A line repeated by his vice presidential pick, Ohio Senator J. D. Vance.
How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president
(NANFeatures)
How Electoral College, not popular votes, picks US president
Although the United States prides itself on being the world’s preeminent democracy, where each person can have their say about who should be president, the Constitution calls for states to choose “electors” who do the actual electing.
This is known as the Electoral College.
This includes the first presidential election in 1789, won by George Washington; there have been 59 U.S. elections.
In all but five, two in this century, the president has won both the popular votes and the Electoral College votes.
In 2000, Democratic candidate Al Gore garnered 543,895 more votes nationwide than Republican George W. Bush.
But in a contentious race that went all the way up to the Supreme Court, the judges decided to end a recount in Florida, giving the state’s then 25 electoral votes to Bush.
This took Bush past the magic number of 270 electoral votes and ensured him the presidency.
In 2016, when Donald Trump was elected, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by a much bigger margin, receiving 2.9 million more votes nationwide.
But Trump became president because he garnered 304 electoral votes to Clinton’s 227.
If the number of electoral votes is tied, then the election is decided by the newly elected House of Representatives.
Each state is allotted electors equal to their number of representatives in Congress.
This means there are 538 electors in total: 435 representatives and 100 senators, plus three for the District of Columbia.
If a candidate wins 270 electors or more, therefore, he or she wins the presidency.
In 48 states, the candidate with the most votes, however slim the margin, wins all the state’s electoral votes.
Maine and Nebraska do things differently and allocate electoral votes by individual congressional districts.
Some critics regard the Electoral College as an anachronism and would replace it with a national popular vote.
They say that the Electoral College makes a mockery of the “one person, one vote” system the country extols.
Furthermore, it causes candidates to concentrate their campaigns primarily on a handful of swing states where the vote could go either way, turning the majority of voters elsewhere in the country into bystanders.
But proponents say the reverse would happen if the president were elected by the popular votes.
Then candidates would concentrate their campaigning in the big states—California, Texas, and New York—and voters in smaller states would be the onlookers.
But what really do the two major candidates in the U.S. presidential election represent?
Kamala Harris is the first woman, first black person, and first person of South Asian descent to be vice president of the United States.
After four years in the second highest office, she now wants to make history again by holding the top job.
She received President Joe Biden’s blessing when he stepped back from being the Democratic candidate just three months ago, triggering her whirlwind campaign.
Harris was born on Oct. 20, 1964, in Oakland, California. She often touts her middle-class upbringing to voters: her father Donald migrated from Jamaica to study economics; her mother Shyamala, a cancer researcher and civil rights activist, came from India.
They married in 1963 and separated when Harris was 5 years old.
Harris, 60, has largely played down her gender and race. But she has said that India is an important part of her life.
When she and her younger sister Maya were children, their mother travelled with them to India almost every other year to see relatives there—and to instill in them a love of Indian food.
Shyamala died of colon cancer in 2009. Harris rarely speaks of her father, who went on to become a professor at Stanford University. She once told an interviewer that they are not close.
Harris became the first black district attorney of San Francisco in 2002, and later she served for six years as California’s attorney general.
When she moved to the U.S. Senate in 2017, she used her experience as a prosecutor to make her mark at high-profile hearings by grilling witnesses, from Trump officials to Supreme Court nominees.
Harris met her partner Doug Emhoff, an entertainment lawyer, relatively late in life.
A friend set up a blind date for the two of them in California, where they were living at the time in 2013.
They married the following year.
Emhoff has two adult children from his first marriage: Cole and Ella.
As the first husband of a vice president, Emhoff is also the first “Second Gentleman” of the United States.
Should Harris win and become the first woman to ever hold the presidency, he would be the very first “First Gentleman.”
Donald Trump’s rise to the U.S. presidency, which he held from 2017-2021, upset many assumptions and taboos, but perhaps just as surprising is that he has brushed off two impeachments, a criminal conviction, and several other threats to contend again for the White House.
His come-from-behind win against Hillary Clinton in 2016, by claiming outsider status and promising to bring a businessman’s acumen for dealmaking to the White House, shocked the U.S. political system and fundamentally changed the Republican party.
In 2024, four years after losing to Joe Biden, he still casts himself as the man to shake up U.S. politics by taking on the corrupt elites.
All the while he has kept his brash campaign style, prone to riffing on theories well outside the mainstream, and rarely shying away from an opportunity to personally insult or belittle his opponents.
If Trump wins, the 78-year-old would be the oldest person in U.S. history elected president.
Born June 14, 1946, he was the fourth of five children of Frederick Trump, a real estate magnate who bequeathed a small New York empire to his family.
At age 13, Trump’s parents sent him to a military academy.
The future president went on to study at Fordham University and then the University of Pennsylvania’s prestigious Wharton School of Business.
After graduating from Wharton, he joined his father’s business and, in 1974, became its president and renamed it the Trump Organisation.
Investments in hotels, casinos, golf courses, luxury apartments, and beauty pageants followed.
As the star of the TV reality show “The Apprentice,” he relished delivering bad news to failed contenders, telling them curtly, “You are fired.”
Trump dipped into politics from time to time but seemed galvanised under the administration of Barack Obama and morphed into a right-wing populist.
He loudly peddled the lie that Obama was not born in the United States.
Trump’s critics, which include several high-profile members of his first administration, have cast him as chaotic, divisive, and a threat to democracy.
General John Kelly, his former chief of staff, recently likened him to a “fascist.”
His rhetoric has been crude and dark at rallies, veering from crass insults to false claims and menacing warnings, like his suggestion this month he could use the military to handle what he called “the enemy from within.”
Like in 2016, his 2024 campaign has put an anti-immigration stance front and centre.
In 2016, he said some Mexican immigrants were rapists and murderers; this year he baselessly accused Haitian immigrants of eating pets in the town of Springfield, Ohio.
A line repeated by his vice presidential pick, Ohio Senator J. D. Vance.
(NANFeatures)
US Singer D4vd Faces Murder Charges Over Teen’s Death in Los Angeles
American singer D4vd, born David Anthony Burke, has been charged in connection with the killing of 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, in a case that prosecutors have described as one of the most serious and disturbing in recent years.
The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, led by District Attorney Nathan J. Hochman, confirmed that the 21-year-old faces multiple felony charges, including first-degree murder, continuous sexual abuse of a minor, and mutilation of human remains.
According to investigators, the teenager was last seen on April 23, 2025, after visiting Burke at his residence in the Hollywood Hills area of Los Angeles. She was reported missing shortly after she failed to return home.
Months later, on September 8, 2025, authorities made a gruesome discovery when her decomposed and dismembered remains were found inside the front trunk of a Tesla vehicle linked to the singer. Police reportedly traced the vehicle after receiving complaints about a strong odour, leading to the recovery of body parts stored in a cadaver bag.
Prosecutors say the case includes several special circumstance allegations, such as murder of a witness, murder for financial gain, and lying in wait. They also allege that Burke used a sharp instrument to carry out the killing.
READ ALSO:
“This is a parent’s nightmare,” Hochman said during a press briefing, describing the case as “brutal and horrific.” He added that the charges represent the most severe offences his office can prosecute.
Jim McDonnell, chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, stated that authorities remain committed to ensuring justice for the victim and her family.
Burke was arrested on April 16, 2026, and is currently being held without bail. He is expected to be arraigned at the Foltz Criminal Justice Center.
If convicted, he faces either the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole, although prosecutors have yet to decide whether capital punishment will be pursued.
The singer’s legal team, led by Blair Berk, alongside Marilyn Bednarski and Regina Peter, has denied all allegations. In a statement, they said evidence will show that Burke “did not murder Celeste Rivas Hernandez and was not the cause of her death.”
The case has already had major consequences for Burke’s career. He cancelled his planned “D4VD Withered” world tour and was dropped from brand partnerships with Hollister Co. and Crocs.
D4vd rose to prominence in 2022 with his hit Here With Me and later released Romantic Homicide, a track whose title he previously described as metaphorical rather than literal.
The case remains ongoing, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.
Iran Keeps Strait of Hormuz Closed, Says Final Deal With US Still Distant
The strategic Strait of Hormuz remained effectively closed on Sunday as the standoff between Iran and the United States deepened, with Tehran insisting that a final peace agreement is still “far off” despite ongoing negotiations.
Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, signalled cautious progress in talks but stressed that key disagreements remain unresolved.
“There has been progress… but there are many gaps and some fundamental points remain. We are still far from the final discussion,” Ghalibaf said in a televised address, underscoring the fragile state of diplomacy.
The latest developments come as mediation efforts involving regional players, including Pakistan and Egypt, continue following high-level talks that ended without a breakthrough.
Iran has maintained that it will not reopen the vital maritime route—through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies pass—until Washington lifts its blockade on Iranian ports.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump said “very good conversations” were ongoing but warned Tehran against attempting to “blackmail” the United States, adding that Washington would continue to take a firm stance.
READ ALSO:
The situation has been further complicated by shifting signals from Tehran. On Friday, Iran briefly declared the strait open following a temporary ceasefire tied to efforts to halt hostilities involving Israel and Iran-backed forces in Lebanon. The announcement initially calmed global markets and drove oil prices down.
However, Iran quickly reversed course after the U.S. reiterated that sanctions and maritime restrictions would remain until a comprehensive agreement is reached.
“If America does not lift the blockade, traffic in the Strait of Hormuz will definitely be limited,” Ghalibaf warned.
Tensions escalated further after Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stern warning that any vessel attempting to pass through the strait without authorisation would be considered as cooperating with hostile forces and could be targeted.
Shipping activity in the area has since dropped sharply. While a few oil and gas tankers briefly crossed during the short-lived reopening, most vessels have retreated, leaving the critical waterway largely empty.
Security incidents have heightened fears of escalation. A UK maritime security agency reported that Iranian forces fired at a tanker, while another vessel was struck by an unidentified projectile, causing damage but no casualties. Separately, a commercial vessel was reportedly threatened while attempting to exit the Gulf.
India also lodged a diplomatic protest after two of its flagged vessels were involved in a reported shooting incident in the strait, reflecting growing international concern over the safety of global shipping routes.
On the diplomatic front, negotiations remain deadlocked over Iran’s nuclear programme—particularly its stockpile of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium. While Washington has indicated that Iran may be willing to relinquish the material, Tehran has firmly rejected the claim.
Iran’s leadership, including President Masoud Pezeshkian, has insisted that the country will not surrender what it describes as its “legal right” to a peaceful nuclear programme.
“How come the U.S. president declares that Iran should not use its nuclear rights but does not say why?” Pezeshkian said, questioning Washington’s position.
The current crisis traces back to a broader regional conflict that escalated after coordinated military actions involving the United States and Israel earlier this year, which triggered retaliatory strikes and drew in Iran-backed groups across the Middle East.
With a fragile two-week ceasefire set to expire midweek, uncertainty remains high. Analysts warn that failure to reach a deal could lead to renewed hostilities and further disruption to global energy markets.
For now, Iran’s position remains unchanged: no reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without concessions from the United States, and no final agreement until core disputes are resolved.
Brazilian President Lula Calls UN Security Council ‘Lords of War’, Slams Trump Over Global Conflicts
Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has sharply criticised the United Nations Security Council and major world powers, accusing them of fuelling global instability instead of promoting peace.
Speaking on Saturday at an international summit of progressive leaders in Barcelona, Lula called on the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States—to “change their behaviour” amid rising global tensions.
He described the permanent members as having shifted from their post-World War II mandate of maintaining peace to becoming what he termed “lords of war.”
“The five members of the Security Council… were supposed to ensure world peace after the Second World War, but have become the lords of war,” Lula said.
The Brazilian leader accused these countries of taking major global decisions without adequate consultation with the United Nations system, saying smaller and poorer nations often bear the consequences of such actions.
Although he did not directly name any leader, Lula appeared to criticise former U.S. President Donald Trump over social media posts and statements he said contributed to escalating tensions, particularly regarding Iran.
READ ALSO:
He referenced Trump’s past comments on his Truth Social platform, including warnings tied to the Strait of Hormuz, which he described as inflammatory and dangerous to global peace.
“We cannot wake up every morning and go to bed every night with the president of a republic tweeting, threatening the world and declaring wars,” Lula said.
He stressed that no single world leader, regardless of power, should impose unilateral rules on other nations, adding that global governance must be based on cooperation and respect.
Lula also accused the United Nations of remaining passive in the face of escalating conflicts, saying the institution is failing to fulfil the purpose for which it was created after World War II.
“Today, the United Nations no longer represents the purpose for which it was created,” he said.
The remarks come amid continued global tensions involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, with ongoing diplomatic disputes over nuclear development and regional security.
However, some of the conflict details cited in circulating reports remain disputed by official international records and are not independently verified by major global institutions.
Lula used the platform to call for urgent reform of global institutions, insisting that the UN Security Council must be restructured to ensure fairness, transparency, and collective decision-making.
The comments have added to growing international debate over the effectiveness of the UN Security Council, particularly its veto system and its role in resolving modern geopolitical conflicts.
FG Opens PTDF Scholarship 2026: Requirements, Deadline, and Application Steps
VIDEO: JAMB Registrar Meets CBT Owner Over Hijab Removal Allegation
Muslim Girls in Hijab Allegedly Harassed at JAMB Centres Amid UTME 2026 Exams
Why UTME Results Were Delayed — JAMB Gives Official Explanation
Yayi’s emergence, defining moment for unity, equity, progress — Ogun West Professionals
Shekarau, Gwarzo Dump PDP for APC in Kano Political Shake-Up
Peller Faces Backlash Over Claim His ₦100m Savings Are Off-Limits
NYSC Expands SAED Programme, Moves to Establish Trust Fund for Corps Members