Marwa shuns investigation on alleged mismanagement of N467m - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

Marwa shuns investigation on alleged mismanagement of N467m

Published

on

The Chairman of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, retired Generak Muhammad Buba Marwa, failed to appear at the investigative hearing on the alleged mismanagement of N467 million before the Senate.

The Director General of the NDLEA was expected to appear before the Senate Public Accounts Committee.

The committee, chaired by Senator Matthew Urhoghide, was to host Marwa on Wednesday, but he failed to honour the invitation.

The Committee’s investigation was on the 2016 Office of Auditor General Report, which raised 11 queries against the NDLEA.

It was gathered that the letter of the meeting was submitted to the NDLEA and received by the Agency.

The query reads: “The  Agency over spent Capital expenditures in 2015 by N12,986,372.00 (Twelve million, nine hundred and eighty-six thousand, three hundred and seventy-two naira) on the renovation of Jigawa State Command and Osun State  Command.

“This  act contravened  Financial  Regulation  419  which  states  that  ‘…officers  controlling  votes  are solely liable for unauthorised  expenditure in excess of  the sum allocated.’”

The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  was  requested  to  justify  this  violation  of  the Financial  Regulation  or  recover  the  sum  of  N12,986,372.00  and  furnish  recovery particulars  for  verification.

The query added: “The  sum  of  N43,228,750.00  (Forty-three  million,  two  hundred  and  twenty-eight thousand,  seven  hundred  and  fifty  naira)  was  spent  on  renovation  and  purchase  of  5 (five)  operational  vehicles  in  Nasarawa  State  Command  in  2015.

“A  scrutiny  of  the Appropriation  Act  revealed  that  the  amounts  spent  were  not  appropriated  for  by  the National Assembly. The  Chairman/Chief  Executive,  having  failed  to  produce  the  authority  for  this expenditure,  should  recover  the  sum  of  N43,228,750.00  and  furnish  relevant  particulars for  verification.

“A sum  of  N42,603,261.94 (Forty-two million,  six hundred  and  three  thousand,  two hundred  and  sixty-one  naira,  ninety-four  kobo)  granted  as  cash  advances  three  years ago,  to    9  (nine)  officers  of  the  Agency,  were  not  retired,  contrary  to  Financial Regulations.

“The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  recover  the  sum  of  N42,603,261.94  from the officers  involved and forward evidence of  recovery  for  verification.

“The  Agency  spent  a  sum  of  N2,577,150.00  (Two  million,  five  hundred  and seventy-seven  thousand,  one  hundred  and  fifty  naira)  on  professional  fees,  renewal  of licence  fees  and  seminar  fees  for  its  staff    in  2015.

“This  is  contrary  to  Office  of  the Head  of  the  Civil  Service  of  the  Federation  Circular  Ref.  No  HCSF/PSO/866/II/214 dated  1st  March,  2009,  which  stopped  payment  of  annual  subscription  of  staff  to professional bodies by  Ministries,  Departments  and  Agencies. The  Chairman/Chief  Executive should  recover  the amounts in question.

“The  sum  of  N4,729,759.00  (Four  million,  seven  hundred  and  twenty-nine thousand,  seven  hundred  and  fifty-nine  naira)  deducted  as  VAT  and  WHT  from payments  to  contractors  for  services  rendered  to  the  Agency  were  not  remitted  to  the relevant  Tax  Authority,  contrary  to  Financial  Regulation  234(i)  which  states  that  ‘it  is mandatory  for  Accounting  Officers  to  ensure  full  compliance  with  dual  roles  of  making provision  for  the  Value  Added  Tax  and  Withholding  Tax  (WHT)  due  on  supply  and services  contract  and  actual  remittance  of  same’ and  234(ii)  which  states  that ‘…Remittance of  WHT and VAT shall be made within 21 days of  deduction.’ The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  remit  the  sum  of  N4,729,759.00  to  the relevant  Tax  authority.    Otherwise,  the  sanctions  under  Financial  Regulation  3112(ii) should  be invoked.

“The  sum  of  N135,301,756.93  (One  hundred  and  thirty-five  million,  three  hundred and  one  thousand,  seven  hundred  and  fifty-six  naira,  ninety-three  kobo)  was  spent  by the  Agency  as  against  the  sum  of  N103,216,923.00  (One  hundred  and  three  million,  two hundred  and  sixteen  thousand,  nine  hundred  and  twenty-three  naira)  appropriated.

“This  resulted  in  excess  expenditure  of  N32,084,833.93  (Thirty-two  million,  eighty-four thousand,  eight  hundred  and  thirty-three  naira,  ninety-three  kobo)  on  Security  Vote  for the  year  2016,  contrary  to  the  provision  of  Financial  Regulation  313  which  states  that ‘No  expenditure  on  any  subhead  of  the  Recurrent  Estimates  in  excess  of  the  provision in  the  Approved  estimates  or  Supplementary  Estimates  may  be  authorised  by  any officer  controlling  a  vote  without  approval  of  the  National  Assembly.’

“Financial Regulation  419  also  states  that  ‘Officers controlling votes  are  solely  liable  for unauthorised expenditure in  excess of  the sum  allocated.’  The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  justify  the  excess  expenditure  of N32,084,833.93.

“A  sum  of  N169,336,264.36  (One  hundred  and  sixty-nine  million,  three  hundred and  thirty-six  thousand,  two  hundred  and  sixty-four  naira,  thirty-six  kobo)  was  spent  on Security  Votes  in  2015.

“Further  examination  of  the  Agency‟s  Budget  for  that  year, revealed that  there was no appropriation for Security Vote  by the National Assembly.   The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  produce  the  authority  for  this  expenditure or recover  the sum  of  N169,336,264.36  and  forward  relevant  details for verification

“Contract  for  the  supply  of  7  (seven)  operational  vehicles  for  a  sum  of N90,772,500.00  (Ninety  million,  seven  hundred  and  seventy-two  thousand,  five  hundred naira)  was  awarded  without  approval  from  the  Ministerial  Tender‟s  Board.

“This contravened  Section  16(2)  of  the  Procurement  Act  of  2007  which  states  that  ‘No  fund shall  be  disbursed  from  Treasury  or  Federation  Account  or  bank  account  of  the procuring  entity  for  any  procurement  falling  above  the  set  thresholds  unless  the cheques,  or  other  form  of  request  for  payments  is  accompanied  by  „No  objection Certificate’ to  an  award  of  contract  duly  signed  by  the  Bureau.  Financial  Regulation 2906 also requires the  Agency not  to  award contract  above its threshold. The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  was  requested  to  void  the  contract,  in  compliance with  Section  16(4)  of  the  Public  Procurement  Act,  2007,  which  states  that  “any procurement  purported  to  be  awarded  without  a  Certificate  of  „No-Objection‟  duly  signed by  the  Bureau  shall  be  null  and  void”  and  recover  the  amounts  already  paid  to  the contractor.

“A  cash  advance  of  N2,350,000.00  (Two  million,  three  hundred  and  fifty  thousand naira)  was  paid  to  a  staff  for  provision  of  furniture  for  the  Guest  House,  while  another sum  of  N700,000.00  (Seven  hundred  thousand  naira)  was  paid  to  a  contractor  for production  of  5,000  file  jackets.  These  items  were  not  taken  on  stores  charge,  contrary to  Financial  Regulation  2402  which  states  that  on  all  payment  vouchers  for  the purchase  of  stores,  the  Store  Keeper  must  certify  that  the  stores  have  been  received and  taken  on  charge  in  the  Store  Ledger  quoting  the  store  receipt  voucher  number  and attaching the original copy of  the  Store Receipt  Voucher to  the original LPO”. The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  produce  evidence  of  receipt  of  the  items into  the store,  or  recover the amounts in question.

“Cash  advances  amounting  to  N8,629,600.00  (Eight  million,  six  hundred  and This twenty-nine  thousand,  six  hundred  naira)  were  granted  to  staff  for  various procurements. was contrary to Treasury Circular TRY A2&B/2009/OAGF/CAD/026/V  dated  24th  March,  2009,  which  stipulates  that  “All Accounting  Officers  and  officers  controlling  expenditures  are  to  ensure  that  all  local procurement  of  stores  and  services  costing  above  N200,000.00  shall  be  made  only  by No. award of  contracts”. The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  recover  the  sum  of  N8,629,600.00,  as  this cannot  be regarded as  a  legitimate charge against  public funds.

“The  Director-General  used  green  ink  in  giving  approval  for  payments.  This contravened  Financial  Regulation  3002  which  restricts  use  of  green  ink  to  staff  of  the Auditor-General for  the Federation.

“The  Chairman/Chief  Executive  should  henceforth  restrain  the  Director-General from this practice. All  the  issues  raised  were  brought  to  the  attention  of  the  Chairman/Chief Executive, but  no response  was received  from  the Agency.”

The Eagle Online

Loading

metro

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over “Inciting” Social Media Posts

Published

on

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over "Inciting" Social Media Posts

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over “Inciting” Social Media Posts

Security forces in Tripoli, Libya, have arrested two Nigerian nationals in the coastal town of Qarabouli over allegations of spreading inciting content on social media. The suspects were detained for allegedly circulating videos and other online materials described by authorities as having an “inciting nature” that promoted violence and criminal activity. Libyan authorities said the content violated the country’s laws and posed a risk to public security and social stability, leading to the swift intervention of security forces in the coastal town.

According to security officials, both suspects have been formally charged and all preliminary legal procedures have been completed. They have since been referred to the Public Prosecution Office for further investigation and possible prosecution in accordance with Libyan criminal laws. The identities of the two Nigerians have not been disclosed by authorities at this time, and it remains unclear whether they have legal representation or have been in contact with the Nigerian embassy in Tripoli.

The arrests come amid increased scrutiny of social media activities in Libya, where security agencies have stepped up surveillance of digital platforms in recent years, citing concerns over content that could fuel unrest, promote violence, or undermine public order. In July 2024, the GNU-affiliated Presidential Council established the Public Morality Protection Agency, granting it broad, vaguely defined powers to police social media for content deemed immoral or harmful to Libyan values. According to human rights groups, the move threatens to infringe on Libyans’ freedom of expression online while also hindering online privacy and encouraging self-censorship, creating an environment where citizens are increasingly fearful of expressing their opinions online.

READ ALSO:

Libya’s internet freedom environment has been described as repressive, with citizens practicing self-censorship or risking arrest and harassment for online posts on sensitive topics. Restrictive laws, arbitrary detentions targeting peaceful expression, and physical violence against online activists have been documented. In January 2025, Faisal Rajab al-Shikhi was arbitrarily detained in Benghazi by armed men from the Libyan Arab Armed Forces and forcibly disappeared because of a video he had posted years earlier critical of LAAF commander Khalifa Haftar, highlighting the severe consequences that can arise from online expression in the country.

The country ranks 138th out of 180 nations in the 2026 World Press Freedom Index, with Reporters Without Borders describing Libya as a “veritable information black hole.” Most traditional media outlets have fled the country or aligned with warring factions, leaving Libyans to turn to social media for dialogue—a platform that remains conducive to radicalization and the dissemination of hate speech, but also subject to government crackdown. The Anti-Cybercrime Law No.5-2022 has further extended restrictions to the digital sphere, forcing journalists and citizens to severely self-censor or risk prosecution or arrest, creating a chilling effect on free expression across the country.

This latest case adds to a pattern of legal issues involving Nigerian nationals in Libya. In March 2026, authorities arrested six Nigerians—one male and five females—in Tripoli for alleged drug trafficking, with authorities seizing large quantities of cocaine intended for distribution. The Nigerian government has not yet issued an official statement regarding the latest social media arrests, though the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is expected to engage with Libyan authorities to ensure that the suspects receive fair legal representation and that their rights are protected throughout the judicial process.

Libya Arrests Two Nigerians Over “Inciting” Social Media Posts

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

Published

on

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

An industrial court sitting in Garki, Abuja, has declared the nationwide strike embarked upon by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) against Dangote Petroleum Refinery illegal, ruling that the union failed to follow due process before commencing the industrial action.

In a landmark judgment delivered on Wednesday, the presiding judge, Justice E.D. Subilim, held that the strike, which disrupted operations at Africa’s largest refinery project, was null and void.

The court also ruled that PENGASSAN had no legal authority to prevent crude oil and gas suppliers from carrying out their contractual obligations to the refinery, describing the union’s actions in cutting off supplies as capable of causing significant economic damage.

Justice Subilim stated that the disruption of crude and gas supply amounted to an act of economic sabotage because it could force suppliers to breach legally binding agreements with the Dangote Refinery.

The suit was instituted by the refinery through its counsel, George Ibrahim (SAN), following the industrial dispute that erupted late last year.

The conflict was triggered by the dismissal of more than 800 Nigerian workers by the refinery. PENGASSAN had alleged that the affected employees were targeted because of their decision to join the union, a claim that sparked nationwide protests and threats to the refinery’s operations.

READ ALSO:

As tensions escalated, the union declared a nationwide strike and moved to pressure suppliers by disrupting crude and gas deliveries to the multi-billion-dollar facility located in the Lekki Free Trade Zone, Lagos.

The dispute quickly drew national attention due to the strategic importance of the refinery to Nigeria’s energy security, fuel supply and foreign exchange earnings.

At the height of the crisis, the Federal Government intervened through a series of marathon negotiations involving the Office of the National Security Adviser and the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment.

The intervention eventually led to the suspension of the strike on October 1, 2025, paving the way for further discussions while the matter remained before the court.

In his judgment, Justice Subilim emphasized that labour unions must operate within the confines of the law when pursuing industrial disputes, stressing that actions capable of disrupting critical national infrastructure and commercial contracts could not be justified outside established legal procedures.

However, the court declined Dangote Refinery’s claim for N50 billion in damages against PENGASSAN. The judge ruled that the company failed to provide sufficient justification for the amount sought, and consequently refused to award the compensation.

Other defendants in the suit included the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd), the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC).

The ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for labour relations in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry, particularly regarding the limits of union actions in disputes involving strategic national assets and critical energy infrastructure.

 

Court Declares PENGASSAN Strike Against Dangote Refinery Illegal, Labels Crude Supply Disruption ‘Economic Sabotage’

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl

Published

on

Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl

Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl

The Kebbi State Police Command has arrested a 36-year-old security guard attached to an Islamiyya school in Jega Local Government Area for allegedly defiling a 10-year-old girl. The Commissioner of Police, Umar Hadejia, disclosed the arrest during a press briefing in Birnin Kebbi on Wednesday, June 17, 2026, where he paraded the suspect alongside others arrested for various crimes. The suspect, identified as Faruku Muhammed of Tungar Zabarmawa area in Jega, was arrested following a complaint lodged by the victim’s family. According to police reports, the incident occurred on June 14, 2026, at about 4:30 p.m. when the suspect allegedly lured the girl into his room located within the Islamiyya school premises where he worked as a security guard. The police did not disclose the name of the school involved in the incident.

Reading from the official police report, CP Hadejia detailed the allegations: *“On 14/06/2026 at about 1630hrs one Faruku Muhammed M aged 36yrs of Tungar Zabarmawa area Jega, LGA, lured one Naja’atu Surajo F aged 10yrs of the same address in to his room located inside an Islamiyya School where he works as a Security Guard and had sexual intercourse with her by inserting his finger inside her vagina. Case under investigation and will be prosecuted accordingly.”* The young girl reportedly sustained injuries and was subsequently taken to a medical facility for treatment and evaluation, though the police did not disclose the extent of her injuries or the name of the hospital where she received care.

READ ALSO:

CP Hadejia assured the public that the case is under investigation and the suspect will be prosecuted accordingly if found culpable. He reiterated the command’s commitment to protecting children and other vulnerable members of society, urging parents and guardians to promptly report cases of abuse, exploitation, and other crimes affecting minors. The police commissioner also encouraged residents to continue providing credible information to security agencies, assuring that reports involving child abuse would receive prompt attention and that all information provided would be treated with utmost confidentiality.

The school guard’s arrest was announced during a press briefing that also covered other security breakthroughs in the state. These included the arrest of four suspected members of the Mamudawa group allegedly involved in supplying logistics to terrorists, as well as the rescue of a kidnapped victim. CP Hadejia used the platform to commend the cooperation of security agencies, vigilante groups, and the Civilian Joint Task Force, describing their collaboration as vital to the ongoing fight against insurgency, banditry, and other violent crimes in the state.

The incident has drawn reactions from parents, education stakeholders, and child protection groups, who have called for a thorough investigation and swift justice for the victim. Advocates have urged authorities to strengthen screening and monitoring processes for non-teaching staff working in schools, stressing the need for stricter background checks and improved child protection measures to ensure the safety of pupils. According to child rights experts, many informal learning centers and community-based educational institutions still operate without comprehensive safeguarding frameworks, leaving children vulnerable to abuse in environments where they are expected to learn and receive moral guidance. Child rights organizations have consistently urged school proprietors, religious institutions, and government authorities to strengthen oversight mechanisms and ensure that anyone working closely with children undergoes proper screening and monitoring, including background checks and regular supervision.

The suspect remains in police custody as investigators prepare the case for possible prosecution. Legal experts suggest that if found guilty, the suspect could face severe penalties under Nigerian law, including life imprisonment, as the country’s child protection laws provide for strict punishment for offenders who commit sexual offenses against minors. Meanwhile, child protection advocates have called on the Kebbi State Government to provide counseling and psychological support for the young victim to help her recover from the traumatic experience, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive care that addresses both the physical and emotional wounds of survivors.

Kebbi Police Arrest School Guard for Alleged Defilement of 10-Year-Old Girl

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending