Classified documents from Biden's time as VP discovered in private office - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Classified documents from Biden’s time as VP discovered in private office

Published

on

U.S. President Joe Biden

Several classified documents from President Joe Biden’s time as vice president were discovered last fall in a private office, Biden’s attorneys acknowledged Monday.

Attorney General Merrick Garland has asked the US attorney in Chicago to investigate the matter, a source familiar with the matter tells CNN, and congressional Republicans are also taking notice.

Biden’s lawyers say they found the government materials in November while closing out a Washington, DC-based office – the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement – that Biden used as part of his relationship with the University of Pennsylvania, where he was an honorary professor from 2017 to 2019.

Fewer than a dozen classified documents were found at Biden’s office, another source told CNN. It is unclear what the documents pertain to or why they were taken to Biden’s private office. Federal officeholders are required by law to relinquish official documents and classified records when their government service ends.

“The White House is cooperating with the National Archives and the Department of Justice regarding the discovery of what appear to be Obama-Biden Administration records, including a small number of documents with classified markings,” Richard Sauber, special counsel to President Biden, said in a statement. “The documents were discovered when the President’s personal attorneys were packing files housed in a locked closet to prepare to vacate office space at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C. The President periodically used this space from mid-2017 until the start of the 2020 campaign. On the day of this discovery, November 2, 2022, the White House Counsel’s Office notified the National Archives. The Archives took possession of the materials the following morning.”

READ ALSO:

“The discovery of these documents was made by the President’s attorneys,” Sauber added. “The documents were not the subject of any previous request or inquiry by the Archives. Since that discovery, the President’s personal attorneys have cooperated with the Archives and the Department of Justice in a process to ensure that any Obama-Biden Administration records are appropriately in the possession of the Archives.”

At a summit in Mexico City on Monday evening, Biden ignored shouted questions from reporters on the classified documents. Garland, also attending the summit, was seated to the President’s left.

A senior administration official traveling with Biden says the issue won’t be a distraction..

“Nothing has changed in his schedule,” the official said. “He’s focused on the summit and meeting with our closest neighbors.”

The classified materials included some top-secret files with the “sensitive compartmented information” designation, also known as SCI, which is used for highly sensitive information obtained from intelligence sources.

After the discovery, Biden’s lawyers immediately contacted the National Archives and Records Administration, which started looking into the matter, the source said. Biden’s team cooperated with NARA, which later came to view the situation as a mistake due to lack of safeguards for documents, the source said.

In November, NARA sent a referral to the Justice Department to look into the matter, a source with knowledge of the situation told CNN.

The US attorney in Chicago, John Lausch Jr., is investigating. Lausch was one of the rare Trump-era holdovers who wasn’t asked to resign after Biden’s inauguration. He was appointed by Trump in 2017 and unanimously confirmed by the Senate. Illinois’ two Democratic senators said in 2021 that they wanted Lausch to remain at his top post “to conclude sensitive investigations,” though they didn’t reveal what probes he was working on.

Political fallout

The discovery of the materials come as special counsel Jack Smith is investigating former President Donald Trump for potentially mishandling classified records at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. Federal investigators have recovered at least 325 classified documents from Trump as part of their inquiry.

READ ALSO:

Republicans are already asking questions of Biden.

“President Biden has been very critical of President Trump mistakenly taking classified documents to the residence or wherever and now it seems he may have done the same,” said GOP Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, who is set to become the House Oversight Chairman. “How ironic.”

Comer pointed out that the National Archives falls under his committee’s jurisdiction for oversight but said when they, while in the minority, sent NARA questions related to former Trump, NARA referred Republicans to the Justice Department.

“Maybe they’ll answer our questions now because it pertains to two presidents,” Comer said, adding he plans to ask the archives for more information later this week.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy didn’t say whether he believes the new GOP Congress should investigate Biden, but said the reaction to Trump holding onto classified documents has been driven by politics.

“I just think it goes to prove what they tried to do to President Trump overplayed their hand on that,” McCarthy said.

“They’ve been around even longer,” McCarthy said of Biden’s team. “President Trump had never been in office before and had just left, came out. Here’s an individual (who) spent his last 40 years in office.”

McCarthy added: “It just shows that they were trying to be political with President Trump.”

Differences between document discoveries

The Trump documents saga emerged in a different way than the Biden situation, however.

According to Biden’s attorneys, they turned over the classified materials and notified NARA as soon as they were discovered. With Trump, NARA realized that key records were missing, and NARA officials haggled with Trump’s team over the return of government documents.

READ ALSO:

Trump eventually gave 15 boxes of materials back to NARA. But federal investigators later came to correctly suspect that he was still holding onto dozens of additional classified files. So, DOJ prosecutors secured a grand jury subpoena and later got a judge’s permission to search Mar-a-Lago, to find the documents.

Ever since the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago in August – a search that uncovered dozens of additional classified files – Trump has promoted wild and unfounded allegations about his predecessors’ supposed mishandling of government records. The news about classified records turning up at Biden’s private office is sure to provide new fodder to Trump, who has already announced his 2024 presidential bid.

On Truth Social, Trump wrote: “When is the FBI going to raid the many homes of Joe Biden, perhaps even the White House? These documents were definitely not declassified.”

Biden was critical of Trump when he saw the photograph taken by the FBI that showed an array of documents found on Trump’s property last summer.

“How that could possibly happen? How one – anyone could be that irresponsible?” Biden said. “And I thought what data was in there that may compromise sources and methods? By that I mean names of people who helped or, et cetera. … totally irresponsible.”

CNN contributor and former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger, who served on the House select committee investigating January 6, said Monday that the investigation may blow some of the political headwinds away from Trump.

“The only thing that’s needed right now by the former president is to be able to throw doubt and say, ‘look, this happened, too,’” Kinzinger told Wolf Blitzer on CNN’s “The Situation Room.” “So from a political perspective, this is actually probably pretty bad. Not just for the president, but really for the idea of getting justice through the political system.”

Kinzinger speculated that the investigation into Biden will come down to who on the former vice president’s staff handled the documents and whether holding onto the documents was intentional or an accident.

“There’s going to be nuances,” Kinzinger said. “I’ll tell you, the U.S. Attorney in Chicago is a very fair man, Mr. Lausch, and so I think we can trust his word.”

CNN

Loading

International

Panama Earthquake: 27 Injured as Powerful 7.7-Magnitude Tremor Damages Hundreds of Buildings

Published

on

Panama Earthquake: 27 Injured as Powerful 7.7-Magnitude Tremor Damages Hundreds of Buildings
Panama Earthquake: 27 Injured as Powerful 7.7-Magnitude Tremor Damages Hundreds of Buildings

A powerful 7.7-magnitude earthquake has struck Panama, injuring at least 27 people, damaging hundreds of buildings and infrastructure, and forcing evacuations in several parts of the Central American country.

The earthquake, which struck on Friday, October 9, 2026, was centred near Pitaloza Arriba in Herrera Province, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The agency initially estimated the magnitude at 8.0 before revising it to 7.7.

Panama’s National Civil Protection System reported that at least 27 people sustained minor injuries. Authorities had not reported any deaths or missing persons in the latest updates available on Saturday.

The disaster damaged more than 400 buildings and other structures, including residential properties, schools, healthcare facilities, churches, government buildings, hotels, bridges and roads, according to reports citing Panamanian authorities.

The provinces of Coclé, Herrera and Los Santos were among the hardest-hit areas, with emergency teams assessing the damage and working to reach communities affected by damaged roads, bridges and landslides.

In Penonomé, parts of buildings reportedly collapsed, including a tower of the San Juan Bautista Cathedral and sections of the provincial government building. A hotel was also reported to have collapsed, while falling debris damaged vehicles.

READ ALSO:

Authorities reported damage to 142 homes and 188 schools, alongside other public and private infrastructure. The full extent of the damage was still being assessed, meaning the figures could change as more inspections were completed.

The coastal town of Tonosí, in Los Santos Province, was among the communities experiencing access difficulties. Health Minister Fernando Boyd said officials were exploring ways to reach affected areas by air where damaged roads made land access difficult.

The earthquake was also strongly felt in Panama City, approximately 200 kilometres from the epicentre. Residents and office workers rushed out of high-rise buildings as the tremor shook the capital, while hospitals and other facilities carried out precautionary evacuations.

Operations at Tocumen International Airport were temporarily disrupted, with some flights reportedly diverted as a precaution. Airport operations later resumed, while the Panama Canal continued operating without reported disruption to shipping.

A tsunami warning was issued for parts of the eastern Pacific following the earthquake but was subsequently lifted. Authorities continued monitoring the situation for aftershocks, with Panama’s geosciences institute reporting more than 80 tremors, including one exceeding magnitude 6.0.

President José Raúl Mulino travelled to Penonomé to coordinate the government’s response and urged residents to remain calm while emergency teams assessed the affected areas.

The country’s Education Ministry also announced the suspension of classes nationwide as a precautionary measure.

The United States offered assistance, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying Washington was monitoring the situation and mobilising resources and personnel at the request of the Panamanian government. Leaders in Colombia, Ecuador and Guatemala also expressed solidarity and offered support.

Despite the extensive damage and widespread evacuations, no fatalities had been confirmed in the latest official updates available on Saturday. Emergency workers continued inspecting buildings, assessing infrastructure and determining the needs of affected communities.

Authorities were expected to provide further updates as damage assessments progressed and more information became available about the earthquake’s impact.

 

Panama Earthquake: 27 Injured as Powerful 7.7-Magnitude Tremor Damages Hundreds of Buildings

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Anti-Apartheid Lawyer Navi Pillay Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize After Gaza Genocide Findings

Published

on

Anti-Apartheid Lawyer Navi Pillay Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize After Gaza Genocide FindingsAnti-Apartheid Lawyer Navi Pillay Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize After Gaza Genocide Findings
South African jurist and human rights advocate Navi Pillay

Anti-Apartheid Lawyer Navi Pillay Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize After Gaza Genocide Findings

South African jurist and human rights advocate Navi Pillay, who fought apartheid and led a United Nations inquiry that concluded Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, has won the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize for her efforts to promote peace and international law.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee announced the award on Friday, October 9, recognising Pillay’s decades-long work to strengthen international justice and ensure accountability for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

Pillay, 85, is a former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and a former judge of the International Criminal Court (ICC). She also served as a judge and president of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, which prosecuted those responsible for crimes committed during the 1994 genocide.

The Nobel Committee praised her courage, integrity and contribution to developing a stronger international legal order at a time when institutions responsible for upholding international law face increasing political pressure.

Born into a family of Indian Tamil descent in Durban, South Africa, during the apartheid era, Pillay built her legal career challenging racial discrimination and defending political activists. Her early work included defending anti-apartheid figures, including Nelson Mandela and others who opposed the system of racial segregation.

She later became one of South Africa’s pioneering female jurists, serving on the country’s High Court after apartheid ended.

Pillay’s international career included serving as a judge at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda from 1999 to 2003, where she contributed to landmark developments in international criminal law, particularly the recognition of rape and sexual violence as potential crimes against humanity and acts of genocide.

READ ALSO:

She subsequently served as a judge at the ICC and as the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014.

More recently, Pillay chaired the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which published findings in 2025 concluding that Israel had committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. The Israeli government strongly rejected the report and its conclusions.

Pillay has continued to defend the importance of accountability under international law. She has also stressed the need to address violations committed by all parties to conflicts, including crimes attributed to Hamas during its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel.

Reacting to the Nobel announcement, Pillay reiterated her position on Gaza, saying the situation amounted to genocide. Her comments came amid continuing international debate over the conflict and the legal responsibilities of the parties involved.

The Nobel Committee’s decision recognises Pillay’s broader career and does not itself constitute a judicial ruling on whether genocide has occurred in Gaza. The committee cited her contribution to international law and the prosecution of serious international crimes as central reasons for the award.

Pillay is also serving as an ad hoc judge at the International Court of Justice in the genocide case brought by The Gambia against Myanmar over the treatment of the Rohingya.

Her award makes her the fifth South African to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, following Albert Luthuli, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela and former president FW de Klerk.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa welcomed the announcement, describing the honour as recognition of Pillay’s courage, integrity and lifelong commitment to justice and human dignity.

The 2026 award comes as international legal institutions face mounting scrutiny and political pressure over their efforts to investigate alleged war crimes and hold individuals and governments accountable.

By recognising Pillay, the Nobel Committee has placed renewed emphasis on the role of international law, independent courts and human rights protections in efforts to prevent violence and build lasting peace.

Anti-Apartheid Lawyer Navi Pillay Wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize After Gaza Genocide Findings

Loading

Continue Reading

International

UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia

Published

on

UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia

UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia

A 24-year-old British Royal Navy sailor has been charged with national security offences over an alleged plot to obtain sensitive military intelligence and pass protected information to Russia, raising fresh concerns about the security of classified defence information.

The suspect, Teddy Young, appeared before Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London on Thursday, October 8, where the allegations against him were outlined.

According to British authorities, Young faces two charges under the National Security Act 2023 relating to the alleged retention of protected information and preparations to disclose sensitive material for the benefit of a foreign power.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) alleged that Young accessed and retained sensitive United Kingdom defence and intelligence information while serving as a Royal Navy warfare intelligence rating with high-level security clearance and access to intelligence systems.

Prosecutors said the alleged offences occurred between November 2024 and May 2025, during his first deployment, which began on November 4, 2024.

The allegations include obtaining, copying, recording or retaining protected information with the intention of benefiting a foreign power, as well as engaging in conduct in preparation for disclosing the material.

READ ALSO:

Although the charges identify an unnamed foreign power, British media reports have identified Russia as the country Young allegedly sought to assist.

Investigators reportedly suspect that Young used the dark web to explore ways of contacting Russian authorities. He is also alleged to have drafted a message in Russian intended to establish contact with a potential recipient of the sensitive information.

Reports further alleged that he copied information to a private email account, in breach of Navy rules.

Young joined the Royal Navy in April 2024 and was serving in a warfare intelligence role when the alleged offences took place.

He was first arrested on May 21, 2025, and subsequently released on bail while investigations continued. His security clearance was suspended, and he was removed from his duties.

Counterterrorism police arrested him again at his home in Bedfordshire on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, before charging him with the offences.

During Thursday’s brief court hearing, Young was not asked to enter a plea because the seriousness of the charges meant the case could not be dealt with at the magistrates’ court.

District Judge Annabel Pilling ordered that he remain in custody pending his next appearance at the Central Criminal Court, commonly known as the Old Bailey, on October 16.

The Royal Navy confirmed that a serving member had been charged following an investigation by Counter Terrorism Policing London.

The Navy declined to comment further, citing the ongoing legal proceedings.

British authorities also stressed that the investigation was separate from a recent security incident involving suspicious vehicles near RAF Fairford, a military airbase in Gloucestershire.

The case comes amid continuing concerns among Western governments about espionage, the protection of sensitive military information and attempts by foreign powers to obtain intelligence relating to national security.

However, the allegations against Young remain unproven, and any determination of his criminal responsibility will be made through the judicial process.

UK Navy Sailor Charged Over Alleged Plot to Leak Intelligence to Russia

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending