Sack Dogara for defecting to APC, PDP tells court - Newstrends
Connect with us

Sports

Sack Dogara for defecting to APC, PDP tells court

Published

on

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to sack a former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Hon. Yakubu Dogara, for defecting to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

Dogara, representing Dass, Tafawa Balewa and Bogoro Federal Constituency of Bauchi State in the House, defected from the APC to the PDP before the last general election and won a re-election to the House on the platform of the PDP.

Dogara, on July 24, returned to the APC after submitting a resignation letter to the PDP Chairman of the Bogoro ‘C’ Ward, in Bauchi State, according to court documents.

The PDP and its Bauchi State Chairman, Mr Hamza Akuyam, listed as plaintiffs in the FHC/ABJ/CS/1060/2020 suit, are contending among others, that by virtue of Section 68(1)(g) of the constitution, Dogara, by defecting from the party that sponsored him to the National Assembly before the expiration of his tenure, ought to vacate the seat as he is no longer qualified to partake in the activities of the House.

Those listed as defendants in the suit filed for the plaintiffs by their lawyer, Mr Jibrin S. Jibrin, are Dogara, the Speaker of House of Representatives, the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the APC.

Akuyam stated in a supporting affidavit that there was no crisis or division in the PDP, being the political platform under which the election of the first defendant (Dogara) as a serving member of the National Assembly was sponsored and from which he has defected to the fifth defendant (APC) before the expiration of the period for which he was elected.

He also stated that there were no mergers involving the PDP from which Dogara defected.

Akuyam added that having defected from the PDP before the expiration of the period for which he was elected, Dogara “has lost his seat/office as a member of the House of Representatives and is no longer entitled to participate in the legislative proceedings and other business of the National Assembly and/or entitled to salaries and allowances as a member of the National Assembly.”

 

They want the court to direct Dogara to vacate his seat in the National Assembly and to refund all the salaries, allowances and all emoluments collected from the date of his defection from the PDP.

The suit, now before Justice Okon Abang, was not heard on December 7 when it was listed for hearing but rescheduled for March 5, 2021.

Loading

Sports

Liverpool Survive Chelsea Penalty Drama to Reach Carabao Cup Quarter-Finals

Published

on

Liverpool Survive Chelsea Penalty Drama to Reach Carabao Cup Quarter-Finals
Liverpool Survive Chelsea Penalty Drama to Reach Carabao Cup Quarter-Finals

Liverpool have booked their place in the Carabao Cup quarter-finals after defeating Chelsea 6-5 on penalties following a tense 1-1 draw at Anfield.

The encounter on Wednesday saw both teams battle for control, with the contest eventually decided by a penalty shootout that ended Chelsea’s hopes of progressing in the competition.

Chelsea moved ahead through a penalty converted by Morgan Rogers after Ryan Gravenberch fouled Moisés Caicedo. Liverpool responded with a spot-kick of their own, converted by Cody Gakpo after Wesley Fofana handled the ball inside the penalty area.

The two sides continued to search for a winning goal, but neither could find a breakthrough before the end of regulation time. Goalkeepers Giorgi Mamardashvili and Mike Penders made important saves to keep their teams in contention.

READ ALSO:

The tie consequently went to penalties, where Liverpool held their nerve to secure a 6-5 victory. Joe Gomez converted the decisive kick for the hosts, while Fofana sent his effort over the crossbar, sealing Chelsea’s elimination.

The result sent Liverpool into the last eight of the Carabao Cup, keeping their hopes of winning the domestic knockout competition alive.

Liverpool will now turn their attention to the quarter-finals, where they are scheduled to face Bournemouth in the week commencing December 14, 2026.

The dramatic victory underlined the fine margins in knockout football, as Liverpool advanced after a closely contested encounter that could not be settled during normal time.

 

Liverpool Survive Chelsea Penalty Drama to Reach Carabao Cup Quarter-Finals

Loading

Continue Reading

Sports

Outrage as Police Respond to Dispute Involving 3-Year-Old Soccer Prodigy Accused of Outshining Older Players

Published

on

US Police Release Bodycam Footage After Dispute Over Three-Year-Old Soccer Prodigy

Outrage as Police Respond to Dispute Involving 3-Year-Old Soccer Prodigy Accused of Outshining Older Players

A three-year-old boy’s remarkable football skills have sparked a social media storm in Florida, United States, after police officers responded to a dispute between his family and officials of a youth soccer league.

The incident involving the young player, Nevada Pierre, reportedly occurred at a youth soccer programme in Winter Park, near Orlando, and has generated widespread debate over how talented children should be treated in grassroots sports.

Videos shared by the boy’s family on social media showed Nevada dribbling past older children, controlling the ball confidently and scoring goals during a match against players reportedly around five years old.

The footage attracted significant attention after his parents alleged that he was being excluded from the league because of his outstanding performance.

However, the controversy took a different turn when police officers arrived at the playing field following a complaint by a league official about an alleged disturbance involving the child’s parents.

The incident subsequently went viral, with many social media users questioning why police had been called during a dispute involving a three-year-old footballer.

Nevada’s parents maintained that their son was being unfairly treated because of his ability to play football at a level they considered advanced for his age.

His mother, Martasia Griffin, disputed the suggestion that her family’s conduct was responsible for the incident, insisting that the disagreement centred on the treatment of her son.

In footage of the confrontation, Griffin was heard telling an officer that the league was effectively removing her son because he was good at football.

READ ALSO:

She questioned why a child who had been enrolled to play the game would be prevented from participating because of his performance.

The family also shared footage of Nevada playing during the match, with his father heard expressing frustration that police officers had become involved in the dispute.

The videos triggered an outpouring of reactions online, with some users expressing sympathy for the youngster and questioning whether his talent had contributed to the controversy.

Others called for a more balanced assessment of the incident, particularly because the child was playing alongside older children and was still at a very early stage of development.

However, the league official involved in the incident offered a different explanation to responding officers.

According to body-camera footage reported by US media, the official acknowledged that Nevada was exceptionally good at football but alleged that the youngster sometimes pushed other children while competing for the ball.

He told officers that the child was more advanced than the other players and scored frequently, but maintained that concerns about physical conduct during play had to be addressed.

The official also alleged that Nevada’s parents had become confrontational over decisions concerning their son’s playing time and the coach’s efforts to rotate players so that other children could participate.

He reportedly told officers that tensions had arisen during an earlier match after Nevada was substituted to give other children playing time.

The league official said he wanted the family to leave the programme and offered to refund their registration fees.

The parents disputed the official’s account and maintained that their son was being unfairly singled out because of his football ability.

The competing accounts have become central to the controversy, with neither side’s allegations establishing, on their own, the full circumstances surrounding the disagreement.

The Winter Park Police Department subsequently issued a statement addressing claims circulating online about the incident.

According to the department, officers were contacted by a soccer league official seeking assistance over a disturbance between league personnel and the parents of a player.

Police said the league had requested that the family leave and offered to refund the registration fees.

The department explained that, after officers arrived, the league official asked them to communicate with the family because he did not want the disagreement to escalate further.

The family told the officers that the game had ended and that they were leaving, according to the police account.

The department described the parents as cooperative and said the incident was a civil matter rather than a criminal case.

It specifically rejected claims that anyone had been arrested, formally trespassed or forcibly removed from the park.

The clarification came amid widespread online commentary suggesting that the police had been called on the child because he was too talented to compete against the other players.

READ ALSO:

Although the officers responded to the scene, the police account indicated that their involvement centred on the disagreement between the league official and the child’s parents, rather than any criminal allegation against the three-year-old.

The incident has also drawn the attention of i9 Sports, the youth sports organisation associated with the programme.

In a statement reported by US media, the organisation said it was aware of concerns being raised about an incident at one of its local programmes and was taking the matter seriously.

It said it had contacted the family and begun reviewing the circumstances, including speaking with those involved.

The organisation also stressed the importance of treating every child and family respectfully, adding that it would not speculate or share unverified information while its review was ongoing.

The review is expected to help clarify the circumstances surrounding the disagreement and the decisions made about the youngster’s participation.

The controversy has generated widespread reactions on social media, with several prominent personalities expressing support for Nevada and calling for opportunities to nurture his talent.

Children’s entertainer and educator Rachel Accurso, popularly known as Ms Rachel, publicly expressed interest in having the youngster appear on her show and called on prominent sports figures to support him.

Former American football quarterback Robert Griffin III also criticised the controversy, adding to the growing online discussion about the treatment of the child.

Former United States soccer international Eddie Johnson has also offered Nevada an opportunity to develop his skills through a training programme, according to reports.

The expressions of support have raised hopes that the incident could ultimately open new opportunities for the young player rather than discourage him from pursuing the sport.

Nevertheless, the dispute has also prompted broader questions about competition, playing time, discipline and the responsibilities of adults involved in children’s sports.

Nevada’s case has reignited discussion about how youth sports programmes should accommodate children whose abilities differ significantly from those of their teammates.

While some parents may welcome a gifted child’s ability to dominate a match, coaches are also responsible for encouraging teamwork, ensuring fair participation and protecting the safety of all players.

At the same time, critics argue that children should not be discouraged from developing their abilities simply because they perform better than their peers.

The circumstances surrounding Nevada’s case remain contested, particularly over whether his playing style, his parents’ alleged conduct or a combination of factors led to the disagreement.

What is established, however, is that police responded to a dispute at the youth soccer programme, no one was arrested, and the organisation has begun reviewing the incident.

For many observers, the episode serves as a reminder that children’s sporting activities should prioritise development, fair play and enjoyment, with disagreements handled in a way that protects young players from unnecessary distress.

Outrage as Police Respond to Dispute Involving 3-Year-Old Soccer Prodigy Accused of Outshining Older Players

Loading

Continue Reading

Sports

Osimhen Brace Sinks Fenerbahce as Galatasaray Win Istanbul Derby

Published

on

Osimhen Brace Sinks Fenerbahce as Galatasaray Win Istanbul Derby
Super Eagles striker Victor Osimhen

Osimhen Brace Sinks Fenerbahce as Galatasaray Win Istanbul Derby

Super Eagles striker Victor Osimhen scored twice in the first half to inspire Galatasaray to a 2-1 victory over arch-rivals Fenerbahce in Monday’s Turkish Super Lig derby at RAMS Park in Istanbul.

The Nigerian forward struck in the 29th and 44th minutes to give the reigning champions a two-goal cushion before Fenerbahce fought back in the second half through Irfan Can Kahveci.

Osimhen opened the scoring in the 29th minute after combining with Baris Alper Yilmaz before driving into the penalty area and firing past goalkeeper Ederson.

The goal gave Galatasaray the breakthrough in a fiercely contested encounter between two of Turkish football’s biggest clubs.

The 27-year-old striker doubled the hosts’ advantage just before half-time, redirecting Davinson Sanchez’s effort into the net with a header in the 44th minute.

Galatasaray went into the break leading 2-0 after dominating much of the first half, while Fenerbahce struggled to create clear scoring opportunities.

READ ALSO:

The visitors returned with greater urgency after the interval and reduced the deficit in the 62nd minute. Kahveci produced an acrobatic overhead kick after receiving a pass from Oguz Aydin, giving Fenerbahce renewed hope of salvaging a result.

Fenerbahce pushed for an equaliser as the match approached its closing stages, but Galatasaray held firm to secure all three points.

The result strengthened Galatasaray’s position in the Turkish Super Lig title race, taking the club back to the top of the standings with 22 points from nine matches. Fenerbahce remained on 16 points, dropping to fifth place.

Osimhen’s brace further underlined his importance to Galatasaray’s attack as the Nigerian international continued to deliver in high-profile matches.

The victory also extended Galatasaray’s impressive recent record against their Istanbul rivals, giving the home side bragging rights in one of Turkish football’s most closely followed fixtures.

For Osimhen, the performance was another significant contribution to Galatasaray’s campaign, with his two first-half goals ultimately proving decisive despite Fenerbahce’s second-half response.

Osimhen Brace Sinks Fenerbahce as Galatasaray Win Istanbul Derby

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending