Women, Children Killed as Pakistan Launches Overnight Strikes on Afghanistan - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Women, Children Killed as Pakistan Launches Overnight Strikes on Afghanistan

Published

on

Islamabad said the strikes were launched on Afghanistan following recent suicide bombings in Pakistan
Islamabad said the strikes were launched on Afghanistan following recent suicide bombings in Pakistan (BBC)

Women, Children Killed as Pakistan Launches Overnight Strikes on Afghanistan

Pakistan has carried out deadly overnight airstrikes on Afghanistan, killing at least 18 people, including women and children, according to the Afghan Taliban, in a major escalation of Pakistan–Afghanistan tensions along their volatile border.

Islamabad confirmed that the operation involved precision airstrikes against seven alleged militant camps and hideouts close to the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, saying the attacks were launched in retaliation for recent suicide bombings inside Pakistan. Pakistani officials said the strikes were intelligence-based and aimed at eliminating armed groups accused of orchestrating cross-border attacks.

The Taliban government in Afghanistan strongly condemned the strikes, accusing Pakistan of bombing civilian homes and a religious school. Afghan authorities described the attacks as a violation of national sovereignty and warned that continued military action could worsen regional instability.

According to Afghanistan’s defence ministry, the airstrikes hit civilian areas in Nangarhar and Paktika provinces. In Girdi Kas village in the Bihsud district of Nangarhar, residents said entire families were affected when homes were destroyed. Local Taliban officials said 18 members of one family were killed, while only a few survived. Earlier casualty estimates had placed the death toll at around 20 people, though figures were later revised.

READ ALSO:

In Paktika province, strikes reportedly hit a guesthouse and a religious school in the Bermal and Urgun districts. Local officials said those facilities were empty at the time, and no deaths were reported there.

Pakistan’s Ministry of Information and Broadcasting said the military action involved “selective targeting” of fighters linked to the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which Islamabad refers to as Fitna al Khawarij, as well as elements of the Islamic State-Khorasan Province. The ministry described the operation as a retributive response to terror attacks it said were planned from Afghan soil.

The latest escalation follows a series of deadly attacks in Pakistan, including a suicide bombing at a Shia mosque in Islamabad earlier this month and additional assaults in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa since the start of Ramadan. Pakistan accused the Afghan Taliban of failing to rein in militants, claiming it had conclusive evidence that some of the attacks were directed from across the border. Kabul has repeatedly denied allowing Afghan territory to be used against neighbouring countries.

In a strongly worded response, the Taliban’s defence ministry described the airstrikes as a “blatant violation of Afghanistan’s territorial integrity” and a “clear breach of international law.” It warned that an “appropriate and measured response” would be taken at a suitable time, accusing Pakistan of flawed intelligence for hitting civilian targets and religious institutions.

The strikes come despite a fragile ceasefire reached in October after deadly cross-border clashes, the worst since the Taliban returned to power in 2021. Although that truce reduced large-scale fighting, sporadic clashes and air operations have continued to strain relations.

Tensions had briefly eased earlier this week after Saudi Arabia mediated the release of three Pakistani soldiers captured during last year’s border clashes. However, analysts warn that the latest airstrikes could undermine diplomatic efforts, worsen humanitarian conditions in border communities, and heighten the risk of further retaliation.

Pakistan and Afghanistan share a 1,600-mile mountainous border, long plagued by militancy, smuggling, and recurring military confrontations, making it one of the region’s most unstable frontiers.

Women, Children Killed as Pakistan Launches Overnight Strikes on Afghanistan

International

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Published

on

Donald Trump, Arif Alvi and Benjamin Netayahu
Donald Trump, Arif Alvi and Benjamin Netayahu

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Israel has publicly doubted Pakistan’s role as a mediator in the ongoing United States–Iran ceasefire negotiations, describing Islamabad as “not a credible player” in the diplomatic process. The comments from Israel’s ambassador to India, Reuven Azar, come ahead of scheduled direct talks between U.S. and Iranian officials in Islamabad on April 11, reportedly to be attended by U.S. Vice President JD Vance.

Azar acknowledged that the United States may have strategic reasons for using Pakistan’s facilitation, but he emphasized that Israel’s primary concern remains the removal of Hezbollah’s terrorist infrastructure in southern Lebanon. He highlighted recent Israeli air operations that reportedly eliminated over 250 Hezbollah operatives and reiterated that disarming the group south of the Litani River is essential to protect Israeli communities.

READ ALSO:

Drawing parallels with past U.S. diplomatic efforts, Azar compared Pakistan’s mediation to previous roles played by Qatar and Turkey in negotiating truces in Gaza, suggesting such mediators were sometimes selected for convenience rather than effectiveness. He stressed that Israel’s objective is to remain closely aligned with the United States on the substance and outcome of any regional agreement.

Regarding the U.S.–Iran ceasefire, Azar expressed support for the two-week truce while noting that Israel considers Lebanon outside its scope. He warned that continued Iranian and Israeli military actions in Lebanon could jeopardize the fragile agreement, potentially destabilizing the Strait of Hormuz and broader Middle East security.

The ceasefire talks themselves remain delicate. While Pakistan has positioned itself as a facilitator, Tehran has acknowledged Islamabad’s role but continues to insist on substantive agreements over nuclear development, missile programs, and regional security obligations. Meanwhile, Israel maintains a firm stance that its operations in southern Lebanon are necessary to neutralize threats from Hezbollah.

The diplomatic dispute over Pakistan’s credibility highlights deep divisions among key stakeholders in the region, underscoring the challenges in maintaining a fragile truce while addressing the security concerns of multiple actors. Observers will closely monitor whether the upcoming Islamabad talks can reconcile these differences and produce a sustainable agreement.

Israel Questions Pakistan’s Credibility as Mediator in US‑Iran Ceasefire Talks

Continue Reading

International

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Published

on

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Thousands of Iranians took to the streets across major cities, including Tehran, Urmia, and Gorgan, on Thursday to honour the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. His death has become a pivotal moment in the ongoing Middle East conflict, and the rallies combined mourning, political messaging, and public solidarity.

The nationwide tribute began precisely at 9:40 a.m. local time, the exact moment Khamenei was killed on February 28 at his Tehran residence in what Iranian authorities described as U.S.–Israeli airstrikes. The attack also claimed the lives of several senior Iranian figures and triggered a series of retaliatory actions, escalating tensions across the Gulf and involving multiple regional actors.

Crowds carried portraits of the long-serving leader, who presided over Iran’s political and ideological direction for nearly four decades. Analysts note that the rallies were not only acts of public mourning but also demonstrations of internal cohesion and state continuity during a period of geopolitical strain. The displays served to reinforce loyalty and resilience in the eyes of both domestic audiences and external observers.

READ ALSO:

Despite these public displays, there is uncertainty surrounding Iran’s leadership visibility. His successor, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has yet to make a public appearance since before the conflict escalated. This absence has raised questions within diplomatic and political circles about the consolidation of authority in Tehran and the future direction of the country’s leadership.

The absence of a formal state funeral further underscores the disruption caused by the war. Security conditions and ongoing military tensions have prevented Iran from organising a centralised burial ceremony, highlighting the impact of the conflict on domestic affairs and governance.

The rallies thus served a dual purpose: beyond mourning the late leader, they acted as a strategic show of unity, signalling resilience to external adversaries while reinforcing internal political continuity. Public mobilisations like these remain a critical indicator of Tehran’s ability to maintain cohesion during times of crisis.

As the conflict continues, Iran’s internal dynamics, leadership visibility, and public mobilisation will be closely watched by analysts as key measures of stability and state authority. The commemorations demonstrate that, even amid uncertainty and regional tension, the government can still orchestrate nationwide expressions of solidarity.

Thousands Rally Across Iran to Honour Late Supreme Leader Khamenei

Continue Reading

International

UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon

Published

on

Secretary-General of the United Nations, António Guterres
UN Secretary‑General António Guterres

UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon

The United Nations has strongly condemned a wave of Israeli airstrikes in Lebanon that killed and injured hundreds, including civilians, amid a fragile ceasefire in the Middle East. UN Secretary‑General António Guterres expressed deep concern over the mounting civilian toll and warned that ongoing military activity threatens efforts to maintain peace and stability in the region.

In a statement released Wednesday, Guterres offered condolences to the people of Lebanon and wished a swift recovery to the injured. He emphasized that international humanitarian law must be respected, urging all parties to halt hostilities and pursue diplomatic solutions. “There is no military solution to the conflict,” he said, stressing the importance of protecting civilians and infrastructure.

The airstrikes on April 8, 2026, marked some of the heaviest bombardments in Lebanon since tensions escalated between Israel and Hezbollah in recent weeks. Lebanese authorities reported hundreds of casualties in Beirut’s southern suburbs, the Bekaa Valley, and southern towns, with significant civilian losses.

READ ALSO:

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, described the attacks as “nothing short of horrific” and called for independent investigations into potential violations of international law, highlighting the devastating impact on civilians and infrastructure.

The strikes occurred shortly after a US‑Iran ceasefire took effect, which did not formally include the Lebanon theater, raising fears that hostilities could escalate further. International reactions have been swift, with countries such as Spain condemning Israel’s actions and urging adherence to international law.

The UN has called for immediate restraint and stressed that protecting civilian lives and upholding humanitarian standards must remain a priority as tensions continue to simmer in the region.

UN Chief Condemns Israeli Airstrikes in Lebanon

Continue Reading
HostArmada Affordable Cloud SSD Shared Hosting
HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Trending