House impeaches President Trump for second time - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

House impeaches President Trump for second time

Published

on

The House on Wednesday impeached President Donald Trump for a second time, charging him with “incitement of insurrection” for his role in the violent riot by a mob of the US Capitol that left five people dead and terrorised lawmakers as they sought to affirm President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

The vote to impeach passed the Democratic-controlled House was 232 to 197, with 10 Republicans voting against the president.

The House is expected to immediately send the article of impeachment to the Senate for them to begin the process of holding a trial to determine whether to convict Trump and potentially bar him from ever running for any office again.

 

However, it is unlikely that the trial will begin before the Senate plans to reconvene on January 19th, just one day before Biden is sworn into office.

Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, a member of the GOP leadership, was the highest ranking Republican to vote to impeach Trump.

She was joined by John Katko of New York, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, Fred Upton of Michigan, Peter Meijer of Michigan, Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, Tom Rice of South Carolina, David Valadao of California, and Jaime Herrera Beutler and Dan Newhouse of Washington.

No House Republican voted to impeach Trump during the inquiry earlier in his term that resulted in a Senate acquittal.

“Those insurrectionists were not patriots. They were not part of a political base to be catered to or managed. They were domestic terrorists and justice must prevail,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on the House floor, kicking off two hours of debate before the final vote was held.

“But they did not appear out of a vacuum. They were sent here, sent here by the president, with words such as a cry to ‘fight like hell’.

“The president saw the insurrectionists not as the foes of freedom, as they are, but as the means to a terrible goal: the goal of him personally clinging to power.”

Many House Republicans argued during debate that Trump was not afforded due process and that the impeachment process was rushed. Some said that impeaching the president for a second time would only further divide the country while others maintained that Trump’s actions on January 6th did not meet the legal standard for incitement.

“I believe impeaching the president in such a short timeframe would be a mistake,” Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, the top House Republican, said during debate.

“No investigations have been completed. No hearings have been held,” he added. “A vote to impeach will further fan the flames of partisan division.”

Other Republicans cried hypocrisy, criticizing Democrats for their support for the Black Lives Matter protests that swept the country last summer.

“For months, our cities burned, police stations burned, our businesses were shattered, and they said nothing,” said Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. “Some have cited the metaphor that the president lit the flame. Well, they lit actual flames.”

It is unclear what will happen in the Senate once the trial begins. Although Trump is likely to have already left office by then, a vote to convict Trump could still bar him from holding federal office again.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told his Republican colleagues Wednesday afternoon that he remains undecided on whether he will vote to convict the president.

“While the press has been full of speculation, I have not made a final decision on how I will vote and I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate,” McConnell wrote in a letter to his colleagues.

The impeachment vote follows a House vote late Tuesday night to formally call on Vice President Mike Pence to use the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.

The act, which was largely symbolic, passed the House 223 to 205 along partisan lines with Kinzinger as the sole Republican to vote in favor of the measure.

Pence, who was one of the targets of the violent mob that attacked the Capitol last week, informed Pelosi shortly before the vote that he would not invoke the 25th Amendment, writing in a letter to the speaker that he didn’t believe “such a course of action is in the best interest of our nation or consistent with our Constitution.”

As the House debated the article of impeachment, Trump, unable to tweet about the process as he did when the House impeached him in December 2019 after Twitter banned his account last week, released a statement urging that “there must be NO violence, NO lawbreaking and NO vandalism of any kind.”

“That is not what I stand for, and it is not what America stands for. I call on ALL Americans to help ease tensions and calm tempers.”

Pelosi named nine Democratic impeachment managers for the trial Tuesday, with Raskin leading the team that will seek to prosecute Trump.

The House on Wednesday impeached President Donald Trump for a second time, charging him with “incitement of insurrection” for his role in the violent riot by a mob of the US Capitol that left five people dead and terrorised lawmakers as they sought to affirm President-elect Joe Biden’s victory.

The vote to impeach passed the Democratic-controlled House was 232 to 197, with 10 Republicans voting against the president.

The House is expected to immediately send the article of impeachment to the Senate for them to begin the process of holding a trial to determine whether to convict Trump and potentially bar him from ever running for any office again.

However, it is unlikely that the trial will begin before the Senate plans to reconvene on January 19th, just one day before Biden is sworn into office.

Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, a member of the GOP leadership, was the highest ranking Republican to vote to impeach Trump.

She was joined by John Katko of New York, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, Fred Upton of Michigan, Peter Meijer of Michigan, Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, Tom Rice of South Carolina, David Valadao of California, and Jaime Herrera Beutler and Dan Newhouse of Washington.

No House Republican voted to impeach Trump during the inquiry earlier in his term that resulted in a Senate acquittal.

“Those insurrectionists were not patriots. They were not part of a political base to be catered to or managed. They were domestic terrorists and justice must prevail,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on the House floor, kicking off two hours of debate before the final vote was held.

“But they did not appear out of a vacuum. They were sent here, sent here by the president, with words such as a cry to ‘fight like hell’.

“The president saw the insurrectionists not as the foes of freedom, as they are, but as the means to a terrible goal: the goal of him personally clinging to power.”

Many House Republicans argued during debate that Trump was not afforded due process and that the impeachment process was rushed. Some said that impeaching the president for a second time would only further divide the country while others maintained that Trump’s actions on January 6th did not meet the legal standard for incitement.

“I believe impeaching the president in such a short timeframe would be a mistake,” Rep. Kevin McCarthy of California, the top House Republican, said during debate.

“No investigations have been completed. No hearings have been held,” he added. “A vote to impeach will further fan the flames of partisan division.”

Other Republicans cried hypocrisy, criticizing Democrats for their support for the Black Lives Matter protests that swept the country last summer.

“For months, our cities burned, police stations burned, our businesses were shattered, and they said nothing,” said Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. “Some have cited the metaphor that the president lit the flame. Well, they lit actual flames.”

It is unclear what will happen in the Senate once the trial begins. Although Trump is likely to have already left office by then, a vote to convict Trump could still bar him from holding federal office again.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told his Republican colleagues Wednesday afternoon that he remains undecided on whether he will vote to convict the president.

“While the press has been full of speculation, I have not made a final decision on how I will vote and I intend to listen to the legal arguments when they are presented to the Senate,” McConnell wrote in a letter to his colleagues.

The impeachment vote follows a House vote late Tuesday night to formally call on Vice President Mike Pence to use the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.

The act, which was largely symbolic, passed the House 223 to 205 along partisan lines with Kinzinger as the sole Republican to vote in favor of the measure.

Pence, who was one of the targets of the violent mob that attacked the Capitol last week, informed Pelosi shortly before the vote that he would not invoke the 25th Amendment, writing in a letter to the speaker that he didn’t believe “such a course of action is in the best interest of our nation or consistent with our Constitution.”

As the House debated the article of impeachment, Trump, unable to tweet about the process as he did when the House impeached him in December 2019 after Twitter banned his account last week, released a statement urging that “there must be NO violence, NO lawbreaking and NO vandalism of any kind.”

“That is not what I stand for, and it is not what America stands for. I call on ALL Americans to help ease tensions and calm tempers.”

Pelosi named nine Democratic impeachment managers for the trial Tuesday, with Raskin leading the team that will seek to prosecute Trump.

-NBC News

News

US Lawmaker Accuses Nigerian Security of Complicity in Attacks on Christian Communities

Published

on

A United States lawmaker, Kimberly Daniels
A United States lawmaker, Kimberly Daniels

US Lawmaker Accuses Nigerian Security of Complicity in Attacks on Christian Communities

A United States lawmaker, Kimberly Daniels, has accused elements within Nigeria’s security system of alleged complicity in attacks on Christian communities, raising fresh global concerns over the country’s worsening insecurity in Nigeria.

Daniels, a member of the Florida House of Representatives and chair of the United World Congress of Diplomats, made the allegation in a report released on April 14, 2026, highlighting recent violence in Plateau State, Kaduna State, and Nasarawa State.

The report focused on attacks that reportedly occurred during Palm Sunday and Easter Sunday, describing them as part of a sustained pattern targeting religious gatherings and vulnerable communities.

According to Daniels, there is a significant gap between official statements from Nigerian authorities and the lived experiences of affected communities. She noted that while the government often condemns such attacks, many residents continue to face insecurity, raising questions about the effectiveness of current security responses.

READ ALSO:

The report included testimonies from survivors and local residents who expressed frustration over recurring violence and what they described as inadequate protection from security agencies. Some of the accounts highlighted continued loss of lives and displacement, despite repeated assurances from government officials.

Daniels also referenced past allegations involving former Zamfara State governor Bello Matawalle, raising concerns about claims of links between political actors and armed groups. While such allegations remain disputed, she warned that unresolved claims could weaken public trust in Nigeria’s security institutions.

The development adds to growing international concern over Nigeria insecurity, as the country continues to battle a complex mix of banditry, insurgency, and communal violence, particularly in northern regions.

Security analysts have repeatedly pointed to challenges such as limited intelligence coordination, inadequate manpower, and logistical constraints as factors contributing to the persistence of attacks in rural and semi-urban communities.

Daniels called for urgent reforms in Nigeria’s security architecture, including improved intelligence gathering, stronger accountability mechanisms, and better protection for vulnerable populations.

She warned that failure to address the situation decisively could embolden perpetrators and deepen the humanitarian crisis in affected regions.

As of the time of filing this report, there has been no official response from Nigerian authorities regarding the allegations. However, government officials have consistently denied claims of complicity in past incidents, maintaining that security agencies remain committed to tackling criminal activities nationwide.

The latest development underscores increasing global scrutiny of Nigeria’s security challenges as political, humanitarian, and governance concerns continue to intersect.

US Lawmaker Accuses Nigerian Security of Complicity in Attacks on Christian Communities

Continue Reading

News

Hajia Sofuratu Seghosime Emerges ICAN President-Elect

Published

on

Hajia Sofuratu Seghosime
Hajia Sofuratu Seghosime

Hajia Sofuratu Seghosime Emerges ICAN President-Elect

The emergence of Hajia Sofuratu Seghosime as the 62nd President-Elect of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN) has continued to draw widespread commendation across Nigeria’s financial and regulatory institutions, with stakeholders describing her elevation as a reflection of decades of professional excellence in taxation, governance, and public service.

Her election has been particularly celebrated within the Nigerian Revenue Service (formerly Federal Inland Revenue Service), where she spent a significant part of her career, rising through the ranks over 26 years to become Coordinating Director for Compliance and Enforcement.

With over 40 years of experience spanning public service and private consultancy, Seghosime’s emergence is widely seen as a natural progression for a seasoned tax administrator and financial expert whose contributions have shaped Nigeria’s fiscal and regulatory landscape.

She currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Quebaan Professional Services, where she leads advisory work across taxation, auditing, corporate governance, financial management, strategy, and dispute resolution, supporting both public and private sector organisations in meeting regulatory and compliance obligations.

Seghosime’s professional journey within ICAN has also been marked by steady progression. Since joining the Council of the institute in 2014, she has held several strategic roles, contributing to policy formulation, professional development, and institutional governance within Nigeria’s accounting profession.

READ ALSO:

Beyond ICAN, she is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, and an alumnus of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, underscoring her multidisciplinary expertise in taxation, dispute resolution, and national policy.

Her influence also extends to key national and international platforms. She currently serves as a Commissioner on the Tax Appeal Tribunal and previously contributed to standard-setting as a member of the Nigerian Accounting Standards Board, now the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. She has also represented Nigeria in global tax discussions at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Commonwealth Association of Tax Administrators.

Industry stakeholders say her experience in both domestic tax administration and international fiscal engagement positions her to strengthen ICAN’s role in shaping financial accountability and governance standards in Nigeria.

Reacting to her emergence, Otunba Tobi Abiola, a senior official of the Nigerian Revenue Service overseeing Ogun, Oyo, and Osun States, described her election as a victory for integrity, professionalism, and ethical leadership.

He praised Seghosime as a leader of “high wisdom” whose career reflects competence, transparency, and a deep commitment to public service, adding that her leadership is expected to drive reforms and strengthen institutional credibility within ICAN.

Abiola noted that her ability to balance tradition with innovation, coupled with her dedication to mentorship and inclusive leadership, would play a crucial role in advancing the accounting profession and fostering collaboration across sectors.

Observers within Nigeria’s financial ecosystem believe her presidency could come at a critical time when issues of tax compliance, public finance transparency, and corporate governance remain central to economic reforms and investor confidence.

Her election is also being viewed as a milestone for gender representation in leadership within Nigeria’s professional bodies, with many noting that her rise could inspire more women to pursue leadership roles in finance, accounting, and public administration.

As she prepares to assume office, expectations are high that Seghosime will leverage her extensive experience to strengthen ICAN’s regulatory influence, promote ethical standards, and support Nigeria’s broader economic and fiscal reforms.

Hajia Sofuratu Seghosime Emerges ICAN President-Elect

Continue Reading

News

2026 JAMB UTME: Over 2.2 Million Candidates Face Stricter Rules, CBT Reforms Begin

Published

on

JAMB CBT Centre

2026 JAMB UTME: Over 2.2 Million Candidates Face Stricter Rules, CBT Reforms Begin

The 2026 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) conducted by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) is shaping up to be one of the most tightly regulated and highly subscribed examinations in Nigeria’s education history, with over 2.2 million candidates expected to participate nationwide.

The examination, which serves as the primary gateway into universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education, is scheduled to hold between April 16 and April 22–25, 2026, across nearly 1,000 accredited Computer-Based Test (CBT) centres across the country.

Massive candidate turnout pushes CBT expansion

With candidate numbers rising yearly, JAMB has expanded its CBT operations by distributing candidates across multiple daily sessions to reduce congestion and improve efficiency.

The board continues to emphasize that the UTME remains a fully computer-based examination, lasting approximately two hours, with candidates tested across four subjects depending on their chosen field of study.

Education stakeholders note that the rising number of candidates reflects increased demand for tertiary education, even as institutions struggle with limited admission capacity.

Revised reporting time for candidates

One of the most notable adjustments for the 2026 examination is the revised reporting time for candidates.

Candidates assigned to the first session are now expected to arrive by 7:00 a.m., with examinations starting at 8:30 a.m. and ending by 10:30 a.m.

READ ALSO:

This adjustment, according to examination officials, was introduced following public concerns over early-morning movement risks faced by teenagers during previous examination cycles.

Authorities clarified that candidates are not required to reprint examination slips, as previously issued documents remain valid for the 2026 UTME.

Stricter monitoring and crackdown on malpractice

In line with ongoing reforms, JAMB has intensified efforts to curb examination malpractice and technical lapses across CBT centres.

Reports indicate that about 23 CBT centres were delisted following poor performance during mock assessments, while some technical staff and operators have faced sanctions for failing to meet required standards.

The board has also strengthened its monitoring systems, with enhanced surveillance and compliance checks at examination centres nationwide to ensure transparency and fairness.

Candidates have been warned against bringing prohibited items into examination halls, with strict penalties attached to any violation.

CBT reforms and operational improvements

Recent related reforms introduced by JAMB include tighter accreditation standards for CBT centres and improved real-time monitoring systems aimed at reducing technical disruptions experienced in previous years.

Education analysts say these measures are part of broader efforts to restore public confidence in the UTME process following past complaints about system glitches and irregularities.

Mandatory requirements for candidates

JAMB has reiterated key instructions that all candidates must follow strictly to avoid disqualification.

Candidates are required to print their examination slips, which contain vital details such as exam date, venue, and time.

They are also expected to arrive early and locate their assigned centres ahead of time to avoid last-minute confusion or transportation challenges.

Authorities have warned that late arrival or failure to comply with examination instructions could result in automatic disqualification.

Disability inclusion and equal opportunity support

In a notable development, JAMB has expanded its Equal Opportunity Group programme to support candidates living with disabilities.

The initiative provides tailored assistance, including modified exam conditions and additional support systems designed to ensure fairness and equal access for all candidates.

Education stakeholders have described the initiative as a significant step toward inclusive education and equal participation in national examinations.

Growing significance of the UTME

The UTME remains Nigeria’s most important tertiary admission examination, determining entry into higher institutions for millions of candidates annually.

The 2026 edition stands out due to its record participation, tighter regulatory framework, and increased operational reforms aimed at improving credibility and efficiency.

Conclusion

The 2026 JAMB UTME is defined by scale, stricter oversight, and major operational reforms. For candidates, success will depend not only on academic preparation but also on strict compliance with examination rules, especially regarding timing, documentation, and conduct.

As the examination approaches, candidates are advised to prepare adequately, follow official guidelines, and ensure early arrival at their designated centres to avoid disqualification.

2026 JAMB UTME: Over 2.2 Million Candidates Face Stricter Rules, CBT Reforms Begin

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending