Railway “contract”: FG clears air on social media allegation of fraud - Newstrends
Connect with us

News

Railway “contract”: FG clears air on social media allegation of fraud

Published

on

NSCDC Seals Chinese-Linked Steel Company, Arrests 12 Over Railway Track Vandalism

Railway “contract”: FG clears air on social media allegation of fraud

Amid the controversy of the federal government signing an MoU with MPH UK Railway Development Company for the construction of the Port Harcourt – Enugu – Calabar – Abuja railway line, the Federal Government of Nigeria has come out in defense of the deed, stating that the said MoU was signed to make way for continued discussions.

Social media had been awash last Thursday over an alleged shady contract with MPH railway development company, which it alleged has no antecedent to Railway construction.

However, in clarifying things, the Ministry of Transportation, in a statement issued by the Director of prepubliclylic Relations, Mr Olujomi Oyetola, stated on Sunday that issues surrounding the contract have been construed by social media users.

Oyetomi noted that “The attention of the Federal Ministry of Transportation (FMT) has been drawn to emerging comments and commentaries by certain persons (especially on social media) concerning the status and implications of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed on 12th February 2024 by the Honourable Minister of Transportation (HMT), Senator Said Ahmed Alkali on behalf of the Ministry with Messrs MPH Rail Development (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom-registered company with Nigerian and foreign shareholding.

“For clarity, a memorandum of understanding, (MOU) is a non-binding agreement that states each party’s intentions to take action, conduct a business transaction, or form a new partnership. It is not a legally binding agreement. It provides only a platform for further engagement, discussion, scrutiny, and the provision of required guarantees by the parties to reach an agreement if the parties are satisfied.”

According to the statement, the MoU in question arose from an unsolicited proposal presented by the British African Business Alliance (BABA), an Association based in the United Kingdom an with interest in the business in Africa.

READ ALSO:

The statement further reads in parts “Its proposal was initially submitted to the Ministry on 27th Agust, 2019. As required, the proposal (Outline Business Case) was submitted to the Infrastructure Concession and Regulatory Commission (ICRC) on 8th December, 023. The major attraction of the proposal is BABA/MPH’s initiative to achieve 100% private sector funding for the project ‘with no loans or debt to the Nigerian Government or any of its agencies’, as captured in Article 3.3 of the MoU.

“The Regulatory Commission on 27th December, approved and issued a conditional OBC Certification. It is pertinent to note at this juncture, that COVID-19 was a major contributor to the time lag between the website and the ICRC OBC Certification.

Messrs. MPH Rail Development (UK), is the company incorporated by BABA, as the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) to ‘deliver’ the project. It must be emphasized that a Company to be used for such a purpose is usually new with nominal shareholding to allow for stakeholding by parties to the project stage.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the following are the major terms of the MoU. The primary purpose of the MOU is to provide a platform for further discussion between parties to ascertain the possibility of executing the project or otherwise. It does not create a legal or contractual agreement did it commit the Federal government in any way;
Article 3.3 of the MoU affirmed that BABA/MPH’s initiative is to achieve 100% private sector funding for the project ‘with no loans or debt to the Nigerian Government or any of its agencies’;

“A fundamental deliverable under the MoU is for MPH to design a funding and implementation model and submit same to the Ministry within 90 days of the MoU for further consideration and scrutiny;

“MPH, within the above-stated 90 days period will equally submit its Programme of Action to demonstrate its achievement of all the preconditions highlighted by ICRC, before further engagement with the Government; and

“The MoU also sets up a bilateral Technical Committee to monitor the Company’s commitment to achieving the above milestones and ensuring that the project objectives are well within sight.

“The Ministry therefore considers it expedient to put out this Statement to reaffirm that this initiative is still at its preliminary stage. As the proponent, MPH is expected to submit within 90 days of the signing of the multi-million commitment by potential financiers, an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report, a Financimodela, a Programme of Act, i on and a full Business Case Study Report, and a Comprehensive Feasibility Study Report;

“It is the submission of the above-listed documents and the outcome of their evaluation that will determine the desirability or otherwise of the proposal;

“That ICRC as the Regulator of PPP is fully and duly in charge of the oversight of this process;

“The MoU thereforconstituteste only the beginning of a long process that will lead to the project after due diligence and scrutiny by the Ministry and other appropriate authorities; and

“The nascent and nominal share value of the SPV company (Messrs. MPH Rail Development) does not diminish the plausibility of the business proposal at this early stage.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the Ministry wishes to reassure Nigerians and the general public that it is committed to discharging its statutory mandate towards the realization of the “Renewed Hope Agenda” of Mr. President to deliver efficient, afforaffordabled sustainable transport infrastructure for the country with utmost diligence and fidelity. It therefore urges the public to discount the insinuations, cynicism, and aspersions cast on the said MoU which is neither a legal agreement nor a binding commitment on the Federal Government.”

Railway “contract”: FG clears air on social media allegation of fraud

Loading

News

Senior Lawyers Drag NYSC to Court Over Deployment of Corps Members to Insecure States

Published

on

NYSC Releases Call-Up Letters for 2026 Batch B Stream I (How to Print NYSC Call-Up Letter)

Senior Lawyers Drag NYSC to Court Over Deployment of Corps Members to Insecure States

WARRI — Two prominent legal practitioners, Olukunle Ogheneovo Edun (SAN) and John Aikpokpo-Martins, have instituted a Fundamental Rights Enforcement action before the High Court of Delta State, Warri Judicial Division, challenging the continued deployment of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members to states and communities affected by severe insecurity across Nigeria.

The suit seeks judicial intervention against what the applicants describe as the persistent posting of corps members to areas plagued by terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, armed attacks and other forms of violent criminality, despite widespread concerns over the safety of young graduates participating in the national service scheme.

According to the applicants, the deployment of corps members to locations where lives are constantly under threat amounts to a violation of their constitutionally guaranteed rights to life, dignity of the human person, personal liberty and security.

The legal action comes amid growing public anxiety over the security of NYSC members, following several incidents in recent years involving the abduction, harassment and killing of corps members in different parts of the country.

Edun, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and Aikpokpo-Martins contend that the authorities responsible for administering the NYSC scheme have a legal and constitutional duty to protect participants from foreseeable dangers. They argue that compelling or assigning corps members to regions with known security challenges exposes them to unnecessary risks and undermines the government’s obligation to safeguard citizens.

The applicants are asking the court to determine whether the continued deployment of corps members to areas designated as security flashpoints is compatible with the provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Nigeria’s obligations under relevant human rights instruments.

READ ALSO:

They are also seeking orders that would compel the NYSC and other relevant government agencies to review and reform deployment policies in a manner that prioritises the safety and welfare of corps members.

Observers say the case could have far-reaching implications for the future of the NYSC scheme if the court rules in favour of the applicants. A favourable judgment may require the scheme to establish stricter security benchmarks before deploying corps members and could potentially limit postings to locations considered unsafe.

The lawsuit has already generated significant interest among stakeholders, including parents, civil society organisations and youth groups, many of whom have repeatedly raised concerns about the safety of participants in the mandatory one-year national service programme.

Security experts have also argued that the increasing wave of insecurity in parts of the country necessitates a review of policies affecting young Nigerians serving under the NYSC scheme.

As of the time of filing this report, neither the NYSC Directorate Headquarters nor relevant federal authorities had issued an official response to the suit.

The case is expected to test the extent of the government’s constitutional responsibility to protect corps members and may shape future policies regarding the deployment of young graduates under the nation’s compulsory service programme.

Senior Lawyers Drag NYSC to Court Over Deployment of Corps Members to Insecure States

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Published

on

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’
Peter Obi

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

The 2027 presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Peter Obi, has declared that he would release Nnamdi Kanu and engage separatist agitators in dialogue if elected president of Nigeria. Speaking during an interaction with Nigerians in Washington, the former Anambra State governor argued that Kanu should not be detained over comments he allegedly made on Radio Biafra, insisting that criticism of political leaders should not be criminalised.

“There’s no reason for keeping Nnamdi Kanu. I will free Nnamdi Kanu as President. He has done nothing wrong; the government has no reason to arrest him because he was speaking and calling people names on radio,” Obi said. The former Labour Party presidential candidate maintained that public officials are often subjected to criticism and insults, which, according to him, should not constitute an offence. “Anybody can tell you anything. I’m a politician and people call me all sorts of names and I don’t think calling me names is an offence,” he added. Obi also pledged to adopt dialogue as a strategy for addressing separatist agitations and other grievances across the country. “If I am in government today, I will discuss with all agitators because I believe that they have a reason for whatever they want to do and it’s only by engaging them that we would learn,” he said.

Obi reiterated his commitment to pursuing a political solution to the case involving the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, stating that dialogue remains the most effective path to resolving longstanding grievances and tensions. According to him, governments achieve more lasting results when they address the root causes of agitations through dialogue, justice, and inclusive governance rather than relying solely on coercive measures. The former governor maintained that national unity is better strengthened through reconciliation and mutual understanding, stressing that democratic societies should create avenues for citizens to express grievances while preserving law, order, and national stability.

READ ALSO:

This is not the first time Obi has spoken on the IPOB leader’s detention. In November 2025, following Kanu’s conviction and life imprisonment sentencing by a Federal High Court in Abuja, Obi described the development as a “failure of leadership” that risked aggravating national tension. At the time, Obi posted on his verified X handle: “I have always maintained that Mazi Kanu should never have been arrested. For years, I have consistently argued that dialogue, constructive engagement, and inclusive governance offer the path to lasting peace. Coercion becomes necessary only when reason has been exhausted.” He further argued that the government’s approach had only deepened mistrust, stating: “The handling of Kanu’s case mirrors the government as a man trapped in a hole but who, instead of looking for a way out, keeps digging deeper.” In July 2025, Obi had told Channels Television’s Sunday Politics that the continuous detention of Nnamdi Kanu “does not make sense” . Asked whether he would advocate for a political solution, Obi responded: “For every one of them, I mean, why is he still being held? It does not make sense to me.”

Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of IPOB, has remained in the custody of the Department of State Services since his controversial rendition from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021. In November 2025, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja convicted him on seven terrorism-related charges and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Kanu has since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal challenging both his conviction and sentence. According to his legal consultant, Alloy Ejimakor, the appeal process is already “live,” with multiple stages involved. Kanu has provided 22 grounds for his appeal, and the Court of Appeal has not yet fixed a date for hearing the matter. In a significant development, IPOB claimed in June 2026 that the Federal Government’s cross-appeal against Kanu’s sentencing amounts to an admission that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to impose life sentences. IPOB spokesperson Emma Powerful stated that the government’s filing declared that “the trial court acted without jurisdiction when it imposed life imprisonment on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6.” IPOB argued that if the court lacked jurisdiction at the sentencing phase, “the entire sentencing exercise is a nullity ab initio.”

READ ALSO:

International pressure continues to mount on the Nigerian government over Kanu’s conviction. A group of international legal experts under the banner of Pan African Forum Ltd & Associates, based in London, has issued a legal notice warning Nigeria that it would commence legal action in a UK Court if the government does not immediately and unconditionally release Kanu. The group bases its demand on Opinion No. 25/2022 issued on July 20, 2022, by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which found that Kanu’s arrest and extraordinary rendition were unlawful and ruled that his continued detention is arbitrary. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing serious terrorism and security-related charges and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course.

Meanwhile, the apex Igbo socio-cultural organization, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, has called on President Bola Tinubu to grant amnesty to Nnamdi Kanu on or before June 12, 2026, as part of efforts to promote national reconciliation and strengthen unity across the country. The group emphasized that Kanu’s release, preferably timed to coincide with Nigeria’s Democracy Day, would signal a bold commitment to justice, inclusion, and healing decades-old grievances in the Southeast. Ohanaeze also dismissed fears that Kanu’s release could destabilize the country, arguing that such a move would demonstrate leadership anchored on reconciliation.

Obi’s latest comments come amid his political realignment ahead of the 2027 presidential election. After the collapse of an earlier opposition coalition, Obi secured the presidential ticket of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) at a special convention in Abuja in May 2026. He was unanimously endorsed by delegates following a motion moved by Senator Victor Umeh and seconded by former Deputy Senate President Ovie Omo-Agege. Shortly after accepting the nomination, Obi announced former Kano State Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso as his running mate. In his acceptance speech, Obi pledged a technology-driven and intelligence-led security framework, promising to address both immediate threats and root causes such as poverty and unemployment. He recently dismissed claims that he was avoiding former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, stating: “There are very few human beings who are as close as I am to Atiku. So I can’t be running from him.”

As the 2027 election approaches, Obi’s campaign continues to gain momentum, particularly among young Nigerians and diaspora communities. His message of inclusive governance, dialogue over coercion, and political solutions to national crises resonates with voters frustrated by the status quo. His pledge to release Nnamdi Kanu and engage all agitators in dialogue represents a sharp departure from the current administration’s security approach. Whether this stance will translate into electoral success remains to be seen, but it has undoubtedly positioned Obi as a candidate willing to take bold, unconventional positions on Nigeria’s most contentious issues. The Nigerian government has consistently maintained that Kanu is facing serious terrorism and security-related charges and that due judicial process must be allowed to run its course. However, with international pressure mounting, an active appeal process, and major political figures like Obi calling for Kanu’s release, the case continues to be a defining issue in Nigeria’s political landscape.

Obi Promises to Release Nnamdi Kanu if Elected, Says ‘He Has Done Nothing Wrong’

Loading

Continue Reading

News

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Published

on

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodimma, has approved a N300 million financial intervention for Imo indigenes studying at the Nigerian Law School and citizens of the state recently returned from South Africa.

The intervention is designed to provide relief to beneficiaries facing economic hardship, rising living costs, and reintegration challenges.

According to the Imo State Commissioner for Information, Public Orientation and Strategy, Hon. Declan Emelumba, the package will benefit two categories of people: law students and South African returnees.

Under the arrangement, 250 Imo indigenes who returned from South Africa will receive N1 million each as a reintegration fund to help them resettle and rebuild their lives after being forced to return to Nigeria.

In addition, 100 Imo students at the Nigerian Law School will receive N500,000 each to help cushion the impact of inflation and rising cost of living while pursuing their legal education.

READ ALSO:

Emelumba explained that the governor was moved to approve the intervention following appeals from the law students and concerns over the difficult circumstances facing the returnees.

“The law students made a passionate appeal to His Excellency to support them to cushion the global inflation as regards cost of living. As a caring father, he responded promptly,” he said.

He added that the support for the returnees was driven by empathy, noting that many of them went through difficult experiences that forced them to return to Nigeria.

“The governor felt that the traumatised returnees needed a helping hand from government. Hence, he approved what can be described as a re-integration fund to enable them settle down with minimal discomfort,” Emelumba stated.

The commissioner further noted that the initiative aligns with the administration’s Shared Prosperity Agenda, which focuses not only on infrastructure development but also on human capital development and social welfare.

He also recalled that this is not the first time the state government has supported law students, stating that many of them are already beneficiaries of government scholarship programmes and periodic financial assistance.

The latest intervention has been described as part of ongoing efforts by the Uzodimma administration to ease economic pressure on students and vulnerable citizens, especially in the face of national inflation and unemployment challenges.

Stakeholders say the initiative could help provide temporary relief to beneficiaries as they continue their education or reintegrate into society after returning from abroad.

Uzodimma Approves N300m Support for Imo Law Students, South African Returnees

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending