UN chief calls for enforcement of Gaza ceasefire  - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

UN chief calls for enforcement of Gaza ceasefire 

Published

on

Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres
United Nations Secretary-General, António Guterres

UN chief calls for enforcement of Gaza ceasefire 

NEW YORK CITY: UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Friday called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Warning that the humanitarian crisis Israel created in the territory had reached “horrific proportions,” he demanded full, safe and sustained access for deliveries of aid.

Speaking ahead of his departure to attend the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, co-hosted by the UN and Spain in Seville from June 30-July 3, Guterres said the situation in Gaza has now grown more dire than at any previous point in the long-running conflict.

“Bombs are falling — on tents, on families, on those with nowhere left to run,” he added. “People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence.”

He said the Israeli military operations launched in response to the Hamas attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, attacks he “unequivocally condemned,” have displaced families repeatedly, confining the population of Gaza to less than one-fifth of its total area. Even these shrinking safe zones remain under threat, he noted.

Guterres acknowledged the recent ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran as a sign of hope but insisted that political courage is now needed to secure a similar ceasefire in Gaza.

READ ALSO:

Referencing the limited amount of humanitarian aid that has been allowed to enter the enclave, he said: “What’s needed now is a surge; the trickle must become an ocean.”

A small shipment of medical supplies from the UN crossed the border into Gaza this week. However, it was the first in months and Guterres stressed it was far from sufficient.

“Doctors are forced to choose who gets the last vial of medicine, or the last ventilator,” he said. “Aid workers themselves are starving. This cannot be normalized.”

Israel, as the occupying power, is obligated under the rules of international law to allow and facilitate humanitarian assistance, he added.

Guterres also dismissed alternative delivery plans for aid as “dangerous schemes,” arguing that the UN already has a detailed, functional plan built on neutrality, impartiality and the trust of affected communities and donors.

“It worked during the last ceasefire, it must be allowed to work again,” he said.

In a direct appeal to governments and other international actors, Guterres urged those in positions of power to fulfill their legal responsibilities, and those with influence that could help to use it.

He called on all UN member states to uphold the UN Charter, which was reaffirmed only a day earlier during the organization’s 80th anniversary commemorations.

“The solution to this problem is ultimately political,” he said. “The only sustainable path to re-establishing hope is by paving the way to the two-state solution. Diplomacy and human dignity for all must prevail.”

UN chief calls for enforcement of Gaza ceasefire

ARAB NEWS

Loading

International

UK Health Minister Wes Streeting Resigns

Published

on

British Health Secretary Wes Streeting
British Health Secretary Wes Streeting

UK Health Minister Wes Streeting Resigns

British Health Secretary Wes Streeting has resigned from the Cabinet, triggering a major political shake-up in the UK government and intensifying pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer amid growing unrest within the Labour Party.

In a strongly worded resignation letter published on X, Streeting said it had become increasingly clear that Starmer would not lead Labour into the next general election. He argued that the party was now facing a “leadership vacuum” and insisted that Labour MPs and trade unions were demanding an open and urgent debate about the party’s future direction.

Streeting said remaining in government under the current leadership situation would be “dishonourable and unprincipled,” adding that the party urgently needs a “battle of ideas” involving strong candidates capable of rebuilding public confidence. While he stopped short of announcing a leadership bid, his comments are widely seen as a direct challenge to Starmer’s authority.

The resignation comes at a time of escalating internal tension within the Labour Party, following a series of disappointing electoral performances across the United Kingdom. In the May 7 local elections, Labour suffered significant losses, including more than 1,400 council seats and control of dozens of local authorities in England. The party also faced historic setbacks in Wales and further declines in Scotland.

READ ALSO:

At the same time, the rise of Reform UK has reshaped the political landscape, with the party gaining hundreds of council seats and taking control of several traditional Labour strongholds, particularly in northern and central England.

The developments have fuelled speculation over a possible Labour leadership contest. Former deputy leader Angela Rayner has been mentioned as a potential successor, although she has publicly stated she will not initiate a challenge. Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is also frequently cited in political discussions, though he is not currently a Member of Parliament, making any immediate leadership move difficult.

Despite the growing unrest, most Cabinet members and over 100 Labour MPs have publicly reaffirmed their support for Starmer. Downing Street has also insisted that the Prime Minister has no intention of resigning.

However, political analysts warn that Streeting’s resignation could mark the beginning of a wider internal struggle that may reshape Labour’s leadership structure if further resignations or open challenges follow.

For now, Starmer remains in office, but the pressure inside the Labour Party continues to build as questions over its direction and leadership grow louder.

UK Health Minister Wes Streeting Resigns

Loading

Continue Reading

International

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

Published

on

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law
United States congressman, Barry Moore

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

A United States congressman, Barry Moore, has sparked nationwide debate after proposing a bill that would require immigrants entering America as religious workers to formally reject Sharia law and pledge loyalty to the US Constitution.

Moore announced the proposed legislation, known as the CRUSADE Act — short for Countering Radicalism Under Sharia and Defeating Extremism Act — in a statement posted on X and published on his official congressional website.

According to the Republican lawmaker, the bill is designed to prevent the promotion of religious doctrines that he believes conflict with American constitutional values.

“America is built on the rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution — not foreign legal systems that conflict with our freedoms and values,” Moore said while unveiling the legislation.

The proposal specifically targets immigrants applying through the EB-4 religious worker visa programme, which allows ministers, missionaries and other faith-based workers to enter the United States.

Under the proposed law, applicants would be required to affirm support for the US Constitution and disavow interpretations of Sharia law that Moore claims promote religious persecution, restrictions on women and suppression of dissent.

“Anyone seeking entry into the United States as a religious worker must affirm their commitment to the Constitution and reject extremist practices found in sharia law that have been used to justify persecution, violence, and the suppression of basic human rights,” he added.

READ ALSO:

The bill has already received backing from several Republican lawmakers, including Andy Ogles, Josh Brecheen and Clay Higgins.

The development comes amid growing political campaigns around the “Sharia-Free America” movement in the United States. Supporters argue that political Islam and Sharia-based governance are incompatible with the American legal system, while critics warn that such measures could stigmatise Muslims and undermine constitutional protections for religious freedom.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, making the proposal likely to face legal and political scrutiny if it advances in Congress.

The controversy has also renewed international attention on Nigeria’s religious freedom concerns.

Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers Riley Moore and Chris Smith introduced the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, a bill seeking stronger US action against alleged religious persecution in Nigeria.

The legislation calls for investigations into violence against Christians, enforcement of anti-blasphemy laws and the implementation of Sharia-based legal systems in northern Nigeria.

The lawmakers argued that some blasphemy laws in northern Nigeria have been used to silence dissent, target minorities and deny due process.

Nigeria currently operates Sharia legal systems in 12 northern states alongside conventional constitutional law, mainly for civil matters involving Muslims, although some states also apply criminal Sharia provisions.

The renewed debate follows the decision by President Donald Trump’s administration to redesignate Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” over allegations of religious persecution and sectarian violence.

Security concerns linked to extremist groups such as Boko Haram and armed bandit networks have continued to fuel international scrutiny of religious tensions in parts of the country.

US Congressman Pushes Bill Requiring Religious Immigrants to Reject Sharia Law

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Published

on

Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Fresh revelations from multiple international media investigations have exposed how Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) allegedly carried out covert military strikes against Iran during the recent Middle East war, despite publicly distancing themselves from direct involvement in the conflict.

According to a detailed investigation by Reuters, Saudi Arabia secretly launched several retaliatory airstrikes inside Iran in late March 2026 after Iranian missiles and drones repeatedly targeted Saudi cities, airports, oil installations, and strategic infrastructure.

The report, which cited Western and Iranian officials familiar with the operations, said the attacks were conducted by the Saudi Air Force and marked the first known instance of Riyadh carrying out direct military action on Iranian territory.

Although Saudi authorities neither officially confirmed nor denied the operations, the revelations suggest a dramatic shift in the kingdom’s long-standing regional security strategy.

The covert strikes reportedly followed an intense escalation in the wider Middle East conflict, which began after joint US-Israeli military operations against Tehran earlier in the year.

During the conflict, Iran launched waves of missiles and drones across Gulf states hosting American military assets. Reports indicated that all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) — including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Oman — experienced varying levels of attacks.

While Tehran maintained that its operations targeted US military facilities, civilian infrastructure was also affected. Airports, oil facilities, and energy infrastructure in Gulf countries reportedly suffered significant disruptions.

READ ALSO:

The conflict also affected global trade as the strategically important Strait of Hormuz became partially paralysed, raising fears of a global oil supply crisis and surging energy prices.

Reuters reported that Iran launched more than 105 missile and drone attacks on Saudi Arabia between March 25 and March 31 alone. However, following Saudi Arabia’s alleged retaliatory strikes and subsequent diplomatic contacts between both countries, the number of attacks reportedly dropped significantly in early April.

Western and Iranian officials told Reuters that Riyadh quietly warned Tehran of further retaliation if attacks on the kingdom continued, while simultaneously opening diplomatic backchannels aimed at preventing a wider regional war.

The latest revelations also implicated the United Arab Emirates in the conflict.

Separate reports by The Telegraph and The Wall Street Journal claimed that Emirati forces secretly carried out attacks against Iranian targets around the same period US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Washington and Tehran after five weeks of military confrontation.

One of the reported UAE operations allegedly targeted an oil refinery on Iran’s Lavan Island in the Persian Gulf in early April.

The refinery strike reportedly caused significant fires and temporarily disrupted refinery operations.

Despite the allegations, Abu Dhabi consistently maintained publicly that it sought regional stability and denied taking offensive military action against Iran during the conflict.

However, reports suggested the UAE adopted a more aggressive stance behind closed doors, believing Iran needed to face direct consequences for attacks on Gulf infrastructure.

The Wall Street Journal also reported that Israel quietly assisted Emirati operations through intelligence coordination and defensive military support during the conflict.

Analysts say the alleged covert operations by Saudi Arabia and the UAE represent one of the most significant shifts in Gulf geopolitics in recent decades.

For years, Gulf monarchies largely relied on the United States for protection against Iranian threats while avoiding direct military confrontation with Tehran.

But the latest reports indicate both Saudi Arabia and the UAE may now be willing to carry out direct retaliatory strikes when their territories are attacked.

The war eventually began to de-escalate after Washington and Tehran agreed to a ceasefire on April 7, 2026, though tensions across the Middle East remain high.

The developments have continued to generate widespread international attention amid concerns that future confrontations between Iran and Gulf states could trigger broader instability across global energy markets and international shipping routes.

Reuters: Saudi Arabia, UAE Secretly Bombed Iran During Gulf War

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending