Former FBI director James Comey indicted on two charges - Newstrends
Connect with us

International

Former FBI director James Comey indicted on two charges

Published

on

Former FBI Director James Comey

Former FBI director James Comey indicted on two charges

A federal grand jury in the US state of Virginia has indicted former FBI Director James Comey on two charges related to his testimony to Congress.

Mr Comey, who has long drawn US President Donald Trump’s criticism, is accused of lying to Congress during his September 2020 testimony over whether he authorised the leak of classified information to the media.

Responding to the indictment, Mr Comey declared himself innocent and said he had “great confidence in the federal judicial system”.

The indictment comes days after Trump called on the country’s top law enforcement official, Attorney General Pam Bondi, to more aggressively investigate his political adversaries, including Mr Comey.

The probe is being led by Lindsey Halligan, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, who was previously Trump’s personal lawyer and took over her new role on Monday.

Mr Comey’s arraignment – where charges are formally read out in front of a defendant in court – has been set for the morning of 9 October in Alexandria, Virginia at 10:00 local time (14:00 GMT), the BBC’s US partner CBS reports.

Bondi said in a statement that the indictment “reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people”.

Mr Comey has been charged with one count of making false statements and another of obstruction of justice.

The first count relates to Mr Comey telling the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had not “authorised someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports” regarding his conversations with Trump over an FBI investigation into whether Russia meddled with the 2016 presidential election.

The second count alleges that Mr Comey “did corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct and impede” the Senate Judiciary Committee investigation by making false statements to it.

READ ALSO:

The Justice Department asked the grand jury to consider three charges against Mr Comey, but it could only agree that two of them were backed by enough evidence to be tried in court.

The third count was another charge of making false statements.

A grand jury is a group of citizens set up by a prosecutor to determine whether there is enough evidence for charges to be filed. In legal terms, it determines whether probable cause exists to believe a crime has been committed.

Mr Comey is the first ex-FBI director to be indicted for a crime, and he maintains that he has not lied under oath.

If found guilty, he could face up to five years in prison.

A lawyer for Mr Comey, Patrick Fitzgerald, issued a short staying saying his client denied the charges, adding: “We look forward to vindicating him in the courtroom.”

Mr Comey said in a separate video statement: “My family and I have known for years that there are costs to standing up to Donald Trump.”

“We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn’t either,” he continued, adding: “And, I am innocent. So, let’s have a trial.”

The charges were filed shortly before the five-year statute of limitations was set to expire on Tuesday.

The case had recently been handed over to a new prosecutor after Erik Seibert, the original US attorney overseeing the case, was fired by the Trump administration. He was replaced by Ms Halligan.

According to charging documents, Mr Comey made his alleged false statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee “willfully and knowingly”, as Mr Comey had directed an unnamed person “to serve as an anonymous source in news reports regarding an FBI investigation”.

This meant Mr Comey “did corruptly endeavour to influence, obstruct and impede the due and proper exercise of the power of the inquiry” of the committee on around 30 September 2020, the document states.

READ ALSO:

At that 2020 congressional hearing, Mr Comey reaffirmed his 2017 testimony that he did not disclose or approve the disclosure of information about FBI investigations into either Trump or his 2016 presidential rival Hillary Clinton.

A series of memos by Mr Comey detailing his conversations with Trump were disclosed to the media in 2017.

In them, Mr Comey wrote that Trump had suggested that he drop an investigation into then-national security adviser Michael Flynn’s contact with Russia.

The case is considered to be the highest-profile indictments of a public figure during Trump’s second term.

Trump recently voiced his frustration that prosecutions of his public critics such as Mr Comey, Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Leticia James are taking so long.

“We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!” Trump said on Truth Social last week.

After charges were filed, Trump called Mr Comey “one of the worst human beings this Country has ever been exposed to”.

“He has been so bad for our Country, for so long, and is now at the beginning of being held responsible for his crimes against our Nation. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Asked about Mr Comey hours before the indictment was unsealed, Trump called him a “bad person” but said he had no advanced knowledge of his prosecution.

Laurie Levenson, a former federal prosecutor and a law professor at Loyola Marymount University, said it will be a very challenging case to prosecute.

“It’s often the defendant’s word against someone else’s and you’re gonna have to look at the credibility of both,” she tells BBC News.

“And even if James Comey got things wrong, that doesn’t mean that he knowingly or intentionally lied to Congress. So proving that is going to be the heart of the case.”

Ms Levenson also said this prosecution and Trump’s public pressure to move forward on it suggests that the traditional firewall between the White House and the US Department of Justice had “collapsed with this case”.

Several Democrats condemned the charges, with House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries denouncing them as “a disgraceful attack on the rule of law”, and vowing “accountability” for “anyone complicit in this malignant corruption”.

Mr Comey served as the FBI’s director between 2013 and 2017.

He had a tumultuous tenure that included overseeing the high-profile inquiry into Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s email just weeks before the 2016 election, which she lost to Trump.

He was fired by Trump amid an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

This is not the first investigation into the former FBI boss to be launched this year.

He was investigated by the Secret Service after he shared and then deleted a social media post of seashells spelled the numbers “8647”, which Republicans alleged was an incitement to violence against US President Donald Trump.

The number 86 is a slang term whose definitions include “to reject” or “to get rid of”, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, which also notes that it has more recently been used as a term meaning “to kill”, while Trump is the 47th US president.

In July, Mr Comey’s daughter Maurene Comey was fired from her role as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. She was given no reason for being removed from the office where she had worked for 10 years, according to media reports.

Earlier this month, she sued the Trump administration over her dismissal.

The Justice Department has been firing lawyers who worked on cases that angered the president, including a special prosecutor investigation of Trump.

Additional reporting by Sumi Somaskanda

Former FBI director James Comey indicted on two charges

BBC

Loading

Advertisement

International

One killed as Ukrainian drones ignite Russian oil refinery in Samara

Published

on

One killed as Ukrainian drones ignite Russian oil refinery in Samara

One killed as Ukrainian drones ignite Russian oil refinery in Samara

Fresh Ukrainian drone attacks have killed one person and injured three others, including a child, while igniting a major fire at a Russian oil refinery in the Samara region, as Kyiv intensified its campaign against Moscow’s energy infrastructure in the latest escalation of the more than four-year war.

Regional Governor Vyacheslav Fedorishchev said the overnight drone strikes hit residential buildings and an industrial facility in Russia’s Volga region, causing casualties and significant damage. While he did not identify the industrial site, independent Russian media outlet Astra, citing images and videos circulating on social media, reported that the target was the Syzran oil refinery.

Videos shared online showed massive flames and thick black smoke billowing from the refinery, as emergency responders battled the blaze. Authorities have yet to disclose the full extent of the damage or whether refinery operations have been suspended.

Russia’s Ministry of Defence said its air defence systems intercepted 349 Ukrainian drones overnight, describing it as one of the largest drone assaults in recent weeks. The ministry said drones targeted multiple regions, highlighting the growing scale and sophistication of Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign.

The Syzran refinery, owned by state-controlled oil giant Rosneft, is one of Russia’s key energy facilities, with an annual crude oil processing capacity of about 8.5 million tonnes. The refinery produces petrol, diesel, aviation fuel and other petroleum products that support both civilian and industrial demand.

READ ALSO:

The facility has been targeted repeatedly since Ukraine expanded its strategy of striking Russian energy infrastructure. Following an earlier drone attack in late May, operations at the refinery were temporarily halted after key processing equipment sustained damage.

The latest strike comes as Russia continues to grapple with disruptions to its fuel supply chain. Repeated attacks on refineries, oil depots and storage facilities have reduced refining capacity in several regions, contributing to fuel shortages and logistical challenges.

Reports indicate that some filling stations have begun rationing petrol, while motorists in affected areas have faced long queues as supplies tighten. Energy analysts say continued attacks on refining infrastructure could further strain domestic fuel distribution if repairs are delayed.

Ukraine has increasingly relied on long-range drones to target military installations, logistics hubs and energy infrastructure deep inside Russian territory. Kyiv argues that oil facilities are critical to financing Moscow’s military operations and sustaining its war effort.

The campaign is intended to increase economic and military pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin as Ukraine seeks stronger leverage in any future peace negotiations.

Meanwhile, Russia has maintained that any peace agreement must include the recognition of territories it claims to have annexed, including areas that remain only partially under Russian control. The Kremlin has continued to reject conditions proposed by Kyiv and its Western allies, leaving diplomatic efforts largely stalled.

The renewed attacks come as both countries continue to exchange long-range missile and drone strikes, targeting military assets, infrastructure and strategic facilities. Analysts warn that the intensifying campaign against energy installations on both sides could have broader implications for regional stability and international energy markets if the conflict continues to escalate.

Despite repeated international calls for restraint, there is little indication that either side is prepared to scale back military operations, raising concerns that the conflict could enter another prolonged and more destructive phase.

One killed as Ukrainian drones ignite Russian oil refinery in Samara

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Iran declares Strait of Hormuz closed as fresh US strikes deepen Gulf conflict

Published

on

Iran declares Strait of Hormuz closed as fresh US strikes deepen Gulf conflict

Iran declares Strait of Hormuz closed as fresh US strikes deepen Gulf conflict

The United States has launched a fresh wave of military strikes against Iran, targeting more than 140 military sites after Tehran was accused of attacking a commercial container ship in the Strait of Hormuz, significantly escalating tensions across the Middle East and raising fears of wider regional conflict.

According to the US Central Command (CENTCOM), the strikes were aimed at degrading Iran’s military capabilities and preventing further attacks on international shipping. US officials said the latest operation followed an alleged Iranian attack on a Cyprus-flagged container vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, which reportedly left one crew member missing and caused extensive damage to the ship.

Iran rejected Washington’s justification and announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, warning that the strategic waterway would remain closed until what it described as the end of US military interference in the region. Despite Tehran’s declaration, CENTCOM maintained that commercial vessels continued to transit the strait under heightened security, while international maritime agencies advised shipping companies to exercise extreme caution.

The renewed confrontation comes just days after US President Donald Trump declared a ceasefire between the United States and Iran effectively over, accusing Tehran of violating the agreement through renewed attacks on commercial shipping and US interests.

READ ALSO:

In response, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed responsibility for coordinated missile and drone strikes on US military assets and allied facilities across the Gulf. The group said it targeted command-and-control centres in Jordan, a US radar installation in Kuwait, aircraft carrier support facilities in Oman, military infrastructure in Qatar and other strategic locations. Iranian officials also claimed another commercial vessel was disabled in the Strait of Hormuz.

The conflict has triggered heightened security measures across the Gulf. The United Arab Emirates said its air defence systems intercepted Iranian missiles and drones, while Bahrain activated air raid sirens after detecting incoming threats. Explosions were also reported in Doha, prompting authorities to reinforce security around key infrastructure.

The latest escalation has intensified concerns over global energy markets. The Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas exports pass, remains one of the most strategically important maritime routes. Although shipping has not completely stopped, insurance premiums for vessels operating in the Gulf have surged, several shipping companies have reviewed their routes, and oil prices have climbed sharply amid fears of prolonged disruption.

Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts to ease tensions continue. Iranian and Omani officials have reportedly held talks in Muscat aimed at maintaining safe maritime navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, with further negotiations expected as regional mediators seek to prevent the conflict from spreading further.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi accused the United States of violating the ceasefire agreement, insisting that any truce could only survive through “mutual compliance.” Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, also warned that “the era of one-sided deals is over,” urging Washington to honour its commitments or face further consequences.

In a separate development, a statement attributed to Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, vowed retaliation for the killing of his father and predecessor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during the early stages of the conflict. The statement has further fuelled concerns that the crisis could evolve into a prolonged confrontation.

International leaders have renewed calls for restraint, warning that continued attacks on commercial shipping and military installations could destabilise the Middle East, disrupt global trade and worsen economic uncertainty.

Security analysts caution that unless diplomatic efforts succeed, the conflict could expand beyond the Gulf, drawing in additional regional actors and posing significant risks to global energy supplies, international commerce and geopolitical stability.

Iran declares Strait of Hormuz closed as fresh US strikes deepen Gulf conflict

Loading

Continue Reading

International

Trump says US will ‘completely decimate’ Iran if he is assassinated

Published

on

Trump says US will ‘completely decimate’ Iran if he is assassinated

Trump says US will ‘completely decimate’ Iran if he is assassinated

US President Donald Trump has warned that the United States would launch an overwhelming military response against Iran if the Islamic Republic attempted or succeeded in assassinating him, declaring that the country would be “completely decimated” under plans he said had already been approved.

The warning, issued on Trump’s Truth Social platform on Friday, marked one of his strongest public statements against Iran since tensions between Washington and Tehran resurfaced following renewed disputes over a fragile ceasefire agreement and ongoing negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme.

In the post, Trump claimed the US military had already prepared extensive contingency plans to respond to any assassination attempt against a sitting American president.

1,000 missiles are locked and loaded and aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands more to immediately follow, should the Iranian Government act on its threat, pronounced in many corners of the globe, to assassinate, or attempt to assassinate, the sitting President of the United States of America, in this case, ME!” Trump wrote.

The President added that the military had standing orders to carry out a devastating response if such an attack occurred.

Orders have already been given, and the U.S. Military is ready, willing, and able, for a one-year period of time, subject to extension, to completely decimate and destroy all areas of Iran,” he stated.

Although Trump did not present new evidence to support his claim, US officials have previously disclosed concerns about alleged Iranian threats against current and former American officials following the 2020 US drone strike that killed senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad. Iran has consistently denied plotting to assassinate American leaders.

Despite his tough rhetoric, Trump revealed that Washington had agreed to continue diplomatic engagement after Iran requested another round of negotiations.

READ ALSO:

“The Islamic Republic of Iran has asked us to continue talks. We have agreed to do so, but the United States has stated to them, in no uncertain terms, that the ceasefire is over,” Trump said.

His comments came just one day after he reiterated during the NATO Summit that the ceasefire arrangement reached between both countries had effectively collapsed following recent military exchanges.

The renewed diplomatic contacts suggest that while both sides remain sharply divided, neither Washington nor Tehran has completely abandoned efforts to resolve their differences through negotiations.

Iran swiftly rejected Trump’s claims, insisting it had complied with the terms of the memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed with the United States.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused Washington of violating the agreement, particularly provisions relating to sanctions and military deployments.

According to Araghchi, Tehran has continued to fulfil its obligations under the interim arrangement while the United States has failed to fully implement its own commitments.

“There can only be mutual compliance,” the Iranian foreign minister said, arguing that lasting progress can only be achieved if both countries honour every aspect of the agreement.

The memorandum of understanding was designed to reduce tensions by maintaining the status quo on Iran’s nuclear activities while creating a framework for broader negotiations on sanctions, regional security and confidence-building measures.

Although no fresh direct negotiations have been announced since the latest exchange of threats, diplomatic contacts remain active.

Regional mediators, particularly Qatar, continue to facilitate communication between Washington and Tehran in an effort to prevent the situation from escalating into a wider regional conflict.

Officials familiar with the negotiations say discussions remain focused on preserving diplomatic channels while reducing the risk of military confrontation across the Middle East.

Relations between the United States and Iran have remained strained for years over Iran’s nuclear programme, US economic sanctions, regional proxy conflicts and military activities in the Gulf.

The latest exchange of warnings comes against the backdrop of heightened instability across the Middle East, where conflicts involving Iran, Israel and armed groups aligned with Tehran continue to fuel international concern.

Security analysts say Trump’s latest remarks underscore the delicate balance between diplomacy and deterrence that continues to define US-Iran relations.

While negotiations remain on the table, experts warn that continued hostile rhetoric or further military incidents could undermine diplomatic efforts and increase the risk of another regional confrontation.

For now, both Washington and Tehran appear determined to maintain dialogue while simultaneously projecting military strength, leaving the future of their relationship uncertain.

The international community continues to monitor developments closely, with global powers urging both countries to exercise restraint, honour existing commitments and pursue peaceful solutions through sustained diplomacy.

Trump says US will ‘completely decimate’ Iran if he is assassinated

Loading

Continue Reading

Trending