Gaza situation morally, politically, legally intolerable - UN chief - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Gaza situation morally, politically, legally intolerable – UN chief

Published

on

Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres
United Nations Secretary-General, António Guterres

Gaza situation morally, politically, legally intolerable – UN chief

NEW YORK CITY/LONDON: The UN secretary-general condemned on Tuesday the “systematic destruction” of Gaza City, but insisted it was for the international courts to determine whether Israel is committing genocide.

Taking questions at UN headquarters, Antonio Guterres said it was not his role to make a legal determination of genocide after a team of experts commissioned by the UN’s Human Rights Council concluded that Israel is doing just that in Gaza.

UN agencies, global bodies and governments face mounting pressure to say that Israel’s conduct in the Palestinian territory since is began military operations in October 2023 amounts to genocide.

Asked whether he believes Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, Guterres said: “As I’ve said, time and time again, in these and different, similar circumstances, it is not in the attributions that the secretary-general to do the legal determination of genocide.

“That belongs to the adequate judicial entities, namely the International Court of Justice.”

Guterres nevertheless said that what is happening in Gaza is “horrendous.”

“We are seeing massive destruction of neighborhoods, now the systematic destruction of Gaza City, we are seeing massive killing of civilians in a way that I do not remember in any conflict since I (became) secretary-general,” he said.

“With the consequences that the Palestinian people are suffering a horrendous situation, famine, with no access to any kind of support, and with continued displacement and imminent risk of losing their lives at any moment.”

He added: “The truth is that this is something that is morally, politically and legally intolerable.”

Guterres’s comments came in response to a damning 72-page report by the Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel published on Tuesday.

Not only did the findings say that Israel has, since October 2023, committed and continues to commit acts of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, it found the incitement to do so came from the highest political and military figures of the Israeli state.

READ ALSO:

These included Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Isaac Herzog, and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

“The ongoing genocide in Gaza is a moral outrage and a legal emergency,” Navi Pillay, head of the three-member commission of inquiry and a former International Criminal Court judge, told a press briefing in Geneva.

“The responsibility for these atrocity crimes lies with Israeli authorities at the highest echelons who have orchestrated a genocidal campaign for almost two years now with the specific intent to destroy the Palestinian group in Gaza.”

The report is based on a meticulous study of factual and legal findings in relation to attacks in Gaza by Israeli forces and the conduct of Israeli authorities.

The panel found Israel had committed four of the five genocidal acts defined by a 1948 international treaty known as the “Genocide Convention.”

The four acts are: Killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the Palestinians in whole or in part, and imposing measures intended to prevent births.

The timing of the report’s release could not have been more pertinent, coming shortly after Israel announced a full-scale ground assault on Gaza City — the territory’s largest urban center.

While the conclusions may not come as a surprise to many, the significance of its findings could have global repercussions.

The commission itself is not a legal body, but the report could be incorporated into cases by prosecutors at the ICJ and the ICC.

The ICJ is examining a case brought by South Africa accusing Israeli forces of committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza.

The ICC has issued arrest warrants for both Netanyahu and Gallant for the war crime of starvation and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and “other inhumane acts.”

The report was immediately attacked by Israel, but was widely welcomed by Palestinians and their supporters.

The foreign ministry of the Palestinian Authority, which governs in the occupied West Bank, said the report had “unequivocally proven” that Israel had committed the crime of genocide in Gaza “through a deliberate and widespread policy aimed at the systematic destruction of the Palestinian people.”

READ ALSO:

The ministry called on the international community to take steps to protect the Palestinian people and “halt all forms of military and political support for Israel.”

The report does not represent the UN’s official position on whether acts of genocide have been carried out in Gaza, but it will increase pressure on UN agencies and governments to use the word.

Volker Turk, the UN high commissioner for human rights, also said it was up to the courts to decide “whether it’s genocide or not” but that the evidence was mounting.

“We see the piling up of war crime after war crime or crime against humanity, and potentially even more,” he said.

In the UK, where the government has come under increasing pressure to take a tougher stance against Israel, a Foreign Office spokesperson told Arab News that any formal determination as to whether genocide has occurred “should be made following a judgment by a competent national or international court.”

“What is happening in Gaza is appalling and we continue to call on Israel to change course immediately by halting its ground offensive and letting in a surge of humanitarian aid without delay,” the spokesperson said.

In a letter earlier this month, the former Foreign Secretary David Lammy wrote that the government “had not concluded that Israel is acting with genocidal intent.”

A joint statement from civil society organizations, including the British Palestinian Committee and Palestine Solidarity Campaign said that the commission of inquiry’s findings confirmed that Lammy was not only “wrong” but showed the extent of UK complicity in Israel’s crimes.

“This government has been playing a linguistic and legal game with MPs, the British public, and the lives of Palestinians,” the statement said. “Rather than doing everything in its power to protect an occupied people, the UK government has opted to back a state committing war crimes.”

The left-wing parliamentarian Zarah Sultana said the report confirmed what was already clear: that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

“This is the most documented genocide in history,” she wrote on X. “The government’s position was already morally indefensible. It is now politically untenable.”

Nimer Sultany, an expert in international law at the School of Oriental and African Studies, said the report was a nail in the coffin of a “genocide denial” that has delayed governments from acting against Israel.

He told Channel 4 News that the report was a “damning indictment of the policy of the UK government, of the European Commission, of European states, that have failed to act, that have continued to shield Israel from accountability.”

READ ALSO:

Israel’s foreign ministry said it “categorically” rejected the report, describing it as “distorted and false.”

The report follows a resolution passed earlier this month by the International Association of Genocide Scholars saying Israel’s conduct meets the legal definition genocide laid out in the 1948 UN convention.

Israel faced further international pressure last week when the UN General Assembly voted overwhelmingly in favor of reviving the two-state solution between Israel and Palestine without involving Hamas.

The “New York Declaration” was presented jointly by Saudi Arabia and France, with the two countries set to host an international conference on the two-state solution at the UN headquarters on Sept. 22.

The French presidency said on Tuesday that the event was the “only viable solution and option on the table in order to come out of this terrible crisis.”

The “vast mobilization” of international support by Saudi Arabia and France for the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict aims to convince the US that there is an “absolute urgency” to end the war in Gaza, the French presidency said on Tuesday.

The idea for the conference “came as a result of the state visit that President (Emmanuel) Macron paid to Saudi Arabia” last year, the Elysee said in a high-level briefing attended by Arab News.

“We were working with Saudi Arabia in reflecting on what kind of initiative we could jointly take in order to get a ceasefire in Gaza, an end to the war and a political solution to the crisis that would lead finally to the creation of two states and bring peace and security to all people in the region.”

A decision was made by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Macron last December to organize and elevate the proposed conference as a mechanism for implementing the two-state solution.

The UN General Assembly later voted to give a mandate to Saudi Arabia and France to host the conference, which held its first stage at the UN in July.

That event resulted in the New York Declaration, which was hailed by French Ambassador to the UN Jerome Bonnafont as a “single road map to deliver the two-state solution.”

Though the New York Declaration condemns Hamas and seeks to secure its international isolation, Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon last week accused the majority of the UNGA of “advancing terror.”

READ ALSO:

US diplomat Morgan Ortagus told the chamber that the resolution was a “gift to Hamas,” adding: “Far from promoting peace, the conference has already prolonged the war, emboldened Hamas and harmed the prospects of peace in both short and long term.”

The French presidency rebuffed those accusations on Tuesday, warning that the “atrocious humanitarian catastrophe” and “unbearable human toll” in Gaza could only be resolved “on the basis of a political horizon for the two-state solution.”

The New York Declaration lays out “both a timeframe and irreversible step towards the two-state solution that would start with a ceasefire, the release of the hostages and humanitarian aid being offered without constraint to the Palestinian population in Gaza,” the Elysee said.

As part of post-war efforts to stabilize Gaza, a reformed Palestinian Authority must be allowed to operate in the enclave through a UN Security Council mandate, it added.

The French presidency highlighted that “all the Arab countries, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation leaders and the Arab League leaders” accepted the plan, which would see Hamas “have no part” in the administration of post-war Gaza.

The PA’s leader Mahmoud Abbas wrote a letter to Macron and the crown prince on June 9 which, in part, committed to reforming the authority.

As part of the joint international project, a slew of major countries — including Canada, Australia, Belgium and Portugal — have committed to recognizing Palestine at the Sept. 22 conference.

“This is the most significant movement since a long while because, for the very first time, UN Security Council member states but also G7 member states will recognize the state of  Palestine,” the Elysee said.

“This will create a way for us to say that the two-state solution cannot be wiped out by the Israeli operation that we see happening on the ground.”

The French presidency expressed its concern over Israel’s recent strikes on Qatar that targeted Hamas leaders.

In the wake of the attack, leaders from the UK, France, Canada, Qatar, Jordan and Egypt held an emergency remote meeting, pledging solidarity with all Gulf states.

“No country should be stricken and the sovereignty of the neighboring countries of Israel should be respected. We managed to get a clear condemnation in the UN Security Council,” the Elysee said.

“But we need this collective mobilization to be crystal clear, and we hope for Sept. 22 to bring light on this international mobilization that needs to move the needle, and needs to convince the US that there is an absolute urgency to end this war.”

Gaza situation morally, politically, legally intolerable – UN chief

International

Iran Police Authorised to Shoot Looters as US-Israel War Intensifies

Published

on

Iranians call for retaliation after US strikes

Iran Police Authorised to Shoot Looters as US-Israel War Intensifies

Amid the escalating war between Iran, the United States, and Israel, Iran’s police chief, Ahmad Radan, has announced that law enforcement officers are authorised to shoot suspected looters and criminals. Speaking on state television on Friday, Radan said the directive was necessary because the country is in “wartime conditions”, warning that any looters would be “swiftly neutralised.”

Radan also stressed the government’s focus on maintaining order online, warning that authorities would clamp down on disinformation and agitators seeking to destabilise public unity. He said: “We will not allow a group of paid agents to undermine the unity that the people achieved with the blood of thousands of martyrs.”

The announcement comes as the Middle East conflict intensifies following joint U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iran, which killed the Islamic Republic’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In retaliation, Iran launched drone and missile attacks against U.S. military bases in Gulf countries and Israeli targets, escalating the crisis.

READ ALSO:

According to Iran’s health ministry, nearly 1,230 people have died in the U.S. and Israeli strikes, which targeted military installations, residential areas, and key infrastructure. Iranian attacks have also resulted in at least 10 deaths in Israel, while the U.S. military reports six personnel fatalities since the outbreak of hostilities. (aljazeera.com)

The police chief’s order highlights the growing internal security challenges Tehran faces as the war disrupts daily life and increases the risk of civil unrest. Analysts warn that authorising lethal force against suspected looters could have serious human rights implications amid the ongoing crisis.

As the conflict continues into its second week, Iran and Israel remain locked in heavy missile and drone exchanges, while U.S. forces in the Gulf region brace for further attacks. International calls for de-escalation and diplomacy have intensified, but no immediate ceasefire has been announced.

Iran Police Authorised to Shoot Looters as US-Israel War Intensifies

Continue Reading

International

Air Defence Thwarts Major Aerial Attack Across Saudi Arabia Amid Middle East Conflict

Published

on

Air Defence Thwarts Major Aerial Attack Across Saudi Arabia Amid Middle East Conflict

Air Defence Thwarts Major Aerial Attack Across Saudi Arabia Amid Middle East Conflict

RIYADH — Saudi Arabia’s air defense forces successfully intercepted and destroyed multiple ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones targeted at key regions within the kingdom early Friday, the Saudi Ministry of Defense announced in a series of posts on X. In the first report shortly after midnight, the ministry said three ballistic missiles were launched toward Prince Sultan Air Base in Al‑Kharj Governorate. Later posts confirmed that one drone was downed in the Eastern Province and another in Al‑Kharj. Early on Friday morning, Saudi defenses also intercepted a cruise missile over Al‑Kharj, followed by three drones in the Eastern Riyadh region.

This latest barrage came hours after Saudi forces neutralized three cruise missiles targeting Al‑Kharj and followed a separate attempted drone strike over the Ras Tanura oil refinery in the Eastern Province — one of the most strategically important energy facilities in the Middle East. Al‑Kharj lies about 80 kilometres southeast of Riyadh and hosts major defence and industrial installations.

The attacks follow previous incidents on March 3, when Saudi defense systems shot down eight drones near Riyadh and Al‑Kharj. On the same day, drones struck the US Embassy in Riyadh, causing a limited fire and minor structural damage, although Tehran has denied involvement, according to Iran’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Alireza Enayati.

READ ALSO:

The recent wave of aerial threats is part of a broader and rapidly escalating regional conflict triggered on February 28, 2026, after a massive air campaign by the United States and Israel against strategic targets inside Iran. The campaign prompted retaliatory strikes by Tehran, involving drones, ballistic and cruise missiles aimed at military, diplomatic, and energy infrastructure throughout the Gulf region. All GCC member states have reported Iranian-linked aggression, with strikes in the region claimed to have killed at least nine people.

The conflict has also severely affected maritime activity. A missile strike on a commercial vessel off Oman contributed to a backlog of around 150 tankers near the Strait of Hormuz, where oil traffic has dropped by approximately 86% due to security concerns. Analysts warn that prolonged instability could jeopardize global energy supply chains and drive further price volatility.

Saudi Arabia and its allies have condemned the attacks and coordinated their defense strategies. In an extraordinary GCC ministerial meeting in Riyadh on March 1, leaders reaffirmed the collective right to defend their territories against “treacherous Iranian aggression.” The meeting stressed shared security commitments among GCC nations to deter further incursions. Following a Saudi Cabinet session chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on March 3, the Kingdom declared that it reserves the full right to respond to ongoing threats and will take “all necessary measures” to protect its territory, citizens, and residents.

Military officials from Saudi Arabia and allied nations are maintaining high alert levels, with air defense systems and early-warning networks deployed across strategic areas to intercept future threats and protect civilian infrastructure. Despite Tehran’s denials of responsibility for some attacks, including the embassy strike and energy site incidents, Saudi and allied governments continue to assert that Iran-linked forces are driving much of the aggression, urging the international community to support collective defense mechanisms.

Air Defence Thwarts Major Aerial Attack Across Saudi Arabia Amid Middle East Conflict

Continue Reading

International

Iran Appreciates Saudi Airspace Assurance, Rejects Embassy Strike Claims

Published

on

Iran’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Alireza Enayati

Iran Appreciates Saudi Airspace Assurance, Rejects Embassy Strike Claims

RIYADH — Iran’s ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Alireza Enayati, has categorically denied that Tehran was behind a drone attack on the United States embassy in Riyadh, rejecting Saudi accusations and highlighting Tehran’s appreciation for Saudi Arabia’s commitment not to allow its airspace or territory to be used against Iran amid the ongoing Middle East conflict. Speaking to reporters and AFP at the Iranian embassy in Riyadh on Thursday, Enayati reiterated that Iran had no role in the strike on the US embassy, which Saudi officials said involved drones that caused a small fire at the diplomatic compound earlier this week. “We confirmed that Iran has no role in the attack on the US embassy in Riyadh,” the ambassador said. “If the operations command in Tehran attacks somewhere, it takes responsibility for it.”

The embassy incident came amidst a wave of cross‑border tensions following retaliatory strikes by Iran after a series of United States and Israeli airstrikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure. Allies of Riyadh, including the United States, have accused Iran of launching missile and drone attacks on Saudi territory, including critical facilities such as the Ras Tanura oil refinery — one of the largest in the region — which Tehran has repeatedly denied. Enayati stressed that Iran appreciates Saudi Arabia’s repeated assurance that its airspace, territorial waters, and soil will not be used against Tehran. “We appreciate what we have repeatedly heard from Saudi Arabia — that it does not allow its airspace, waters, or territory to be used against the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he said.

READ ALSO:

Saudi authorities have repeatedly condemned missile and drone attacks targeting their territory, warning that Riyadh reserves the right to defend itself and respond to violations of its sovereignty. Prior to the outbreak of hostilities, Saudi Arabia had backed diplomatic efforts aimed at defusing tensions between Tehran and Washington, but recent developments have seen the Gulf kingdom caught up in the wider regional crisis. In response to the Riyadh embassy incident and earlier allegations involving the Ras Tanura oil facility, Saudi officials publicly condemned the attacks as violations of international norms and threats to regional security and economic stability. Tehran, for its part, has rejected all such claims.

The crisis has engulfed the previously stable Gulf region, with Iran stepping up strikes after joint US‑Israeli operations reportedly killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and damaged strategic sites inside Iran. Tehran’s retaliation has included missile and drone strikes against Israeli and US‑linked targets across the broader Middle East. At least 13 people have been killed in the Gulf region, including seven civilians, since Iran began its offensive, according to regional reports. The cross‑border strikes and counter-strikes have alarmed global markets and heightened fears of a broader conflict.

Despite the escalation, Enayati denied that Iran considers the situation a regional war borne of its own design. “This is not a regional war and it is not our war. It was imposed on the region,” he said, echoing Iran’s longstanding narrative that external pressures and actions have forced Tehran into a defensive posture. International leaders and organisations have expressed deep concern over the rapid escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, with calls for calm and restraint growing louder as civilian casualties mount and tensions rise. Observers warn that continued conflict could further destabilise key global energy arteries, particularly the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supplies transit. As diplomatic efforts intensify alongside military developments, Riyadh, Tehran and Washington remain under global scrutiny to manage the crisis and avert a wider conflagration that could draw in multiple regional and international actors.

Iran Appreciates Saudi Airspace Assurance, Rejects Embassy Strike Claims

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending