Buhari extends Adamu’s tenure as IGP for three months - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Buhari extends Adamu’s tenure as IGP for three months

Published

on

  • Tenure extension illegal — Adegboruwa, Ozekhome

Inspector General of Police, Mohammed Adamu, has had his tenure extended by three months.

He was due for retirement on Monday February 1, after serving in the public sector for 35 years.

Minister of Police Affairs, Muhammad Dingyadi, said President Muhammadu Buhari granted the approval on Thursday.

Dingyadi spoke, who spoke with state house correspondents in Abuja, said the decision was to allow for proper selection of a successor.

But a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Ebun Adegboruwa, faulted the extension of the tenure, saying it is illegal and unconstitutional.

According to him, Adamu cannot be asked to continue in office having completed his mandatory 35 years of service.

The SAN said, “Section 215 (1)(a) of 1999 Constitution – There shall be an Inspector-General of Police who, subject to section 216(2) of this Constitution shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Nigeria Police Council from among serving members of the Nigeria Police Force.

“Section 216(2) – Before making any appointment to the office of the Inspector-General of Police or removing him from office, the President shall consult the Nigeria Police Council.

“Paragraph 27 of Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution – The Nigeria Police Council shall comprise the following members: the President who shall be the Chairman; the Governor of each State of the Federation; the Chairman of the Police Service Commission; and the Inspector-General of Police.

“From all the above, when the tenure of a serving IGP expires on the ground of completing the mandatory 35 years of service, he cannot be asked to continue in office beyond his mandatory tenure.

“An IGP who has served the mandatory years of service ceases to be a member of the Nigeria Police Force from the date of the completion of his service. In this case, Mr Adamu ceases to be a member of the NPF from February 2, 2021.

“Under and by virtue of section 215(1)(a) of the Constitution and section 7(3) of the Police Act, 2020, only a SERVING member of the Nigeria Police Force can be appointed as IGP. Mr Adamu having completed his mandatory years of service in February 2, 2021, he cannot be appointed as IGP, from outside the force.

“The President lacks the power to reabsorb a retired police officer into the NPF through a purported tenure extension, which is not contemplated by law.

“The President cannot appoint an IGP or extend the tenure of a retired IGP without the advice of the Nigeria Police Council, which in this case has not met to consider, let alone approve such tenure extension. The Federal Republic of Nigeria presently has no IGP properly so recognised by law.”

Also, a constitutional lawyer, Mike Ozekhome, SAN, described the extension of the IG’s tenure as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.

He said this while featuring on Politics Today, a Channels Television programme’s Politics Today Thursday night, adding that Buhari should have appointed a replacement for Adamu before the expiration of his tenure.

He said, “The President was wrong to have purportedly extended the tenure of Mr Adamu. Did he not see what just happened in America that we modelled our democracy after? Before Biden was sworn in on the 20th of January, he had already assembled his entire cabinet.

“A fire-brigade approach and doing the things that are unconstitutional, illegal, unlawful, unconscionable, arbitrary, whimsical and capricious are the present acts of Mr President.”

 

The lawyer said Adamu tenure extension contravened the Nigeria Police Act of 2020.

“The Nigeria Police Force is in a class of its own; that is sui generis. What do you mean by sui generis? It means that it is in a class of its own that does not go according to other laws, like the civil service rule, just like election petitions are sui generis and governed by electoral acts and electoral rules of procedures, and not by the ordinary service procedural rule that we know in our court.”

Loading

News

Tinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo

Published

on

Tinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo

 

UYO, Akwa Ibom State – A tragic road accident involving a bus conveying supporters of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has reportedly claimed one life and left several others injured in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.

 

The accident occurred on Friday, November 6, when the bus, reportedly conveying APC women to participate in activities marking President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s visit to the state, collided with a security vehicle along Oron Road.

 

The incident happened amid heightened security arrangements for the President’s visit to Akwa Ibom, where he was scheduled to commission several projects executed by Governor Umo Eno’s administration and attend political activities.

 

According to reports, the bus, identified as belonging to the Akwa Ibom State Transport Corporation (AKTC), was conveying the women towards the reception venue when it collided with a Toyota Hilux security vehicle.

 

The impact reportedly left the bus badly damaged, triggering panic as passers-by, motorists and security personnel rushed to assist the victims.

 

A video circulating on social media showed the wreckage of the bus at the accident scene, with people gathering around the damaged vehicle as rescue efforts continued.

 

The injured victims were reportedly evacuated and taken to hospitals in Uyo for medical attention.

 

The Guardian reported that one person had died in the accident, while several others sustained injuries. However, another local media report said no death had been confirmed as of the time of its publication.

 

The exact casualty figure and the identities of the victims had yet to be officially established.

 

The accident has raised concerns about the safety of transportation arrangements for political supporters mobilised to participate in high-profile presidential events.

 

President Tinubu arrived in Akwa Ibom on Friday as part of a two-state visit to Akwa Ibom and Rivers states. His itinerary included the inauguration of major infrastructure projects and engagement with political stakeholders.

 

As of the time of filing this report, further details about the circumstances surrounding the collision and the condition of the injured victims were still emerging.

 

 

Tinubu’s Visit: One Feared Dead, Several Injured as APC Women’s Bus Collides With Security Vehicle in Uyo

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Sex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor

Published

on

Sex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor

 

 

 

A survivor of human trafficking, Piana Shua Kimari, has recounted how she was subjected to disturbing traditional rituals before being trafficked out of Nigeria at the age of 15.

 

Kimari, who shared her experience during a media appearance, disclosed that she and other young girls were taken to a traditional practitioner in Ekpoma, Edo State, where parts of their bodies were shaved before they were transported out of the country.

 

Recounting the frightening experience, she said the traffickers subjected them to the rituals before leaving Ekpoma.

 

“Before we left Ekpoma in Edo State, they took us to a powerful native doctor. They shaved our armpits, private parts and head hair,” she recalled.

 

Her revelation has brought renewed attention to the disturbing methods allegedly employed by human trafficking syndicates to recruit, intimidate and control vulnerable young women and girls.

 

The practice of subjecting trafficking victims to traditional oaths and rituals is a recognised method of psychological intimidation used by some trafficking networks, particularly in cases involving cross-border sexual exploitation.

 

In some instances, victims are made to believe that revealing the identities of their traffickers, escaping or refusing to repay alleged trafficking debts could expose them or their families to spiritual attacks, madness or death.

 

Such threats often leave victims traumatised and afraid to seek help, even when they have opportunities to escape.

 

Kimari further recounted how their journey took them beyond Nigeria, with movements through areas around the Seme border and towards Mali, before she fully understood the dangerous situation she had found herself in.

 

According to her account, what initially appeared to be an opportunity turned into a nightmare when she realised she had fallen into the hands of human traffickers.

 

Her experience highlights the vulnerability of young girls to trafficking networks that exploit poverty, unemployment, deception and the desire for better opportunities abroad.

 

Nigeria, particularly Edo State, has long been identified as an important source area for victims of human trafficking, with some victims recruited and transported through international routes for sexual and other forms of exploitation.

 

The survivor’s account also underscores the importance of community awareness, early intervention and effective collaboration among security agencies, anti-trafficking organisations and relevant authorities.

 

There are growing calls for stronger efforts to identify and prosecute individuals involved in trafficking networks, including recruiters, transporters and collaborators who facilitate the exploitation of vulnerable persons.

 

Beyond rescuing victims, human rights advocates have consistently stressed the need for rehabilitation, psychological support, vocational training and reintegration programmes to help survivors rebuild their lives.

 

Kimari’s testimony serves as another reminder of the dangers confronting vulnerable Nigerian girls and the need for families and communities to remain vigilant against deceptive offers of overseas employment and travel opportunities.

 

Sex Trafficking: ‘They Took Us To Native Doctor, Shaved Our Private Parts Before Leaving Edo’ – Survivor

 

Loading

Continue Reading

News

2027: Abati Takes On Keyamo Over Atiku, ADC Court Judgment, Says ‘Stop Celebrating’

Published

on

Keyamo: ₦70,000 Minimum Wage No Longer Enough as Cost of Living Soars

2027: Abati Takes On Keyamo Over Atiku, ADC Court Judgment, Says ‘Stop Celebrating’

 

 

 

ABUJA — Veteran journalist and Arise Television presenter, Dr Reuben Abati, has taken a swipe at the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, over his celebration of the Federal High Court judgment that nullified the David Mark-led leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and invalidated the emergence of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the party’s presidential candidate for the 2027 general election.

 

Abati, who spoke on Friday during Arise Television’s Morning Show, cautioned Keyamo against celebrating what he described as an unresolved legal battle, insisting that the ADC leadership and Atiku’s supporters still have the opportunity to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal.

 

“Stop celebrating, Keyamo. The matter is not over yet. They will go to the Appeal Court,” Abati declared.

 

The journalist’s intervention followed Keyamo’s reaction to Thursday’s judgment delivered by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

 

The court had ruled against the caretaker leadership of the ADC led by former Senate President David Mark, declaring its emergence illegal and setting aside decisions taken under its leadership, including the party primary that produced Atiku as its presidential candidate for the 2027 election.

 

Reacting to the judgment, Keyamo, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), had criticised opposition figures accusing the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of influencing the judiciary.

 

In a post on his official X account, the minister described as a warped argument the suggestion that whenever an opposition party loses a court case, the ruling party must be responsible.

 

Keyamo argued that the court’s decision was based on facts and evidence rather than political sentiments, insisting that the Mark-led leadership could not take control of a party without complying with its constitutional provisions.

 

However, Abati questioned the minister’s enthusiasm in celebrating a judgment that remains subject to appellate review.

 

According to the former presidential spokesman, the concerns being raised by Nigerians are not necessarily about the right of the court to determine disputes but the timing, circumstances and public reactions surrounding judgments that affect opposition parties.

 

He maintained that the legal process had not reached its conclusion, noting that the Court of Appeal could still examine several issues surrounding the judgment.

 

Abati specifically identified questions bordering on procedure, timing, technicalities and the admissibility of evidence as matters that could feature prominently in the appeal.

 

He also questioned why a serving minister whose official responsibilities have little connection with electoral politics would become one of the loudest voices celebrating a judgment that effectively knocks out an opposition presidential candidate.

 

The Arise Television presenter warned that such public celebrations could fuel suspicions about the relationship between political power and judicial decisions, even as he cautioned against jumping to conclusions about external interference in the judiciary.

 

The controversy stems from a suit instituted by Nafiu Bala Gombe, a former ADC National Deputy Chairman, who challenged the process through which Mark and other members of the caretaker leadership assumed control of the party.

 

Bala argued that he was constitutionally entitled to assume leadership following the resignation of the party’s former National Chairman, Ralph Nwosu.

 

Justice Lifu subsequently ruled against the Mark-led leadership and invalidated its decisions, including the process that produced Atiku as the ADC’s presidential flagbearer.

 

The ruling has created fresh uncertainty around the opposition party’s preparations for the 2027 presidential election, particularly as Atiku had already commenced political mobilisation following his emergence as the party’s candidate.

 

Meanwhile, Atiku and the ADC have rejected the judgment and vowed to challenge it at the Court of Appeal.

 

Atiku’s camp has also indicated plans to seek appropriate legal relief, including a stay of execution where applicable, while pursuing the appeal.

 

The former vice president has described the development as an attempt to frustrate his presidential ambition, while the ADC has questioned the circumstances surrounding the judgment.

 

The emerging confrontation between Abati and Keyamo has added another dimension to the political controversy, with the 2027 presidential election gradually becoming a battleground for legal arguments, political accusations and competing interpretations of judicial decisions.

 

For now, the fate of Atiku’s ADC presidential ticket and the party’s leadership structure remains a major legal and political issue.

 

Whether the Court of Appeal will uphold or overturn Justice Lifu’s decision is expected to play a significant role in determining the next chapter of the ADC crisis and Atiku’s 2027 presidential ambition.

 

2027: Abati Takes On Keyamo Over Atiku, ADC Court Judgment, Says ‘Stop Celebrating’

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending