructed Kalu to submit a written response within seven days, citing allegations of perjury, false representation, and discrepancies in his NYSC and Law School records.

The CLE, however, has maintained silence publicly on the matter. A senior official confirmed that the petition was received and the process is being handled internally, declining to provide further details or confirm whether Kalu responded after the deadline.

Kalu’s legal team also dismissed reliance on an alleged declaration he reportedly signed during his academic period, which stated he would not participate in NYSC while in Law School. They argued that the document was unsworn and therefore carries no legal weight or enforceability.

They further maintained that no statute, regulation, or institutional guideline in force at the time prohibited simultaneous participation in the Nigerian Law School and NYSC programme. According to them, a review of the Nigerian Law School Student Handbook for the relevant academic session also revealed no such restriction.

Meanwhile, the Civil Society Groups of Good Governance (CSGGG) has filed a separate petition questioning the legality of combining Law School studies with NYSC service, arguing that law students are expected to fully dedicate themselves to professional training without parallel obligations.

The CLE’s investigative panel is expected to review all submissions before deciding on further action. For now, the dispute remains unresolved, with Kalu insisting his certificate is valid and cannot be revoked, while the council continues its internal inquiry.

“You Lack Power To Revoke My Certificate” — Kalu Tells Legal Education Council