Kano beats South East in VAT collection - Newstrends
Connect with us

Business

Kano beats South East in VAT collection

Published

5 years ago

on

Kano State collected more money as Value Added Tax (VAT) than the entire South East zone in the first eight months of 2021, an exclusive data obtained by Daily Trust show.

Records of VAT receipts from Federal Inland Revenue Services (FIRS) seen by Daily Trust indicate that the state collected N24.4bn, ahead of the five south-eastern states with accumulated collection of N20bn.

The data further revealed that Kaduna State with N19bn accrual also did better than Akwa Ibom (N9.3bn), Bayelsa (N13bn), Delta (N13bn), Edo (N9bn), and Ogun (N11bn).

For instance, Kaduna’s N19.8bn is higher than the combined collection of Abia, Cross River, Osun, Ekiti, Ondo and Imo.

Abia, according to the chart, collected N2.2bn representing 0.22%; Cross River collected N1.9bn or 0.19%; Osun collected N2.07bn or 0.20; Ekiti made N6.2bn or 0.62; Ondo collected N4.8bn or 0.48, while Imo collected 1.01bn or 0.10 %.

READ ALSO:

Yobe in the North East collected N9.3bn rubbing shoulders with Akwa Ibom (N9.3bn), Edo (N9bn), Ebonyi (N7.2bn) and Ekiti (N6.2bn).

Lagos and the FCT, combined, contribute 65.22% of the total, while all the remaining 35 states contribute 34.78 percent of the total.

This revelation is coming amidst VAT row between the federal government and some states, and allegations that some states, majorly in the North, benefit more than what they contribute to the central pool.

The statics show that Lagos is on top of the chart with 41.5 percent of the total VAT amounting to N421.2bn while Zamfara collected the least recording, N762.5m or 0.08 percent of the total sum.

Lagos is followed by the FCT which collected N241bn or 23.74 %; Rivers collected N92.3bn or 9.09 % while Oyo followed with N61bn representing 6.01%.

Other top performers in the chart are Kano with N24.4bn or 2.40% and Kaduna with N19.8bn or 1.95%.

However, in spite of Zamfara, a state in the North West recording the least performance, more northern States performed better than the southern states as the figure indicated.

Despite the crisis in some of the North East states, the region collected a total of N27.7bn compared to N21bn collected by the south-eastern region of the country.

READ ALSO:

Exclusive of Lagos, the other South West states collected a total of N85.8bn only while the North East and North West, which have been heavily bedevilled by insurgency and other security challenges, have collected N86.5bn within the same period.

With the exception of Lagos (N421.2bn), Rivers (92.3bn), Oyo (N61bn), Kano (N24bn) and Kaduna (19bn) most states have posted an average performance lower than N10bn.

How VAT pitched southern, northern states

A verdict by a Federal High Court in Rivers on August 9, 2021, on who has the power to collect VAT favoured the state government; a development seen as a victory for those clamouring for decentralised collection.

Daily Trust reports that both Rivers and Lagos had sued the federal government over the continued collection of VAT by the FIRS.

The controversy spiked after a meeting of the Southern Governors Forum (SGF) endorsed the position of Lagos and Rivers and insisted on allowing every state to collect its VAT revenue individually.

Members of the Northern Governors Forum (NGF) shot back at their southern counterparts, saying the southern governors were confusing the value-added tax (VAT) with sales tax.

The governors noted that the reason Lagos would account for 50 percent of VAT collection was that most telecommunication companies, banks, manufacturing and other trading activities had their headquarters in the state.

“VAT is being confused by these state governments as a sales tax. If every state enacted its own VAT Law, multiple taxations will result in increases in prices of goods and services and collapse in interstate trade. VAT is not a production tax like excise, but terminal tax which is paid by the ultimate consumer,” chairman of the forum, Governor Simon Lalong had said.

READ ALSO:

‘Claim VAT sharing benefits northern states more than the southern erroneous’

An economist and a former presidential candidate, Mr. Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim, said those who have “managed the information about the VAT wars have created the impression that the present distribution benefits the northern states more than the southern states.

“They try to make it look like the VAT is part of the ‘hegemonic domination’ of the North. Many commentators hardly look at the data before they hit their keyboards online. Many swallowed hook line and sinker very obvious lies.”

Olawepo-Hashim argued that apart from Lagos, Rivers and the FCT who benefit from the fact that they host the headquarters of major economic, political and oil-related institutions, most states apart from Oyo are doing badly in VAT generation and a lot of southern states are woeful.

“Most states, whether they are in the North or South are doing badly in production of goods and services except for Lagos, Rivers, Oyo, Kano and Kaduna states. The present centrally collected VAT which is then distributed subsidizes everybody,” he noted.

He maintained that in comparison to eastern states, Kaduna, Kano and Katsina are doing better than Abia, Anambra, Imo, and Enugu, adding that based on available data in the past eight months, total VAT generated in Abia was N2.290b, Anambra -N5.938b, Imo -N1.941 compared to Kaduna -N18.262b and Kano -N24.492b.

“Conversely, when it came to distribution, Abia State got N20.020b for generating N2billion. Abia got 10 times what it contributed whereas Kaduna and Kano did not get as much as twice what they contributed. Lagos, Rivers and Oyo got lower.

Similarly, President of Arewa Youth Consultative Forum (AYCF), Alhaji Yerima Shettima in a chat with Daily Trust said he was not surprised with the figure, insisting the North is not doing badly as it is being portrayed in the VAT war.

He said, “We are not good at talking too much. We are more real and more practical. If there is any region who believes more in Nigeria is the Northern part of this country that believes we must work together.

“When Wike started the issue, some of us were shocked. The man who believes he wants to be a national leader, a nationalist, came up with that idea, making it as if he is fighting the North. Some of us took his pronouncements at that time very personal because the way he presented it was funny.

“The truth of the matter is that we must try as much as possible to discourage what will disunite us. Let us promote things that would unite us. Together, we can do better.

READ ALSO:

“There is no region in this country that has nothing to bring to the table. But because you have a system that encourages people to only eye the oil and as a result of this out of 1001 things we have on the ground in terms of mineral resources, today we are receiving a lot of abuses and insults from people. We could have done better if we were running a regional system of government where all regions will go back and harness their resources, then pay 13 percent to the centre. These arrogances and abuses on our sensibilities as a nation would not come to play anymore,” he said.

States will bear the brunt of decentralised collection – Experts

Fiscal Policy Partner and Africa Tax Leader at the PriceWaterCoopers (PwC), Taiwo Oyedele said if the right to collect VAT is given to states, “the biggest losers will be the states except for Lagos. A few states like Kano, Rivers, Oyo, Kaduna, Delta and Katsina may experience minimal impact, while at least 30 states, which account for less than 20 percent of VAT collection will suffer significant revenue decline.

“The federal government may be better off given that FCT generates the second-highest VAT (after Lagos) in addition to import and non-import foreign VAT,” he said.

Commenting, Ogbeide E. Benjamin, a tax expert and former chairman, Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), Abuja Chapter, said, “The impact of this judgment on the finances of the states will be enormous.”

According to him, “VAT is consumption-based and on several items, some of which are outlawed in some states. I believe the country stands to profit by allowing states to administer VAT. By this, states will be further encouraged to scale up their economic drive to attract more foreign direct investments and local investments since they will be the ones to get the VAT benefits.”

Daily Trust

Loading

Related Topics:
Advertisement

Auto

Auto Industry Heavyweights, Top Regulators Converge for Nigeria Summit on EV, CNG Future

Published

14 hours ago

on

July 16, 2026

By

Auto Industry Heavyweights, Top Regulators Converge for Nigeria Summit on EV, CNG Future

 

Leading automobile manufacturers, transport regulators and key government agencies have confirmed participation in the 2026 Nigeria Auto Industry Summit(NAISU), underscoring growing industry support for Nigeria’s transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)-powered transportation.

Among the major industry players backing this year’s summit are Weststar Associates Limited, Toyota (Nigeria) Limited, Jetour Nigeria, Carloha Nigeria, Simba Group, Cedric Masters Group, Coscharis Motors, Lanre Shittu Motors etc.

Policymakers, investors, financial institutions, fleet operators and technology providers are also expected at the event being organised by Nigeria Auto Journalists Association (NAJA) in collaboration with the National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC).

The Corps Marshal of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), Shehu Mohammed, has confirmed his participation as a keynote speaker and is expected to address issues bordering on road safety, regulation and the deployment of EVs and CNG-powered vehicles in Nigeria.

Also confirmed as guest speakers are the Director-General of the National Automotive Design and Development Council (NADDC), Joseph Osanipin, and the Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of the Presidential Initiative on Compressed Natural Gas and Electric Vehicles (Pi-CNG and EV), Ismaeel Ahmed.

They are expected to provide insights into the Federal Government’s automotive industrialisation agenda, clean mobility policies and ongoing efforts to accelerate the adoption of EVs and CNG-powered vehicles across Nigeria.

The third edition of the summit will hold on Thursday, July 30, 2026, at the Radisson Hotel, Ikeja, Lagos.

The theme of this year’s event is: “Nigeria’s Clean Mobility Future: The EV and CNG Journey Under the Bola Tinubu Administration.”

Chairman of the 2026 Auto Summit Planning Committee, Rasheed Bisiriyu, said the event comes at a critical period as Nigeria intensifies efforts to drive cleaner transportation through the adoption of electric vehicles and compressed natural gas.

According to him, the summit will bring together government officials, automotive manufacturers, regulators, energy experts and transport stakeholders to assess ongoing reforms and develop practical strategies for advancing the country’s clean mobility agenda.

“The summit comes at a critical period when Nigeria is implementing policies aimed at reducing transportation costs, lowering carbon emissions and encouraging greater investment in alternative energy mobility solutions,” Bisiriyu said.

He added that discussions would review the progress made under the Bola Tinubu administration in promoting EV and CNG adoption while identifying policy, infrastructure and financing gaps requiring urgent attention.

According to him, participants will also examine strategies for expanding EV charging infrastructure and CNG refuelling stations, promoting local vehicle assembly, improving consumer awareness, attracting private sector investment and strengthening the regulatory framework needed to support sustainable transportation.

Bisiriyu noted that the summit is designed to move beyond policy conversations by generating practical recommendations capable of accelerating Nigeria’s transition to cleaner mobility.

Also speaking, NAJA Chairman, Theodore Opara, said the annual Auto Summit has evolved into one of Nigeria’s foremost automotive policy dialogue platforms, bringing together government institutions and private sector operators to address critical issues affecting the industry’s growth.

According to Opara, achieving Nigeria’s clean mobility objectives requires broad collaboration among regulators, manufacturers, energy providers, transport operators, safety agencies and consumers.

He said, “We are bringing together regulators, manufacturers, energy providers, transport operators, safety agencies and consumers because the transition to clean mobility requires collective action.

“The objective is not only to discuss policy but also to identify practical solutions that will accelerate Nigeria’s journey towards affordable, cleaner and more sustainable transportation.”

Organisers said the summit is expected to generate actionable recommendations to support the Federal Government’s drive to deepen investment in alternative fuel technologies, strengthen local automotive manufacturing, improve transport sustainability and position Nigeria as a leading player in Africa’s emerging clean mobility ecosystem.

With participation already confirmed by leading automotive brands, regulators and other key stakeholders, the 2026 NAISU is shaping up to be one of Nigeria’s most influential gatherings on the future of the automotive industry and the country’s transition to cleaner, more sustainable mobility.

Loading

Continue Reading

Business

Senate gives NNPC auditors one week to explain ₦210 trillion unreconciled accounts

Published

21 hours ago

on

July 16, 2026

By

Senate gives NNPC auditors one week to explain ₦210 trillion unreconciled accounts

Senate gives NNPC auditors one week to explain ₦210 trillion unreconciled accounts

The Senate Public Accounts Committee (SPAC) has given the external auditors of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd.) a one-week ultimatum to submit documents explaining more than ₦210 trillion recorded as receivables and payables in the company’s audited financial statements.

The directive followed a heated investigative hearing on Wednesday, during which lawmakers insisted that auditors who certified the accounts must provide detailed evidence to support the figures presented in the financial statements.

The committee ordered the auditors to produce comprehensive schedules and audit working papers explaining approximately ₦107 trillion listed as receivables and another ₦103 trillion recorded as payables in NNPC Ltd.’s audited accounts.

The auditors had requested two weeks to retrieve the documents, arguing that the schedules formed part of their audit working papers. However, the committee rejected the request and instead granted them just one week to comply.

Chairman of the committee, Senator Ibrahim Dankwambo, questioned why auditors who had already signed off on the financial statements required additional time to produce documents supporting the figures.

“If you already have the figures in your working papers, why do you need to go back before presenting them to this committee?” Dankwambo asked.

The auditors maintained that NNPC Ltd. remained their client and should be responsible for explaining the disputed figures. They also argued that the committee had previously agreed that officials of the national oil company would provide clarifications on the financial entries.

However, members of the committee rejected that position, stressing that external auditors are professionally responsible for defending the audit opinions they issue after certifying financial statements.

READ ALSO:

Senator Abdul Ningi reminded the auditors that the National Assembly has constitutional powers to compel any individual or organisation to produce documents required for legislative oversight and investigations.

Also speaking, Senator Patrick Ndubueze questioned the credibility of the audit exercise, warning that failure to provide supporting schedules could cast doubt on whether the audit was conducted in accordance with accepted professional standards.

The committee also expressed dissatisfaction with previous explanations offered by NNPC Ltd., which attributed the figures largely to joint venture (JV) cash call transactions and related obligations. Lawmakers noted that those explanations failed to reconcile the receivables and payables or clearly identify the transactions, counterparties and calculations supporting the entries.

Former Edo State Governor and Senator, Adams Oshiomhole, argued that although NNPC Ltd. now operates as a limited liability company under the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), it remains wholly owned by the Federal Government and cannot rely on commercial confidentiality to withhold information from Parliament.

According to Oshiomhole, institutions managing public assets are fully accountable to Nigerians through the National Assembly and must cooperate with legislative oversight.

Responding to concerns that the Senate was alleging financial misappropriation, Dankwambo clarified that the committee had not stated that the ₦210 trillion was missing or stolen.

He explained that the issue before the committee is that the huge receivables and payables remain unreconciled and insufficiently explained, making it necessary for the auditors to provide documentary evidence supporting the figures contained in the audited accounts.

The ongoing investigation forms part of the Senate’s broader review of audit queries arising from NNPC Ltd.’s audited financial statements covering multiple financial years. The Public Accounts Committee has been examining observations raised by the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation, particularly those relating to financial reporting, asset management and accounting practices within the national oil company.

The committee subsequently directed the auditors to return within one week with detailed audit schedules, working papers and supporting documents explaining every component of the ₦107 trillion receivables and ₦103 trillion payables, warning that failure to comply could attract further legislative action.

Senate gives NNPC auditors one week to explain ₦210 trillion unreconciled accounts

Loading

Continue Reading

Business

Oil prices surge near $85 per barrel as escalating US-Iran conflict fuels global supply fears

Published

2 days ago

on

July 15, 2026

By

Oil prices surge near $85 per barrel as escalating US-Iran conflict fuels global supply fears

Oil prices surge near $85 per barrel as escalating US-Iran conflict fuels global supply fears

Global oil prices surged by about 14 per cent to nearly $85 per barrel on Tuesday as escalating military hostilities between the United States and Iran intensified fears of prolonged disruptions to global crude supplies and heightened concerns over energy security.

The sharp rally pushed Brent crude, the international oil benchmark, to $84.37 per barrel, up from $76.01 recorded on Sunday. The latest gains extend a strong upward trend that began earlier in the week as investors reacted to renewed military exchanges between Washington and Tehran and growing uncertainty surrounding oil exports from the Middle East.

Market sentiment was further shaken after Iran announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategic oil shipping routes. Approximately 20 per cent of global crude oil supplies pass through the narrow waterway, making any disruption a significant threat to international energy markets and global economic stability.

Analysts said fears that the conflict could escalate further prompted traders to increase purchases of crude futures, anticipating tighter global supplies and higher energy costs in the coming weeks.

The rally was also supported by uncertainty over US trade and sanctions policies. In a post on his Truth Social platform, US President Donald Trump announced that he had abandoned a proposed 20 per cent cargo reimbursement fee for vessels using the Strait of Hormuz, opting instead for broader trade and investment agreements with Gulf states.

READ ALSO:

According to Trump, Gulf nations have agreed to make “massive” investments in the United States, describing the proposed arrangements as beneficial to both sides. The announcement came after earlier proposals to impose restrictions on Iranian ports had raised concerns about further disruptions to global shipping and crude exports.

Despite the policy shift, energy markets remained focused on the broader geopolitical risks posed by the conflict, including potential attacks on oil infrastructure, tighter sanctions against Iran and prolonged instability across the Gulf region.

The latest price rally marks a dramatic reversal from the downward trend seen in recent weeks. Brent crude had fallen to around $72 per barrel amid easing geopolitical tensions, increased production by OPEC+ members and concerns over slowing global demand before rebounding sharply as tensions between the United States and Iran intensified.

Energy market analysts said the renewed conflict has restored a substantial geopolitical risk premium to crude prices, with investors closely monitoring developments around the Strait of Hormuz and their potential impact on global oil supplies.

Olufemi Idowu, Partner at Kreston Pedabo, said while higher crude prices could boost Nigeria’s earnings, the increase was not yet sufficient to trigger a significant rise in domestic petrol prices.

“I do not expect any major upward review in the local pump price of petrol because oil prices are still significantly lower than the level we had during the war,” he said.

For Nigeria, the sharp increase in crude prices comes at a favourable time as the country records its strongest oil production performance in more than six years.

According to figures released by the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), Nigeria’s average daily crude oil and condensate production rose by 2.3 per cent to 1.74 million barrels per day in June, compared with 1.70 million barrels per day in May.

The combination of stronger production and higher international crude prices could significantly improve Nigeria’s export earnings, foreign exchange inflows and government revenues if the rally is sustained.

However, economists caution that persistently higher oil prices could also increase global inflationary pressures, raise transportation and manufacturing costs and increase the cost of importing refined petroleum products into oil-importing countries.

Investors are expected to keep a close watch on military developments in the Middle East, diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and shipping activity around the Strait of Hormuz, as any further disruption could trigger additional volatility in global energy markets.

Oil prices surge near $85 per barrel as escalating US-Iran conflict fuels global supply fears

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending