Obi knows he can't win 2023 presidential poll - Soludo - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Obi knows he can’t win 2023 presidential poll – Soludo

Published

on

Anambra State Governor, Chukwuma Soludo, has again tackled the Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, saying the latter knows he cannot win the 2023 poll.

Soludo, who was reacting to attacks that followed his recent comment on Obi’s investment in Anambra, said in an article released on Monday that the LP standard bearer was only playing game.

The article was titled, ‘History beckons and I will not be silent (Part 1)’.

He said, “Let’s be clear: Peter Obi knows that he can’t and won’t win. He knows the game he is playing, and we know too, and he knows that we know.

“The game he is playing is the main reason he didn’t return to the All Progressives Grand Alliance. The brutal truth (and some will say, God forbid) is that there are two persons/parties seriously contesting for president: the rest is exciting drama!”

Soludo concluded by saying, “Let me once again wish my brother Peter Obi good luck. He should have fun and enjoy the fleeting frenzy of the moment…

“I hope that after February 2023, Peter Obi will return to APGA (the party that made him everything he is politically) as I offered him on 8th March, 2022 and begin the hard work, if he truly wants to be president of Nigeria. It won’t happen by desperately jumping from one party to another or by unleashing a social media mob on everyone who slightly disagrees with you.”

 

Read the full article below:

14th November, 2022

History Beckons and I will not be Silent (Part 1)

Chukwuma Charles Soludo, CFR

My attention has been drawn to some of the tirades on social media following my frank response during an interview on Channels TV regarding the “investments” Mr. Peter Obi claimed to have made with Anambra state revenues. Sadly, several of the comments left the issue of the interview to probe or suggest motives, inferred from my response on “investment” that I am opposed to Peter Obi’s ambition and therefore committed a “crime” for which the punishment is internecine abuse and harassment even to my family. Some people even suggest that the gunmen who went to attack a checkpoint at my hometown on Saturday 12th November but were gunned down was part of the mob reaction. I used to think that for decent people, certain conducts are off-limits, and that in Anambra, politics is not warfare.

Of course, as a Christian, I know that telling the truth can be very costly, even suicidal. Our Lord and saviour was crucified simply for telling the truth the people did not want to hear. I promised that I won’t be the usual politician, and will not knowingly lie to the people. I am not an Angel but rather than knowingly repeat the same deceitful character that politicians are known for, I would leave public office. It is a vow I made to my God and to my family. Only God knows how many days I will be on this seat but whether I am on it or not I will always say it as it is— knowing fully the suicidal consequences of telling the truth in a political arena, especially in a country where lying and deceit by politicians have become culture and celebrated as being “smart”.

Ideally, I should just have laughed off the infantile exuberances as many friends advised (I am used to this, having been in the ‘Arena’ for a while). I always re-read the quote “The Man in the Arena…” by President Theodore Roosevelt (1910) to remind myself of the burden of public office. Several well meaning Nigerians and Ndigbo called to advise that I should just ignore them. A respected Igbo elder-statesman who called, advised that I should just ignore what he described as “Peter Obi and his social media mob”. According to him, “everyone knows that he is going nowhere, but they are looking for who to blame”. After some 20 minutes of discussion, he advised that I should personally author a response— just for the records.

Everyone knows that I don’t follow the winds nor one to succumb to bullies, nor shy away from a good fight especially when weighty matters of principles and future of the people are involved. One lesson I learnt from my former boss and mentor, President Obasanjo, is never to be on the fence. I learnt that one must always take a stand: for better or for worse. I do so with every sense of humility, and leave history to judge. Most people have commended me for “tactfully avoiding being drawn into the Peter Obi issue” until now. Since I am now being forced into the Arena on this matter, I have a duty and a right of reply, if only for the records, and to also give the social media mob something substantive to rant upon and rain their abuses for weeks. In this preliminary response, there are some things I will refrain from saying here because, in the end, February/March 2023 will come and go, and life will continue.

At the outset, let me state that this exhibition of desperation, intolerance and attempt to bully everyone who expresses the slightest of dissent is reprehensible. This is Hitler in the making. When the revered Arch Bishop Chukwuma stated that in Enugu State, they were not obedient, he was ferociously bullied on social media. Any dissent is tagged a saboteur or, in my case, it could be that I want to contest for president after office or that I am envious of Peter Obi. Soludo envious of Peter Obi? Totally laughable! But this is the same person I was asking to return to APGA in March 2022 and contest for president and yet envious or doesn’t want him to be president. This is madness! Seriously speaking, the obdurate attempt to muscle the republican Igbos to maintain the silence of the graveyard is antithetical to everything Igbo. It is not who we are. Insulting other ethnic groups and religions or denigrating others is certainly not the path to Aso Rock. If this is not checked, it may indeed endanger the future political and economic interests of the Igbos.

In his time, Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe was the undisputed all time leader of the Igbos but he had his arch rivals and even independent candidates won landslide elections against his party, NCNC, in Igboland. Obafemi Awolowo had stiff opposition among the Yorubas while Ahmadu Bello had his share of opponents in the Northern region. Today, no one has accused Afenifere or other strong presidential candidates from the South West of being “anti Yoruba” because Tinubu is a frontrunner, nor has anyone accused Kwankwaso and several other Northern candidates of being “anti-North” for not supporting Atiku. As a full blooded republican Igboman and democrat, I reject this despotic intolerance.

Yes, I fully understand the anger of some urban and Diaspora youths and some Nigerians who are dissatisfied with the trajectory of the country or with the candidates of the major parties and wished other options. Not knowing much about others, some see Peter Obi as the contrast they wished for. I get the point. But this is a democracy: the minority will have their say, but the majority their way. Translating anger and social media agitation into political outcomes requires humongous work.

For full disclosure, let me state that Peter Obi and I are not just friends, we call ourselves “brothers”. But we have political differences: he left APGA for PDP after his tenure as Governor while I have remained in APGA since 2013. During the last two governorship elections in Anambra in 2017 and 2021, he led the PDP campaigns but APGA won landslide in both elections. By the way, in 2016, he visited and proposed that I defect to PDP and contest the 2017 election against the incumbent Willie Obiano, but I declined. After my victory in November 2021, he called to congratulate me as I did to him in 2010. That is the Anambra way: we fight fiercely during campaigns but share drinks at the next social events. After all, it was the great Zik of Africa who taught us that in politics, there are no permanent friends or permanent enemies but only permanent interests.

We sat next to each other during the Emeka Anyaoku lecture at Nnamdi Azikiwe University on 8th March, 2022 and I made an offer for him to return to APGA and contest as its presidential candidate. Yes, I did. In my mind, it was time for Igbos to organize their region politically before stepping out to bargain power with other organized coalitions. On his part, he tried to convince me that he expected APC to unravel while PDP would be the “only one” standing. We debated and he proposed that we could meet later to discuss further. He attended my inauguration on March 17. A few weeks later, he requested and I obliged him to use the Anambra State government house facility to launch his presidential bid under PDP. I was surprised to read in the news later that he had defected to LP (a party with literally zero structure), thereby attempting to weaken the same PDP he saw as the saviour a few weeks earlier. He paid me a courtesy call as the presidential candidate of LP, and we had frank discussions.

During our meeting, I reminded him of my proposal to him to come and contest under APGA. More importantly, I told him (possibly to his surprise) that I did not make the proposal in the belief that he will win in 2023 but that it would give us the opportunity to get our people organized as a bargaining force, with him leading the effort since I was busy as Governor (my immediate predecessor, Willie Obiano had indicated to me that he was not disposed to contest an election). We noted that we were in opposing political parties and in response to my direct question as to how I might help him, he requested that I should just ensure a “level playing field” and let the people decide. In fidelity, my government has provided the atmosphere for him and his supporters to operate freely in Anambra without any molestation (compare with treatments to LP even in other South East states), and allowed his billboards which are, in many places, wrongly placed almost on the roads. As a person, I have several shortcomings but being petty is not one of them. We have shown him tremendous goodwill—which he did not extend to the same Labour Party when he was Governor (Senator Ifeanyi Ubah, as LP governorship candidate in 2013 was denied the use of Ekwueme Square for his rallies).

Someone reminded me that a mob has no head and hence cannot reason. The same Peter Obi was one of those who told Ndigbo that APGA was the vehicle through which Igbos would organize to engage the rest of Nigeria politically. He was said to have sworn to Ojukwu and publicly that he would quit politics the day he leaves APGA. The rest is history. When he was the Vice-Presidential candidate under PDP in 2019, the emotive train then dubbed the ticket “the Igbo project”. As then chairman of planning and strategy committee of Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide, I cautioned for a more pragmatic approach but the emotive blaze of the time held sway. We were vindicated afterwards.

By the way, APGA is Nigeria’s third largest political party today (after APC and PDP, it is the only other party with a state governor and third largest presence at the National Assembly). And some people have the temerity to suggest that APGA’s candidate should “step down” for Peter Obi as the “Igbo candidate”. I wonder when Igbos met to choose a candidate. They even argue that afterall APGA supported President Jonathan and did not field a candidate then. Well, the fact as I was told was that no candidate showed interest under APGA then. Besides, APGA’s unwritten rule then was to support the party at the centre — which, if we apply this time, should actually be APC. But we have our own candidate. Recall that all the political parties had their primaries during the same period. Once Peter Obi realized that he won’t get the presidential or vice-presidential ticket of PDP he ran to Labour Party (a political party known as a transit camp for aspirants who lost primaries in APC, PDP and APGA), and the chorus by a vociferous minority now is that LP has become the “Igbo project”, and the APGA candidate who emerged the same time as Peter Obi should “step down”. Ridiculous! Now I truly understand that a mob cannot reason.

When will Ndigbo understand and learn politics, especially of Nigeria? When Bola Ahmed Tinubu defied the political wind of the time and stood out as the “only man standing” in AD and later AC (before ACN) against a sitting president of Yoruba descent, no one accused him of being “anti-Yoruba”. Indeed, everyone recalls that both Tinubu and President Obasanjo disagreed politically, and probably still disagree—but none is being accused of being “anti- Yoruba”. Under Tinubu, the South West strategically organized under a different political party, the ACN and went into a formidable alliance that kicked out a sitting president (in Africa?), and that alliance is not broken yet. Igbos, in their frenzied Nzogbu nzogbu politics, have sadly found themselves in a political cul de sac. Tragic indeed! When will my people smell the morning coffee?

Let me now address the substance of my response during the interview, and I stand by what I said. On record, I doubt that any governor in Nigeria has paid as much tribute to his predecessors as I have done during campaigns and in office. I always said that ALL of them did well and to the best of their abilities. Yes, Peter Obi was governor for 8 years (2006 -2014) during a period of unprecedented oil boom and prosperity in Nigeria (Nigerian economy was growing at average of 6-8% per annum, and oil price was highest during this time). I have seen all kinds of funny comments and interpretations regarding what I said about the value of his “investments”. Some refer to SabMiller and bandy all kinds of figures as to how the investment of $12 million is now worth less than $3 million. Of course, there is room for legitimate debate about the logic or quality of the investments. For example, people might differ as to the propriety of using taxpayers money to promote a company in which one is a shareholder in the name of “investment”, or even whether so called “savings” are warranted when there were dozens of schools without roofs or classrooms, or local governments without access roads or hospitals without doctors/nurses. A Bishop recently publicly advised that I should please try to construct the “Ngige type of quality roads”, stating that the ones done by his successor (that is, Peter Obi) had washed off, while Ngige’s remained. I promised and we are delivering quality roads that Anambra has not seen before.

For sure, prudence in public resource management is desirable and we are opening new frontiers in that area. People will however differ as to whether saving money in the bank account is a KPI (key performance indicator) for a government where poverty is escalating except where its institutions for absorption are weak or where the government has no robust/big agenda for transformation. Governments exist to save lives, not to save money. We can debate and differ on this— (by the way, I know when/how it is appropriate to “save” as I built Nigeria’s foreign reserves from $10 billion I inherited to all time $63 billion, and even after paying $12 billion to pay-off Nigeria’s external debt and going through unprecedented global financial crisis, I still left behind about $45 billion— Go and verify!).

Funny, in the rabid frenzy to grab every straw, they cut a clip during our governorship debate where I was stating vital statistics and they claimed that I was “praising” Peter Obi then while committing a crime now by “criticising” him. Hahahaha! Well, it is true that I said during the debate that, according to National Bureau of Statistics, poverty in Anambra actually grew (from less than 25% in 2005) to about 53% under Peter Obi in 2010/2011 but fell under Willie Obiano to 14.78% in 2020. Yes, poverty more than doubled under Peter Obi and more than 50% of Ndi Anambra were in poverty under him. Go and verify! I am Governor, and sitting on privileged information which I will not want to use against a political opponent. But on matters of facts, I will always state same as is. As the saying goes, you can fool some of the people some of the time but never all the people all the time. Enough said for now!

Where do we go from here? I listened to my friend Gov El-Rufai on TV explaining why the northern governors decided that power should shift to the South. According to him, they asked themselves what would their founding fathers—Ahmadu Bello, Tafawa Balewa or Aminu Kano have done in the circumstance. Today, I ask my people, Ndigbo: do we ask what Azikiwe or M.I. Okpara or Akanu Ibiam would do in the present circumstance? I worry that Ndigbo as Nigeria’s foremost itinerant tribe and with the greatest stake in the Nigerian project does not yet have a strategy to engage Nigeria—politically! Every four years, we resurface with emotive Nzogbu Nzogbu political dance (“it is our turn dance” but without organization or strategy) and fizzle out afterwards while others work 24/7 strategizing and organizing.

Let’s be clear: Peter Obi knows that he can’t and won’t win. He knows the game he is playing, and we know too; and he knows that we know. The game he is playing is the main reason he didn’t return to APGA. The brutal truth (and some will say, God forbid) is that there are two persons/parties seriously contesting for president: the rest is exciting drama! That many Americans may not like the fact that Joe Biden (79 years) and Donald Trump (76 years) are two frontrunners for president in their parties does not remove the fact that if both of them emerge as candidates, definitely one of them will be president in 2024.

As my brother, I wish him well and even pray for him. I told him during his courtesy call that my prayer is that himself or Prof Umeadi of APGA would win, why not? That is from my heart, but I also told him that my head and facts on the ground led me to know that it’s probability is next to zero (what I cannot say before you, I won’t say behind you). So I already told him my opinion. Indeed, there is no credible pathway for him near the first two positions, and if care is not taken, he won’t even near the third position. Analysts tell him you don’t need “structure” to win. Fantasy! Of course, LP won governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun on social media and via phantom polls, while getting barely 2,000 votes on ground. Creating a credible third force for presidential election in Nigeria requires a totally different strategy and extreme hard work.

Of course, Peter Obi will get some votes, and may probably win in Anambra state— as “home boy”. But Anambra is not Nigeria. If he likes, I can even campaign for him but that won’t change much. From internal state by state polling available to me, he was on course to get 25% in 5 states as at August this year. The latest polling shows that it is down to four states, and declining. Not even in Lagos state (supposed headquarters of urban youths) where Labour Party could not find candidates to contest for House of Reps or Senate. The polls also show that he is taking votes away mostly from PDP. Indeed, if I were Asiwaju Tinubu, I would even give Peter Obi money as someone heading one of the departments of his campaign because Obi is making Tinubu’s pathway to victory much easier by indirectly pulling down PDP. It is what it is!

The current fleeting frenzy, if not checked, will cost Ndigbo dearly for years. The South East has the lowest number of votes of any region, but it is also the only region where the presidential race might be a 4-way race (it is a two-way race in the other 5 regions) thereby ensuring that our votes won’t count in the making of the next president of Nigeria. Afterwards, we would start complaining that we don’t get “what we deserve” or cry of marginalization. During the 2019 presidential election, the five South East States were united for PDP but contributed merely 1.6 million votes to PDP which was about the votes that Kano state gave to Buhari. The emotions might run to heavens but politics-power is about cold calculations, organization and building alliances for power. In a democracy, it is a game of numbers. So far, I don’t see any of these— and 2023 might again be a wasted opportunity for Ndigbo! What is our Plan B when Peter Obi loses in February 2023? Some people prefer that we should play the Ostrich while Peter Obi toys with the collective destiny of over 60 million Igbos. Yes, you pray that he wins, but what if he fails as he is certain to? The Bible says that my people perish for lack of knowledge. As the saying goes, only those who Plan can control the future. Ndigbo, wake up and smell the coffee!

What would Zik of Africa or M.I. Okpara do in this circumstance? Our founding fathers understood that in politics, you don’t get what you deserve but what you bargain/negotiate, and you negotiate with your organization and VOTES. Not social media militancy or bullying (where over 90% of actual voters are not on social media)! Our fathers built alliances with other major political parties in other regions (not with socio-cultural groups that don’t command any votes), and Ndigbo were in the reckoning in the first and second republics. After the elections, we will see how many votes any of the leaders of the socio-cultural groups will get for Peter Obi from their wards. Sometimes I even sense a conspiracy to nudge us on a path to nowhere thereby further pushing us into irrelevance, and I pray that I am wrong. Just my two cents!

It is not too late for Ohanaeze Ndigbo and progressive Igbo leaders to pre-emptively start charting a pragmatic future for Ndigbo in Nigeria after the elections. Armchair social media analysts can have the luxury of fantasizing with wild speculations. Right or wrong, they earn their pay and with no consequences. For us as leaders, the lives of tens of millions are at stake. We have a historic duty to act and being silent or politically correct is not an option. For starters, Ohanaeze should study the report of my committee (planning and strategy) in 2019. It may still be relevant today. Second, Ndigbo should seriously study the MoU signed at the Yar’Adua Centre in 2010. The leader of Igbo Political Association, Chief Simon Okeke and our members are still there. Thirdly and for me, Ndigbo should strategize and bargain especially with the TWO candidates likely to be president on at least four central issues:

A) Lasting peace and security in the South East, including the release and engagement with Nnamdi Kanu.

B) South East Economic transformation agenda and the FGN’s Marshall Plan for the South East as promised since the end of the Civil War (the post war ‘reconstruction’). We appreciate the Second Niger Bridge and recent contract for MTN to reconstruct the Onitsha-Enugu expressway. But the rail-lines to the five state capitals, speedy access to the sea, highways linking South East to the North and South South, addressing our existential threat as gully erosion capital of Africa, Free Trade and Export Processing Zones, etc.

C) Restructuring Agenda for Nigeria that devolves powers/resources to the subnational entities and in which it would no longer matter where the President comes from.

D) Levelling the playing field for the unleashing of the private sector and the full participation of Ndigbo in the economic and governance space; etc.

To conclude, let me once again wish my brother Peter Obi good luck. He should have fun and enjoy the fleeting frenzy of the moment. But he must moderate the desperation as exhibited by his social media mob. There is a limit to propaganda. A mob action often reflects the character of its leader. No one has a monopoly of social media violence, and no one should play God. Life won’t end by February/March 2023.

I hope that after February 2023, Peter Obi will return to APGA (the party that made him everything he is politically) as I offered him on 8th March, 2022 and begin the hard work, if he truly wants to be president of Nigeria. It won’t happen by desperately jumping from one party to another or by unleashing a social media mob on everyone who slightly disagrees with you. I decided to pen my views personally — again for the records. On this, I don’t mind being a one man minority. As history beckons, my conscience and sense of duty to my people dictate that I should never be silent. I will happily accept the judgment of history for standing by the truth!

Loading

Politics

LP Chieftain Calls for Protest Against Peter Obi Over Okonkwo Feud

Published

on

LP Chieftain Calls for Protest Against Peter Obi Over Okonkwo Feud

LP Chieftain Calls for Protest Against Peter Obi Over Okonkwo Feud

A former Chairman of the Labour Party in Enugu State, Barr Casmir Agbo, has called on the people of Enugu North Senatorial District to stage a protest against the legal suit filed against actor-turned-lawyer Kenneth Okonkwo by the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Mr Peter Obi. The call comes ahead of Obi’s planned visit to Nsukka to campaign for the NDC’s senatorial candidate, Bishop Oscar Ossai, in the by-election scheduled for June 20, 2026. Okonkwo, a prominent son of Nsukka, is at the center of a heated public dispute with his former political ally, and Agbo’s demand for protest reflects growing tension within the opposition ranks as the by-election approaches.

In a trending social media post, Agbo condemned Obi’s legal suit against Okonkwo, describing it as a case of “prosecuting the same man who toiled for him during the 2023 election.” He expressed outrage that Obi would take legal action against someone who worked tirelessly for his presidential campaign. “If it were to be in the North or West, our demand today would be to let him know that he is prosecuting our son, Barr Kenneth Okonkwo, who toiled for him,” Agbo stated, adding that he expects a massive protest demanding the immediate withdrawal of the suit. He reminded Obi that Nsukka, through the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN), trained him, and that “Kenneth popularly known as Andy Okeke has paid his dues.” This sentiment reflects a broader feeling of betrayal among some LP supporters who view Obi’s legal action as an attack on a loyal party member who sacrificed time, resources, and reputation to support Obi’s presidential ambition.

Agbo, who was the state LP chairman during the 2023 general election, made explosive allegations against Obi, claiming that the NDC presidential candidate actively worked against the LP’s gubernatorial candidate, Barr Chijioke Edeoga, in favor of Governor Peter Mbah, who was then the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). According to Agbo, “What happened in Enugu State during 2023 general elections are very fresh in our minds. We are blaming some of our people and shouting that they worked against Edeoga during that election, but our greatest enemy in that election was Mr Peter Obi.” He claimed that Obi had wanted another candidate from the outset and when the party endorsed Edeoga, “he pitched his tent with PDP in the state.” Agbo further alleged that Obi made everything possible to deny the LP victory in Enugu State. “Peter Obi never campaigned for LP in Enugu State; even to the extent that he stopped me from reading my address at a point by sending Clement Ojukwu to tell me to stop at a certain point at Okpara Square when I was reading about the failure of PDP in the state,” he claimed. “Secondly, he avoided us like a plague whenever we met at a meeting in Enugu,” Agbo added, painting a picture of a candidate who was distant from the party’s state structure and more aligned with the opposition.

READ ALSO:

The legal dispute between Obi and Okonkwo began after Okonkwo, a chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and a former spokesperson for Obi’s 2023 presidential campaign, made explosive allegations during an interview on Channels Television on June 8, 2026. Okonkwo alleged that Obi and other South East leaders of the NDC demanded bribes from House of Representatives and Senatorial aspirants during the party’s primaries, claiming that aspirants were required to pay N10 million and N20 million for tickets, respectively. The allegations sent shockwaves through the political landscape, given Okonkwo’s close association with Obi during the 2023 campaign and his credibility as a former spokesperson.

In response to Okonkwo’s allegations, Obi, through his lawyer Alex Ejesieme (SAN), issued a pre-action notice demanding that Okonkwo retract the statements, issue a public apology, and pay N5 billion in damages. Obi described the allegations as false, malicious, and defamatory, giving Okonkwo a seven-day ultimatum to comply. The demand letter also included Okonkwo’s personal phone number, which was published publicly, a move Okonkwo later described as a data breach and an invasion of privacy. The legal threat has escalated the feud, drawing attention from political observers and party loyalists across the country.

Okonkwo has remained defiant in the face of the legal threats, insisting that he stands by his words. In his formal response dated June 16, 2026, through his lawyer V. I. Uma of Supreme God Chambers, Okonkwo denied defaming Obi and maintained that his comments were based on information received from aggrieved aspirants. He disclosed that one aspirant, Obunike Ohaegbu (alias Nwa Miss), had approached him for assistance in recovering N10 million allegedly paid during the nomination process, describing it as a “scam orchestrated by your Client, Mr Peter Obi.” Okonkwo argued that he was within his rights as a lawyer, politician, and public affairs analyst to raise concerns about the complaints, and he challenged Obi to face him in court rather than resorting to legal intimidation.

However, the House of Representatives aspirant, Obunike Ohaegbu, who appeared on the same Channels TV program, stated that he never made such statements to Okonkwo. Ohaegbu clarified that “Peter Obi never told me to pay N10 million. I never told Kenneth Okonkwo that Peter Obi, in any way, told me to pay N10 million.” He further said he never accused the NDC South-east caucus of bribery. This contradiction has further complicated the dispute and raised questions about the veracity of Okonkwo’s claims, potentially undermining his credibility in the eyes of the public.

Okonkwo has a history of public disputes with Obi. In July 2024, he resigned from the Labour Party, accusing Obi of lacking the capacity to protect the mandate given to him by Nigerian voters. At the time, Agbo, then LP chairman in Enugu State, dismissed Okonkwo as “an actor” who “has no business in politics,” adding that he was “not known in his local government as a strong LP member.” Agbo suggested that Okonkwo’s resignation was motivated by personal grievances, which may have included frustration with the party’s leadership and internal dynamics. This history suggests a long-standing pattern of friction between the two figures.

Peter Obi has vowed to proceed with the defamation lawsuit against Okonkwo. During an interview on Nevon Media, Obi stated: “The issue of taking Kenneth Okonkwo to court wouldn’t have arisen if he had stopped at those allegations. But he claimed he still has more he would expose about me in the future.” Obi added that he is “very happy to take him to court so that he can expose me publicly, alongside other Nigerians.” This indicates that the legal battle is likely to continue, further deepening the rift between the former allies and potentially affecting the political landscape in the South East.

The current dispute unfolds against the backdrop of the Enugu North Senatorial by-election scheduled for June 20, 2026. The seat became vacant following the death of Senator Okey Ezea in November 2025. Ezea was a political ally of Obi and a member of the LP. The NDC has fielded Bishop Oscar Ossai Okwudili Elias as its candidate, with Obi expected to lead the campaign in Nsukka. The late Ezea’s support group has backed Ossai, calling on voters to elect a candidate who can continue the late senator’s legacy. However, political analysts suggest that the APC candidate, Chief Ikeje Asogwa, may have the edge in the contest due to the support of Governor Peter Mbah and former Governor Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi. The by-election is expected to be fiercely contested, with Agbo’s call for protest adding a further layer of political drama.

LP Chieftain Calls for Protest Against Peter Obi Over Okonkwo Feud

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

NDC Introduces Anti-Defection Pact for Obi, Kwankwaso, Others

Published

on

Peter Obi and Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso

NDC Introduces Anti-Defection Pact for Obi, Kwankwaso, Others

The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has unveiled a stringent anti-defection policy requiring all its candidates seeking elective offices to sign indemnity and affidavit forms pledging to relinquish their seats if they defect from the party after winning elections. The policy, announced on Tuesday at the party’s National Secretariat in Abuja, is aimed at strengthening internal discipline and preventing the wave of post-election defections that has weakened several opposition parties in recent years. Speaking during the unveiling ceremony, NDC National Chairman, Moses Cleopas, explained that the decision was informed by years of observing politicians secure electoral victories on party platforms only to abandon them for personal or political convenience, and he specifically pointed to the experience of the Labour Party after the 2023 elections as a cautionary tale. Cleopas stated, “A very typical example that we have all seen in the last three years is the Labour Party, where so many individuals won elections under the platform of the party. Now, we are in another election cycle. Go and check their history. How many of the people who won elections under the Labour Party and were inaugurated are still members of the party? If all of them had remained, you and I can imagine how the Labour Party could have been today, even if they had not won the presidency.”

Cleopas stressed that the NDC was founded to build an enduring political institution rather than serve as a temporary vehicle for personal ambitions, noting that the party had observed a trend where elected public office holders became detached from the political structures that produced them after winning elections. He stated, “One thing we have come to observe is that in the present polity, when people contest elections and win under political parties, they become gods. And in between the time that they ought to have, they will just use one minor excuse to dump the platform and perhaps go into the ruling party.” The party chairman emphasized that while membership of the NDC is voluntary, anyone seeking to contest elections on its platform must agree to abide by its rules, stating that candidates would be required to sign affidavit and indemnity forms before receiving the party’s ticket, making it clear that if they choose to leave the party after winning, they must also surrender the mandate obtained through the party’s platform. He declared, “If you win, the mandate is owned by the party. If you otherwise choose to leave, go the same way you came and leave what you picked from here.” Cleopas also referenced provisions of the NDC Constitution, specifically Articles 1, 2 and 3, which establish that elected officials remain bound by the party platform through which they were elected.

READ ALSO:

The party’s National Legal Adviser, Reuben Egwuaba, defended the policy, describing political parties as voluntary associations governed by internal rules accepted by members, and he cited constitutional provisions and judicial precedents, including landmark Supreme Court decisions, to support the party’s position that candidates function as agents of their political parties during elections. Egwuaba stated, “A political party is just like a club, church or mosque where there are rules and regulations. That is why the 1999 constitution, under Section 222, states that a candidate of a political party is just a mere agent of the party. And once a candidate is declared the winner and inaugurated, until the expiration of the tenure upon which that candidate won the election and was inaugurated, the mandate belongs to the political party, not any other.” Egwuaba stressed that the policy does not infringe on the constitutional right of freedom of association because candidates remain free to leave the party whenever they choose—but they must forfeit the seat obtained through the party’s platform. He insisted that adherence to the new requirement is non-negotiable under the party’s internal rules, warning that without the signed affidavit, a candidate’s name cannot be uploaded in the INEC portal. According to Egwuaba, the mandatory affidavit will serve as a binding legal undertaking, and candidates must swear before a competent court that they understand and accept the party’s anti-defection terms before their names can be processed. The party maintained that the new rule was necessary to strengthen party discipline, preserve voter intent, and reduce what it called the distortion of electoral mandates through opportunistic defections.

In a clarification that drew attention, the party’s Director of New Media and Strategic Communication, Theo Agada, stated that the policy does not affect the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and his running mate, Dr. Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, explaining that the party trusts the commitment of its presidential and vice presidential nominees, and they are not bound by this policy. Agada stated, “The policy does not affect the presidential candidate, His Excellency Peter Obi, and the vice presidential candidate, His Excellency Alhaji Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso. The party trusts the commitment of our presidential and vice presidential nominees, and they are not bound by this policy. This internal policy is aimed at building the NDC as an institution and preventing political prostitution among some of its members.” However, multiple reports indicate that despite the significance of the policy, several prominent party figures, including Obi and Kwankwaso, were absent from the signing ceremony at the party’s national secretariat, and aspirants who were absent were directed to obtain, complete, and submit the required documents as a condition for final validation and submission of their names to INEC. Some gubernatorial and National Assembly candidates present at the meeting signed the affidavits before the end of the event.

The policy is widely seen as an attempt by the NDC to avoid the wave of defections that has weakened several opposition parties in recent years, and notably, both Obi and Kwankwaso have moved across multiple political platforms throughout their careers. Obi’s political journey has taken him from the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) , the Labour Party , the African Democratic Congress (ADC) , and eventually the NDC , while Kwankwaso has also belonged to multiple parties, including the PDP, the All Progressives Congress (APC) , the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) , the ADC, and the NDC. Former Adamawa State governorship candidate, Aishatu Binani, is also among recent entrants into the NDC, having moved from the APC to the ADC before joining the party in 2026, and the new anti-defection policy is expected to affect several high-profile politicians who recently joined the NDC ahead of the 2027 general elections. NDC leaders say the initiative forms part of a broader effort to redefine Nigeria’s political culture, strengthen party supremacy, and promote greater accountability among elected officials, with the party expressing hope that the policy would encourage ideological commitment, reduce opportunistic defections, and contribute to the development of stronger democratic institutions in the country. Cleopas concluded, “This is not just a party for one man to rise and achieve his ambitions and do anything he likes with the party. This is a political party that we desire to groom and hand over to the next generation.”

NDC Introduces Anti-Defection Pact for Obi, Kwankwaso, Others

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition

Published

on

ADC.s David Mark, Atiku Abubakar and Rauf Aregbesola

Atiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition

ABUJA — The camp of former Vice President and presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has strongly condemned the judgment of a Federal High Court in Abuja ordering the deregistration of the party, describing the ruling as a dangerous attempt to weaken opposition forces and entrench a one-party state ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The reaction was conveyed on Monday by Atiku’s media aide, Paul Ibe, who argued that the judgment was delivered in defiance of a subsisting order of the Court of Appeal and amounted to what he termed “judicial rascality.”

Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court had earlier ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the ADC alongside four other political parties — the Accord Party (AP), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

The judgment, delivered in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, followed a legal action instituted by the National Forum of Former Legislators. The plaintiffs argued that the affected parties failed to satisfy constitutional and statutory requirements for continued registration, including winning elective positions or securing at least 25 per cent of votes in any state during the 2023 general elections and subsequent by-elections.

In addition to ordering their deregistration, the court restrained the affected parties from participating in future political activities and directed INEC not to recognize them as registered political parties.

READ ALSO:

However, the Atiku camp insisted that the ruling could not stand, citing a pending appeal and a stay-of-action order issued by the Court of Appeal.

In a statement posted on X, Ibe maintained that the appellate court had previously directed Justice Lifu to halt further proceedings on the matter pending the determination of an appeal filed before it.

According to him, a panel of the Court of Appeal comprising Justices Mohammed A. Danjuma, Adebunkunola A. Banjoko and Oyejoju O. Oyewumi, in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CV/569/2026, ordered a stay of further action in the case, with the substantive appeal scheduled for hearing on October 27, 2026.

“The so-called deregistration of the ADC and other parties by Justice Peter Lifu may yet be the biggest manifestation of President Bola Tinubu’s determination to undermine the opposition and entrench a de facto one-party state,” Ibe stated.

He further described the judgment as “the height of judicial rascality” and accused the ruling party of seeking to weaken democratic institutions ahead of the next electoral cycle.

“Nigerians and the international community can see the level of desperation of the government of the ruling party to either have their way in the 2027 elections or destroy our democracy that was purchased at a huge cost,” he added.

The development has heightened political tensions, with observers anticipating a legal showdown at the Court of Appeal over the validity of the Federal High Court’s judgment and the future status of the affected political parties.

As of press time, INEC had yet to issue an official response on the court order or indicate the steps it would take regarding the affected parties.

Atiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending