News
Summary of Atiku’s Chicago fishing expedition – Bayo Onanuga
Summary of Atiku’s Chicago fishing expedition – Bayo Onanuga
With the circulation of misleading reports about Atiku’s case in Chicago, I asked a lawyer, Oluwole Afolabi for an executive summary. He did a good job, offering non-legalese, succinct insight.
How it started: Atiku’s lawyers brought an application under U.S.C. 1782 for the court’s assistance to obtain evidence from CSU by way of Subpoena regarding President Bola Tinubu’s academic records.
Tinubu’s lawyers brought an application on his behalf to Intervene in the matter. The application was granted.
Tinubu’s lawyers opposed the issuing of subpoena to obtain his academic records primarily on 3 grounds:
1. The documents are protected by FERPA (Federal Educational Rights Protection Act).
2. Atiku did not plead any facts relating to whether Asiwaju attended or graduated from CSU in his Petition at the Election Tribunal and as such any information that he obtained will not be admissible.
3. Atiku’s petition at the Election Tribunal had gone beyond the ‘evidentiary stage’ in that parties had adopted their processes and all that remained for the Tribunal to do was to deliver judgment. The Tribunal could no longer admit evidence.
READ ALSO:
- Thought subsidy was bad. Why is Tinubu bringing it back? – Farooq Kperogi
-
BBN-All-Stars: CeeC wins brand new Innoson car
-
FG, states, LGs get N1.1tn as August allocation
AFTERMATH OF JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL
While Atiku’s application was pending, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment. The judgment was against Atiku and in favour of Asiwaju.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE GILBERT
The Magistrate Judge to whom the case was assigned scheduled hearing of the case for September 11th, 2023. At the hearing, Atiku’s lawyers contended that they needed the documents for Atiku’s use at the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
Tinubu’s lawyers countered that not only are the documents protected by FERPA, they can not use them at the Supreme Court because they were not pleaded in the Petition as required by the Electoral Act.
CSU informed the Court that Tinubu graduated from CSU and that the school does not have a copy of the Diploma that Tinubu allegedly submitted to INEC and so was not in a position to speak on the veracity or otherwise of the document.
CSU counsel further told the court that the school, like most schools in America, does not keep copies of Diplomas that it issued to its students.
DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Magistrate Judge Gilbert ordered CSU to respond to a limited portion of Atiku’s subpoena within 48 hours.
TINUBU’S MOTION FOR STAY
Tinubu’s lawyers filed a motion for stay of the execution of Magistrate Judge Gilbert’s order on the ground that the Magistrate Judge did not have the power to make the order it made.
He could only have made a recommendation to the Supervising Judge, who may then affirm or modify or reject it outrightly while proceeding to hear the application afresh.
Tinubu’s prayer was granted by Judge Nancy Maldonado. The Order of Magistrate Judge Gilbert was stayed and the Judge decided to hear the application afresh. Judge Maldonado then directed Tinubu’s lawyers to file papers on their client’s behalf not later than 9am Monday, September 25th on why a subpoena should not be issued against CSU to release some of Asiwaju’s documents.
Atiku’s lawyers were directed to respond to Asiwaju’s court filings not later than 11:59pm on Wednesday and Asiwaju’s lawyers should file a Reply to it, if necessary, not later than 11:59pm on Thursday, September 28th.
Now that all the processes have been filed, Judge Nancy Maldonado will give a date for the hearing of Tinubu’s application. Ruling will be delivered thereafter.
Summary of Atiku’s Chicago fishing expedition – Bayo Onanuga
News
FG Opens Application for Second Cohort of TVET Programme to Tackle Unemployment
FG Opens Application for Second Cohort of TVET Programme to Tackle Unemployment
The Federal Government has officially opened applications for the second cohort of the National Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) programme, a nationwide skills development initiative designed to tackle unemployment, promote entrepreneurship, and strengthen Nigeria’s technical and vocational education system.
The announcement was made by the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, who confirmed that the application portal went live on Monday at 4:00 pm (WAT), urging Nigerians across all age groups to take advantage of the opportunity.
He described the initiative as a key component of the government’s broader human capital development strategy, aimed at equipping citizens with practical, industry-relevant skills that can drive job creation and economic productivity.
Alausa noted that the first phase of the programme recorded massive nationwide participation, with over 1.3 million applications, describing it as evidence of strong demand for vocational training and skills acquisition in Nigeria.
He added that the government remains committed to expanding access to hands-on technical education as part of efforts to reduce unemployment and encourage self-reliance.
TVET Programme Structure: Two Training Tracks
According to official details, the programme is divided into two major pathways:
The Short-Term Certificate Track runs for six months and is designed for beginners seeking foundational technical and vocational skills.
READ ALSO:
- Trump Claims 158 Iranian Ships Destroyed as US Enforces Naval Blockade in Gulf Region
- Wike Denies ADC Was Blocked From Using Eagle Square for Convention
- Judge Dismisses Trump’s $10bn Defamation Suit Against WSJ Over Epstein Report
The Vocational Education and Innovation Track runs for one year and targets individuals with prior informal experience or basic educational background, offering more advanced training in specialised fields.
Both tracks are fully funded and include practical learning delivered through accredited centres across Nigeria.
Eligibility Requirements and Application Process
Applicants are required to have a valid National Identification Number (NIN) and Bank Verification Number (BVN) to complete registration.
Candidates applying for the advanced track may also be required to provide proof of prior learning or relevant educational qualifications.
The application process is open to Nigerians nationwide, with training centres spread across federal and state technical colleges as well as accredited private institutions.
Benefits of the TVET Programme
Participants in the programme will enjoy several benefits, including:
- Fully funded free tuition under the Federal Government
- Monthly training stipends to support participants
- Practical, hands-on instruction in selected skill areas
- Nationally recognised certification upon completion
- Access to start-up support and small business financing opportunities
Skills and Training Areas Covered
The programme covers a wide range of high-demand sectors, including:
- Electrical installation and maintenance
- Welding and fabrication
- Automobile repair and mechanical services
- Digital and creative media production
- Fashion design and tailoring
- Agriculture and agribusiness development
- Renewable energy technologies
Officials say the curriculum is designed to align with Nigeria’s growing need for skilled manpower in both industrial and emerging sectors.
FG Push for Skills-Based Economy
The Federal Government says the TVET initiative is part of ongoing reforms aimed at transitioning Nigeria toward a more skills-driven and production-based economy.
It is also expected to reduce dependence on white-collar jobs by encouraging young Nigerians to embrace entrepreneurship, technical innovation, and self-employment.
With training centres located across all six geopolitical zones, the programme is positioned as one of the government’s largest national efforts to expand access to vocational and technical education in Nigeria.
FG Opens Application for Second Cohort of TVET Programme to Tackle Unemployment
News
INEC: Chairman Joash Amupitan Has No X Account, Warns Against Fake Posts
INEC: Chairman Joash Amupitan Has No X Account, Warns Against Fake Posts
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has clarified that its Chairman, Joash Amupitan, does not operate any personal account on X (formerly Twitter), distancing him from controversial posts circulating online and allegedly linked to an impersonation account.
INEC’s clarification was reinforced by its ICT Director, Lawrence Bayode, during an appearance on Channels Television’s Morning Brief, where he confirmed that the commission had already issued an official statement addressing the issue.
Bayode stated that any content circulating under accounts claiming to represent the INEC chairman should be disregarded, stressing that such accounts are not recognised by the commission.
“Based on the official statement issued by the commission, the chairman does not maintain any personal X account. Any content attributed to such an account is not recognised by the commission as originating from him,” he said.
He explained that the controversy highlights a broader challenge of digital impersonation and misinformation, warning that false online identities can easily be used to mislead the public and damage trust in national institutions, particularly during sensitive political periods.
READ ALSO:
- Trump Claims 158 Iranian Ships Destroyed as US Enforces Naval Blockade in Gulf Region
- Wike Denies ADC Was Blocked From Using Eagle Square for Convention
- Judge Dismisses Trump’s $10bn Defamation Suit Against WSJ Over Epstein Report
According to him, INEC’s priority is to safeguard electoral integrity by ensuring that only verified and official communication channels are used for public information.
“And for me, this is not about an individual; this is about how digital impersonation and misinformation can target public institutions,” he added, emphasising the need for vigilance among citizens and media organisations.
INEC reiterated that the chairman’s official communications are released strictly through institutional platforms, including verified press statements, official briefings, and the commission’s corporate social media handles.
The clarification comes amid controversy over resurfaced posts attributed to a now-disputed X account allegedly linked to the INEC chairman. The commission insists the account is fake and should not be associated with its leadership.
INEC also urged Nigerians to verify information before sharing, warning that the spread of fake accounts and false statements could undermine public confidence in the electoral process.
The commission further called on social media platforms to strengthen measures against impersonation accounts, particularly those targeting high-ranking public officials and sensitive democratic institutions.
As political discussions intensify ahead of future elections, INEC said it remains committed to transparency, neutrality, and protecting the integrity of electoral communication in Nigeria.
INEC: Chairman Joash Amupitan Has No X Account, Warns Against Fake Posts
News
Tinubu Aide Defends Early INEC Statement Release on Amupitan Controversy
Tinubu Aide Defends Early INEC Statement Release on Amupitan Controversy
A presidential media aide, Dada Olusegun, has defended his decision to circulate a statement clearing the embattled Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Joash Amupitan, hours before it was officially released by the commission, saying his action falls within his responsibility to communicate government activities.
The controversy began after Olusegun posted on X (formerly Twitter) at about 8:12 pm on April 10, sharing a statement denying allegations that Amupitan had links to pro-government or pro-APC political activity during the 2023 general elections.
However, INEC reportedly published the same statement on its official platform the following day at about 6:16 pm on April 11, a timing gap that triggered public debate and questions about coordination between the presidency and the electoral body.
The development immediately sparked concerns online, with critics questioning why a presidential aide would publish a statement involving an independent institution before the commission itself, raising renewed discussions about the independence of INEC and institutional communication protocols.
Reacting to the backlash, Olusegun dismissed suggestions of wrongdoing, insisting that there was no conspiracy and that the similarity in messaging should not be misinterpreted.
READ ALSO:
- Nigeria-Kenya Comparison Won’t Solve Economic Crisis — Peter Obi Replies Tinubu
- Trump Sparks Global Outrage After Calling Pope Leo XIV “Weak, Terrible”
- INEC Chairman Under Pressure Over Alleged Pro-Tinubu X Account Link
“It is important to separate coincidence in messaging from conspiracy,” he wrote on X, adding that public institutions often respond to issues already in the public domain and that his post did not influence INEC’s official communication.
He further clarified that he did not author the statement and has no authority over INEC’s internal processes, stressing that his role is limited to communicating and defending the policies and image of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration.
“My role remains what it has always been: to communicate, clarify, and propagate the good works of President Tinubu’s administration responsibly,” he said.
Despite his explanation, the incident triggered widespread reactions on social media, with users questioning the timing of the publications and alleging possible coordination between the presidency and the electoral body.
Some commenters argued that the early release of the statement by a presidential aide could create public perception issues regarding electoral credibility in Nigeria, while others insisted it reflected deeper concerns about institutional independence.
The Independent National Electoral Commission has not issued any further clarification beyond its earlier denial of allegations linking its chairman to partisan political activity during the 2023 elections.
INEC has consistently maintained that its leadership remains neutral and that claims suggesting political bias are false and capable of undermining public trust in the electoral process.
The controversy has further fueled national debate over the boundaries between government communication, political messaging, and the independence of key democratic institutions in Nigeria, particularly ahead of future elections.
Observers say the incident highlights the increasing sensitivity of official communication in the digital era, where timing and perception can significantly shape public trust in institutions.
Tinubu Aide Defends Early INEC Statement Release on Amupitan Controversy
-
metro2 days agoJUST IN: FG Publishes List of 48 Individuals, Groups Linked to Terrorism Financing in Nigeria
-
metro24 hours agoBREAKING: Troops Arrest 15-Year-Old Linked to Killing of Gen Braimah in Borno
-
metro2 days ago42-Year-Old Married Woman Declared Missing Found in Hotel with Man
-
Politics3 days agoDid Faleke Just Reveal Lagos’ Next Governor? Party Moves Begin
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Oyo APC Governorship Aspirant Saheed Oladele Resigns From Party
-
metro2 days agoADC Threatens Civil Disobedience To Force INEC Chairman To Resign
-
metro1 day agoFayose Warns Makinde May Query Olubadan Over Absence at Ibadan Coronation Event
-
Entertainment3 days agoEFCC, Police Investigate Blessing CEO Over Alleged ₦300m Cancer Scam


