Olujimi withdraws gender equality bill as religion, ethnicity, sentiment split senators - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Olujimi withdraws gender equality bill as religion, ethnicity, sentiment split senators

Published

on

Senator BiodunĀ  Olujimi

THERE were sharp disagreements among senators yesterday during the consideration of a bill seeking to promote women empowerment and gender equality.

The disagreement led to the subsequent withdrawal of the bill by the sponsor, Senator BiodunĀ  Olujimi.

The bill, which was stepped down, is designed to create equal opportunities for both the male and female gender in the country.

It was obvious that religion, ethnic affiliation and section 42 of the Constitution as amended, led to the split that reared its head at the Hallowed Chamber.

The bill, which was first brought to the Senate during the 7th Assembly, had earlier been killed in both the 7th and 8th Senate.

The proposed legislation, sponsored by Senator Biodun Olujimi, Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Ekiti South, is titled ā€œA bill for an Act to make provisions for the empowerment of women and gender equality and to establish a legislative framework for the empowerment of womenā€

The document was presented yesterday for second reading, but after much heated debate, the sponsor was forced to withdraw it after some senators who kicked against it, cited ā€œsocio-cultural and Islamic concerns.ā€

READ ALSO:

According to the sponsor, the bill is designed to align all aspects and implementation of laws relating to women empowerment as well as address issues relating to appointments and representation of women in decision making, positions and structures.

In her lead debate on the general principles of the bill, Senator Olujimi noted that the same bill she sponsored in the Eight Senate suffered same fate, but explained that the proposed legislation was targeted at ending discrimination against the female gender.

While leading debate on the bill, Senator Olujimi, who represents Ekiti South, said the legislation would help eliminate all forms of discrimination against women.

Olujimi said, among others: ā€œThis bill seeks to further strengthen section 42 of the constitution. It seeks to eliminate gender-based violence. This bill was read for the first time in 2019.

ā€œIt will allow the domestication of all forms of discrimination against women. It will provide for the equality of all persons. If enacted, it will prohibit all forms of discrimination against women and persons living with disabilities.

ā€œThis bill will provide a legal basis and foundation upon which there will be formal, structured and institutional responses to prevent discrimination and provide for the rights of men and women, the equality of all persons and opportunities availed to all citizens, including people living with disability in Nigeria.’’

However, sharp disagreement reared its head among senators soon after the sponsor rounded off presentation of the lead debate as four senators spoke against the bill.

In their arguments, senators who vehemently kicked against it, said the bill, if passed into law, would offend the sensibilities of a certain religion, and make it unimplementable in some parts of the country.

On the other hand, senators who supported the bill, believed it should go for second reading, so the inputs of the stakeholders could be accommodated.

Senator Yusuf Yusuf, All Progressives Congress, APC, Taraba Central, argued that the equality of the male and female gender ā€œinfringes on the Quran.’’

He said: ā€œThis equality infringes on the Quran. I will not support the passage of the bill until the word equal is removed. When you bring equality into it, it infringes on the Quran.ā€

Also kicking against the bill, Senator Aliyu Wamakko, APC, Sokoto North, said the equality was wrong when it came to Islamic and socio-cultural practices.

ā€œWhen it comes to socio-cultural practices, it is wrong. When you talk of equity, it is okay; when you talk of equality, it is not. I will not support it.ā€

Senator Adamu Abdullahi, APC, Nasarawa West, urged the Senate to totally step it down, while Senators Oluremi Tinubu, APC, Lagos West and Bala Ibn Na’Allah, APC, Kebbi South, called for its withdrawal to give room for further consultations.

Supporting the bill, Senator Istifanus Gyang, PDP, Plateau North, said women were entitled to equal opportunities, and threw his support for the bill.

ā€œWomen have been at the receiving end of being excluded. Women are entitled to equal opportunities. Being a woman is not being less human,’’ he said.

Also speaking, the Deputy President of the Senate, Senator Ovie Omo-Agege, said the bill should be allowed to go for second reading, pointing out that the concerns raised by Yusuf and Wamakko would be addressed at the public hearing.

Omo-Agege said: ā€œWith the feelers I’m getting from the chambers, it appears the consultation has not gone far enough. I want to plead that this bill should not be killed here but be allowed to go for public hearing, so if there is anything that Senator Olujimi missed, it will be addressed.ā€

Senators James Manager, PDP, Delta South and Ajibola Basiru, APC, Osun Central, said the bill should be allowed to scale second reading.

The development degenerated into a heated debate and the majority opinion, including that of the Senate President, Ahmad Lawan, was that the sponsor should consult widely and re-present the bill after removing areas of serious concerns raised by the lawmakers.

Even when Olujimi amended the title from A bill for an Act to make provisions for the empowerment of women and gender equality and to establish a legislative framework for the empowerment of womenā€ to Gender Equality Bill, the bill was still killed.

Olujimi noted that she actually consulted widely before she came up with the bill again in the Ninth Senate and expressed surprise at the turn of event.

VANGUARD

Loading

News

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ā€˜He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Published

on

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ā€˜He Has Done Nothing Wrong’
Peter Obi

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ā€˜He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

The 2027 presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has declared that he wouldĀ release Nnamdi KanuĀ and engage separatist agitators inĀ dialogueĀ if elected president of Nigeria. Speaking during an interaction with Nigerians in Washington, the former Anambra State governor argued that Kanu should not be detained over comments he allegedly made onĀ Radio Biafra, insisting thatĀ criticism of political leaders should not be criminalised.

“There’s no reason for keepingĀ Nnamdi Kanu. I will free Nnamdi Kanu as President. He has done nothing wrong; the government has no reason to arrest him because he was speaking and calling people names on radio,” Obi said. The former Labour Party presidential candidate maintained that public officials are often subjected to criticism and insults, which, according to him, should not constitute an offence. “Anybody can tell you anything. I’m a politician and people call me all sorts of names and I don’t think calling me names is an offence,” he added. Obi also pledged to adoptĀ dialogue as a strategyĀ for addressing separatist agitations and other grievances across the country. “If I am in government today, I will discuss with all agitators because I believe that they have a reason for whatever they want to do and it’s only by engaging them that we would learn,” he said.

Obi reiterated his commitment to pursuing aĀ political solutionĀ to the case involving theĀ Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB)Ā leader, stating that dialogue remains the most effective path to resolving longstanding grievances and tensions. According to him, governments achieve more lasting results when they address the root causes of agitations throughĀ dialogue, justice, and inclusive governanceĀ rather than relying solely on coercive measures. The former governor maintained that national unity is better strengthened throughĀ reconciliation and mutual understanding, stressing that democratic societies should create avenues for citizens to express grievances while preserving law, order, and national stability.

READ ALSO:

This is not the first time Obi has spoken on theĀ IPOB leader’s detention. InĀ November 2025, following Kanu’s conviction andĀ life imprisonment sentencingĀ by a Federal High Court in Abuja, Obi described the development as aĀ “failure of leadership”Ā that risked aggravating national tension. At the time, Obi posted on his verified X handle: “I have always maintained that Mazi Kanu should never have been arrested. For years, I have consistently argued thatĀ dialogue, constructive engagement, and inclusive governanceĀ offer the path to lasting peace. Coercion becomes necessary only when reason has been exhausted.” He further argued that the government’s approach had only deepened mistrust, stating: “The handling of Kanu’s case mirrors the government as a man trapped in a hole but who, instead of looking for a way out, keeps digging deeper.” InĀ July 2025, Obi had told Channels Television’sĀ Sunday PoliticsĀ that the continuous detention of Nnamdi KanuĀ “does not make sense”Ā . Asked whether he would advocate for a political solution, Obi responded: “For every one of them, I mean, why is he still being held? It does not make sense to me.”

Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of IPOB, has remained in the custody of the Department of State Services since his controversial rendition from Kenya to Nigeria inĀ June 2021. InĀ November 2025, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja convicted him onĀ seven terrorism-related chargesĀ and sentenced him toĀ life imprisonment. Kanu has since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal challenging both his conviction and sentence. According to his legal consultant,Ā Alloy Ejimakor, the appeal process is already “live,” with multiple stages involved. Kanu has providedĀ 22 grounds for his appeal, and the Court of Appeal has not yet fixed a date for hearing the matter. In a significant development, IPOB claimed in June 2026 that the Federal Government’sĀ cross-appealĀ against Kanu’s sentencing amounts to an admission that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose life sentences. IPOB spokespersonĀ Emma PowerfulĀ stated that the government’s filing declared that “the trial court acted without jurisdiction when it imposed life imprisonment on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6.” IPOB argued that if the court lacked jurisdiction at the sentencing phase, “the entire sentencing exercise is a nullity ab initio.”

READ ALSO:

International pressure continues to mount on the Nigerian government over Kanu’s conviction. A group of international legal experts under the banner ofĀ Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates, based in London, has issued a legal notice warning Nigeria that it would commence legal action in aĀ UK CourtĀ if the government does not immediately and unconditionally release Kanu. The group bases its demand onĀ Opinion No. 25/2022Ā issued on July 20, 2022, by theĀ United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which found that Kanu’s arrest and extraordinary rendition were unlawful and ruled that his continued detention is arbitrary. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing seriousĀ terrorism and security-related chargesĀ and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course.

Meanwhile, the apex Igbo socio-cultural organization,Ā Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has called on President Bola Tinubu to grantĀ amnesty to Nnamdi KanuĀ on or before June 12, 2026, as part of efforts to promote national reconciliation and strengthen unity across the country. The group emphasized that Kanu’s release, preferably timed to coincide with Nigeria’s Democracy Day, would signal a bold commitment to justice, inclusion, and healing decades-old grievances in the Southeast. Ohanaeze also dismissed fears that Kanu’s release could destabilize the country, arguing that such a move would demonstrate leadership anchored on reconciliation.

Obi’s latest comments come amid his political realignment ahead of theĀ 2027 presidential election. After the collapse of an earlier opposition coalition, Obi secured the presidential ticket of theĀ Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC)Ā at a special convention in Abuja in May 2026. He was unanimously endorsed by delegates following a motion moved by SenatorĀ Victor UmehĀ and seconded by former Deputy Senate PresidentĀ Ovie Omo-Agege. Shortly after accepting the nomination, Obi announced former Kano State GovernorĀ Rabiu Musa KwankwasoĀ as his running mate. In his acceptance speech, Obi pledged a technology-driven and intelligence-led security framework, promising to address both immediate threats and root causes such as poverty and unemployment. He recently dismissed claims that he was avoiding former Vice-PresidentĀ Atiku Abubakar, stating: “There are very few human beings who are as close as I am to Atiku. So I can’t be running from him.”

As the 2027 election approaches, Obi’s campaign continues to gain momentum, particularly among young Nigerians and diaspora communities. His message of inclusive governance, dialogue over coercion, and political solutions to national crises resonates with voters frustrated by the status quo. His pledge toĀ release Nnamdi KanuĀ and engage all agitators in dialogue represents a sharp departure from the current administration’s security approach. Whether this stance will translate into electoral success remains to be seen, but it has undoubtedly positioned Obi as a candidate willing to take bold, unconventional positions on Nigeria’s most contentious issues. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing seriousĀ terrorism and security-related chargesĀ and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course. However, with international pressure mounting, an active appeal process, and major political figures like Obi calling for Kanu’s release, the case continues to be a defining issue in Nigeria’s political landscape.

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ā€˜He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Published

on

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodimma, has approved a N300 million financial intervention for Imo indigenes studying at the Nigerian Law School and citizens of the state recently returned from South Africa.

The intervention is designed to provide relief to beneficiaries facing economic hardship, rising living costs, and reintegration challenges.

According to the Imo State Commissioner for Information, Public Orientation and Strategy, Hon. Declan Emelumba, the package will benefit two categories of people: law students and South African returnees.

Under the arrangement, 250 Imo indigenes who returned from South Africa will receive N1 million each as a reintegration fund to help them resettle and rebuild their lives after being forced to return to Nigeria.

In addition, 100 Imo students at the Nigerian Law School will receive N500,000 each to help cushion the impact of inflation and rising cost of living while pursuing their legal education.

READ ALSO:

Emelumba explained that the governor was moved to approve the intervention following appeals from the law students and concerns over the difficult circumstances facing the returnees.

ā€œThe law students made a passionate appeal to His Excellency to support them to cushion the global inflation as regards cost of living. As a caring father, he responded promptly,ā€ he said.

He added that the support for the returnees was driven by empathy, noting that many of them went through difficult experiences that forced them to return to Nigeria.

ā€œThe governor felt that the traumatised returnees needed a helping hand from government. Hence, he approved what can be described as a re-integration fund to enable them settle down with minimal discomfort,ā€ Emelumba stated.

The commissioner further noted that the initiative aligns with the administration’s Shared Prosperity Agenda, which focuses not only on infrastructure development but also on human capital development and social welfare.

He also recalled that this is not the first time the state government has supported law students, stating that many of them are already beneficiaries of government scholarship programmes and periodic financial assistance.

The latest intervention has been described as part of ongoing efforts by the Uzodimma administration to ease economic pressure on students and vulnerable citizens, especially in the face of national inflation and unemployment challenges.

Stakeholders say the initiative could help provide temporary relief to beneficiaries as they continue their education or reintegrate into society after returning from abroad.

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri Warns

Published

on

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri WarnsĀ 
Ambassador-designate to Mexico, Reno Omokri

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri WarnsĀ 

Former presidential aide and author, Reno Omokri, has argued that excessive publicity and global attention on terrorist activities often benefit perpetrators rather than pressure them into releasing victims.

In a detailed statement, Omokri maintained that terrorists thrive on attention and deliberately use media coverage to spread fear, attract influence, and strengthen their operations. He referenced former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s famous remark that ā€œpublicity is the oxygen of terrorism,ā€ arguing that this principle remains relevant in modern counterterrorism strategy.

Omokri said public reactions to high-profile abductions, including global campaigns and celebrity involvement, can unintentionally increase the value of hostages in the eyes of kidnappers, making their release less likely.

He cited the case of the #BringBackOurGirls campaign following the 2014 Chibok schoolgirls’ abduction, claiming that international attention elevated the profile of Boko Haram and complicated rescue efforts. According to him, what began as a humanitarian movement eventually made the girls ā€œhigh-value hostagesā€ in the hands of their captors.

READ ALSO:

The former presidential spokesman also said he personally engaged in international advocacy efforts to secure the release of abducted Leah Sharibu, including meetings with world leaders and funding personal initiatives. However, he claimed security experts later advised that excessive publicity around her case may have inadvertently increased her value to terrorists.

Omokri further referenced guidance allegedly contained in journalism and security manuals on terrorism coverage, arguing that responsible reporting should avoid amplifying fear or giving undue attention to terrorist acts.

He insisted that government security agencies continue to work behind the scenes to secure the release of abducted victims, while urging Nigerians to avoid emotionally driven reactions that may, in his view, complicate rescue operations.

According to him, terrorists are strategic actors who benefit from attention, and reducing publicity around their actions may weaken their psychological impact and operational incentives.

Omokri concluded that counterterrorism efforts require a more rational and less emotional public response, warning that sustained global amplification of kidnapping incidents may unintentionally serve the interests of criminal groups rather than victims.

Publicity Helps Terrorists, Not Victims — Reno Omokri Warns

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending