NANS to Tinubu: Don’t Sack Gbajabiamila Over Unproven PFIPC Allegations

The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) has called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu not to remove his Chief of Staff, Femi Gbajabiamila, over allegations arising from the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), insisting that no public official should be sanctioned before the completion of a credible and impartial investigation.

In a statement issued on Friday in Abuja, NANS President, Comrade Akinteye Babatunde Afeez, described calls for Gbajabiamila’s dismissal as premature, urging Nigerians to uphold the constitutional principles of due process, fair hearing, and the presumption of innocence.

The student body said it had closely followed recent developments involving Gbajabiamila and Adeniyi Adeyemi, who claims to be the Director-General of the PFIPC, stressing that while corruption allegations must always be taken seriously, they should be investigated through lawful institutions rather than adjudicated in the court of public opinion.

According to NANS, every Nigerian is entitled to the constitutional protection that presumes an accused person innocent until proven guilty by a competent court of law.

READ ALSO:

• FG Clears N39.6bn Pension Arrears for Former NITEL, PHCN, Bank Workers
• Appeal Court Overturns Hijab Verdict, Declares UI International School Can Enforce Dress Code
• Appeal Court Verdict: UI International School to Enforce Hijab Ban from Monday

“We respectfully urge President Bola Ahmed Tinubu not to allow a loyal and dedicated public servant to be sacrificed on the altar of unsubstantiated accusations before the truth is established,” the association stated.

The appeal comes amid growing public debate over the PFIPC, an organisation that the Presidency has publicly stated is not a recognised agency under the Tinubu administration.

Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga recently maintained that the Federal Government does not recognise the PFIPC and disclosed that the Nigeria Police Force had filed an eight-count criminal charge against Adeyemi over allegations including forgery, impersonation, and related offences.

Despite the Presidency’s position, the controversy intensified after documents surfaced showing that the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation approved a waiver in August 2025 for the recruitment of 300 personnel into the PFIPC despite an existing embargo on public service recruitment. The council was also reportedly allocated about N1.3 billion in the 2026 Appropriation Act, prompting renewed scrutiny over its legal status and operations.

Adeyemi has consistently rejected the Presidency’s position, insisting that the PFIPC is a legitimate government initiative. He has also publicly alleged that the dispute stemmed from his refusal to surrender a portion of the council’s take-off grant and claimed he paid money to secure his appointment. Those allegations have not been proven in court, and no judicial findings have been made against the Chief of Staff.

Against this backdrop, NANS urged Nigerians to avoid reaching conclusions before ongoing investigations and court proceedings are concluded.

Afeez said the association supports the fight against corruption but believes it must always be conducted within the framework of justice, equity, fairness, and the rule of law.

He called on the appropriate law enforcement and investigative agencies to conduct a transparent, independent, and comprehensive investigation into all claims surrounding the controversy.

According to him, every allegation, supporting document, and the conduct of all parties involved should be objectively scrutinised before any administrative or political action is taken.

The student body also defended Gbajabiamila’s record in public service, describing the former Speaker of the House of Representatives as a leader who has consistently demonstrated commitment to democratic governance, education, and youth development.

NANS recalled his role during the 2022 Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) strike, noting that he facilitated dialogue between the Federal Government and the union at a critical period when public universities were shut down for several months.

The association argued that Gbajabiamila had maintained a longstanding relationship with Nigerian students through legislative interventions and policy engagements aimed at improving the education sector.

While reaffirming its support for accountability, transparency, and responsible governance, NANS insisted that allegations alone should never replace established judicial processes.

The association warned against what it described as trial by media, political witch-hunts, and attempts to weaken public institutions through claims that have not been subjected to judicial scrutiny.

It further noted that concerns had also been raised regarding Adeyemi’s previous dealings with some organisations, arguing that his allegations against the Chief of Staff should not be accepted as established facts until investigations and court proceedings are concluded.

NANS maintained that respecting the principles of due process is essential to preserving public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic institutions and ensuring that justice is administered fairly.

As the controversy continues to unfold, the association urged all stakeholders to allow law enforcement agencies and the courts to determine the facts, rather than relying on speculation or public pressure.

NANS to Tinubu: Don’t Sack Gbajabiamila Over Unproven PFIPC Allegations

Emefiele Trial: Witness Tells Court $6.23m CBN Election Observer Fund Was ‘Pure Theft’

The trial of former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Godwin Emefiele, took a dramatic turn on Thursday as a prosecution witness told the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Abuja that the controversial release of $6.23 million for a purported foreign election observer mission was fraudulent and amounted to “pure theft.”

The allegation was made by the 14th prosecution witness, Commissioner of Police Okpoziakpo Eloho of the Nigeria Police Force Fraud Unit, during proceedings before Justice Hamza Muazu in the ongoing case filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against the former CBN governor.

According to the EFCC, the witness testified that the entire $6.23 million was released based on Emefiele’s approval without sufficient documentation to justify the expenditure.

“The entire money was released. We saw the approval of the governor,” Eloho told the court.

He further alleged that investigators found no legitimate basis for the transaction.

“It was pure theft. It was stolen, otherwise obtained under false pretence,” the police commissioner testified.

While identifying Exhibit PD5, which purportedly contained a presidential directive authorising a foreign election observer mission, the witness insisted that investigators concluded the document was fraudulent.

“Our finding with regards to PD5 is that it is all fraud,” he said.

The prosecution witness also disclosed that investigators recovered part of the allegedly diverted funds.

Although he could not recall the exact amount, Eloho said approximately $800,000 had been recovered during the course of the investigation.

READ ALSO:

• Documents Expose How Disputed Presidential Council Secured Approval to Recruit 300 Staff
• Tinubu Lightens Mood, Calls First Lady ‘Iya Alakara’ After Viral Akara Debate
• Trump Weighs Entry Restrictions for Pregnant Foreign Visitors After Supreme Court Ruling

“I can’t remember the figure but it was about Eight Hundred Thousand United States Dollars,” he told the court.

During cross-examination by defence counsel, Matthew Burkaa (SAN), the witness acknowledged that Emefiele, as the CBN governor at the time, had authority over the bank’s funds.

However, he maintained that the disbursement did not comply with the Central Bank’s established approval procedures.

According to Eloho, the approval moved directly from the governor to the Director of Banking Services without following the normal administrative chain through a deputy governor.

“This document is from the governor to the Director Banking Services. Protocol was not followed. I presume that the procedure would have been for the document to follow through the deputy governor,” he testified.

The witness also identified Jibril Abubakar as the individual who allegedly received the $6.23 million.

Presenting Exhibit PD4, Eloho told the court that although Abubakar presented a staff identity card linked to the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF), investigators established that the identification number did not belong to him.

“The staff ID card number does not belong to him. He is not a staff of the SGF. That is what the investigation revealed,” the witness said.

Eloho further informed the court that investigators interviewed former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Boss Mustapha, during the investigation.

According to him, although one of the documents tendered by the prosecution purportedly originated from the SGF’s office, Mustapha denied that the signature appearing on the document belonged to him.

The EFCC alleges that the $6.23 million was released in February 2023 for the payment of foreign election observers ahead of Nigeria’s 2023 general election based on forged presidential approval.

The anti-graft agency is prosecuting Emefiele on charges bordering on criminal breach of trust, forgery, conspiracy, and obtaining by false pretence, arguing that the election observer mission never existed and that the documents used to obtain the funds were fabricated.

Emefiele has pleaded not guilty to all the charges and continues to deny any wrongdoing.

The former CBN governor is also facing separate criminal cases before the Federal High Court and the FCT High Court involving allegations of procurement fraud, abuse of office, unlawful possession of firearms and corruption. He has equally denied those allegations.

Following Thursday’s proceedings, Justice Hamza Muazu adjourned the matter until Friday, July 3, 2026, for the continuation of the trial.

The case remains one of Nigeria’s most closely watched corruption trials, with the prosecution seeking to establish that the controversial $6.23 million CBN disbursement was fraudulently authorised, while the defence maintains that Emefiele acted within the powers vested in him as governor of the apex bank.

Emefiele Trial: Witness Tells Court $6.23m CBN Election Observer Fund Was ‘Pure Theft’

Documents Expose How Disputed Presidential Council Secured Approval to Recruit 300 Staff

Fresh documents have revealed that the Federal Government (FG) approved the recruitment of 300 personnel for the controversial Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC) in August 2025, despite the Presidency later declaring that the council was not officially recognised under President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

The revelation has raised fresh concerns over the council’s legal status, the recruitment process, budgetary allocations and the level of official approval it received before being publicly disowned by the Presidency.

A letter dated August 7, 2025, issued by the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (OHCSF), granted the PFIPC a waiver to recruit staff despite the Federal Government’s existing embargo on general recruitment into the federal civil service.

The approval, signed by the Director of Organisation Design and Development, Mimi Abu, was also copied to the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (OSGF) and stated that the waiver was based on the council’s 2025 Approved Establishment.

Under the approval, the council received permission to recruit 10 directors on Grade Level (GL) 17, 20 assistant directors on GL15 and 44 administrative officers across different grade levels.

The waiver also covered the recruitment of 45 planning officers, 32 commercial officers, 22 investment promotion officers, 26 accountants, 13 procurement officers, 12 information officers, 11 programme analysts, 10 legal officers, 10 motor drivers/mechanics, nine executive officers (Accounts), nine executive officers (General Duties), seven data processing assistants, six statisticians, six technical officers in engineering disciplines, five data processing officers and three confidential secretaries.

READ ALSO:

• Tinubu Lightens Mood, Calls First Lady ‘Iya Alakara’ After Viral Akara Debate
• Trump Weighs Entry Restrictions for Pregnant Foreign Visitors After Supreme Court Ruling
• Ogun 2027: Group Rejects Yayi’s Governorship Bid, Endorses Adebutu

In the approval letter, the Head of Service’s office directed the council to obtain clearance from the Budget Office of the Federation before commencing recruitment, comply with the Federal Character Principle and reserve five per cent of available positions for persons living with disabilities.

The letter also warned the council not to exceed the approved number of recruits and instructed that officials of the Head of Service’s office should supervise the recruitment exercise to ensure compliance with the waiver.

Just one day after receiving the approval, PFIPC Director-General Adeniyi Adeyemi publicly thanked President Tinubu in a social media post, claiming the administration had approved the recruitment.

“Mr President, we are growing because you believe in us,” Adeyemi wrote.

He also announced plans to establish PFIPC offices in all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), alongside 127 international offices, which he said would promote Nigerian businesses and attract foreign direct investment.

However, the council’s activities came under intense scrutiny on June 11, 2026, when Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, issued an official statement distancing the Presidency from the PFIPC.

Gbajabiamila stated that the council was not recognised by the Federal Government and had no legal authority to operate on behalf of President Tinubu’s administration.

The Presidency’s disclaimer triggered widespread questions about how the council secured official recruitment approval, operated from a government office and appeared in the federal budget despite its disputed status.

The controversy deepened further after reports indicated that the PFIPC was allocated approximately ₦1.3 billion in the 2026 Appropriation Act, including ₦802.98 million for personnel costs, ₦200 million for overhead expenditure and ₦300 million for capital projects.

Reports also showed that Adeyemi had been operating from an office within the Federal Secretariat in Abuja, where he hosted diplomats, government officials and foreign investors while organising several official engagements under the council’s name.

Meanwhile, presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga disclosed that the Nigeria Police Force has filed an eight-count criminal charge against Adeyemi over allegations including impersonation, forgery and related offences.

Reacting to the Presidency’s position, Adeyemi rejected claims that the PFIPC lacked official recognition and called on President Tinubu to establish an independent panel to investigate the dispute.

He further alleged that the controversy began after he refused to surrender 48 per cent of the council’s take-off grant to unnamed individuals.

Adeyemi also claimed he paid ₦400 million to secure his appointment as Director-General and still had an outstanding balance of ₦200 million.

The Presidency has not publicly responded to those allegations, which remain unverified.

The emergence of the recruitment approval documents has intensified calls for a thorough investigation into the PFIPC, particularly regarding its legal status, recruitment process, budgetary allocation and the circumstances under which it obtained official approvals before later being disowned by the Presidency.

The matter is expected to remain under public and legal scrutiny as criminal proceedings against Adeyemi continue and lawmakers sustain oversight of federal agencies and public expenditure.

Documents Expose How Disputed Presidential Council Secured Approval to Recruit 300 Staff