International

Many Nigerians in UK risk deportation over scrapping of sponsorship

Published

8 months ago

July 26, 2025

Many Nigerians in UK risk deportation over scrapping of sponsorship

A sweeping overhaul of the United Kingdom’s immigration policy has thrown thousands of Nigerians living and working in the country into a state of uncertainty, as over 100 skilled jobs have been removed from the list of roles eligible for sponsorship under the Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS) scheme.

The policy changes, which took effect from July 22, are part of a broader push by the UK government to tighten immigration controls. Key reforms include increasing salary thresholds for Skilled Worker and Health and Care visa holders, and disqualifying a wide range of professions from sponsorship unless listed under a newly established Temporary Shortage Occupation List.

Among the categories affected are jobs in agriculture, logistics, hospitality, health, law enforcement, the arts, and other professional fields. Roles such as youth workers, police officers, interior designers, translators, actors, and care supervisors are no longer eligible for sponsorship under the new rules.

According to the revised framework, the minimum salary for most skilled roles has risen sharply to £41,700, while the threshold for health and care positions remains at £25,600 — but with a caveat. Employers in these sectors must now ensure that employees receive that amount after deductions like transport and housing.

The developments have triggered widespread anxiety among Nigerians who are on time-bound visas linked to their current employers. Many now face the risk of deportation once their sponsorships expire.

“No Nigerians have been sacked because of the new regulations, but their fate will hang in the balance because at the end of their current sponsorship, those whose jobs have been removed from CoS eligibility will not be able to find a new job in that category, and their visa will not be renewed. If you don’t have a valid visa, you become an illegal immigrant,” said Kayode Alabi, a UK-based travel consultant and CEO of Phika Travels and Tours.

READ ALSO:

He added: “Another challenge those whose jobs were retained under the new regulations will face is that their employers may not be able to pay the new salary threshold, which has risen to £41,700 from £24,000, £25,000 or £26,000 per annum.

“If you are not on any of the delisted job roles, you will still be earning the salary you were earning when you received sponsorship, which is usually between one and five years. By the time that sponsorship expires, will your company be able to pay the new salary threshold? That is the issue.”

Several Nigerian workers in the UK expressed growing concerns, describing the uncertainty they now face.

“We can say there is panic among our people. Yes, there is. People don’t know what will become their fate at the expiration of their sponsorship, especially when the eligibility criteria for other jobs have been increased. People are afraid,” Alabi added.

A Nigerian resident in the UK, Banjo Fola, said he was directly impacted by the new policy shift.“My visa with this current job will expire in some months, and my employer has said he cannot afford the new salary threshold. It is very hard. I don’t even know what to do,” he said.

Another affected worker, who chose to remain anonymous, said she may be forced to return to Nigeria after her current sponsorship expires in August.“My sponsorship will expire in August, and the new regulation has made it impossible to get a new job because of the salary threshold. I may likely return home,” she said.

A third Nigerian, also on a CoS visa, voiced similar fears:“Things are not easy. The new rules have cut short our plans to stay longer here. But our current jobs have been removed, meaning that we will be jobless in the next one year. I came here (UK) in February 2023 on a Certificate of Sponsorship. My sponsorship is for three years, so I have less than a year to find another job, which is not even there because of the new salary threshold.”

READ ALSO:

Sulaimon Okewole, CEO of Cardinal E-School and Edu Services, estimated that over 10,000 Nigerians may have to return home due to the changes.“While the UK government’s goal of reducing net migration is understandable, the impact on Nigerians, a community known for its immense contribution to the UK’s workforce, demands some discussions,” he said.

“The most immediate concern is the sharp rise in salary thresholds for Skilled Worker visas. For many Nigerians, especially those in sectors like healthcare and IT, this could mean fewer job offers unless UK employers adjust pay scales. This may be a tough task in an economy already dealing with inflation,” he added.

He warned that unless alternative employment options open up, the UK may lose skilled Nigerian professionals to other countries with more favorable migration policies.

A student at the University of Ibadan, Eniola, shared how the new rules have disrupted her mother’s life in the UK. “She has practically lost her job because the sponsorship will come to an end in November. She has been there since 2023. She informed me that her job has been delisted, and she is not sure she will find a fresh sponsor or new job. I can tell from our conversation that she is afraid,” Eniola said.

Data from the UK Home Office show that 26,715 Skilled Worker visas were granted to Nigerians in 2023 — a steep rise from 8,491 in 2022. However, early figures from 2024 indicate a drop, particularly in the issuance of Health and Care Worker visas, reflecting the tightening immigration environment.

Many Nigerians in UK risk deportation over scrapping of sponsorship

(PUNCH)

Related Topics:Deportation Featured Nigerians sponsorship UK

Up Next

One third of Gaza residents not eating for days, UN warns

Don't Miss

UK, French, German leaders press Israel over Gaza aid

International

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

Published

7 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Trends Admin

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

Several Muslim-majority countries have strongly condemned Israel’s new death penalty law, which reintroduces capital punishment for certain terrorism-related offenses, warning that it could further escalate tensions in the Middle East. The legislation, passed by Israel’s Knesset on March 30, 2026, allows death by hanging as the default sentence for Palestinians convicted in military courts of deadly attacks classified as terrorism, with executions scheduled within 90 days of conviction.

The foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Qatar, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates issued a joint statement criticizing the law, describing it as a discriminatory measure that undermines the fundamental rights of Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. The ministers warned that the legislation reinforces an apartheid-like system and could inflame tensions on the ground.

READ ALSO:

Human rights organizations, including the Association for Civil Rights in Israel and the International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute, have opposed the law, filing petitions with Israel’s Supreme Court to block it. Critics argue that the legislation disproportionately targets Palestinians, applying primarily in military courts in the occupied territories, while allowing Israeli civilians discretion in sentencing for terrorism-motivated murder.

The law was introduced by the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, led by National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who argued that stricter penalties are necessary to deter terrorism and protect citizens. However, opponents say that the measure risks undermining the rule of law and exacerbating ongoing conflicts.

The legislation has drawn strong international criticism. The Palestinian Authority condemned the law as a violation of international law, potentially amounting to a war crime under the Fourth Geneva Convention. UN human rights officials have also expressed concern, highlighting the risk to civilian safety, due process, and human rights protections.

Muslim nations and international observers continue to call for restraint and adherence to international legal standards. They emphasize that reinstating the death penalty in a volatile conflict zone could heighten instability and hinder prospects for peace.

Muslim Nations Condemn Israel’s New Death Penalty Law for Palestinians

International

China Blames US‑Israeli Strikes on Iran for Strait of Hormuz Blockage

Published

7 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Trends Admin

Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning

China Blames US‑Israeli Strikes on Iran for Strait of Hormuz Blockage

China has accused the United States and Israel of being the “root cause” of the disruption of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, following recent military strikes on Iran. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said on Thursday that the interruption to navigation resulted directly from what Beijing described as “illegal military operations” by Washington and Tel Aviv against Tehran.

The Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime corridor connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman, is one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes for crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Iran has effectively restricted access to the strait in retaliation for the joint strikes, escalating tensions in the Middle East and threatening global energy supply chains.

China, as the largest importer of Iranian crude, has been particularly affected. Mao Ning warned that further military escalation would not resolve the crisis, saying, “Military means cannot fundamentally solve the problem, and the escalation of conflicts is not in the interests of either side.” Beijing called for an immediate ceasefire and de-escalation to restore safe passage and regional stability.

READ ALSO:

The remarks came after U.S. President Donald Trump urged nations dependent on oil shipments through the strait to “take care of that passage” themselves. Trump also indicated that the conflict could continue for another two to three weeks, with potential strikes targeting critical Iranian infrastructure if negotiations fail.

The disruption has already sent shockwaves through global energy markets, with oil prices surging between 40 to 50 percent. Industries reliant on fuel have been hard hit, including airlines such as Air China, which announced increases in fuel surcharges on domestic routes. Analysts warn that sustained instability in the strait could prolong energy price volatility and further strain global supply chains.

Market experts say that reopening the Strait of Hormuz is crucial for stabilising international energy flows. Private and public sectors are closely monitoring developments, with international diplomacy expected to play a key role in resolving the crisis. China’s call for a negotiated solution highlights its strategic interest in protecting maritime energy imports and preventing long-term disruption to global oil supply.

China Blames US‑Israeli Strikes on Iran for Strait of Hormuz Blockage

International

Qatar Petitions UN Over Iranian Missile Strikes on Maritime Assets

Published

8 hours ago

April 2, 2026

Trends Admin

Qatar Petitions UN Over Iranian Missile Strikes on Maritime Assets

The government of Qatar has formally appealed to Antonio Guterres, strongly condemning what it described as Iranian drone and cruise missile attacks on its territory and maritime infrastructure, calling them clear violations of international law and national sovereignty.

In a detailed communication to the United Nations, Qatari authorities outlined a series of incidents that occurred between March 28 and April 1, 2026, describing them as “unlawful acts” that pose a serious threat to regional stability and global energy security. The letter is part of a broader diplomatic push, with Qatar submitting multiple complaints to the UN and Security Council in recent weeks over what it calls sustained aggression by Iran.

The most recent and severe incident took place on April 1, when three cruise missiles were launched from Iranian territory toward Qatari waters. According to officials, Qatari air defense systems intercepted two of the missiles, while a third struck the Aqua 1 fuel oil tanker operating within Qatar’s territorial waters. The vessel is leased to state-owned QatarEnergy.

QatarEnergy confirmed that all 21 crew members aboard the tanker were safely evacuated. Authorities reported no casualties and no environmental damage, but warned that the attack underscores growing risks to maritime safety and critical energy infrastructure in the Gulf.

READ ALSO:

Qatar invoked Article 51 of the UN Charter, affirming its right to self-defense, and indicated that a full assessment of damages and losses is ongoing. The government also called for urgent international intervention, accountability, and enhanced protection of vital shipping lanes and offshore facilities.

Officials stressed that repeated attacks on commercial vessels and energy assets threaten not only Qatar but also the broader global economy, given the Gulf’s strategic role in oil and gas exports. The incidents have intensified concerns among Gulf states about the vulnerability of energy infrastructure, commercial shipping routes, and key maritime corridors.

The latest escalation comes amid heightened regional tensions involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, with fears growing that continued hostilities could spiral into a wider conflict. Maritime security bodies, including the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, have continued to monitor the situation closely and warn of increased risks in the Gulf.

Despite the attacks, QatarEnergy stated that operations at affected facilities remain fully operational, signaling resilience in the country’s energy sector. However, analysts warn that sustained threats could disrupt supply chains and shake investor confidence if the situation deteriorates further.

Qatar has repeatedly emphasized that such actions are inconsistent with principles of good neighborliness and international norms, urging the global community to act decisively to prevent further escalation.

As of now, there has been no official response from Iran regarding the latest accusations.