Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola - Newstrends
Connect with us

Opinion

Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola

Published

on

Tunde Odesola

Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola

A counteroffensive ignited by Alexis Mac Allister from the right of the Argentine midfield finds Messi, who gave a two-touch twisty flick to a speeding Julian Alverez, whose intelligent pass returns the ball to Allister, who measured a diagonal pass across the French defence line to locate Angel Di Maria who stabbed in a sublime second goal.

For 70 minutes, Argentina was in control, and France was in a coma with their talisman, Kylian Mbappe, locked in the cooler.

France had their first shot on target in the 71st minute. Then, substitute Kolo Muani, who replaced Ousmane Dembele, burst forth with youthful energy to beat the ageing and tired Nicolas Otamendi who pulled back Muani in the 18-yard box. Penalty!

Mbappe fired a low shot to the far right of Argentina goalie, Emiliano Martinez, whose fingertips failed to keep the ball out. Goooal! 2-1. 80th minute. The French were back the next minute when Marcus Thuram found Mbappe with a sweet dink in the Argentina box, and the rejuvenated PSG superstar made no mistake, volleying the ball into the left of Argentina’s post. 2-2!

The cat with nine lives, Messi, pounced in the 108th minute of the extra time to make it 3-2, blasting in a rare right-foot shot inside the 16-yard box after goalkeeper Hugo Lloris’ point-blank save, sending the 88,966-capacity Lusail Stadium on fire.

Argentina idol, Diego Armando Maradona, fooled the world during the 1986 Mexico World Cup quarterfinal match against England when he scored his infamous ‘Hand of God’ goal to send La Albiceleste en route to a second World Cup glory. English players, including Gary Lineker, John Barnes and goalkeeper Peter Shilton protested but Tunisian referee, Ben Nasser, had no Video Assistant Referee to consult. So, the goal stood. After the dubious first goal, Maradona produced a breathtaking second goal, dribbling past half of the English team right from outside his own centre-circle and slotting home FIFA’s ‘Goal of the Century’ inside the box with his left foot.

But Polish referee Szymon Marciniak didn’t see the ‘Hand of God’ in the 116th minute of the Qatar 2022 World Cup final, he saw the hand of Gonzalo Montiel stop a shot from Mbappe and he rightly awarded a penalty. Again, Mbappe stepped forward to send Martinez the wrong way, scoring all his three penalties in the final to the right of the keeper and sending the game into a pulsating penalty shootout. 3-3!

READ ALSO:

Keeper Martinez aka Dibu weaved his name into World Cup folklore as he saved Kingsley Coman’s penalty and​​ Aurelien Tchouameni missed while Messi, Paredes Leandro, Lucas Ocampus, and villain-turned-hero Montiel delivered the coveted trophy with the last kick of the game, sending Lloris on a wild goose chase leftward.

In the final analysis, Argentina came tops in the vital statistics of the game with 54% possession to France’s 46%, 10 shots on goal to 5 for France, 20 to 10 shot attempts, 6 to 5 corner kicks, and taking the lead on all three occasions.

But no matter what Ádámò does, he can never please the citizens of the Land of Àkámárà. Even if he gets another horse and he and his son ride one each, the people of Àkámárà would blame him for an impudent display of wealth.

I have many anti-Messi friends who are citizens of the Land of Àkámárà. They include Nigeria’s Ambassador to Mexico, Adejare Bello; a former Editor of PUNCH, Chiawo Nwankwo; childhood friend and banker, Victor Olowogorioye; former spokesperson for ex-Governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola, Kayode Oladeji; and a former colleague, Femi Adepoju. Look, it’s not only men that populate Àkámárà. There are women there, too. One of them is the smashing General Manager, Corporate Services, PUNCH Nigeria Limited, Mrs Folakemi Gbemutor, whose love for Real Madrid is conc. Despite all Messi had done to win his 8th Ballon d’Or, she still believes her team’s former icon, Ronaldo, is superior with his five Ballons d’Or haul. Even though my maths is struggling, I think 8-5 remains 3, abi?

Well, Juju music superstar, Chief Commander Ebenezer Obey, said it all in his parable of the man and his son journeying on their horse: there’s nothing you can do to please Àkámáràns. I asked another Àkámáràn, Stanley Adiele, a friend, why he didn’t want Messi to win the World Cup, he said, “It’s going to hurt my brand.” Adiele’s brand is not superior football prowess, it’s Ronaldo and his ebbing career.

A good number of anti-Messi fans queued behind Manchester City lightning striker, Erlin Haaland. Let’s consider the optics. Like Haaland, Messi won a treble of Ligue 1, French Super Cuo and the Father of All Trophies, the World Cup. Unlike no other player, Messi won 29 Man-of-the-Match awards to Haaland’s 17, meaning that he impacted more on the game than Haaland. Though Haaland scored more goals than Messi (52 to 37), Àkámáràns should be reminded that a Soviet goalkeeper, Lev Yashin, won the award in 1963.

Therefore, the Ballon d’Or isn’t an award for goal-scoring alone but for the overall impact a player has on his team. Messi spearheaded the most thrilling World Cup final in history, emerging as the best player of the tournament at 35! Without Haaland, City would have swept the stakes in Europe and England but Argentina, without Messi, would have returned home empty-handed. In the season, Messi had 25 assists to Haaland’s 9. Messi was way ahead of Haaland in other parameters such as Dribbles: 149 to 19; Key Passes: 140 to 37; Tackles: 40 to 8; Big Chances Created: 45 to 13. Yet, Àkámáràns won’t stop saying both the World Cup and the Ballon d’Or were rigged in Messi’s favour.

READ ALSO:

Do not be fooled, there are Àkámáràns in the white man’s land, too. They dealt a bad hand during the heavyweight boxing fight between British world champion, Tyson Fury, and Cameroonian mixed martial artist, Francis Ngannou, who turned professional boxer recently.

Watching the slugfest, it was obvious that Fury got more than he bargained for in Ngannou, who knocked him down in the third round with a left hook. The booing of the judges’ verdicts at the end of the fight shows the fans’ belief as to where the pendulum of victory should have swung. From rounds one to seven, (David) Ngannou stood toe-to-toe, in my estimation, against the Goliath of England, winning at least four of the seven rounds. The referees also gave Round 8 to Ngannou. With the Round 3 knockdown, the fight should have been awarded to Ngannou even if Fury won the other five rounds of the 10-round encounter.

David had to cut off Goliath’s head, lift it high up and feed it to the birds of the sky. This is boxing, Ngannou couldn’t do so, so he lost. If it was a mixed martial arts fight, Fury the Giant would’ve been levelled in the third round.

Let me tell you why Ngannou can never be declared winner except he yanks off Fury’s head. Declaring Ngannou, a ‘greenhorn’ in professional boxing, the winner of the bout would have greatly diminished boxing in the eyes of the world. How can a newcomer mixed martial artist defeat boxing’s biggest champion in his first professional boxing fight?

I watch wrestling for comic relief because it’s not a true test of strength. Boxing is seen worldwide as a sweet science that tests strength, wit, brains and guts. Mixed martial arts, since its emergence in the 1990s, has, no doubt, gained global acclaim, sharing the stage with boxing.

If Ngannou was declared winner over Fury, MMA would’ve enjoyed an increased popularity, a situation likely to challenge boxing’s position as the king of combat sports.

An Ngannou victory would also have changed the direction of the heavyweight boxing fights in the pipeline as Fury would have no choice but to stake his titles against Ngannou, putting on hold other possible fights.

Ngannou cannot just come from nowhere and pour san-san for boxing garri. E gbe kinni yi wa, Fury lokan. It’s Fury’s turn, not Ngannou’s yet.

Concluded.

Email: tundeodesola2003@yahoo.com; Facebook: @Tunde Odesola; X: @Tunde_Odesola.

Published in The PUNCH, on Friday, November 10, 2023.

Lord, have Messi on Fury and bless Ngannou (2), by Tunde Odesola

Loading

Opinion

2027: Competence, Not Zoning, Should Decide Nigeria’s Next President — Imasuagbon

Published

on

Nigerians should look beyond ethnicity, region and the longstanding debate over rotational presidency when choosing the country’s next leader, according to a chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Kenneth Imasuagbon.

The former Edo State governorship aspirant said the priority ahead of the 2027 election should be finding a president with the ability to confront Nigeria’s economic, security and infrastructure challenges.

Speaking to journalists in Benin, Imasuagbon argued that presidential rotation is not a requirement of the Nigerian Constitution and should therefore not outweigh the question of competence.

He said voters should be more concerned about replacing poor schools with better ones, improving healthcare and addressing hardship than debating where the next president comes from.

Imasuagbon specifically appealed to voters in the South to support former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who is contesting the 2027 presidency on the ADC platform.

According to him, Atiku has demonstrated the experience and determination needed to improve the country, describing the former vice president as someone capable of promoting national unity and fairness.

He also accused the Bola Tinubu administration of worsening economic pressure through policies including the removal of fuel subsidy, while expressing concern about the condition of roads, electricity and other infrastructure.

Imasuagbon argued that the next administration must focus on practical improvements in areas such as power, transportation, employment, security and public services.

The ADC chieftain also dismissed the idea that the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) would automatically benefit from its incumbency advantage in 2027.

He maintained that the electorate ultimately determines the outcome of an election, arguing that voters could change the political direction of the country if they were determined to do so.

Imasuagbon further criticised what he described as regional and ethnic considerations in the distribution of political appointments and opportunities, insisting that the next president should give Nigerians across different parts of the country a sense of belonging.

His comments come as political parties and their candidates intensify preparations for the 2027 presidential election.

Loading

Continue Reading

Opinion

Lesson from Dotun Oladipo’s Brave Daughters, by Bamidele Johnson

Published

on

Lesson from Dotun Oladipo’s Brave Daughters, by Bamidele Johnson

 

I hope to grow old. I want to see my kids become real adults, find their own feet, make mistakes, recover from them, and perhaps one day complain that their own children are giving them grey hairs. I want that plainly stated before anything else, as everything that follows might read as a man agreeing to an early exit rather than a man simply being honest about the odds.

I want the decades. I want to become the grandfather who repeats the same stories until nobody bothers correcting him anymore. But wanting a thing and being granted are different things. The last year has made that difference harder to ignore than I would like. I have lost many friends recently to keep thinking that optimism is my natural resting state. Some of these men had better blood pressure than mine, better habits, better everything that is supposed to count. It did not save them.

There is no formula I know that reliably separates the men who make it to 70 from those who do not. Anyone who says he knows one is selling something. So, I do not assume that old age is an already booked destination. Even if I once did, which I doubt, the last three years have cured me of such an illusion. As such, I treat it as a hope rather than an expectation, and I have found that a more honest way to live.

It is exactly why I want something placed on record now, while I am still able to place things on record, rather than leave it for people to guess what my wishes were in the fog of a funeral week. If I do not make old bones, my children are not to be asked to read tributes at my funeral. Not one line, however short, however lovingly written.

This, for me, was settled today rather than re-opened. At Dotun Oladipo’s funeral service, his three daughters took turns to read their tributes to their dad, and I found myself watching them with awe. There was a kind of strength in them that I do not possess. It is the strength needed to stand in front of a hall brimming with grieving adults and speak about a man they have just lost. Forever. Strength, however, is not the same as ease. I could see plainly what that strength was costing them as they read. Their voices caught. Their composure held and then did not hold and then held again through sheer will.

In front of them, in the pews, men and women considerably older than them came undone in ways the girls themselves were somehow managing to resist. I went mightily close. Some of the sobbing was quiet, the type people try to fold into a handkerchief. Some of it was not quiet at all, the kind that announces itself whether or not you want it.

Those young women honoured their father with a grace that is beyond me. What they did was astonishing. So, what I am attempting is an observation of a custom I have now watched wound people. This was not the first time I had watched this particular ritual extract more than it should from people already running on fumes. I saw an earlier and harder version of it at a friend’s wake back in 2015.

The first son was called forward to read his father’s tribute, and he could not do it. He tried, but the words would not come, and he stood there in front of a crowd of mourners, with his grief simply refusing to organise itself into sentences. The officiating minister, rather than releasing him from the task, urged him to continue. I sat fizzing with sorrow and ire. He could not go on and, eventually, the minister accepted, but not before insisting a while longer than it should have reasonably taken. His younger brother was called up next, presumably on the theory that if one grieving son could not manage it, maybe another one could. He flunked it in the same way. Grief does not distribute itself more conveniently among siblings just because a programme has been printed and needs to be followed.

I have turned that memory over many times since, trying to work out why this part of the rites is treated as mandatory in the first place. I have not found a satisfying answer. Maybe it comes from a belief that a child’s words carry more weight than anyone else’s, which may even be true, but weight is exactly the problem when those carrying it are struggling to hold themselves together with nothing but adrenaline and the fear of dissolving in public.

Maybe it is simply inertia, the reason we still do a hundred things at funerals that nobody can explain the original purpose of. Either way, I have stopped looking for the justification. I no longer think one exists that is good enough to weigh against what I watched happen to that boy in 2015.

So, let this stand as my instruction rather than my preference, the kind of thing I would rather state plainly now than leave for my children to infer later from how uncertain I sound when the subject comes up in passing. If I do not get the old age I am hoping for, my children will not be asked to read a single word over my body. Someone else can speak for me. A friend, a stranger with a steadier voice and a smaller stake in the loss, anyone whose grief will not be quite so total that standing upright becomes almost impossible.

My children, of course, will sit in front and fall apart if that is what the day requires of them, but without the microphone. That, at least, is one small mercy I intend to arrange for them while I am still here to arrange it.

Dotun deserved every bit of the send-off his daughters gave him today, and I suspect he would have been the first to tell them to sit down and let someone else carry the weight for a while. He did not get a say in that, as none of us ever do once we are the ones being spoken of rather than the ones speaking. Rest well, Dotun. You raised three young women whose strength I will not soon forget. That alone says everything worth saying about the man you were.

 

Loading

Continue Reading

Opinion

‘Tinubu Will Win Again in 2027’ — Charismatic Bishops’ Secretary

Published

on

‘Tinubu Will Win Again in 2027’ — Charismatic Bishops’ Secretary

A senior Nigerian cleric, Archbishop Chivir Chianson, has declared that President Bola Tinubu will retain the presidency after the 2027 general election, attributing the prediction to a message he said came from God.

Chianson, who serves as Secretary General of the Charismatic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria, made the statement while appearing on Arise Television on Saturday.

Rather than basing his prediction on political calculations, the archbishop said his confidence came from what he described as the prophetic role of bishops.

He maintained that the conference had previously spoken about Tinubu’s political future based on what he said was divine revelation and that the President would return for another term.

Chianson also predicted that Tinubu’s performance would improve if he wins the 2027 election.

READ ALSO:

Addressing the political opposition, the cleric said the bishops could not be blamed if rival parties failed to unite or organise themselves effectively ahead of the election.

He also sought to clarify the position of the bishops when dealing with government, saying their role in speaking truth to power did not mean they should approach political leaders with hostility or disrespect.

According to him, the Constitution, alongside their religious convictions, should guide how they engage the President and the country.

Chianson said he was sufficiently confident in his prediction to promise that he would return to the Arise TV studio after the 2027 election, when he expects the result to demonstrate that the bishops’ prophecy was correct.

His comments add a religious dimension to the increasingly active political conversation surrounding the 2027 presidential race.

‘Tinubu Will Win Again in 2027’ — Charismatic Bishops’ Secretary

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending