metro
Rivers: Senate to decide on emergency rule today, Atiku, Bode George kick
The Senate will today take a position on the state of emergency declared in Rivers State.
This was disclosed by a senator who spoke to the Sun on condition of anonymity.
The National Assembly legislates for states under emergency rule. It has the power to approve the president’s declaration of a state of emergency in any part of the country, as outlined in Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution as amended.
“I don’t want to speak on the matter because we have agreed to deliberate on it tomorrow in plenary. We will take a decision in plenary tomorrow,” he said.
All attempts to get a reaction to the development in Rivers State from spokesman of the Senate, Yemi Adaramodu, failed as he did not respond to text message, nor return calls to his line.
But former vice president, Atiku Abubakar, former deputy national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Bode George and the Rivers Peace Initiative (RPI) have criticised the action.
Atiku, in a statement he personally signed, alleged that Tinubu had been a “partisan actor” in the political crisis, saying the declaration of emergency rule was in bad faith.
According to him, President Tinubu cannot escape responsibility for the chaos in Rivers State, which his administration either allegedly enabled or failed to avert.
The statement read: “The declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State reeks of political manipulation and outright bad faith. Anyone paying attention to the unfolding crisis knows that Bola Tinubu has been a vested partisan actor in the political turmoil engulfing Rivers. His blatant refusal — or calculated negligence — in preventing this escalation is nothing short of disgraceful.
READ ALSO:
- Fubara’s whereabouts unknown after FG imposed emergency rule on Rivers State
- Jandor is a congenital liar, he taught us big lesson in PDP – Bode George
- Suspected kidnapper arrested with N3.6m ransom in Ondo
“Beyond the political scheming in Rivers, the brazen security breaches that led to the condemnable destruction of national infrastructure in the state land squarely on the President’s desk.
“Tinubu cannot evade responsibility for the chaos his administration has either enabled or failed to prevent.
“It is an unforgivable failure that under Tinubu’s watch, the Niger Delta has been thrown back into an era of violent unrest and instability — undoing the hard-won peace secured by the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. Years of progress have been recklessly erased in pursuit of selfish political calculations.
“If federal infrastructure in Rivers has been compromised, the President bears full responsibility. Punishing the people of Rivers State just to serve the political gamesmanship between the governor and Tinubu’s enablers in the federal government is nothing less than an assault on democracy and must be condemned in the strongest terms.”
In his reaction, George said Tinubu’s action showed total disrespect for constituted authority.
He said: “This is absolute armageddon. Total disrespect for constituted authority. The Constitution has been viciously violated. We can’t keep quiet. This is recklessness of the highest order. What did Fubara do? As the Commander-in-Chief, you gave Wike soldiers and security agents to try to destabilise Rivers State. The governor does not have powers over any security agency. Like a gentleman that he is, he kept his cool. Nobody has told me what the governor did to warrant this dictatorial emergency rule.
READ ALSO:
- Pipeline explosion hits Bayelsa amid Rivers state emergency declaration
- 35-year-old man arrested for sexually assaulting five-year-old
- State of Emergency: Soldiers take over Rivers Government House
“What type of democracy is this in 2025? This is how it started in 1962 and 1983. This is a dress rehearsal of what Tinubu wants to do in 2027. APC wants to get all states through unconstitutional means. This state of emergency is absolute balderdash. Did he get the approval of the National Assembly before his broadcast? What happened in Rivers before today was the hand of Esau and the voice of Jacob.
Why didn’t he declare a state of emergency in Lagos when the lawmakers were fighting? Why? Why did he invite Diete-Spiff and Niger Delta leaders last week when he knew where he was going? Is Tinubu now becoming a civilian dictator?”
Meanwhile, the Rivers Peace Initiative (RPI) said declaration forced by the deep political impasse that has gripped the state for over 16 months marked a tragic and critical moment in the history of the state.
Convener, Rivers Peace Initiative, Obinna Ebogidi, expressed this in a statement shortly after the president’s declaration.
“It is impossible to ignore the series of events that have led to this point— events that speak to the failure of leadership, both from the executive and the legislature.
“What should have been a constructive dialogue between political leaders has instead been a prolonged battle of egos and selfish ambitions.
“The people of Rivers State have been caught in the crossfire, deprived of the leadership and progress they so rightfully deserve. As a result, the state has stagnated, and the vision of peace, security, and development has all but disappeared from view.”
The convener of RRI further accused the state political leaders of being responsible for the declaration of a state of emergency by the president.
“The Rivers Peace Initiative acknowledges the difficult position the President has found himself in. The state of emergency, while a constitutional measure, is a hasty decision—one that could have been avoided had our leaders taken greater responsibility and prioritised the well-being of Rivers people over personal interests.
READ ALSO:
- Pipeline explosion hits Bayelsa amid Rivers state emergency declaration
- 35-year-old man arrested for sexually assaulting five-year-old
- State of Emergency: Soldiers take over Rivers Government House
“This is not a time to celebrate political triumphs or lament political failures. It is a time to reflect deeply on the consequences of our actions, for both the actors involved and for the future of Rivers State.
“Rivers State now stands at a critical juncture. The inability of our elected officials to reach a peaceful resolution has created a vacuum of governance, which has been exploited by outsiders and destructive forces, further complicating the state’s challenges. The implications of such external interference cannot be understated, as it undermines the progress we have worked so hard to achieve as a state and as a people.
According to him, the declaration of a state of emergency might have been necessary, but it is not a perfect solution, and it must not be seen as an end in itself.
“This measure must be a temporary and transformative intervention. We must use this moment to reflect on the deeper causes of our crisis, and to ensure that, once this period of emergency concludes, the focus will shift back to a fully functional democracy that truly reflects the wishes of the Rivers people.
“We call on all stakeholders—political leaders, civil society groups, religious organizations, and citizens of Rivers State—to come together in the spirit of unity, healing, and renewal.
“This is not a time for division, but for collective action and reconciliation. The peace and progress of Rivers State must remain the guiding principles as we navigate this period of uncertainty.
“The Rivers Peace Initiative remains committed to fostering dialogue, and we will continue to advocate for the restoration of peace, security, and the rule of law in Rivers State.
“We urge all parties involved to prioritize the future of Rivers State over political gamesmanship and to work together to rebuild trust, governance, and a sense of purpose for the people.
“Let this state of emergency be a catalyst for real change, a reminder that the collective good should always come before individual interests. We remain hopeful that, in time, Rivers State will rise above this crisis, and that peace, unity, and prosperity will prevail.”
Rivers: Senate to decide on emergency rule today, Atiku, Bode George kick
![]()
metro
Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military’s Position on Alleged Hostel Assault
Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military’s Position on Alleged Hostel Assault
OSOGBO – The management of Osun State University (UNIOSUN) has publicly rejected the position of the Depot Nigerian Army, Osogbo, regarding allegations of sexual assault involving military personnel and students, insisting that survivors of sexual violence should never be compelled to report directly to institutions linked to alleged perpetrators .
The disagreement stems from allegations that military recruits from the Nigerian Army Depot in Osogbo invaded private student hostels on June 29, assaulting students, sexually harassing female students, and carting away mobile phones and other valuables . The Vice Chancellor, Professor Odunayo Clement Adebooye, described the incident as one of the “darkest moments” in the institution’s recent history and referred to the perpetrators as “misfits” unfit to serve in the Nigerian Army . The university’s response follows an earlier statement by the Depot Nigerian Army, which said it had not received any formal complaint or credible evidence to substantiate rape allegations linked to recently passed-out personnel, even as it reaffirmed that an ongoing investigation would be thorough and transparent .
In a statement issued on Friday by the Assistant Director, Army Public Relations, Depot Nigerian Army Osogbo, Major Ibrahim Yahaya, the Army stated that the allegations had been attributed to the Vice Chancellor and amplified on social media platforms . The Army appealed to victims and witnesses of the alleged assault at the UNIOSUN hostels to provide evidence to assist its ongoing investigation into allegations of misconduct involving some recently passed-out military personnel . The Army stated that the Board of Inquiry, which was formed earlier to probe charges against its personnel, is still in operation and would “leave no stone unturned” . It assured that any personnel found culpable would be dealt with in accordance with the Armed Forces Act and other extant laws . The military also disclosed that some personnel involved have been apprehended and are undergoing disciplinary procedures .
READ ALSO:
- Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community
- MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution
- Islamic Scholar Cautions Students Against Wasteful ‘Signing-Out’ Shirt Tradition
In a statement issued on Friday by the university’s Public Relations Officer, Ademola Adesoji, the institution welcomed the Army’s decision to establish a Board of Inquiry but expressed concerns about the expectation that alleged victims should report directly to the same institution whose personnel are under investigation . According to the university, such an approach ignores the trauma, fear, intimidation, and psychological barriers that frequently prevent survivors of sexual violence from reporting directly to organisations affiliated with the alleged offenders . The institution also rejected any suggestion that it should reveal the identities of affected students or compel them to appear before military authorities . “Osun State University owes every student a duty of care, confidentiality and protection. The University will not compromise the privacy, dignity or safety of any student by disclosing identities without their informed consent or in contravention of applicable laws,” the statement said .
UNIOSUN stressed that the welfare and safety of its students remain its top priority, adding that the Vice-Chancellor would continue to support students who report harassment, assault, or abuse . According to the statement, “The Vice-Chancellor’s earlier comments were not intended to prejudge the outcome of any investigation or sensationalise the matter but were made in fulfilment of the University’s responsibility to address concerns affecting the safety and well-being of its students” . The university maintained that investigations into sexual assault charges should be victim-centred, independent, transparent, and capable of inspiring public trust . “The University believes that survivors of sexual violence should never be placed in circumstances where they may reasonably fear intimidation or victimisation by being required to report directly to those connected with the subject of an investigation,” the statement added .
UNIOSUN also disagreed with the Depot Nigerian Army’s characterisation of the Vice-Chancellor’s comments as unconfirmed or potentially misleading, insisting that the remarks were made responsibly, in good faith, and in accordance with the institution’s statutory and moral obligation to protect its students . The university further announced that it had instructed its legal advisers to commence appropriate legal proceedings to safeguard the integrity of the institution, the reputation of the Vice-Chancellor and the interests of its students . “The appropriate judicial process provides the proper forum for resolving the issues arising from this unfortunate development,” the statement said .
Army-UNIOSUN Clash: University Faults Military’s Position on Alleged Hostel Assault
![]()
metro
Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community
Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community
NASARAWA – Suspected gunmen have killed a retired Nigerian Army officer and abducted a woman during a midnight attack on a residential community in Nasarawa State bordering the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) , heightening security concerns along the Abuja outskirts .
The attack occurred at approximately 12:45 am on Friday at Plot 038, PGC Community, located along the Nasarawa-FCT border near Jikwoyi . Police sources confirmed that the assailants invaded the residence of Silas Orite, 46, and forcibly abducted his wife, Bukola Oluwatoyin Silas, 40, taking her to an unknown destination . During the attack, the Community Chief Security Officer, Master Warrant Officer Reuben Yelwa, 61, a retired Nigerian Army personnel, responded in an attempt to assist the family but was shot dead by the assailants . The retired officer’s intervention came as the attackers were carrying out the raid.
READ ALSO:
- MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution
- Islamic Scholar Cautions Students Against Wasteful ‘Signing-Out’ Shirt Tradition
- South Africa Rejects Nigeria’s Compensation Request Over Xenophobic Attacks
Police officers visited the scene after the attack, documented evidence, and commenced investigations into the incident . According to security sources, security operatives have intensified efforts to rescue the abducted woman unharmed and track down those responsible for the attack . Area domination operations have been reinforced in and around the community to prevent further criminal activities, while patrols have been stepped up along the FCT-Nasarawa border . Authorities have called on residents to remain vigilant and cooperate with security agencies.
The incident adds to growing concerns over insecurity in communities located along the Nasarawa-FCT border, where residents have repeatedly called for stronger security measures to curb kidnappings and violent crimes . The area has experienced increasing criminal activities, with kidnappers and bandits exploiting the porous boundaries between the FCT and Nasarawa State to evade security forces . This latest attack follows a pattern of violence in border communities, where criminal elements have targeted residents for abduction and robbery . In recent months, police have arrested several armed robbery suspects operating between Jikwoyi and Nasarawa State, highlighting the security challenges facing the region . The police have urged residents to report suspicious persons or activities through the command’s emergency lines as investigations continue.
Gunmen Kill Retired Army Officer, Abduct Woman in Nasarawa Community
![]()
metro
MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution
MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution
The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), Oyo State Chapter, has filed a notice of appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal on the International School, University of Ibadan (ISI) hijab case and urged the school management not to enforce its directive banning the use of hijab pending the determination of its application for a stay of execution.
The organisation disclosed this in a statement issued on Friday by its General Secretary, Mallam Ibrahim Agunbiade, following a notice reportedly issued by the management of ISI directing that, with effect from Monday, July 6, 2026, female students would no longer be permitted to wear the hijab with the school uniform.
According to MURIC, the directive was based on the judgment delivered earlier on Friday by the Court of Appeal, Ibadan, which overturned the May 22, 2024, ruling of the Oyo State High Court that had recognised the right of 11 Muslim female students to wear the hijab as part of their school uniform.
The group, however, said it had immediately commenced the appellate process by filing and serving a Notice of Appeal, alongside a Motion for Stay of Execution/Injunction Pending Appeal before the appropriate court.
MURIC argued that the filing of the appeal means the legal dispute has not been concluded and that the rights of the affected Muslim students remain subject to further judicial determination.
READ ALSO:
- Islamic Scholar Cautions Students Against Wasteful ‘Signing-Out’ Shirt Tradition
- South Africa Rejects Nigeria’s Compensation Request Over Xenophobic Attacks
- 13 Women, 12 Men Arrested as Kebbi Hisbah Cracks Down on Immoral Activities in Hotel
“The filing and service of these processes signify that the legal contest is far from concluded,” the organisation said.
It maintained that implementing the Court of Appeal judgment before the pending application for a stay of execution is determined would be inappropriate and could prejudice the judicial process.
The group therefore called on the management of the International School, University of Ibadan, to exercise restraint and refrain from enforcing the directive pending the court’s decision on its application.
According to MURIC, taking steps to implement the judgment at this stage could render the pending application ineffective and heighten tensions within the school community.
The organisation reiterated its commitment to resolving the dispute through lawful means, stressing that the protection of fundamental rights and peaceful coexistence can only be guaranteed through respect for due process and judicial proceedings.
MURIC also appealed to Muslim parents, guardians, students and members of the Muslim community to remain calm, peaceful and law-abiding while the legal process continues.
It urged stakeholders to avoid any action capable of disrupting public peace, expressing confidence that the courts would ultimately determine the matter in accordance with the Constitution and the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The organisation reaffirmed its commitment to pursuing all available legal remedies in defence of what it described as the constitutional rights of Muslim students.
The latest development comes hours after the Court of Appeal, in a split decision, held that ISI is a private school because it does not receive direct government subventions and ruled that the Supreme Court’s earlier judgment recognising the right of Muslim students to wear the hijab applies only to publicly funded schools.
The appellate court also held that the affected students voluntarily accepted the school’s dress code upon admission. However, it upheld the finding that confining the students to the school library over their use of the hijab violated their rights, although it reduced the damages awarded by the High Court.
The case is expected to proceed to the Supreme Court, where the final determination on the dispute over the use of the hijab at ISI will be made.
MURIC Appeals ISI Hijab Judgment, Seeks Stay of Execution
![]()
-
metro2 days agoFG Clears N39.6bn Pension Arrears for Former NITEL, PHCN, Bank Workers
-
Entertainment3 days agoBaba Ijesha Receives Chieftaincy Title, Brand-New Car from Ooni of Ife
-
Education2 days agoAppeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code
-
metro2 days agoInside the Fake Agency Scandal: Staff Detail How Adeyemi’s ‘Presidential Council’ Operated Without Work or Direction
-
Education2 days agoAppeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday
-
metro2 days agoISI Muslim Parents Reject Appeal Court Verdict, Head to Supreme Court Over Hijab Ban
-
metro1 day agoIslamic Scholar Cautions Students Against Wasteful ‘Signing-Out’ Shirt Tradition
-
metro3 days agoDocuments Expose How Disputed Presidential Council Secured Approval to Recruit 300 Staff
