International
Biden blames jet lag, travel for poor debate performance
Biden blames jet lag, travel for poor debate performance
President Joe Biden has blamed his poor debate performance last week on jet lag, telling reporters that he “wasn’t very smart” for “travelling around the world a couple of times” before the debate.
“I didn’t listen to my staff… and then I nearly fell asleep on stage,” he said.
Mr Biden, 81, last returned from travel on 15 June, nearly two weeks ahead of the 27 June debate.
Mr Biden’s remarks come amid intra-party panic ahead of November’s election over his mental fitness, and after a congressman from Texas became the first sitting Democratic lawmaker to call for him to step aside following his debate.
“I am hopeful that he will make the painful and difficult to decision to withdraw,” Rep Lloyd Doggett said in a statement on Tuesday.
President Biden appeared to struggle through some responses during a debate with former President Donald Trump last Thursday.
“It’s not an excuse but an explanation,” he said at a private fundraiser in Virginia on Tuesday evening, referring to his travel.
He also apologised for his performance and said it was “critical” that he win re-election, according to ABC News.
Mr Biden made two separate trips to Europe in the span of two weeks last month.
On 15 June, he appeared at a fundraiser alongside former President Barack Obama after an overnight trip from Italy. He returned to Washington DC the following day.
READ ALSO:
- Three Indians abducted on Sagamu – Ijebu-Ode highway
- South-East governors agreed to meet Tinubu over Nnamdi Kanu
- 19 killed in Mexican gang fight
White House officials have previously said Mr Biden’s was battling a cold on the day of the debate.
The president did not mention any illness in his remarks on Tuesday. A spokeswoman for the White House said earlier in the day that he was not taking any cold medication during the debate.
Mr Biden also spent six days at Camp David, the presidential retreat outside Washington DC, preparing for his debate against Mr Trump.
The New York Times, citing an unnamed source familiar with Mr Biden’s schedule, reported on Tuesday that his days began at 11:00 each morning and that he was given time each day to nap.
The newspaper also reported that he was so exhausted from his travel that his debate preparations were cut short by two days to give him time to rest at his beach house in Delaware.
Andrew Bates, a spokesman for Mr Biden, said the president began “working well before” 11:00, after his exercise routine, during his time at Camp David.
His age has been a long-simmering issue this election, with voters in multiple polls saying they think he is too old to be effective.
Mr Biden is currently the Democratic Party’s presumptive nominee for the White House.
He has vowed to stay in the race despite the debate performance.
In his Tuesday statement, Rep Doggett, 77, said the debate solidified his decision to urge Mr Biden to step aside.
“Instead of reassuring voters, the President failed to effectively defend his many accomplishments and expose Trump’s many lies,” said Rep Doggett, who was sworn in in 1995 and is running for reelection.
He said too much is at stake to risk the president losing to Trump over fears about his age.
“While much of his work has been transformational, he pledged to be transitional,” the congressman said of Mr Biden.
READ ALSO:
- Borno suicide bombing meant to cover terrorists’ weakness – DHQ
- Three people selling fake appointment letters @N400,000 in Adamawa arrested
- Nigerians still struggling with poverty, unemployment, says Speaker Abbas
“He has the opportunity to encourage a new generation of leaders from whom a nominee can be chosen to unite our country through an open, democratic process.”
“My decision to make these strong reservations public is not done lightly nor does it in any way diminish my respect for all that President Biden has achieved,” Rep Doggett said.
Mr Biden will give a primetime interview to ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos on Friday, his first since the debate.
Some prominent Democratic lawmakers voiced their concerns about Mr Biden’s age and stamina this week, but none until Rep Doggett has called for him to move aside as a candidate.
Other top Democrats have acknowledged fears about Mr Biden’s ability to win but emphasised that the choice to leave the race is the president’s alone.
Several have flocked to liberal-leaning network MSNBC to defend him.
“It’s going to be up to Joe Biden” to do what he thinks is best, former US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told MSNBC on Tuesday.
One of President Biden’s most important backers, Congressman Jim Clyburn of South Carolina, said he would support Vice-President Kamala Harris as the party’s nominee if Mr Biden stepped down.
But he told the network: “I want this ticket to continue to be Biden-Harris.”
Congressman Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, told MSNBC this weekend that the debate created a “difficult situation”.
He acknowledged that there were “very honest and serious and rigorous conversations taking place at every level of our party.”
But he added: “Regardless of what President Biden decides, our party is going to be unified and our party also needs him at the very centre of our deliberations in our campaign.”
Biden blames jet lag, travel for poor debate performance
BBC
![]()
International
Israel Warns US of ‘Specific’ Iranian Assassination Plot Against Trump
Israel Warns US of ‘Specific’ Iranian Assassination Plot Against Trump
Israeli intelligence authorities have reportedly alerted the United States to a fresh and specific Iranian plot to assassinate President Donald Trump, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. The Wall Street Journal first reported on Thursday that Israel provided new intelligence revealing that Iran had recently developed a detailed plan to kill the American president. The warning, delivered earlier this week, was described by sources as more concrete than previous threat assessments, marking a significant escalation in intelligence-sharing between the two allies amid growing regional instability.
While the exact details of the alleged plot remain classified, officials familiar with the briefing confirmed that the Israeli intelligence pointed to a coordinated operation aimed at the US leader. According to CNN, US authorities had been tracking a “steady drumbeat” of general threats against Trump in recent weeks, but the Israeli warning was considered new and operationally specific. However, US intelligence agencies have not yet independently verified the plot, and officials admitted they were not actively tracking this particular scheme before receiving the Israeli alert, leaving some room for caution within Washington’s national security apparatus.
President Trump addressed the threats publicly during a visit to Ankara, Turkey, following the NATO summit on Wednesday. He told reporters: “They want to take out the US leader – me. I’m on whatever list. I saw this morning I’m on every single one of their lists. So far, I guess I’ve been a bit lucky, but maybe that doesn’t last very long. These are evil, sick people.” He added that Iran had recently updated a ranking list of assassination targets, placing him at the top – though it remains unclear whether he was directly referring to the Israeli intelligence report or to separate threat assessments circulating within US security circles.
READ ALSO:
- Troops intercept foreign courier carrying drugs, alcohol to terrorists in Borno
- Kogi Teacher’s Murder: Three Suspects Arrested, to Face Trial for Culpable Homicide
- Nigeria’s stock market surpasses South Korea as world’s top-performing equity market
The reported plot comes amid years of open threats from Iranian authorities vowing retaliation for the 2020 US drone strike that killed General Qassem Soleimani – a top commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – during Trump’s first term. Although Iranian officials have publicly pledged revenge on multiple occasions, the latest intelligence suggests a new and active operational phase, rather than a continuation of rhetorical threats. This shift has heightened concerns among US counter-terrorism officials, who now view the Iranian threat as more immediate and actionable than previously assessed.
The intelligence warning surfaces against a backdrop of renewed military confrontation between Washington and Tehran. The US resumed large-scale airstrikes on Iranian positions on 8 July, accusing Tehran of violating the terms of a ceasefire agreement regarding the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump declared the ceasefire agreement “over” on Wednesday, though diplomatic backchannels reportedly remain open. Meanwhile, the funeral of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in US-Israeli airstrikes on 28 February, saw mass gatherings where mourners chanted anti-Trump slogans and displayed banners reading “We Will Kill Trump,” underscoring the depth of anti-American sentiment within the Iranian establishment.
Despite the seriousness of the Israeli warning, some US officials have expressed caution. According to insiders, there is a degree of scepticism within the American intelligence community about the timing and intent of the Israeli report. Some analysts suggest that Israel may be seeking to influence President Trump’s decision-making as he weighs whether to intensify military action against Iran. The intelligence, they argue, could serve as a strategic lever to push the US toward a harder line, rather than representing an immediate and verifiable threat. This scepticism reflects broader tensions in US-Israeli intelligence relations, where shared information is sometimes viewed through the lens of各自 national interests.
As of now, US security agencies have increased protective measures around the president, though specifics remain undisclosed for operational security reasons. Diplomatic efforts continue behind the scenes, even as military strikes resume, suggesting that both Washington and Tehran are hedging their bets. Iran has not formally responded to the Israeli intelligence claims, and its UN mission declined to comment when approached by reporters. The situation remains fluid, and the coming days are likely to bring further developments as Washington and Tehran navigate one of the most volatile chapters in their long-standing conflict, with global attention fixed on whether the alleged plot will materialise or remain another layer in the ongoing shadow war between the two nations.
Israel Warns US of ‘Specific’ Iranian Assassination Plot Against Trump
![]()
International
CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive
CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive
The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) says American forces have struck more than 170 Iranian military targets over two consecutive nights, dramatically escalating tensions in the Middle East after a fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran collapsed.
According to CENTCOM, the operation was launched in retaliation for Iranian attacks on three commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime corridor through which about one-fifth of the world’s seaborne crude oil passes. The U.S. military described the attacks as a violation of the ceasefire agreement and a threat to global maritime security.
CENTCOM said the first wave of strikes, conducted on Tuesday night, targeted more than 80 Iranian military sites, including air defence systems, command and control networks, coastal radar installations, anti-ship missile systems, and more than 60 boats belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) operating in and around the Strait of Hormuz.
The military command said a second wave of attacks followed on Wednesday night, with U.S. forces striking approximately 90 additional military targets along Iran’s southern coastline. The latest operation focused on degrading Iran’s ability to threaten international shipping by targeting coastal surveillance assets, missile and drone storage facilities, naval capabilities, air defence positions, and military logistics infrastructure.
In a statement posted on its official X account, CENTCOM said U.S. forces remained ready to respond to any further violations of the ceasefire.
READ ALSO:
- Presidency Slams Peter Obi’s ‘False Intimidation Claims’
- Dangote cuts petrol price again as crude oil surge threatens fuel price relief
- FG expands emergency healthcare services to 34 states
“U.S. forces remain postured and prepared to hold Iran accountable when the agreement is not adhered to or obeyed,” the command said.
Iranian state media reported explosions in several southern cities, including Bandar Abbas, Chabahar and Konarak, with parts of the affected areas experiencing electricity outages following the bombardments.
Iranian authorities said the initial U.S. strikes killed at least eight military personnel, while the country’s Health Ministry later reported that the overall casualty toll from the two-day operation had risen to 14 people killed and 78 injured. Those figures have not been independently verified.
In response, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) launched missiles and drones targeting U.S. military facilities in Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar, triggering air raid sirens and prompting air defence systems across the Gulf to intercept incoming projectiles. U.S. and Gulf officials reported no immediate casualties, although military bases remained on high alert.
The latest confrontation followed Iranian attacks on three commercial tankers identified by CENTCOM as the Marshall Islands-flagged M/T Al Rekayyat, the Saudi Arabia-flagged M/T Wedyan, and the Liberian-flagged M/T Cyprus Prosperity.
The U.S. military described the attacks on the vessels as “unwarranted aggression” that endangered freedom of navigation and disrupted one of the world’s busiest energy shipping lanes. CENTCOM also said commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz had dropped sharply following the attacks.
Speaking during the NATO Summit in Türkiye, U.S. President Donald Trump declared that the memorandum of understanding signed with Iran on June 17 was effectively over, warning that the American military campaign would intensify if Tehran continued to threaten commercial shipping.
Trump said Washington remained open to limited diplomatic contacts but expressed little confidence that negotiations would produce a lasting agreement. He also warned that further disruptions to maritime trade could trigger a stronger U.S. military response.
The U.S. administration also reinstated sweeping sanctions on Iranian oil exports by revoking a temporary waiver that had allowed Tehran to continue limited crude sales during ceasefire negotiations, further increasing economic pressure on the Iranian government.
The renewed military confrontation sent shockwaves through global energy markets, with international benchmark Brent crude surging to nearly $80 per barrel as investors reacted to fears of possible supply disruptions.
Analysts warned that any prolonged conflict around the Strait of Hormuz could push global crude oil prices even higher, increase fuel costs, worsen inflation and disrupt international supply chains, given the strategic importance of the waterway to global energy exports.
Security analysts say the latest exchange of attacks represents one of the most serious military confrontations between Washington and Tehran in recent years, raising concerns that the conflict could spread beyond the Gulf if diplomatic efforts fail to restore calm.
Although both countries have kept limited diplomatic channels open, the collapse of the ceasefire has heightened fears of a broader regional conflict involving additional state and non-state actors across the Middle East.
CENTCOM confirms US hit 170 Iranian military targets in 48-hour offensive
![]()
International
German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients
German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients
A German palliative care doctor has been sentenced to life imprisonment after a court in Berlin found him guilty of murdering 15 patients over a three-year period, in a case prosecutors say could become one of the largest serial murder investigations involving a medical professional in Germany.
The 41-year-old physician, identified only as Johannes M. under Germany’s privacy laws, was convicted on Wednesday of killing 12 women and three men between September 2021 and July 2024 while working for a home-based palliative care service in the German capital.
The Berlin Regional Court heard that the victims, aged between 25 and 94, were all seriously ill but were not considered to be at imminent risk of death. Most of them were receiving palliative care in their homes when the killings occurred.
According to prosecutors, Johannes M. deliberately administered a lethal combination of an anaesthetic and a muscle relaxant without the knowledge or consent of the patients. The drugs caused respiratory paralysis, leading to their deaths within minutes.
READ ALSO:
- PFIPC Scandal: Adeyemi Pledges Full Cooperation with ICPC, Vows to Submit Documents to DSS
- Dangote launches free petrol delivery in Lagos, Abuja, five other states
- Appeal Court orders status quo in ISI hijab case, adjourns hearing to Oct. 7
Prosecutors argued that the doctor acted out of what they described as a “lust for murder” rather than compassion or any legitimate medical purpose. They also accused him of setting fire to several victims’ homes in an attempt to destroy evidence and conceal the crimes.
Investigators linked at least five suspected arson incidents to the murders, saying the fires were intended to make the deaths appear accidental.
One of the most shocking incidents presented during the trial occurred in July 2024, shortly before the doctor’s arrest. Prosecutors alleged that Johannes M. killed two patients on the same day.
According to the prosecution, he first fatally injected a 75-year-old man during a home visit in central Berlin before travelling to another district, where he allegedly killed a 76-year-old woman. Investigators said he later attempted to set fire to the woman’s apartment, but the blaze failed to destroy crucial evidence.
For much of the year-long trial, the doctor declined to testify. However, during proceedings last month, he admitted responsibility for killing 12 of the victims, telling the court that he believed he was relieving them of pain and suffering.
“Throughout it all, I thought this was the best thing for everyone,” he said, before expressing remorse and apologising to the families of the victims.
Despite the admission, prosecutors maintained that the killings were neither acts of mercy nor medically justified, insisting the victims had not consented to ending their lives and that many still had plans for the future.
In delivering its judgment, the Berlin Regional Court imposed Germany’s maximum sentence for murder and made a finding of “particularly severe guilt,” a legal classification that makes early release after the standard 15-year period highly unlikely.
The court also ordered preventive detention, allowing authorities to continue holding the doctor after completion of his prison sentence if he is still considered a danger to society. In addition, he was permanently banned from practising medicine.
Authorities believe the 15 confirmed murders may represent only a fraction of the doctor’s alleged crimes.
Investigators initially opened the case after becoming suspicious about four patient deaths before widening the inquiry. A special investigative team has since reviewed 395 patient files, exhumed several bodies and identified dozens of additional suspicious cases.
Prosecutors are now investigating 76 more deaths linked to the doctor, raising the possibility of further criminal charges if sufficient evidence is established.
If additional allegations are proven, the case could become one of the most extensive serial murder investigations in Germany’s modern history.
The trial featured emotional testimony from relatives of several victims, many of whom rejected the doctor’s claim that he was acting out of compassion.
The mother of the youngest victim, a 25-year-old woman, tearfully told the court that her daughter “never said she didn’t want to live anymore.”
Similarly, the son of a 72-year-old woman said his mother had been planning a holiday with her sister before her death, insisting she had every intention of continuing her life.
Legal experts say the verdict has renewed debate in Germany over patient safety, oversight of palliative care services and the safeguards required to protect vulnerable patients receiving treatment in their homes.
As investigations continue, prosecutors say Johannes M. has indicated a willingness to cooperate in future proceedings, while authorities remain focused on determining whether additional patients fell victim to the same pattern of crimes.
German doctor sentenced to life in prison for murdering 15 patients
![]()
-
metro2 days agoRescue Hope Rises as Security Operatives Identify Oyo Kidnappers’ Network
-
metro2 days agoAppeal Court orders status quo in ISI hijab case, adjourns hearing to Oct. 7
-
News2 days agoEl-Rufai’s Wives Beg Tinubu for Fair Treatment, Say Family Is Traumatised
-
News2 days agoProperties Razed as Yoruba, Hausa Residents Clash in Ibadan
-
metro2 days agoMan Seeks Divorce Over Wife’s Alleged Refusal to Fund Daughter’s Treatment
-
Business2 days agoDangote launches free petrol delivery in Lagos, Abuja, five other states
-
metro3 days agoUPDATED: Gbajabiamila gives Adeniyi 72 hours to retract allegations or face ₦10bn defamation suit
-
Entertainment3 days agoNollywood actress appeals for support as recurring cancer spreads to bones
