International
US, Iran Set to Sign Peace Deal June 19 in Switzerland as Hostilities Cease
US, Iran Set to Sign Peace Deal June 19 in Switzerland as Hostilities Cease
GENEVA, Switzerland — In a landmark diplomatic breakthrough, the United States and Iran have reached a historic peace agreement aimed at ending nearly four months of military confrontation that threatened to destabilize the entire Middle East. The formal signing ceremony is scheduled to take place on Friday, June 19, 2026, in Switzerland, following intensive mediation efforts led by Pakistan with support from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Türkiye.
The agreement, structured as a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) , is expected to establish an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, once signed. It also provides for the reopening of the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for global oil supplies, and sets the stage for a 60-day negotiation period to address outstanding issues, including Iran’s nuclear programme and comprehensive sanctions relief.
Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the breakthrough on social media, confirming that both nations had agreed to a peace framework following weeks of intense back-channel diplomacy. Shortly thereafter, US President Donald Trump confirmed the deal on his Truth Social platform, writing: “The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all! I hereby fully authorize the toll free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, and, simultaneously herewith, authorize the immediate removal of the United States Naval blockade. Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow.” The actual signing, however, awaits the formal ceremony on June 19.
The final draft of the memorandum covers a wide range of critical issues that had kept the region on edge for months. Under the pending agreement, Iran is expected to immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz to all commercial vessels upon signing. In return, the United States will lift its naval blockade on Iranian ports, with implementation to be completed within 30 days of the signing. The waterway, which handles a substantial share of the world’s oil exports, will be restored to full commercial traffic. News of the anticipated reopening has already prompted a decline in global oil prices as markets react positively to expectations of improved regional stability.
Both sides are expected to declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, where Iranian-backed Hezbollah forces had been engaged in cross-border clashes with Israeli forces. The ceasefire is expected to be unconditional and take effect immediately upon signing.
READ ALSO:
- Police Foil Kidnap Attempt, Rescue Nine Victims on Katsina–Kankara Road
- Edo Gov Okpebholo Orders Probe Into Benin Vegetable Market Kidnapping
- Late Gen. Rabe’s Son Denies Claim Father Had Diabetes, Says Mother Still in Captivity
The United States has agreed not to impose any new sanctions on Iran until a final deal is reached. Additionally, the US will waive oil sanctions on Iran for a specified period, allowing Tehran to sell oil and receive revenue. Most significantly, the US has agreed to release approximately $25 billion of Iran’s frozen assets, to be delivered through a combination of direct cash transfers, cooperation among regional countries, and financial credit lines. A separate reconstruction and development plan for Iran is to be defined within the 60-day negotiation window that follows the signing.
The nuclear question — perhaps the most sensitive issue in US-Iran relations — has been addressed in a phased manner. Tehran has agreed that it will neither produce nor acquire nuclear weapons. Pending a final agreement, Iran will maintain the nuclear status quo, including refraining from enriching uranium and not expanding nuclear facilities. The United States, for its part, has agreed that Tehran will be permitted to dilute its highly enriched uranium stockpile inside Iran, with a specific mechanism to be discussed during the 60-day negotiation period after the June 19 signing.
Despite the celebratory announcements, significant differences in how the two sides interpret the agreement have already emerged — raising questions about the durability of the peace framework. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi confirmed that a final text had been agreed upon and would be signed in Switzerland on June 19. However, he emphasized that Iran’s entry into the 60-day negotiation period is conditional upon US fulfilment of its initial commitments — specifically, ending all hostilities, lifting the naval blockade, and releasing frozen Iranian assets. “This memorandum of understanding does not mean trusting the enemy,” Gharibabadi said. “We will monitor the implementation of US commitments.” On the nuclear issue, Iranian media reported that Tehran has not accepted any new nuclear obligations under the agreement, with nuclear issues to be addressed only during the 60-day negotiation period following the signing ceremony. A Trump administration official, however, offered a markedly different interpretation, stating that the draft agreement includes the removal and destruction of Iran’s nuclear materials and the dismantling of its nuclear program, with sanctions relief tied to verified compliance by Tehran. This discrepancy suggests that the 60-day technical negotiation period, far from being a mere formality, could become a contentious battleground where the true contours of the deal are fought out.
The international community has largely welcomed the deal, while some observers have expressed skepticism about its long-term viability. In a joint statement, the leaders of France, Britain, Germany, and Italy congratulated the United States, Iran, Pakistan, Qatar, and other mediators on the “diplomatic breakthrough.” “This is a moment of opportunity to restore regional stability and stabilise the global economy,” the statement read. “It is now vital that the detailed negotiations are concluded and this agreement is implemented rapidly and comprehensively. We are ready to support that effort.” The European leaders stressed that Iran must never acquire a nuclear weapon and said they were “prepared to lift relevant sanctions in response to clear, verifiable steps by Iran on its nuclear programme.” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres hailed the deal as a “critical step” towards resolving the war in the Middle East, expressing hope that the parties would build on this new momentum. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said the agreement “constitutes an important milestone on the path to establishing lasting peace and stability in the region.”
READ ALSO:
- Abdulsalami Reveals Why Ojukwu Rejected Gowon as Nigeria’s Leader
- How Abacha’s ‘Kitchen Cabinet’ Tried to Oust Me, Pushed for Babangida’s Arrest — Abdulsalami
- Grand Chief Imam of Oyo Land Celebrates Ambassador Victor Adeleke, Praises His Service, Humility
Not everyone has greeted the deal with enthusiasm. Some political figures in both the United States and Israel have expressed caution, questioning whether the agreement can withstand future challenges. Ben Rhodes, who served as a speechwriter during the Obama administration’s 2015 nuclear negotiations with Iran, said the new deal leaves an emboldened Iranian regime at great cost to the world. “This deal reopens a body of water that was open before the war and begins a nuclear negotiation far narrower than what Trump was seeking before the war,” he wrote on X. Former Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger, a longtime Trump critic, wrote on social media: “Iran is now rich and will control the strait while selling their oil on the open market. I was critical of Obama’s deal, but this makes that look amazing in comparison.”
Israel, which was not party to the negotiations, has expressed deep concerns about the deal’s implications for its security. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has publicly supported efforts to end hostilities between Washington and Tehran but warned that certain terms of the agreement could undermine Israeli security. Israeli officials have expressed concern that Iran may be receiving significant concessions without making sufficient commitments on its nuclear activities. There are also questions about whether Hezbollah-related issues in Lebanon have been adequately addressed. Israel has maintained that its confrontation with Hezbollah is separate from the US-Iran arrangement and that it reserves the right to act in its own defense. Reports have emerged of growing tensions between Trump and Netanyahu, with Trump reportedly criticizing Israeli airstrikes in Beirut that occurred while the United States and Iran were nearing a peace agreement — strikes that nearly derailed the negotiations in their final hours.
The anticipated reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is viewed as one of the most significant aspects of the pending agreement. The waterway is a critical route for global energy supplies, handling approximately 20% of the world’s oil exports. News of the breakthrough has already prompted a decline in oil prices as markets react positively to expectations of improved regional stability and increased supply. Asian stocks have moved higher amid expectations that energy exports through the Strait of Hormuz could gradually resume once the agreement is signed. Shipping and logistics companies, which had been forced to reroute vessels around the Cape of Good Hope at significant cost, have already begun planning for the resumption of normal transit through the waterway pending the June 19 signing.
While the agreement marks a significant step towards peace, several complex issues remain unresolved. Negotiators are expected to spend the coming weeks after the signing discussing Iran’s nuclear activities, including the future of its centrifuges and heavy water reactor; comprehensive sanctions relief, including the scope and timeline for lifting UN and EU sanctions; the verification and monitoring regime to ensure Iranian compliance; the mechanism for diluting Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile inside the country; and a reconstruction and development plan for Iran’s economy. The 60-day technical negotiation period is scheduled to begin after the June 19 signing ceremony, though Iran has insisted that it will only enter these talks after verifying that the United States has fulfilled its initial commitments regarding ending hostilities, lifting the blockade, and releasing frozen assets. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has repeatedly emphasized that entering into 60 days of negotiations is conditional upon the fulfilment of these commitments by the United States. This conditionality means that any delay or perceived non-compliance by Washington between the signing and the start of talks could unravel the entire framework before substantive negotiations even begin.
All eyes now turn to Switzerland, where on Friday, June 19, 2026, the formal signing ceremony is expected to take place. Further details will likely emerge once both parties officially endorse the agreement and the full text of the memorandum of understanding is made public.
US, Iran Set to Sign Peace Deal June 19 in Switzerland as Hostilities Cease
![]()
International
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House Over ‘Fake News’
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House Over ‘Fake News’
WASHINGTON — United States President Donald Trump has announced restrictions barring CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, accusing the three media organisations of repeatedly publishing what he described as “fake news” about his administration.
Trump announced the decision on Friday, September 18, 2026, in a post on his Truth Social platform, declaring that the restrictions were effective immediately.
The president accused the organisations of reporting what he called “fiction and lies” about him, his administration and the United States, while warning that other media outlets could also face similar restrictions.
The announcement has opened another confrontation between the Trump administration and the American media, with press-freedom advocates and journalists raising questions about the constitutional limits of presidential control over access to the White House.
The dispute also escalated on Saturday after journalists working for MS NOW were denied entry to the White House grounds, providing the clearest indication that the administration had begun enforcing at least part of Trump’s announced restrictions.
Trump, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office after making the announcement, defended the decision and said the three organisations had engaged in what he regarded as deliberately negative coverage of his administration.
“They’re fake news,” Trump said when asked about the decision, adding that other media organisations could also be affected if they continued with what he described as unfair reporting.
Trump did not identify a single report that prompted the action. Instead, he pointed to what he characterised as the organisations’ overall coverage of his presidency.
He also criticised other major American news organisations, including The New York Times and The Washington Post, suggesting that additional outlets could face restrictions.
However, no ban on either newspaper was immediately announced.
The White House action initially created uncertainty because journalists from the three targeted organisations remained on the White House grounds after Trump’s announcement on Friday.
READ ALSO:
- Jetour Unleashes F700 Hybrid Pickup as Abuja Experience Begins Tuesday
- “She Wanted to Stay Single”: Rema Opens Up About Rejection That Inspired Hit Song ‘Oh No’
- Ronaldo Included in Portugal’s Nations League Squad as Jorge Jesus Begins New Era
CNN journalists were still working from the network’s White House workspace, while CNN also had personnel involved in the television pool covering Vice President JD Vance.
The situation changed on Saturday when MS NOW journalists were denied access to the White House grounds.
The development raised fresh questions about whether the administration intended to apply the restrictions to physical access, press credentials, White House workspaces, presidential events and media pools, or all forms of coverage from the presidential complex.
It was not immediately clear whether CNN journalists had also been denied entry on Saturday, while Politico journalists are generally not based at the White House during weekends.
Trump was spending the weekend at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland.
The president’s action has drawn a strong response from the affected organisations.
CNN rejected the move and said it stood behind its White House reporting team. The network maintained that journalists should be able to report from the White House without government interference and indicated that it would challenge any formal restriction that violated its constitutional protections.
Politico also rejected the president’s allegations and said it would continue covering the Trump administration and future administrations.
The organisation said it would defend its First Amendment rights against attempts to restrict its access to government officials and presidential activities.
MS NOW also condemned the restriction after its journalists were denied entry, saying it would pursue available measures to protect its constitutional rights and the public’s access to information about government activities.
The White House Correspondents’ Association also criticised the administration’s decision.
The association argued that freedom of the press should not depend on whether a president agrees with the coverage produced by a particular news organisation or approves of questions asked by its journalists.
The controversy has also attracted the attention of major press-freedom organisations, which have warned that excluding news organisations because of dissatisfaction with their reporting could raise serious constitutional questions.
The First Amendment protects freedom of the press in the United States, although the government also has authority to regulate access to secure government facilities.
The central legal question is therefore likely to concern whether the White House can selectively exclude particular news organisations because the administration objects to their reporting or perceived editorial position.
The latest dispute follows an earlier confrontation between the Trump administration and the Associated Press over White House access.
In 2025, the White House restricted AP journalists from certain presidential events after the news organisation declined to adopt Trump’s preferred name, “Gulf of America”, for the body of water traditionally known as the Gulf of Mexico.
The AP challenged the restrictions in court, turning the dispute into a wider legal battle over presidential control of press access.
Trump has also had a previous major confrontation with CNN over White House access.
During his first presidency, the White House revoked CNN correspondent Jim Acosta’s press credentials following a contentious exchange between Acosta and Trump at a November 2018 press conference.
CNN challenged the decision in court, and a federal judge temporarily ordered the restoration of Acosta’s access. The White House later restored his credentials permanently.
The latest dispute is therefore occurring against the background of several years of tension between Trump and major American news organisations.
Trump has repeatedly criticised media outlets whose reporting he considers unfair or inaccurate, while journalists and press-freedom groups have argued that government officials should not determine access to the presidency according to whether they approve of news coverage.
Another issue raised by Trump’s latest announcement is the absence of specific reports identified by the president as the basis for the restrictions.
Rather than pointing to one article or broadcast, Trump referred broadly to what he described as the organisations’ continued publication of negative and false reports.
The president also raised the issue of government spending on Politico subscriptions while defending his decision.
Politico has rejected suggestions that its government subscriptions amounted to improper financial support, arguing that such claims were misleading.
Trump’s warning that other media organisations could also be targeted has added another dimension to the dispute.
The president has suggested that additional outlets could be excluded from the White House if he believes they continue to engage in what he considers unfair reporting.
That possibility has heightened concerns among journalists about the future of White House press access and whether the administration could establish different levels of access for media organisations based on their editorial coverage.
The immediate focus, however, is on how the restrictions against CNN, MS NOW and Politico will be implemented.
Questions remain over whether the administration will issue formal rules covering press credentials, presidential events, White House workspaces and press pools.
The organisations affected have indicated that they intend to continue covering the Trump administration and defend their rights to do so.
The confrontation could consequently develop into another major legal battle over the relationship between the White House and the American press, with the outcome potentially affecting how journalists gain access to the presidency.
For now, the denial of entry to MS NOW journalists represents a significant development from Friday’s announcement, when the precise scope of the proposed ban remained unclear.
The unfolding dispute places White House press access, media freedom and First Amendment protections at the centre of another major confrontation between President Trump and the American news media.
Trump Bans CNN, MS NOW, Politico From White House Over ‘Fake News’
![]()
International
Asian Games Organisers Apologise After Blunder Broadcasts North Korean Anthem for South Korea
Asian Games Organisers Apologise After Blunder Broadcasts North Korean Anthem for South Korea
A mistaken stadium audio track following South Korea’s 5-0 hockey win over Bangladesh triggers protests amid wider logistical issues in Japan.
Organisers of the Asian Games in Japan issued a formal apology on Friday after mistakenly playing the North Korean national anthem for South Korea’s men’s hockey team.
The embarrassing mix-up occurred shortly after South Korea secured a commanding 5-0 victory over Bangladesh, leaving players standing perplexed on the pitch as the wrong national anthem echoed through the stadium speakers.
Following the initial blunder, venue operators played the national anthem of Bangladesh before finally broadcasting South Korea’s proper anthem, prompting a stadium announcer to issue an immediate apology over the public address system.
However, South Korea coach Min Tae-seok condemned the oversight as an inexcusable operational failure. Min stated that while tournament officials blamed an individual operator for selecting the wrong audio file, an international competition must never tolerate errors of such sensitive political magnitude.
Furthermore, the anthem blunder compounds wider operational difficulties facing Japanese host venues ahead of Saturday’s official opening ceremony. Several delegations have voiced strong frustration over logistical arrangements, with visiting teams reporting airport delays lasting up to six hours.
In addition, members of South Korea’s basketball squad published videos showing water pouring from broken pipes into their athlete village rooms, intensifying pressure on local organisers to resolve village infrastructure and technical coordination before mainstream competitions begin.
Asian Games Organisers Apologise After Blunder Broadcasts North Korean Anthem for South Korea
![]()
International
BREAKING: Bloodbath at Pakistan Mosque as Suicide Blast Kills 21, Injures 103
BREAKING: Bloodbath at Pakistan Mosque as Suicide Blast Kills 21, Injures 103
KOHAT, Pakistan — Friday prayers turned into a scene of horror in Pakistan on Friday as a powerful suicide attack ripped through a mosque inside a police compound in Kohat, leaving at least 21 people dead and 103 others injured.
The devastating attack, which struck the Old Police Lines in Kohat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, claimed the lives of 15 police personnel and six civilians, while 73 policemen and 30 civilians were injured, according to health officials.
The attack occurred at about 1:20pm local time, when worshippers had gathered for the weekly Friday prayers at the mosque located inside the heavily guarded Police Lines compound.
Eyewitness accounts and initial reports described scenes of panic as a massive explosion tore through the facility, sending debris flying and trapping victims beneath damaged sections of the mosque and surrounding buildings.
According to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Inspector-General of Police Zulfiqar Hamid, an explosives-laden vehicle was rammed into the gate of the old Police Lines before detonating, unleashing the devastating blast.
The explosion caused extensive damage to the police facility and mosque, with parts of the structure collapsing as worshippers and police officers were caught in the blast.
But the nightmare did not end with the explosion.
As rescue workers rushed to evacuate the wounded, gunfire erupted inside the compound after armed militants reportedly attempted to force their way deeper into the police facility.
A further suicide explosion was also reported near the Special Branch building during the ensuing confrontation between the attackers and security forces.
READ ALSO:
- Xenophobia: FG Brings 33 More Nigerians Home From South Africa
- Falconets Thrash England 3-0, Face Colombia in U-20 World Cup Quarter-Finals
- Replace Fuel Subsidy With Vehicle Credit to Drive Mobility, Jobs,LCCI, Ilekuba tell FG
Police said seven armed attackers had entered the compound following the initial assault, triggering a fierce firefight involving police and Counter-Terrorism Department personnel.
Security forces eventually killed the attackers, including a suicide bomber and a sniper, as they battled to regain control of the compound.
The scale of the casualties overwhelmed medical facilities in Kohat, forcing the District Headquarters Hospital to declare an emergency.
Ambulances raced to the scene as doctors and medical workers treated scores of victims suffering blast injuries, gunshot wounds and injuries caused by collapsing structures.
Health authorities put the number of injured at 103, with 73 police personnel and 30 civilians among those receiving treatment.
Some of the wounded were reportedly in critical condition, while rescue teams continued searching the damaged compound for possible survivors trapped under debris.
The heavy police casualties were attributed to the location and timing of the attack, with officers among those gathered inside the mosque for Friday prayers.
Among those reportedly killed were SP Traffic Akbar Shinwari and Dr Israel Orakzai, head of the children’s department at DHQ KDA Kohat, according to Pakistani media reports.
Security forces subsequently cordoned off the area and restricted movement around the Police Lines as investigators began examining the scene and searching for explosives or possible accomplices.
The Kohat-Hangu Road was also closed temporarily as security and rescue operations continued.
The attack triggered widespread outrage across Pakistan, with President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif condemning the bombing and mourning the victims.
Sharif directed authorities to ensure that the injured received immediate and adequate medical treatment while security agencies were ordered to investigate the attack.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi also condemned the assault and directed officials to mobilise available resources for the treatment of the wounded.
Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi expressed solidarity with the families of those killed and injured, as condemnation poured in from within and outside Pakistan.
Countries including Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, Russia, Poland, Australia and Jordan also condemned the attack and expressed sympathy with the victims and their families.
The Kohat bombing comes against the backdrop of an escalating militant threat in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, one of Pakistan’s most violence-prone regions.
The province, which shares a border with Afghanistan, has witnessed repeated attacks targeting police, soldiers and civilians.
The latest bloodshed also came shortly after a roadside bombing in neighbouring Hangu district reportedly killed six soldiers, further raising security concerns in the region.
Pakistan has repeatedly accused militants linked to the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) of using hideouts in Afghanistan to launch attacks inside Pakistan. Afghanistan’s Taliban authorities have consistently rejected allegations that they permit their territory to be used for attacks against Pakistan.
Responsibility for the Kohat attack remained disputed in the immediate aftermath.
While later reports attributed a claim to a faction associated with the TTP, other reports said the TTP denied involvement. Security authorities have therefore continued investigations to establish the identity of those behind the attack and determine whether others assisted the attackers.
The deadly incident has also drawn painful memories of the January 2023 Police Lines mosque bombing in Peshawar, in which more than 100 people, mostly police officers, were killed.
For residents of Kohat, Friday’s attack once again turned a place of worship into a battlefield, leaving families searching for loved ones and hospitals struggling to cope with the influx of casualties.
As security agencies combed through the wreckage and investigators worked to establish the circumstances surrounding the assault, the death toll and number of injured remained subject to further updates.
At least 21 people are confirmed dead and 103 injured in the latest official figures, with fears that the casualty figures could change as authorities complete rescue and medical operations.
BREAKING: Bloodbath at Pakistan Mosque as Suicide Blast Kills 21, Injures 103
![]()
-
metro3 days agoNiger Mosque Abductions: Terrorists Execute 30 of 500 Captive Muslim Worshippers
-
Business2 days agoFuel Prices Climb to ₦1,500 per Litre Across Nigeria, Sparking Calls for Urgent Action
-
News2 days agoOAU Investigates Death of Final-Year Student as Police Begin Probe
-
News1 day agoECOWAS Biometric Card Expands as Seven Countries Begin Rollout
-
Politics2 days agoAisha Buhari Visits Atiku Amid Opposition Coalition Activities
-
metro3 days agoUS-Based Nigerian Lawyers Disbarred: Full List of Fraud, Theft and Misconduct Cases
-
Business2 days agoNCAA Moves Against Airlines Over Rising Flight Delays
-
Interview2 days agoHe Does Not Lose Elections”: Abdulmumin Jibrin Predicts 65% Landslide for Tinubu in 2027
