Appeal Court Nullifies INEC Deregistration Order, Restores ADC, Accord Party, Three Others - Newstrends
Connect with us

Politics

Appeal Court Nullifies INEC Deregistration Order, Restores ADC, Accord Party, Three Others

Published

on

Appeal Court Nullifies INEC Deregistration Order, Restores ADC, Accord Party, Three Others

Appeal Court Nullifies INEC Deregistration Order, Restores ADC, Accord Party, Three Others

Appeal Court overturns Federal High Court judgment, ruling the trial court lacked jurisdiction and acted in “judicial insubordination”

The Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal has delivered a landmark judgment setting aside the Federal High Court order that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Accord Party, and three other political parties. In a unanimous decision delivered on Tuesday, a three-member panel led by Justice Abba Mohammed declared the June 15 judgment of the Federal High Court “null and void,” describing the lower court’s action as “judicial impertinence.” The appellate court restored the legal status of all five affected parties—the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP)—clearing the way for their participation in the 2027 general elections.

The appellate court identified multiple fundamental flaws in the trial court’s handling of the case, ranging from jurisdictional errors to procedural violations. The three-member panel meticulously examined each ground of appeal and found that the lower court’s judgment was not only legally unsound but also procedurally improper, warranting its complete nullification.

First, the appellate court held that the Federal High Court wrongly assumed jurisdiction over a fundamentally incompetent suit. The case was filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators (NFFL), which the Court of Appeal ruled was a “non-juristic entity” lacking the legal capacity (locus standi) to institute the proceedings. The court further emphasized that since there was no valid suit before the Federal High Court, every consequential order made against the affected political parties, including the directive compelling INEC to withdraw their recognition, automatically collapsed. This foundational defect rendered the entire proceedings null and void from the outset.

Second, the appellate court strongly criticised the trial judge, Justice Peter Lifu, for proceeding to deliver judgment despite a subsisting order from the Court of Appeal directing a stay of proceedings. The panel noted that the trial court acted in defiance of an earlier order made on May 22, which directed it to halt proceedings pending the determination of an appeal. The court declared that what the learned trial court did amounted to judicial impertinence or what the Supreme Court called judicial insubordination. The court further observed that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who acts in such a manner is unfit for the bench, as the conduct amounts to judicial rascality.

READ ALSO:

Third, the appellate court also ruled that the trial judge failed to properly evaluate crucial evidence placed before him. Documentary evidence showing that the affected political parties had won elective seats in previous elections was ignored before the trial court reached its conclusion. The court noted that the evidence before the court clearly shows compliance with Section 225A of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as Amended), and that the judgment of the trial judge was perverse. This failure to consider available evidence undermined the credibility and validity of the lower court’s findings.

Furthermore, the Court of Appeal clarified that the compliance requirements of Section 225A of the Constitution should be interpreted disjunctively, meaning that meeting one of the conditions for continued registration is sufficient. The court also noted that the suit was premature as election cycles in some states were still ongoing when it was filed. This clarification is significant because it establishes a more flexible standard for political parties seeking to maintain their registration with INEC, potentially affecting how the electoral body evaluates party performance in future elections.

The legal battle originated from Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators against INEC, the Attorney General of the Federation, and the five political parties. The plaintiffs had asked the Federal High Court to compel INEC to deregister the ADC, APP, AA, Accord Party, and ZLP, arguing that they failed to satisfy the constitutional conditions required for continued registration under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution.

According to the plaintiffs, the affected parties failed to secure at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during presidential elections or win elective offices at the federal, state, or local government levels. They argued that the parties performed poorly during the 2023 general elections and subsequent by-elections and therefore no longer deserved recognition by INEC. The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), supported the plaintiffs’ position before the trial court, arguing that INEC had a constitutional obligation to deregister political parties that no longer met the minimum constitutional requirements.

Justice Peter Lifu accepted those arguments and ordered INEC to immediately deregister the five parties, barring them from participating in the 2027 general elections. However, dissatisfied with the judgment, INEC and all the affected political parties approached the Court of Appeal seeking to have the verdict set aside, setting the stage for Tuesday’s landmark ruling.

The ruling has elicited widespread reactions from political stakeholders, legal practitioners, and civil society organizations, with many hailing it as a victory for democracy and judicial independence. The African Democratic Congress described the ruling as a “watershed moment” for Nigeria’s constitutional democracy. In a statement titled “2027: Court of Appeal Clears the Road for ADC,” the party commended the appellate justices for their courage, independence and commitment to justice. The party said the judgment reaffirmed the judiciary’s constitutional role as the final guardian of democratic governance and the rule of law.

According to the ADC, the appellate court correctly ruled that the June 15 judgment was a nullity because it was delivered in violation of an existing order of the Court of Appeal. The ADC also welcomed the court’s finding that the plaintiffs lacked the locus standi to institute the suit and that their claims were speculative and legally unsustainable. The party further stated that the latest judgment, combined with an earlier Federal High Court ruling affirming the Senator David Mark-led National Executive Committee, has finally removed every pending legal challenge to the party’s leadership and legal status.

Counsel to the Action Peoples Party (APP), Barr. Peter Abang, expressed satisfaction with the appellate court’s decision, stating that the judgment is a victory for democracy in Nigeria and that in the administration of justice, the hierarchy of Courts in Nigeria must be respected as they establish an unbroken chain of command and no court has the luxury to sit in judgment against the correctness or otherwise of orders of superior courts. The Court of Appeal allowed the separate appeals filed by the political parties and awarded monetary costs of ₦1 million against the National Forum of Former Legislators for filing the incompetent suit.

The Court of Appeal’s decision has significant implications for Nigeria’s political landscape ahead of the 2027 general elections. The ruling restores the legal status of the ADC, APP, AA, Accord Party, and ZLP, allowing them to participate fully in the upcoming elections. This means that these parties can now field candidates, mobilize supporters, and contest for elective positions across all levels of government without the legal cloud that had hung over their existence since the June 15 judgment.

The judgment reinforces the principle that INEC must follow due process and cannot deregister political parties based on suits filed by entities lacking legal standing. This protects political parties from frivolous legal challenges that could destabilize their operations and disenfranchise their supporters. The appellate court’s strong criticism of the trial judge for “judicial insubordination” serves as a warning to lower courts to respect judicial hierarchy and appellate orders, reinforcing the importance of procedural compliance in the administration of justice.

Finally, the clarification that Section 225A requirements should be interpreted disjunctively may affect how INEC evaluates political parties’ performance in future elections. This interpretation provides a more lenient standard for political parties to maintain their registration, potentially encouraging political pluralism and competition within Nigeria’s democratic space. As the country prepares for the 2027 general elections, this ruling ensures that the political landscape remains inclusive and that no party is unfairly excluded from the democratic process through procedural irregularities or jurisdictional overreach.

Appeal Court Nullifies INEC Deregistration Order, Restores ADC, Accord Party, Three Others

Loading

Politics

Yari: God Chose Me to Lead Tinubu’s 2027 Campaign

Published

on

Yari: God Chose Me to Lead Tinubu’s 2027 Campaign
Senator Abdul’aziz Yari Abubakar

Yari: God Chose Me to Lead Tinubu’s 2027 Campaign

The Director-General of President Bola Tinubu’s 2027 campaign council, Senator Abdul’aziz Yari Abubakar, has said he believes God chose him for the position.

Yari spoke on Friday in Gusau during a meeting with APC leaders and stakeholders as part of efforts to mobilise support for Tinubu ahead of the 2027 election.

He said he would travel across the country to present Tinubu’s achievements and explain why Nigerians should support his bid for a second term.

According to Yari, however, success in Zamfara would depend on the support of party leaders and members across the state.

READ ALSO:

He predicted massive support for Tinubu from Zamfara and said the campaign would be driven by the administration’s record rather than attacks on opposition figures.

Yari admitted that some of Tinubu’s economic policies had brought hardship but maintained that certain reforms were necessary to strengthen the economy.

He also defended the government’s tax reforms, saying they were designed to ensure that people contribute based on their income without placing an unfair burden on the masses.

On security, Yari said the government was committing significant resources to fighting terrorism and banditry. He argued that although the spending could have been used for development, tackling insecurity was necessary to create room for economic growth.

Yari said the campaign would focus on the country’s challenges and the government’s plans for the future.

Nigeria is before us as Nigerians” he said.

Yari: God Chose Me to Lead Tinubu’s 2027 Campaign

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: Obi Supporters Won’t Trust INEC With Their Votes — Aisha Yesufu

Published

on

Ekiti Election: Aisha Yesufu Blasts EFCC, Calls for Decriminalisation of Vote Buying

2027: Obi Supporters Won’t Trust INEC With Their Votes — Aisha Yesufu

Political activist and member of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Aisha Yesufu, has said supporters of the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, will not rely solely on electoral institutions to protect their votes in the 2027 presidential election.

Yesufu said Obi supporters would establish strong structures at polling units and deploy representatives to monitor voting, counting and the movement of result sheets through the various stages of collation, up to the final declaration in Abuja.

She made the remarks during an interview on Arise News, where she discussed Obi’s chances in the 2027 presidential election, the lessons from the 2023 election and the strategy she believes his supporters should adopt ahead of the next poll.

According to Yesufu, the experience of 2023 showed the need for voters and political organisations to take a more active role in monitoring the electoral process after ballots have been cast.

“Yes, we are going to have people at every polling unit to protect the votes,” she said.

She explained that the proposed structure would monitor results from the polling unit through the ward, local government and state collation levels until the final collation in Abuja.

“No result sheet will leave our sight. We will follow the results from the polling units all the way to Abuja,” Yesufu said.

She said the objective was to ensure that the results eventually declared accurately reflected the votes cast by Nigerians.

Yesufu further said she had “zero trust” in INEC, security agencies and the judiciary, arguing that voters could not afford to leave the protection of their votes entirely to public institutions.

Her comments highlight the emphasis she intends to place on grassroots mobilisation and vote protection ahead of the 2027 election.

Rather than focusing exclusively on large campaign rallies, Yesufu said supporters should build structures at the grassroots and prepare people to monitor the electoral process at their respective polling units.

She had earlier explained that Nigerians should not expect to see her travelling around the country with Obi in the same manner she did during the 2023 campaign.

According to her, her role in the previous election was largely focused on helping to mobilise support for Obi and counter perceptions that his candidacy was limited to a particular ethnic or religious group.

For the 2027 election, she said her priority would be to help establish structures capable of mobilising voters and ensuring that votes cast for Obi are properly counted and protected.

Yesufu has urged supporters to organise themselves before election day and understand the procedures for voting, counting and result collation.

She believes that monitoring should continue beyond the polling unit, with supporters following the results through the ward, local government and state collation centres.

Her position comes amid continuing debate over electoral transparency, result management and voter confidence in INEC ahead of the 2027 general election.

INEC remains legally responsible for conducting elections and managing the official collation and declaration of results, while political parties and their accredited agents are entitled to observe proceedings and raise objections through established legal channels.

Yesufu’s call for greater vigilance is therefore centred on encouraging supporters to observe the process closely and ensure that discrepancies are documented and challenged through lawful mechanisms.

She also spoke about the recent incident in Benue State, where Obi’s movement was reportedly obstructed while he was attempting to reach the Yelwata area.

Yesufu defended Obi’s decision not to engage those who reportedly blocked his convoy, arguing that he had other engagements to attend and should not allow people she described as “miscreants” to dictate his movements.

The incident generated political reactions, particularly over the circumstances surrounding Obi’s reported inability to proceed to the area.

Yesufu also expressed confidence in Peter Obi’s chances in the 2027 presidential election, arguing that economic hardship and insecurity would be important factors in determining how Nigerians vote.

She criticised the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, describing it as a “colossal failure” and arguing that improvements claimed in some macroeconomic indicators had not translated sufficiently into better living conditions for ordinary Nigerians.

According to Yesufu, Nigerians remain concerned about rising living costs, insecurity and declining purchasing power, adding that economic policies should ultimately be judged by their effect on households and businesses.

She also argued that voters were increasingly interested in competence, character and capacity, rather than allowing religious or ethnic considerations to determine their choices.

Yesufu expressed confidence that Obi could perform strongly across the country and specifically said she expected him to retain significant support in Lagos during the 2027 election.

Her comments come as opposition parties continue preparations for the 2027 presidential contest.

Obi is the NDC presidential candidate, while Atiku Abubakar is the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC). Both opposition figures have continued to pursue their respective political platforms amid discussions about possible cooperation among opposition parties.

Obi has also said recently that any agreement involving opposition presidential candidates would ultimately have to be negotiated by the political parties rather than by individual candidates alone.

The opposition landscape therefore remains fluid, with discussions about alliances, cooperation and the possibility of a common strategy continuing ahead of the 2027 election.

For Yesufu, however, political alliances are only one aspect of the challenge facing opposition parties.

She said the immediate priority should be ensuring that supporters are organised at the grassroots and prepared to participate actively in protecting their votes on election day.

The activist, who said she was not seeking elective office, said her focus would remain on mobilising supporters for the 2027 presidential election and helping to ensure that votes cast for Obi are properly accounted for.

She believes the experience of the 2023 election demonstrated that campaign popularity must be matched by effective election-day organisation.

Her strategy therefore places greater responsibility on supporters to understand the electoral process, remain present during counting, verify result entries and follow the lawful collation process.

As preparations for the 2027 general election intensify, Yesufu’s comments are likely to add to the debate over voter mobilisation, electoral credibility, result transmission and the capacity of political parties to protect their votes.

For the activist, winning support at campaign rallies is only part of the electoral contest. The greater challenge, she argues, is ensuring that every vote cast is counted, correctly recorded and followed through the collation process.

 

2027: Obi Supporters Won’t Trust INEC With Their Votes — Aisha Yesufu

Loading

Continue Reading

Politics

Obi Explains Why He Won’t Step Down for Atiku in 2027

Published

on

Obi Explains Why He Won’t Step Down for Atiku in 2027

Obi Explains Why He Won’t Step Down for Atiku in 2027

Presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has explained why he is not prepared to step down for his African Democratic Congress (ADC) counterpart, Atiku Abubakar, ahead of the 2027 presidential election, saying any decision on a possible opposition alliance must now be taken by the political parties rather than individual candidates.

Obi said the issue was no longer simply about whether he or Atiku would personally make way for the other, stressing that both politicians are now presidential candidates of separate political parties with their own structures and interests.

The former Anambra State governor made the remarks during an interview with Arise Television, where he discussed the 2027 election, opposition cooperation, the economy, national unity, security and governance.

Asked whether he would step down for Atiku, Obi said the political circumstances had changed because both men now represented different parties.

“Do you know where we are now? Where we are now is that I’m a candidate, my leader Atiku is a candidate of another party, so you are talking about two parties coming together; it’s no longer me or me, as you are now talking about parties coming together,” Obi said.

He explained that with different opposition parties already having their own candidates and political structures, any agreement would have to be negotiated at the party level.

“All those parties have candidates. So, it is a discussion. It is no longer me, as Peter, talking. It is like a situation where two corporations are trying to come together. It is no longer something where the two CEOs go for a drink and say, ‘We are going to work together’. They need to look at how to bring these two corporations together,” he added.

The comments come amid continuing efforts by opposition politicians to forge a single political platform or consensus arrangement capable of challenging President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2027 election.

READ ALSO:

The opposition coalition initially generated expectations that Obi, Atiku and other political leaders could work together after the coalition adopted the ADC as its platform in 2025.

The political arrangement, however, did not result in Obi and Atiku contesting the 2027 presidential election on the same platform.

Obi subsequently emerged as the NDC presidential candidate, while Atiku became the ADC presidential candidate, setting the stage for both former allies to pursue separate presidential bids.

Their separate candidacies have since fuelled speculation over whether either politician could eventually step down in favour of the other as part of efforts to produce a single opposition candidate.

Obi’s latest comments, however, suggest that he does not view the matter as a personal decision to surrender his presidential ticket to Atiku.

Instead, he argued that any possible merger, alliance or consensus arrangement would require negotiations among the political parties involved, including discussions on how their different structures and interests would be accommodated.

The NDC candidate was also asked whether he would accept the position of vice-president if an agreement was eventually reached with Atiku.

Obi denied reports that he had previously rejected an offer to become Atiku’s running mate.

“I don’t know where that was said. I wasn’t even in a position where that was being offered, and I refused,” he said.

The clarification comes amid persistent speculation over a possible Obi-Atiku ticket ahead of the 2027 election.

Obi and Atiku have a history of contesting together. Obi served as Atiku’s running mate on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2019 presidential election.

Their political paths diverged ahead of the 2023 election, when Obi left the PDP and contested the presidency on the platform of the Labour Party, while Atiku remained the PDP presidential candidate.

The 2027 election will therefore mark another presidential contest involving both politicians, although this time they are seeking the presidency under separate opposition platforms.

Beyond the question of opposition unity, Obi used the interview to outline some of the economic policies he would retain if elected president.

Asked to identify one policy of the Tinubu administration he would keep, Obi named the floating of the naira.

“There’s one – the floating of the Naira. I’m not going to defend it. But I’m going to put productivity to make it more valuable to the people,” he said.

READ ALSO:

The naira float was introduced by the Tinubu administration in 2023 as part of broader foreign-exchange reforms designed to allow greater market determination of the currency’s value.

The policy has remained one of the most debated aspects of the administration’s economic programme, particularly because of its impact on the exchange rate, inflation, import costs, businesses and household purchasing power.

Obi’s position indicates that he would not necessarily reverse the floating exchange-rate regime if elected but would seek to strengthen the productive capacity of the economy.

He said his focus would be on increasing productivity so that the naira could become more valuable rather than attempting to defend the currency without addressing the underlying strength of the economy.

The former Anambra governor has consistently advocated a shift from what he describes as a consumption-driven economy towards greater production, agriculture, exports and investment.

His latest position suggests that his economic strategy would focus on expanding domestic production and improving the country’s ability to generate wealth rather than relying heavily on imported goods and oil revenues.

Obi also warned against allowing tribalism and ethnic politics to dominate the 2027 presidential election.

“Our election should not be driven by tribalism,” he said.

According to him, Nigerians should assess political candidates based on their competence, character, policies and ability to address the country’s problems rather than their ethnic or regional backgrounds.

He also sought to reassure Nigerians in the North that his political ambitions were not directed against the region.

“I am committed to the future of the North. I believe the North has so much to offer Nigeria. As a country, we can make more money from agriculture than we do from oil,” Obi said.

The NDC candidate also addressed historical grievances associated with Nigeria’s political past, including attempts to associate him personally with the 1966 military coup.

READ ALSO:

Obi said he was only four years old when the event occurred and urged Nigerians to move beyond historical grievances.

“There were regrettable things that happened in our collective history. I was not personally involved in those sad events, but it is time to show love and pursue unity in Nigeria. We must not dwell on the past. We can only build through love,” he said.

He argued that agriculture could become one of Nigeria’s major sources of economic growth, particularly in the North, where he said the country could generate significant wealth from agricultural production.

His position forms part of his broader argument that Nigeria must increase domestic production, create jobs, expand exports and reduce dependence on oil and imported goods.

Obi also criticised the practice of Nigerian presidents spending their holidays outside the country, saying the President should remain connected to the realities faced by citizens.

The NDC presidential candidate said that, if elected, he would spend presidential holidays within Nigeria and use the opportunity to visit communities facing security and developmental challenges.

“Nigeria’s President must spend his vacation in Nigeria. We cannot continue with this nonsense,” Obi said.

He argued that the President should be able to visit states affected by insecurity, including Borno, Zamfara and Benue, and use such visits to engage directly with residents, traditional rulers, state officials and other stakeholders.

“Nigeria’s President should go to Zamfara, to Borno, to Anambra, to anywhere. As President of Nigeria, I will visit other countries, but I will not take my holidays there,” he said.

When asked about the security implications of spending holidays in areas affected by insurgency and banditry, Obi maintained that security concerns should not prevent the President from being physically present in troubled parts of the country.

He argued that presidential visits to areas affected by insecurity should go beyond brief official engagements and should involve sustained interaction with communities.

Obi said the President should spend enough time in affected states to understand the challenges confronting residents and engage the relevant stakeholders.

“He should go to Benue and say, ‘I’m here for the next three days; I want to see these stakeholders in the state,’” he stated.

The former Anambra governor also criticised what he described as brief presidential visits to crisis-hit areas, arguing that spending more time with affected communities would enable the President to better understand the security and developmental challenges confronting them.

His comments come as security, the economy, cost of living, national unity and opposition cooperation are expected to feature prominently in the 2027 presidential campaign.

For now, Obi remains the NDC presidential candidate, while Atiku remains the ADC presidential candidate. Their separate candidacies mean that any eventual opposition alliance would require negotiations involving the political parties and their respective structures.

Obi’s latest remarks therefore leave open the possibility of further discussions among opposition parties while rejecting the idea that the 2027 contest should be reduced to a personal decision by him to step aside for Atiku.

The outcome of the ongoing opposition negotiations could determine whether the parties eventually field separate candidates or reach a consensus arrangement ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

Obi Explains Why He Won’t Step Down for Atiku in 2027

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending