metro

You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu

Published

1 month ago

September 26, 2025

leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Nnamdi Kanu with some of his lawyers

You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu

A Federal High Court in Abuja has rejected the no-case submission made by the detained self-acclaimed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, in his ongoing alleged terrorism trial.

Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling on Friday, held that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against Kanu to warrant that he be ordered to enter his defence.

The judge, who overruled Kanu’s no-case submission, found that the evidence led by the prosecution and the exhibits it tendered have raised serious allegations of Kanu’s involvement in terrorist activities to warrant that he be allowed to defend himself.

On the defendant’s argument that the court lacked jurisdiction because of his alleged extraordinary rendition from Kenya, the judge held that evidence to that effect was not placed before the court, and so, the court cannot make a finding on it.

He said, “The defence raised the issue of jurisdiction of the court as a result of the alleged extraordinary rendition of the defendant.

“It must be known that no evidence of extraordinary rendition has been placed or given in this court.

“It is when such evidence relating to extraordinary rendition of the defendant is given on oath that the issue of jurisdiction relating to it can be considered by this court.

“Laws are not based on evidence that is not placed before the court,” the judge said.

Justice Omotosho held that the evidence and exhibits and the need for him to demonstrate and lead evidence on his allegations of an extraordinary rendition, require that the defendant be given the opportunity and afforded his fundamental rights to a fair hearing to be allowed to enter his defence.

READ ALSO:

Kanu is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS) on a seven-count amended charge bordering on his alleged involvement in terrorist activities.

Justice Omotosho said, “I have carefully gone through the evidence presented to the court by the prosecution with respect to this charge. The evidence all points to the establishment of a prima facie case against the defendant.

“The evidence is such that the defendant must proffer some explanation or defence to the allegation made against him, especially considering the seriousness of the offence, as they are such that the life of the defendant is at stake.

“This court will refrain from evaluating the evidence, but will limit itself to stating that, on the whole, a prima facie case of engaging in terrorist activities has been made out against the defendant.

“This is not to say that the defendant is guilty as charged, but simply that he be afforded his right to a fair hearing and put in his defence before this court.

“The evidence of the prosecution has founded sufficient ground for proceeding with this trial.

“A connection of the defendant with the offence, no matter how slight, constitutes prima facie evidence and as such the Defendant would be required to enter his defence to the charge or a rebuttal of some sort.

“I must say here that holding that a prima facie case has been established does not necessarily imply that the court finds the defendant guilty of the charge.

“It is simply to allow the defendant to exhaust his options for his defence and to clear every unresolved issue which may weigh on the mind of the court in reaching a final decision.

READ ALSO:

“The defendant is still presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the prosecution still has the duty to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt.

“I must say here that, in determining a no case submission, no other issue, including credibility of witnesses, competence of charge, pre-trial detention, lack of fair hearing, etc., will be entertained.

“It is only whether a prima facie case is made out that will be considered.

“The right of a defendant to defend himself/herself is a fundamental right provided under section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

“Such right cannot be taken from a defendant except where a Defendant expressly or by conduct waives the same.

“This defendant, having not waived his right to defend himself either expressly or by conduct, and the no case submission made by him, having been overruled, he is hereby called upon to put in his defence to the charge against him.

“The evidence by the prosecution witnesses, exhibits, and the need for the defendant to give evidence on how the extraordinary rendition took place and for the defendant to react to the evidence led by the prosecution through its five witnesses and the exhibits tendered, have occasioned a need for the defendant to put in his defence.

“The address of counsel, no matter how beautifully constructed, cannot take the place of evidence.

READ ALSO:

“Based on the fundamental right to fair hearing as contained in Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), which the defendant is entitled to, this court is inclined to give him the opportunity and afford him his fundamental right to fair hearing.

“Consequently, the no-case submission is overruled and the defendant is hereby ordered to enter his defence and make some explanations relating to the prima facie case against him,” Justice Omotosho said.

In an earlier ruling, the judge ordered the President of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) to set up a team of between eight to 10 members to determine whether Kanu’s health status makes him unfit to continue to stand trial.

Justice Omotosho issued the order while ruling on an application by Kanu, seeking to be transferred to a private ward in the National Hospital for urgent medical attention for alleged life-threatening ailments.

Justice Omotosho, who reviewed arguments by Kanu’s lawyer, Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN) and that of the prosecution, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), ordered that the team, to be constituted by the NMA’s President, should assess the health facilities of the Department of State Services (DSS) to determine if they were adequate to effectively take care of Kanu’s ailments.

According to the judge, the team is also to determine whether or not it was necessary to transfer Kanu to the National Hospital as he requested and whether Kanu’s medical status was such that it could make him unfit to continue to stand trial.

The judge also ordered that the Chief Medical Director of the National Hospital or his representative should be a member of the team because the National Hospital is the hospital of choice of the defendant.

Justice Omotosho ordered that the report of the team’s findings should be signed by both its Chairman and Secretary, and it should be filed in the court’s registry within eight days from today.

You have case to answer, court tells Nnamdi Kanu

Related Topics:court Nnamdi Kanu terrorism

Up Next

Mining site collapses in Zamfara, kills 8, injures many

Don't Miss

Kwara lawmakers worry over surge in sperm, egg trade among students

metro

Turji’s Gang strikes again, kills five, abducts nine in Sokoto Village

Published

3 hours ago

November 8, 2025

Trends Admin

Notorious bandit leader, Bello Turji

Turji’s Gang strikes again, kills five, abducts nine in Sokoto Village

Notorious bandit leader Bello Turji and his gang have reportedly launched a deadly pre-dawn attack on Bargaja village in Isa Local Government Area of Sokoto State, killing five residents and abducting nine others, mostly women.

The attack, which occurred in the early hours of Saturday, also left a member of the Community Guard Corps seriously injured, according to local sources.

Prior to the incident, a local activist, Basharu Altine Guyawa, had raised an alarm on social media about the movement of Turji and his men, warning that they were advancing toward the Isa axis.

Guyawa claimed the bandits were sighted moving out of Fadanar Tursa and Dorawar Madugu toward Dan Huntuwa via the Katutu Bridge, which links Shinkafi and Isa LGAs, with about 40 motorcycles, suggesting a coordinated large-scale operation.

He accused security operatives and local authorities of failing to act on the intelligence, alleging negligence and mismanagement of security resources.

However, Isa Local Government Chairman, Alhaji Sharehu Abubakar Kamarawa, dismissed the allegations, insisting that the authorities responded swiftly after receiving the alert.

“Upon receiving the alert, we immediately mobilized local security guards and notified the relevant security agencies for swift action,” Kamarawa said.

READ ALSO:

He explained that despite the rapid response, the bandits diverted through another route, leading to the attack on Bargaja.

Kamarawa disclosed that the commander in charge of the area had been replaced after an internal review found lapses in coordination and response.

“We deeply sympathize with the affected families and assure them that both the state and local governments are fully committed to restoring peace and stability in the area,” he added.

The chairman also praised Governor Ahmed Aliyu for his continued support to security agencies, citing the recent distribution of patrol vehicles, motorcycles, and the reinstatement of operational allowances to boost counter-banditry operations.

The latest assault underscores the persistent insecurity troubling parts of eastern Sokoto, where Turji’s gang and other armed groups continue to terrorize rural communities despite ongoing military operations and local security interventions.

Who is Bello Turji?

Bello Turji Kachalla, widely known as Bello Turji, is one of Nigeria’s most notorious bandit leaders, operating mainly across the Sokoto, Zamfara, and Katsina axis in the North-West.

Turji gained prominence around 2019 after orchestrating a series of mass abductions, killings, and village raids, often targeting rural communities, security convoys, and highway travelers.

Despite several military offensives and bounty announcements, he has continued to evade capture, operating from remote forest hideouts near the Shinkafi–Isa border.

In 2022, Turji was reported to have declared a temporary ceasefire, claiming his actions were driven by revenge for government neglect and military airstrikes on his community. The truce quickly collapsed amid renewed violence.

Security experts describe Turji as a symbol of the deep-rooted banditry crisis in the region—one that thrives on arms trafficking, ransom networks, and weak rural governance.

Authorities say he remains one of the most wanted bandit commanders in Nigeria, with ongoing intelligence-led operations aimed at neutralizing his network.

Turji’s Gang strikes again, kills five, abducts nine in Sokoto Village

metro

Soludo condemns vote buying in Nnewi South, praises INEC for peaceful polls

Published

3 hours ago

November 8, 2025

Trends Admin

Soludo condemns vote buying in Nnewi South, praises INEC for peaceful polls

Anambra State Governor, Chukwuma Charles Soludo, has condemned reports of vote buying in some parts of Nnewi South Local Government Area, describing the practice as a major concern in an otherwise peaceful election exercise across the state.

Governor Soludo made the remarks after casting his vote at Polling Unit 002, Ofiyi Square, Umueze, Isuofia Ward 13, Aguata Local Government Area, around 1:20 p.m. on Saturday.

Addressing journalists shortly after voting, the governor commended the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for ensuring a smooth and orderly process in most parts of the state.

“I have been getting numerous calls from across the state. I think it has been relatively peaceful and going smoothly. Though there are some glitches at polling units in Olumbanasa in Anambra West, where the BVAS reportedly did not work as expected, on average, the election is going well,” Soludo said.

READ ALSO:

He, however, expressed dismay over reports of massive vote buying in Nnewi South, alleging that some voters were offered as much as ₦15,000 to influence their choices.

“The only concern we have received is in one or two places in Nnewi South, where we understand that there has been massive vote buying. Some voters are being paid as much as ₦15,000,” he stated.

While expressing confidence in his party’s chances, Soludo stressed that the election should be decided through “one man, one vote.”

He also claimed that a certain political party was planning to manipulate results during collation, urging vigilance among voters and party agents.

“We have information that one political party’s strategy is to swap results during collation. They even told their polling agents not to write results properly or upload them on IReV to create room for manipulation,” Soludo alleged.

“But we have confidence in the system. Our people are vigilant, organized, and united. If the process works as designed, we have no doubt that we will win all 21 local government areas,” he added.

The governor commended INEC for the early commencement of voting and praised residents for their peaceful conduct during the exercise, assuring that everyone on the queue before the official closing time would be allowed to vote.

Soludo condemns vote buying in Nnewi South, praises INEC for peaceful polls

metro

Shari’ah Council urges Tinubu to withdraw appointment of INEC Chairman, Prof. Amupitan

Published

3 hours ago

November 8, 2025

Trends Admin

Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN

Shari’ah Council urges Tinubu to withdraw appointment of INEC Chairman, Prof. Amupitan

The Supreme Council for Shari’ah in Nigeria (SCSN) has called on President Bola Tinubu to immediately withdraw the appointment of the newly inaugurated Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan, over alleged bias reflected in a past publication attributed to him.

The demand, made in a statement issued on Friday, November 7, 2025 (16th Jumada I 1447 AH), followed a report revealing that Prof. Amupitan authored a 2020 legal brief describing attacks in parts of Nigeria as “genocide against Christians and minority groups.”

According to the report, the document — titled “Legal Brief: Genocide in Nigeria – The Implications for the International Community” — was released by the International Committee on Nigeria (ICON), a global human rights advocacy group. It was reportedly signed by Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan (SAN) & Co., Legal Practitioners & Corporate Consultants, with offices in Jos and Abuja.

The SCSN expressed “deep disappointment and grave concern” over the publication, describing it as “provocative, distorted, and bigoted” in its portrayal of Muslims in Northern Nigeria.

“If indeed Prof. Amupitan authored the said document, his submissions are not only unbecoming of a person of learning but dangerously inimical to the unity, peace, and stability of our country,” the statement read.

The council criticised the alleged claims in the brief as “divisive and factually inaccurate narratives against a majority faith community.”

READ ALSO:

Rejecting the characterisation of Northern violence as “Christian genocide,” the SCSN said the conflicts in the North are “complex and multi-dimensional,” affecting both Muslims and Christians.

“Both Muslims and Christians have suffered immensely from extremist attacks, banditry, and communal conflicts rooted in accumulated neglect, poverty, and social injustice,” it stated.

Citing humanitarian data, the council maintained that Muslims have suffered more casualties than any other group.

“Credible data from independent and international sources reveal that Muslims have suffered more casualties in these conflicts. This is verifiable by mapping violence across states such as Borno, Zamfara, Katsina, Sokoto, Kebbi, Niger, and Yobe, where over 90 percent of victims are Muslims,” it added.

The SCSN also faulted the alleged attempt in the brief to link northern insecurity to the 19th-century Jihad of Sheikh Uthman bn Fodio, calling it a “malicious distortion of history.”

“The Jihad of Sheikh Uthman was not a war of hatred but a reform movement rooted in justice and ethics. These ideals remain respected across Africa today,” the council stated.

Questioning Prof. Amupitan’s neutrality as the head of the electoral body, the council said his alleged views “raise doubts about his capacity to ensure fairness and inclusivity in national elections.”

“By his own words, Prof. Amupitan has demonstrated a deep-seated prejudice that calls into serious question his ability to conduct free and fair elections,” the statement added.

Consequently, the SCSN urged President Tinubu to “review and reverse” the appointment, insisting that “the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral process cannot be entrusted to someone whose record reveals open hostility toward one of the country’s largest faith communities.”

The council, however, appealed for calm and unity across religious lines, urging Nigerians to reject divisive narratives.

“Our common enemies are injustice, corruption, poverty, and insecurity,” it said, reaffirming its commitment to peace, fairness, and national cohesion.