'My wife died giving birth after Trump cut funding to our clinic' - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

‘My wife died giving birth after Trump cut funding to our clinic’

Published

on

‘My wife died giving birth after Trump cut funding to our clinic’

When Shahnaz went into labour, her husband Abdul called a taxi to take them to the only medical facility accessible to them.

“She was in a lot pain,” he says.

A 20-minute drive away, the clinic was in Shesh Pol village in Afghanistan’s north-eastern Badakhshan province. It was where their two older children were born.

Abdul sat next to Shahnaz comforting her as they drove over gravel tracks to reach help.

“But when we reached the clinic, we saw that it was closed. I didn’t know it had shut down,” he said, his face crumpling with agony.

Warning: Readers may find some details in this article distressing.

The clinic in Shesh Pol is one of more than 400 medical facilities that closed down in Afghanistan, one of the world’s poorest countries, after the Trump administration cut nearly all US aid to the country earlier this year, in a drastic and abrupt move following the dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

A single-storey structure with four small rooms, white paint peeling off its walls, the Shesh Pol clinic has USAID posters tacked up everywhere with information and guidance for pregnant women and new mothers.

It doesn’t look like much but in Badakhshan’s mountainous, unforgiving terrain, where a lack of access has been a major reason for historically high maternal mortality rates, the clinic was a critical lifeline, part of a wider programme implemented during the tenure of the US-backed government in the country, to reduce maternal and newborn deaths.

It had a trained midwife who assisted around 25-30 deliveries every month. It had a stock of medicines and injections, and it also provided basic healthcare services.

READ ALSO:

Other medical facilities are simply too far from Abdul’s village, and it was not without risk for Shahnaz to travel on bumpy roads. Abdul also didn’t have money to pay for a longer journey – renting the taxi cost 1,000 Afghani ($14.65; £12.70), roughly a quarter of his monthly income as a labourer. So they decided to return home.

“But the baby was coming and we had to stop by the side of the road,” Abdul said.

Shahnaz delivered their baby girl in the car. Shortly after, she died, bleeding profusely. A few hours later, before she could be named, their baby also died.

“I wept and screamed. My wife and child could’ve been saved if the clinic was open,” said Abdul. “We had a hard life, but we were living it together. I was always happy when I was with her.”

He doesn’t even have a photo of Shahnaz to hold on to.

There’s no certainty the mother and baby would’ve survived if they’d been treated at the clinic, but without it, they didn’t stand a chance, underlining the undeniable impact of US aid cuts in Afghanistan.

For decades, America has been the largest donor to Afghanistan, and in 2024, US funds made up a staggering 43% of all aid coming into the country.

The Trump administration has justified withdrawing it, saying there were “credible and longstanding concerns that funding was benefiting terrorist groups, including… the Taliban”, who govern the country. The US government further added that they had reports stating that at least $11m were “being siphoned or enriching the Taliban”.

The report that the US State Department referenced was made by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR). It said that $10.9m of US taxpayer money had been paid to the Taliban-controlled government by partners of USAID in “taxes, fees, duties, or utilities”.

READ ALSO:

The Taliban government denies that aid money was going into their hands.

“This allegation is not true. The aid is given to the UN, and through them to NGOs in provinces. They identify who needs the aid, and they distribute it themselves. The government is not involved,” said Suhail Shaheen, the head of the Taliban’s political office in Doha.

The Taliban government’s policies, especially its restrictions on women, the harshest in the world, have meant that after four years in power, it is still not recognised by most of the world. It’s also a key reason donors have been increasingly walking away from the country.

The US insists no one has died because of aid cuts. Shahnaz and her baby’s deaths are not recorded anywhere. Neither are countless others.

The BBC has documented at least half a dozen first-hand, devastating accounts in areas where USAID-supported clinics have shut down.

Right next to Shahnaz’s grave, villagers who had gathered around us pointed to two other graves. They told us both were of women who died in childbirth in the past four months – Daulat Begi and Javhar. Their babies survived.

Not far from the graveyard, we met Khan Mohammad whose wife, 36-year-old Gul Jan, died in childbirth five months ago. Their baby boy Safiullah died three days later.

“When she became pregnant, she would go to the clinic for check-ups. But midway through her pregnancy it shut down. During the delivery she had a lot of pain and blood loss,” Khan Mohammad said. “My children are sad all the time. No one can give them the love of a mother. I miss her every day. We had a sweet and loving life together.”

A roughly five-hour drive from Shesh Pol, in Cawgani, another village where a USAID-backed clinic closed down, Ahmad Khan, the grief-stricken father of Maidamo showed us the room in their mud and clay home where she died giving birth to baby Karima.

“If the clinic had been open, she might have survived. And even if she had died, we would not have had regrets knowing the medics tried their best. Now we’re left with regret and pain. America did this to us,” he said, tears rolling down his face.

In another home a few lanes away, Bahisa tells us how terrifying it was to give birth at home. Her three other children were born in the Cawgani clinic.

“I was so scared. In the clinic, we had a midwife, medicines and injections. At home I had nothing, no painkillers. It was unbearable pain. I felt like life was leaving my body. I became numb,” she said.

READ ALSO:

Her baby girl, named Fakiha, died three days after she was born.

The closure of clinics in villages has resulted in a surge of patients at the maternity ward of the main regional hospital in the provincial capital Faizabad.

Getting to it, through Badakhshan’s treacherous landscape is risky. We were shown a horrifying photo of a newborn baby, who was delivered on the way to Faizabad, and whose neck snapped before he got to the hospital.

We had visited the hospital back in 2022, and while it was stretched then, the scenes we saw this time were unprecedented.

In each bed, there were three women. Imagine having gone into labour, or just having gone through a miscarriage, and not even having a bed to yourself to lie in.

It’s what Zuhra Shewan, who suffered a miscarriage, had to endure.

“I was bleeding severely and didn’t even have a place to sit. It was really hard. By the time a bed is free, a woman could die bleeding,” she said.

Dr Shafiq Hamdard, the director of the hospital, said: “We have 120 beds in the hospital. Now we’ve admitted 300 to 305.”

While the patient load is swelling, the hospital, too, has faced sharp cuts in its funding.

“Three years ago our annual budget was $80,000. Now we have $25,000,” Dr Hamdard said.

By August this year, there had been as many maternal deaths recorded as there were for the whole of last year. Which means that at this rate, maternal mortality could increase by as much as 50% over last year.

Newborn deaths have already increased by roughly a third in the past four months, compared with the start of the year.

Razia Hanifi, the hospital’s head midwife, says she’s exhausted. “I have been working for the past 20 years. This year is the toughest, because of the overcrowding, the shortage of resources and the shortage of trained staff,” she said.

But no reinforcements are coming because of the Taliban government’s restrictions on women. Three years ago, all higher education, including medical education was banned for women. Less than a year ago, in December 2024, training for midwives and female nurses was also banned.

At a discreet location, we met two female students who were midway through the training when it was closed. They didn’t want to be identified for fear of reprisal.

Anya (name changed) said they both were in graduate courses at university when the Taliban took over. When those were closed in December 2022, they began midwife and nursing training, as it was the only path left to getting an education and a job.

“When that was also banned, I became depressed. I was crying day and night, and I wasn’t able to eat. It’s a painful situation,” she said.

Karishma (named changed) said: “There is already a shortage of midwives and nurses in Afghanistan. Without more being trained, women will be forced to give birth at home which will put them at risk.”

We asked the Taliban government’s Suhail Shaheen how they can justify bans which effectively curb access to health for half the population.

“It is our internal issue. These are our issues, how to handle them, how to consider them, how to take decisions, this is something internal. That is up to the leadership. Based on the needs of the society, they will take a decision,” he said.

With their access to medical services severely restricted, by wave after wave of crushing blows, for Afghanistan’s women, their right to health, and life itself, is at grave risk.

Additional reporting, photography and video: Aakriti Thapar, Mahfouz Zubaide, Sanjay Ganguly

Top image shows Abdul with his daughter and son in Shesh Pol.

‘My wife died giving birth after Trump cut funding to our clinic’

BBC

Loading

International

US Resumes Executions as Trump Reintroduces Firing Squad Option

Published

on

US President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump

Trump Orders Aggressive Return of Death Penalty as US Restores Firing Squad, Lethal Injection

The United States Department of Justice has announced a sweeping return to aggressive enforcement of capital punishment, including the reintroduction of firing squads and lethal injection, in a major policy shift under Donald Trump.

In a statement released Friday, the department said it is restoring its mandate to carry out lawful executions of federal death row inmates who have exhausted their appeals. The directive follows an executive order signed by Trump on his first day in office, instructing the Justice Department to prioritise the pursuit and enforcement of death sentences in appropriate cases.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche criticised the previous administration under Joe Biden, accusing it of failing to fully enforce capital punishment. He said the renewed approach is aimed at ensuring justice for victims of violent crimes, including terrorism, child killings, and attacks on law enforcement officers.

The policy marks a direct reversal of the federal execution moratorium introduced by former Attorney General Merrick Garland, which had paused executions pending a review of lethal injection protocols, particularly the use of pentobarbital.

READ ALSO:

According to the Justice Department, that review has now concluded that the drug complies with the Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The department’s newly released report, “Restoring and Strengthening the Federal Death Penalty,” supports the resumption of executions under updated guidelines.

As part of the overhaul, federal prosecutors have been authorised to seek the death penalty in at least 44 cases, with Blanche personally approving capital punishment in nine, including cases involving alleged members of the MS-13 gang accused of killing a federal witness.

The Federal Bureau of Prisons has also been directed to reinstate lethal injection protocols, expand execution methods to include firing squads, and explore the construction of new execution facilities capable of handling multiple methods.

Officials further revealed plans to streamline internal legal processes, including reforms to federal habeas corpus procedures, in a bid to reduce delays between conviction and execution—an issue that has long characterised the US capital punishment system.

The announcement also revisits controversial decisions made during the Biden era, including the commutation of sentences for 37 out of 40 federal death row inmates. The current Justice Department criticised that move, arguing it was carried out without sufficient consultation with victims’ families.

The policy shift is expected to reignite intense national debate over death penalty laws in the United States, with critics raising concerns about wrongful convictions, racial disparities, and the ethical implications of state-sanctioned executions. Human rights organisations have also questioned the reintroduction of firing squads, describing it as a regressive step.

Supporters, however, argue that the move reinforces accountability and ensures that the most serious crimes are met with the strongest legal consequences.

With executions now set to resume under expanded methods, the United States once again finds itself at the center of a deeply divisive debate over justice, punishment, and constitutional rights.

US Resumes Executions as Trump Reintroduces Firing Squad Option

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US Offers $10M Reward for Iraqi Militia Leader Linked to Attacks

Published

on

Hashim Finyan Rahim al-Saraji

US Offers $10M Reward for Iraqi Militia Leader Linked to Attacks

The United States State Department has announced a $10 million reward for information leading to the capture or identification of a senior Iraqi militia leader accused of involvement in attacks on American and allied targets in the Middle East.

The reward targets Hashim Finyan Rahim al-Saraji, who is identified as the leader of the Iran-backed armed group Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada (KSS), which Washington designates as a terrorist organisation.

The announcement was made through the U.S. State Department’s Rewards for Justice programme, which stated that individuals who provide credible information on al-Saraji’s whereabouts may also be eligible for relocation assistance in addition to the financial reward.

U.S. authorities say the group has carried out attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Iraq, including sites in Baghdad, as well as strikes on American military bases and personnel in both Iraq and Syria. Washington also accuses KSS of involvement in violence against Iraqi civilians, describing it as part of a wider network of Iran-aligned militias operating across Iraq and the region.

Al-Saraji is also linked to Iraq’s powerful Coordination Framework, a Shiite political alliance that holds significant influence in the country’s parliamentary system.

READ ALSO:

The reward forms part of a broader U.S. strategy of increasing pressure on Iran-backed militias in Iraq, which Washington says continue to destabilise the country and threaten regional security. In recent months, the United States has urged Baghdad to tighten financial controls, restrict militia funding, and improve oversight of security-related spending.

The move follows similar action earlier this month when Washington offered a reward for a commander linked to Kataib Hezbollah, another Iran-aligned armed group operating in Iraq.

Iraq remains a key flashpoint in wider U.S.–Iran tensions, with multiple armed groups operating alongside official state security forces. Although the country has seen relative stability in recent years, the continued presence of powerful militias outside full government control remains a major security and governance challenge.

These armed groups have previously been accused of targeting the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, the diplomatic zone at Baghdad International Airport, and foreign-owned energy installations in Iraq.

There has been no immediate response from KSS or Iraqi authorities regarding the U.S. announcement. However, similar reward offers and sanctions measures have previously been criticised by militia-linked political actors in Iraq, who often describe them as interference in domestic affairs.

Analysts say the latest move reflects Washington’s broader approach of combining financial incentives, intelligence gathering, and sanctions pressure to disrupt militia networks across the Middle East.

US Offers $10M Reward for Iraqi Militia Leader Linked to Attacks

Loading

Continue Reading

International

No Nuclear Strike on Iran, Trump Reaffirms US Military Strategy

Published

on

U.S President Donald Trump
US President Donald Trump

No Nuclear Strike on Iran, Trump Reaffirms US Military Strategy

US President Donald Trump has ruled out the possibility of a nuclear strike on Iran, insisting that the United States has no need to consider nuclear weapons in its approach to the ongoing tensions with Tehran.

Speaking at the White House, Trump said the U.S. has already achieved significant results using conventional military capability, arguing that there is no justification for escalating to nuclear warfare.

“Why would I use a nuclear weapon when we’ve totally, in a very conventional way, decimated them without it?” he said, while stressing that nuclear weapons should never be used under any circumstances.

The remarks come amid heightened geopolitical tension in the Middle East, where the United States continues to maintain pressure on Iran over its nuclear programme, regional influence, and security concerns.

READ ALSO:

Trump reiterated that his administration’s strategy focuses on conventional deterrence, military readiness, and diplomatic pressure, rather than nuclear escalation.

He also emphasised that nuclear weapons remain a last-resort option that should never be part of active military planning, regardless of the level of conflict.

The comments reflect ongoing U.S. efforts to manage the volatile U.S.–Iran relations, which have been marked by sanctions, military posturing, and intermittent diplomatic engagement.

Washington has continued to monitor Iran’s activities closely, particularly in relation to its nuclear capabilities and regional military operations, while maintaining a mix of pressure and negotiation channels.

Analysts say Trump’s statement is aimed at reassuring both domestic and international audiences that the United States is not considering any form of nuclear escalation, even as tensions persist in the region.

The U.S. position underscores a broader strategy of relying on conventional military strength and diplomatic leverage to contain threats while avoiding actions that could trigger catastrophic global consequences.

No Nuclear Strike on Iran, Trump Reaffirms US Military Strategy

Loading

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending