You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu - Newstrends
Connect with us

metro

You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

'Show Me the Law': Lawyer Questions FG's Reluctance to Defend Kanu's Conviction
leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu with some of his lawyers

You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu

A Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected the no-case submission made by the detained self-acclaimed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, in his ongoing alleged terrorism trial.

Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling on Friday, held that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against Kanu to warrant that he be ordered to enter his defence.

The judge, who overruled Kanu’s no-case submission, found that the evidence led by the prosecution and the exhibits it tendered have raised serious allegations of Kanu’s involvement in terrorist activities to warrant that he be allowed to defend himself.

On the defendant’s argument that the court lacked jurisdiction because of his alleged extraordinary rendition from Kenya, the judge held that evidence to that effect was not placed before the court, and so, the court cannot make a finding on it.

He said, “The defence raised the issue of jurisdiction of the court as a result of the alleged extraordinary rendition of the defendant.

“It must be known that no evidence of extraordinary rendition has been placed or given in this court.

“It is when such evidence relating to extraordinary rendition of the defendant is given on oath that the issue of jurisdiction relating to it can be considered by this court.

“Laws are not based on evidence that is not placed before the court,” the judge said.

Justice Omotosho held that the evidence and exhibits and the need for him to demonstrate and lead evidence on his allegations of an extraordinary rendition, require that the defendant be given the opportunity and afforded his fundamental rights to a fair hearing to be allowed to enter his defence.

READ ALSO:

Kanu is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS) on a seven-count amended charge bordering on his alleged involvement in terrorist activities.

Justice Omotosho said, “I have carefully gone through the evidence presented to the court by the prosecution with respect to this charge. The evidence all points to the establishment of a prima facie case against the defendant.

“The evidence is such that the defendant must proffer some explanation or defence to the allegation made against him, especially considering the seriousness of the offence, as they are such that the life of the defendant is at stake.

“This court will refrain from evaluating the evidence, but will limit itself to stating that, on the whole, a prima facie case of engaging in terrorist activities has been made out against the defendant.

“This is not to say that the defendant is guilty as charged, but simply that he be afforded his right to a fair hearing and put in his defence before this court.

“The evidence of the prosecution has founded sufficient ground for proceeding with this trial.

“A connection of the defendant with the offence, no matter how slight, constitutes prima facie evidence and as such the Defendant would be required to enter his defence to the charge or a rebuttal of some sort.

“I must say here that holding that a prima facie case has been established does not necessarily imply that the court finds the defendant guilty of the charge.

“It is simply to allow the defendant to exhaust his options for his defence and to clear every unresolved issue which may weigh on the mind of the court in reaching a final decision.

READ ALSO:

“The defendant is still presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the prosecution still has the duty to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.

“I must say here that, in determining a no case submission, no other issue, including credibility of witnesses, competence of charge, pre-trial detention, lack of fair hearing, etc., will be entertained.

“It is only whether a prima facie case is made out that will be considered.

“The right of a defendant to defend himself/herself is a fundamental right provided under section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

“Such right cannot be taken from a defendant except where a Defendant expressly or by conduct waives the same.

“This defendant, having not waived his right to defend himself either expressly or by conduct, and the no case submission made by him, having been overruled, he is hereby called upon to put in his defence to the charge against him.

“The evidence by the prosecution witnesses, exhibits, and the need for the defendant to give evidence on how the extraordinary rendition took place and for the defendant to react to the evidence led by the prosecution through its five witnesses and the exhibits tendered, have occasioned a need for the defendant to put in his defence.

“The address of counsel, no matter how beautifully constructed, cannot take the place of evidence.

READ ALSO:

“Based on the fundamental right to fair hearing as contained in Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), which the defendant is entitled to, this court is inclined to give him the opportunity and afford him his fundamental right to fair hearing.

“Consequently, the no-case submission is overruled and the defendant is hereby ordered to enter his defence and make some explanations relating to the prima facie case against him,” Justice Omotosho said.

In an earlier ruling, the judge ordered the President of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) to set up a team of between eight to 10 members to determine whether Kanu’s health status makes him unfit to continue to stand trial.

Justice Omotosho issued the order while ruling on an application by Kanu, seeking to be transferred to a private ward in the National Hospital for urgent medical attention for alleged life-threatening ailments.

Justice Omotosho, who reviewed arguments by Kanu’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) and that of the prosecution, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), ordered that the team, to be constituted by the NMA’s President, should assess the health facilities of the Department of State Services (DSS) to determine if they were adequate to effectively take care of Kanu’s ailments.

According to the judge, the team is also to determine whether or not it was necessary to transfer Kanu to the National Hospital as he requested and whether Kanu’s medical status was such that it could make him unfit to continue to stand trial.

The judge also ordered that the Chief Medical Director of the National Hospital or his representative should be a member of the team because the National Hospital is the hospital of choice of the defendant.

Justice Omotosho ordered that the report of the team’s findings should be signed by both its Chairman and Secretary, and it should be filed in the court’s registry within eight days from today.

You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu

Loading

metro

CSU CERTIFICATE CONTROVERSY: How Ex-Lecturer Inadvertently Indicted Himself Over Claims Against President Tinubu

Published

on

Dr. Adetokunbo Pearse

CSU CERTIFICATE CONTROVERSY: How Ex-Lecturer Inadvertently Indicted Himself Over Claims Against President Tinubu

LAGOS — A fresh controversy surrounding President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s academic credentials at Chicago State University (CSU) has taken an unexpected turn, following explosive claims made by a former lecturer at the institution, Dr. Adetokunbo Pearse.

Pearse, a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and governorship aspirant, publicly accused President Tinubu of never attending CSU, describing the Nigerian leader in harsh terms during a broadcast interview on News Central Television. Pearse claimed that as a former lecturer at CSU, he had direct knowledge of the institution’s records and served as the director of the program Tinubu reportedly attended.

However, Pearse’s allegations have sparked fierce backlash after key details of his timeline emerged, leading political analysts and presidential aides to conclude that the former lecturer effectively indicted himself.

The Discrepancy in Timelines

During his broadcast appearance, Dr. Pearse disclosed that he served as a lecturer and program director at Chicago State University between 1985 and 1990.

Official records previously confirmed by Chicago State University establish that President Bola Tinubu attended the university between 1977 and 1979, graduating with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration in June 1979.

The six-year gap between Tinubu’s graduation in 1979 and Pearse’s arrival at the university in 1985 has drawn significant scrutiny. Critics point out that Pearse was not present at CSU during the years Tinubu studied there, undermining his claim of personal first-hand knowledge of student enrollments during the late 1970s.

Presidency and Allies Respond

Reacting to the allegations, aides to President Tinubu and members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) cited major flaws in Pearse’s narrative.

Special Assistant to the President on Social Media, Dada Olusegun, highlighted the timeline mismatch, noting that a lecturer who joined CSU six years after a student had already graduated could not authoritatively claim personal knowledge of that student’s presence on campus.

“Facts are always scary to con-artists,” Olusegun noted, emphasizing that individual faculty members do not possess administrative ownership of an entire university’s historical database across different decades.

Furthermore, APC chieftains have demanded that Pearse retract his statement or face legal action for defamation, describing the allegations as politically motivated rhetoric aimed at heating up the polity ahead of future elections.

While certificate controversies have repeatedly resurfaced in public debate, legal investigations and past disclosures by Chicago State University have maintained that President Tinubu was indeed a registered student who completed his degree at the institution in 1979.

As public debate continues over the incident, Pearse’s attempt to present himself as the ultimate authority on the matter has instead turned the spotlight back onto his own timeline, leaving him to address the glaring inconsistencies in his claims.

 

For further context and analysis regarding public statements and legal responses to President Tinubu’s academic record controversies, you can watch Dr. Adetokunbo Pearse’s statement on Chicago State University records, which details the allegations and political reactions surrounding the issue.

 

CSU CERTIFICATE CONTROVERSY: How Ex-Lecturer Inadvertently Indicted Himself Over Claims Against President Tinubu

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Ogbomosoland Grand Chief Imam Marks Five Years in Office, Expresses Gratitude to Allah, Community

Published

on

Ogbomosoland Grand Chief Imam Marks Five Years in Office, Expresses Gratitude to Allah, Community

 

By Newstrends Reporter

 

The Grand Chief Imam of Ogbomosoland has celebrated five years of spiritual leadership and service, expressing profound gratitude to Almighty Allah for His guidance, wisdom and strength throughout his tenure.

 

The Islamic cleric marked the milestone on Wednesday, November 11, 2026, exactly five years after assuming the revered position of Grand Chief Imam of Ogbomosoland.

 

In a commemorative message reflecting on his journey since November 11, 2021, the cleric described his five years in office as a period of divine grace and responsibility, noting that the opportunity to lead the Muslim community had been a privilege for which he remained deeply grateful to Allah.

He said Almighty Allah had remained his source of strength and direction in the discharge of his responsibilities, particularly in guiding the affairs of the Muslim Ummah and promoting peaceful coexistence, unity and religious harmony across Ogbomosoland.

 

Reflecting on the achievements and challenges of the past five years, the Grand Chief Imam acknowledged the contributions of Islamic scholars, traditional rulers, community leaders and members of the Muslim community, whose cooperation and support, he said, had been instrumental to the progress recorded during his leadership.

 

He also extended appreciation to well-wishers, supporters and Muslim faithful who had stood by him throughout his tenure, offering prayers, encouragement and other forms of assistance.

 

The cleric particularly commended the dedication of Islamic leaders and scholars, stressing the importance of collective responsibility in advancing the cause of Islam and strengthening the bonds of unity among Muslims.

 

He said their unwavering commitment and cooperation had provided him with the necessary encouragement to navigate the demands of the exalted religious office.

 

The Grand Chief Imam also reserved special appreciation for his family members, acknowledging their sacrifices, patience, prayers and steadfast support behind the scenes.

 

According to him, the demands of the office had required considerable commitment, making the understanding and support of his family an invaluable source of comfort and strength.

 

Looking ahead, the Islamic leader called for continued commitment to peaceful coexistence, religious tolerance, knowledge and compassion, while praying for greater unity and development within Ogbomosoland.

 

He expressed hope that Almighty Allah would continue to grant him good health, wisdom and the strength to serve humanity better, deepen community relationships and promote Islamic teachings founded on peace, tolerance and compassion.

 

He further prayed for the continued blessings of Allah upon Ogbomosoland and Nigeria, seeking divine guidance and the opportunity for more years of meaningful service to humanity and the cause of Islam.

 

The cleric concluded his message with prayers for Allah’s continued favour and blessings upon all those who had supported his leadership journey, expressing gratitude for their contributions over the past five years.

 

He prayed that Almighty Allah would reward everyone who had contributed to the success of his administration and grant the Muslim community more fruitful years of service, unity and progress.

 

Jazakumullahu Khairan.

 

Ogbomosoland Grand Chief Imam Marks Five Years in Office, Expresses Gratitude to Allah, Community

Loading

Continue Reading

metro

Osun NURTW Takes Adeleke Govt to Court Over Planned Park Management System

Published

on

Osun NURTW Takes Adeleke Govt to Court Over Planned Park Management System

 

By Newstrends Reporter

 

OSOGBO – The leadership crisis between the National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW), Osun State Council, and the state government has taken a fresh turn as the union has dragged Governor Ademola Adeleke’s administration before the State High Court over its proposed motor park management system.

 

The union is challenging the legality of the government’s plan to introduce a new management arrangement for motor parks across the state, arguing that the move could undermine its existing operational rights and violate relevant legal provisions.

 

The suit, instituted by the NURTW Osun State Council, is seeking judicial intervention to determine whether the state government has the legal authority to restructure motor park administration without complying with established statutory procedures.

 

The union is led by its State Chairman, Comrade Kazem Oyewale, popularly known as Asiri Eniba, alongside other executive members.

 

According to information contained in the suit, the union is contesting the proposed arrangement on grounds bordering on its constitutional right to freedom of association and the legality of the government’s intended changes to the existing park management structure.

 

The development signals an escalating confrontation between the transport union and the Adeleke administration over who should control the management and administration of motor parks in Osun.

 

NURTW Seeks Court Order to Stop Implementation

 

The union is reportedly seeking an injunction restraining the state government from implementing the proposed park management arrangement pending the determination of the substantive suit.

 

At the centre of the dispute is the government’s proposed restructuring of motor park administration, which the union believes could affect its established role in the state’s transport sector.

 

The disagreement also raises questions about the extent of state governments’ powers to regulate motor park operations, particularly where established transport unions are involved.

 

The defendants in the suit include Governor Ademola Adeleke and the Osun State Government.

 

Government Yet to React

 

As of the time of filing this report, the Osun State Government had not issued an official response to the lawsuit.

 

However, the proposed park management arrangement has been presented as part of efforts to improve transport administration, strengthen revenue collection and enhance commuter safety.

 

The court is expected to consider the legal arguments presented by both sides as the dispute progresses.

 

The outcome could have wider implications for the relationship between state governments and transport unions, particularly over the administration, control and revenue generation of motor parks.

 

Osun NURTW Takes Adeleke Govt to Court Over Planned Park Management System

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending