Classified documents from Biden's time as VP discovered in private office - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Classified documents from Biden’s time as VP discovered in private office

Published

on

U.S. President Joe Biden

Several classified documents from President Joe Biden’s time as vice president were discovered last fall in a private office, Biden’s attorneys acknowledged Monday.

Attorney General Merrick Garland has asked the US attorney in Chicago to investigate the matter, a source familiar with the matter tells CNNand congressional Republicans are also taking notice.

Biden’s lawyers say they found the government materials in November while closing out a Washington, DC-based office – the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement – that Biden used as part of his relationship with the University of Pennsylvania, where he was an honorary professor from 2017 to 2019.

Fewer than a dozen classified documents were found at Biden’s office, another source told CNN. It is unclear what the documents pertain to or why they were taken to Biden’s private office. Federal officeholders are required by law to relinquish official documents and classified records when their government service ends.

“The White House is cooperating with the National Archives and the Department of Justice regarding the discovery of what appear to be Obama-Biden Administration records, including a small number of documents with classified markings,” Richard Sauber, special counsel to President Biden, said in a statement. “The documents were discovered when the President’s personal attorneys were packing files housed in a locked closet to prepare to vacate office space at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C. The President periodically used this space from mid-2017 until the start of the 2020 campaign. On the day of this discovery, November 2, 2022, the White House Counsel’s Office notified the National Archives. The Archives took possession of the materials the following morning.”

READ ALSO:

“The discovery of these documents was made by the President’s attorneys,” Sauber added. “The documents were not the subject of any previous request or inquiry by the Archives. Since that discovery, the President’s personal attorneys have cooperated with the Archives and the Department of Justice in a process to ensure that any Obama-Biden Administration records are appropriately in the possession of the Archives.”

At a summit in Mexico City on Monday evening, Biden ignored shouted questions from reporters on the classified documents. Garland, also attending the summit, was seated to the President’s left.

A senior administration official traveling with Biden says the issue won’t be a distraction..

“Nothing has changed in his schedule,” the official said. “He’s focused on the summit and meeting with our closest neighbors.”

The classified materials included some top-secret files with the “sensitive compartmented information” designation, also known as SCI, which is used for highly sensitive information obtained from intelligence sources.

After the discovery, Biden’s lawyers immediately contacted the National Archives and Records Administration, which started looking into the matter, the source said. Biden’s team cooperated with NARA, which later came to view the situation as a mistake due to lack of safeguards for documents, the source said.

In November, NARA sent a referral to the Justice Department to look into the matter, a source with knowledge of the situation told CNN.

The US attorney in Chicago, John Lausch Jr., is investigating. Lausch was one of the rare Trump-era holdovers who wasn’t asked to resign after Biden’s inauguration. He was appointed by Trump in 2017 and unanimously confirmed by the Senate. Illinois’ two Democratic senators said in 2021 that they wanted Lausch to remain at his top post “to conclude sensitive investigations,” though they didn’t reveal what probes he was working on.

Political fallout

The discovery of the materials come as special counsel Jack Smith is investigating former President Donald Trump for potentially mishandling classified records at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Federal investigators have recovered at least 325 classified documents from Trump as part of their inquiry.

READ ALSO:

Republicans are already asking questions of Biden.

“President Biden has been very critical of President Trump mistakenly taking classified documents to the residence or wherever and now it seems he may have done the same,” said GOP Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, who is set to become the House Oversight Chairman. “How ironic.”

Comer pointed out that the National Archives falls under his committee’s jurisdiction for oversight but said when they, while in the minority, sent NARA questions related to former Trump, NARA referred Republicans to the Justice Department.

“Maybe they’ll answer our questions now because it pertains to two presidents,” Comer said, adding he plans to ask the archives for more information later this week.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy didn’t say whether he believes the new GOP Congress should investigate Biden, but said the reaction to Trump holding onto classified documents has been driven by politics.

“I just think it goes to prove what they tried to do to President Trump overplayed their hand on that,” McCarthy said.

“They’ve been around even longer,” McCarthy said of Biden’s team. “President Trump had never been in office before and had just left, came out. Here’s an individual (who) spent his last 40 years in office.”

McCarthy added: “It just shows that they were trying to be political with President Trump.”

Differences between document discoveries

The Trump documents saga emerged in a different way than the Biden situation, however.

According to Biden’s attorneys, they turned over the classified materials and notified NARA as soon as they were discovered. With Trump, NARA realized that key records were missing, and NARA officials haggled with Trump’s team over the return of government documents.

READ ALSO:

Trump eventually gave 15 boxes of materials back to NARA. But federal investigators later came to correctly suspect that he was still holding onto dozens of additional classified files. So, DOJ prosecutors secured a grand jury subpoena and later got a judge’s permission to search Mar-a-Lago, to find the documents.

Ever since the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August – a search that uncovered dozens of additional classified files – Trump has promoted wild and unfounded allegations about his predecessors’ supposed mishandling of government records. The news about classified records turning up at Biden’s private office is sure to provide new fodder to Trump, who has already announced his 2024 presidential bid.

On Truth Social, Trump wrote: “When is the FBI going to raid the many homes of Joe Biden, perhaps even the White House? These documents were definitely not declassified.”

Biden was critical of Trump when he saw the photograph taken by the FBI that showed an array of documents found on Trump’s property last summer.

“How that could possibly happen? How one – anyone could be that irresponsible?” Biden said. “And I thought what data was in there that may compromise sources and methods? By that I mean names of people who helped or, et cetera. … totally irresponsible.”

CNN contributor and former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, who served on the House select committee investigating January 6, said Monday that the investigation may blow some of the political headwinds away from Trump.

“The only thing that’s needed right now by the former president is to be able to throw doubt and say, ‘look, this happened, too,’” Kinzinger told Wolf Blitzer on CNN’s “The Situation Room.” “So from a political perspective, this is actually probably pretty bad. Not just for the president, but really for the idea of getting justice through the political system.”

Kinzinger speculated that the investigation into Biden will come down to who on the former vice president’s staff handled the documents and whether holding onto the documents was intentional or an accident.

“There’s going to be nuances,” Kinzinger said. “I’ll tell you, the U.S. Attorney in Chicago is a very fair man, Mr. Lausch, and so I think we can trust his word.”

CNN

Loading

International

CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive

Published

on

CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive

CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) says American forces have struck more than 170 Iranian military targets over two consecutive nights, dramatically escalating tensions in the Middle East after a fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran collapsed.

According to CENTCOM, the operation was launched in retaliation for Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime corridor through which about one-fifth of the world’s seaborne crude oil passes. The U.S. military described the attacks as a violation of the ceasefire agreement and a threat to global maritime security.

CENTCOM said the first wave of strikes, conducted on Tuesday night, targeted more than 80 Iranian military sites, including air defence systems, command and control networks, coastal radar installations, anti-ship missile systems, and more than 60 boats belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) operating in and around the Strait of Hormuz.

The military command said a second wave of attacks followed on Wednesday night, with U.S. forces striking approximately 90 additional military targets along Iran’s southern coastline. The latest operation focused on degrading Iran’s ability to threaten international shipping by targeting coastal surveillance assets, missile and drone storage facilities, naval capabilities, air defence positions, and military logistics infrastructure.

In a statement posted on its official X account, CENTCOM said U.S. forces remained ready to respond to any further violations of the ceasefire.

READ ALSO:

“U.S. forces remain postured and prepared to hold Iran accountable when the agreement is not adhered to or obeyed,” the command said.

Iranian state media reported explosions in several southern cities, including Bandar Abbas, Chabahar and Konarak, with parts of the affected areas experiencing electricity outages following the bombardments.

Iranian authorities said the initial U.S. strikes killed at least eight military personnel, while the country’s Health Ministry later reported that the overall casualty toll from the two-day operation had risen to 14 people killed and 78 injured. Those figures have not been independently verified.

In response, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched missiles and drones targeting U.S. military facilities in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar, triggering air raid sirens and prompting air defence systems across the Gulf to intercept incoming projectiles. U.S. and Gulf officials reported no immediate casualties, although military bases remained on high alert.

The latest confrontation followed Iranian attacks on three commercial tankers identified by CENTCOM as the Marshall Islands-flagged M/T Al Rekayyat, the Saudi Arabia-flagged M/T Wedyan, and the Liberian-flagged M/T Cyprus Prosperity.

The U.S. military described the attacks on the vessels as “unwarranted aggression” that endangered freedom of navigation and disrupted one of the world’s busiest energy shipping lanes. CENTCOM also said commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz had dropped sharply following the attacks.

Speaking during the NATO Summit in Türkiye, U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the memorandum of understanding signed with Iran on June 17 was effectively over, warning that the American military campaign would intensify if Tehran continued to threaten commercial shipping.

Trump said Washington remained open to limited diplomatic contacts but expressed little confidence that negotiations would produce a lasting agreement. He also warned that further disruptions to maritime trade could trigger a stronger U.S. military response.

The U.S. administration also reinstated sweeping sanctions on Iranian oil exports by revoking a temporary waiver that had allowed Tehran to continue limited crude sales during ceasefire negotiations, further increasing economic pressure on the Iranian government.

The renewed military confrontation sent shockwaves through global energy markets, with international benchmark Brent crude surging to nearly $80 per barrel as investors reacted to fears of possible supply disruptions.

Analysts warned that any prolonged conflict around the Strait of Hormuz could push global crude oil prices even higher, increase fuel costs, worsen inflation and disrupt international supply chains, given the strategic importance of the waterway to global energy exports.

Security analysts say the latest exchange of attacks represents one of the most serious military confrontations between Washington and Tehran in recent years, raising concerns that the conflict could spread beyond the Gulf if diplomatic efforts fail to restore calm.

Although both countries have kept limited diplomatic channels open, the collapse of the ceasefire has heightened fears of a broader regional conflict involving additional state and non-state actors across the Middle East.

CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive

Loading

Continue Reading

International

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

Published

on

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

A German palliative care doctor has been sentenced to life imprisonment after a court in Berlin found him guilty of murdering 15 patients over a three-year period, in a case prosecutors say could become one of the largest serial murder investigations involving a medical professional in Germany.

The 41-year-old physician, identified only as Johannes M. under Germany’s privacy laws, was convicted on Wednesday of killing 12 women and three men between September 2021 and July 2024 while working for a home-based palliative care service in the German capital.

The Berlin Regional Court heard that the victims, aged between 25 and 94, were all seriously ill but were not considered to be at imminent risk of death. Most of them were receiving palliative care in their homes when the killings occurred.

According to prosecutors, Johannes M. deliberately administered a lethal combination of an anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant without the knowledge or consent of the patients. The drugs caused respiratory paralysis, leading to their deaths within minutes.

READ ALSO:

Prosecutors argued that the doctor acted out of what they described as a “lust for murder” rather than compassion or any legitimate medical purpose. They also accused him of setting fire to several victims’ homes in an attempt to destroy evidence and conceal the crimes.

Investigators linked at least five suspected arson incidents to the murders, saying the fires were intended to make the deaths appear accidental.

One of the most shocking incidents presented during the trial occurred in July 2024, shortly before the doctor’s arrest. Prosecutors alleged that Johannes M. killed two patients on the same day.

According to the prosecution, he first fatally injected a 75-year-old man during a home visit in central Berlin before travelling to another district, where he allegedly killed a 76-year-old woman. Investigators said he later attempted to set fire to the woman’s apartment, but the blaze failed to destroy crucial evidence.

For much of the year-long trial, the doctor declined to testify. However, during proceedings last month, he admitted responsibility for killing 12 of the victims, telling the court that he believed he was relieving them of pain and suffering.

“Throughout it all, I thought this was the best thing for everyone,” he said, before expressing remorse and apologising to the families of the victims.

Despite the admission, prosecutors maintained that the killings were neither acts of mercy nor medically justified, insisting the victims had not consented to ending their lives and that many still had plans for the future.

In delivering its judgment, the Berlin Regional Court imposed Germany’s maximum sentence for murder and made a finding of “particularly severe guilt,” a legal classification that makes early release after the standard 15-year period highly unlikely.

The court also ordered preventive detention, allowing authorities to continue holding the doctor after completion of his prison sentence if he is still considered a danger to society. In addition, he was permanently banned from practising medicine.

Authorities believe the 15 confirmed murders may represent only a fraction of the doctor’s alleged crimes.

Investigators initially opened the case after becoming suspicious about four patient deaths before widening the inquiry. A special investigative team has since reviewed 395 patient files, exhumed several bodies and identified dozens of additional suspicious cases.

Prosecutors are now investigating 76 more deaths linked to the doctor, raising the possibility of further criminal charges if sufficient evidence is established.

If additional allegations are proven, the case could become one of the most extensive serial murder investigations in Germany’s modern history.

The trial featured emotional testimony from relatives of several victims, many of whom rejected the doctor’s claim that he was acting out of compassion.

The mother of the youngest victim, a 25-year-old woman, tearfully told the court that her daughter “never said she didn’t want to live anymore.”

Similarly, the son of a 72-year-old woman said his mother had been planning a holiday with her sister before her death, insisting she had every intention of continuing her life.

Legal experts say the verdict has renewed debate in Germany over patient safety, oversight of palliative care services and the safeguards required to protect vulnerable patients receiving treatment in their homes.

As investigations continue, prosecutors say Johannes M. has indicated a willingness to cooperate in future proceedings, while authorities remain focused on determining whether additional patients fell victim to the same pattern of crimes.

German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz

Published

on

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz 

The United States has launched a fresh wave of military strikes against Iran, targeting more than 80 military sites after three commercial oil tankers were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, dramatically escalating tensions in the Gulf and raising fresh concerns over global energy supplies.

The strikes, announced by the US Central Command (CENTCOM) on Tuesday, targeted over 80 Iranian military assets, including missile launch sites, command-and-control centres, radar installations, air defence systems, drone launch facilities and more than 60 Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fast attack boats operating in the strategic waterway.

According to CENTCOM, the operation was designed to “impose heavy costs” on Iran for what Washington described as attacks on commercial vessels crewed by innocent civilians in international waters.

The military action followed separate attacks on three oil tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes through which nearly one-fifth of global oil supplies pass.

The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) confirmed that one tanker caught fire after an unidentified projectile struck its engine room, while two other vessels sustained damage in separate incidents but were able to continue their voyages.

Although Iran has not officially admitted responsibility for the attacks, the United States, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia have accused Tehran of orchestrating the assaults.

Qatar said one of its vessels, Al-Rekayyat, was deliberately targeted while sailing near the Strait of Hormuz, while Saudi Arabia said its crude oil tanker, Wadyan, was also struck during transit.

READ ALSO:

Iran rejected the allegations, insisting that commercial vessels failing to coordinate with Iranian maritime authorities or tampering with navigation systems risked accidents and collisions.

Hours after the US operation, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced retaliatory missile and drone strikes on what it described as 85 US military facilities in Bahrain and Kuwait.

The IRGC claimed the attacks targeted the headquarters of the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet in Bahrain and Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait. Independent verification of the extent of the reported attacks had not been immediately available.

Iranian state media also reported explosions in Qeshm Island, Bandar Abbas, Sirik, and other southern locations, saying several civilians were injured by flying debris following the US bombardment.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister described the US military action as a clear violation of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding signed last month, warning that Tehran would take “decisive measures” to defend its sovereignty.

The country’s Foreign Ministry also condemned Washington’s decision to revoke a temporary waiver that had allowed limited Iranian oil exports under the agreement.

According to Iranian officials, the move demonstrates the “bad faith, inconsistency and unreliability” of the US government and effectively undermines diplomatic efforts.

Before launching the strikes, the US Treasury revoked the waiver that had temporarily eased oil sanctions on Iran.

The decision restores restrictions on Iranian crude exports and significantly increases economic pressure on Tehran.

US President Donald Trump warned that Washington was prepared to carry out further military operations if Iran continued attacking commercial shipping or violated the ceasefire framework reached last month.

Despite the latest escalation, US officials said diplomatic negotiations remain open and that Washington continues to pursue a long-term agreement with Tehran.

The renewed confrontation has heightened fears of prolonged instability in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime corridor linking the Persian Gulf with global markets.

Any sustained disruption to shipping through the waterway could significantly affect global energy supplies and drive up international oil prices.

Oil markets reacted immediately to the latest developments, with crude prices climbing as investors weighed the risk of further attacks and possible disruptions to one of the world’s most important oil transit routes.

The latest exchange of military action represents one of the most serious confrontations between the United States and Iran since the two countries signed a 14-point memorandum aimed at extending a ceasefire and reducing hostilities across the region.

While both sides continue to insist that diplomatic channels remain open, the latest escalation has cast fresh doubt over the future of the agreement and renewed fears of a wider regional conflict.

US launches fresh strikes on Iran after tanker attacks in Strait of Hormuz

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending