metro
Adeyemi Insists Gbajabiamila Approved His Appointment as Court Case Begins
Adeyemi Insists Gbajabiamila Approved His Appointment as Court Case Begins
Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, who is facing charges of alleged impersonation, forgery and related offences, has denied any wrongdoing, insisting that Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was aware of his appointment as Director-General of the now-defunct Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC).
Adeyemi made the claims during a telephone interview on Channels Television’s Politics Today, maintaining that he acted lawfully throughout his time in office and expressing confidence that the court would eventually clear his name.
His comments come days after Nigerian authorities filed charges against him over allegations that he falsely presented himself as the Director-General of the PFIPC and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council (PEAC)—two entities the Presidency has said were never legally established as federal government agencies.
When asked whether he was evading law enforcement, Adeyemi dismissed the suggestion, saying he was prepared to defend himself before the court.
“Not at all,” he said.
He stressed that the matter was already before a competent court and urged the public to allow the judicial process to determine the facts.
“Definitely, if I am wrong, let the court of law do that; if I am right, let the court of law do the right thing. Since the matter is in court, let the court of competent jurisdiction vindicate me because I am ready to clear my name.”
Adeyemi also disclosed that he possesses what he described as a valid letter of appointment, although he declined to provide details because of the ongoing legal proceedings.
“I have a letter of appointment. However, since the matter is in court, I won’t be able to say much about it. I am on medication. I am a bit down; I am sick.”
Responding to questions about whether he considered himself a criminal, Adeyemi rejected the allegation outright.
READ ALSO:
- UK Plans £10,000 Repayment Rule for Asylum Seekers Before Permanent Settlement
- US Withdraws Majority of Troops from Nigeria After Counterterrorism Mission
- Ronaldo Makes World Cup History as Ramos Fires Portugal Past Croatia into Round of 16
“No, I am not a criminal. The court will be fair to that.”
Asked directly whether Femi Gbajabiamila was aware of his appointment, Adeyemi answered in the affirmative.
When further questioned about whether he had confirmation from the Chief of Staff’s office, he replied:
“Yes. Let the court vindicate all those things.”
Adeyemi argued that it would have been impossible for him to publicly represent the agency for nearly three years without official knowledge or approval.
“For one second, let us assume the agency does not exist. Would I have the temerity, the audacity, to be going all over the country, meeting heads of ministries, departments and agencies if I knew the agency did not exist or that I fabricated everything?
“No Nigerian can dare do that. I could not have summoned the courage to be going from one place to another for almost three years. Nigeria is not a banana republic.”
The case stems from allegations that Adeyemi unlawfully held himself out as the head of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council, using the titles in engagements with government institutions and other organisations.
The Presidency has consistently maintained that neither the PFIPC nor the PEAC exists as a legally recognised federal government agency. Officials have also distanced the Presidency from any appointment letters or authorisations allegedly issued in connection with the organisations.
The Office of the Chief of Staff has previously denied authorising Adeyemi to represent the Presidency or act on behalf of any federal agency, a position that forms part of the issues expected to be examined during the court proceedings.
Legal analysts say the trial is likely to focus on the authenticity of the appointment documents presented by Adeyemi, the legal status of the agencies involved and whether any government officials had knowledge of or participated in the alleged appointments.
The case has attracted significant public attention because it raises broader questions about the verification of government appointments, institutional accountability and safeguards against the misuse of official identities.
With the matter now before the court, both the prosecution and the defence are expected to present documentary evidence and witness testimony as the judiciary determines the merits of the allegations.
Adeyemi Insists Gbajabiamila Approved His Appointment as Court Case Begins
![]()
metro
Over 50 Killed, Scores Injured as Gunmen Attack Mangu Communities in Plateau
Over 50 Killed, Scores Injured as Gunmen Attack Mangu Communities in Plateau
More than 50 people have been confirmed dead and several others injured following coordinated attacks on two communities in Mangu Local Government Area of Plateau State, with gunmen moving from house to house and slaughtering residents while they slept .
More than 50 people have been confirmed dead and several others injured following coordinated attacks on two communities in Mangu Local Government Area of Plateau State, with gunmen moving from house to house and slaughtering residents while they slept. The attacks, which occurred on Sunday, August 16, and Monday, August 17, 2026, have heightened concerns over the escalating cycle of violence in Plateau State, where farmer-herder conflicts and communal reprisals have claimed hundreds of lives in recent years.
The latest assault targeted Binper community in Mangu Local Government Area, occurring between midnight on Monday and the early hours of Tuesday, August 18, 2026. According to eyewitness Daniel Musa, the attackers were heavily armed and moved systematically from house to house, forcing their way into homes where residents were sleeping. Musa told Vanguard: “Our village came under attack last night and in the early hours of today, Tuesday, by heavily armed persons. They were moving from house to house, opening the doors of people who were sleeping and slaughtering them. As of this morning, we have confirmed over 20 deaths, while several others sustained serious injuries and some people are still missing” . Another resident, John Dalyop, condemned the attack as barbaric and expressed frustration over the continued violence, stating: “We expected the new Commissioner of Police in the state to act quickly and go after those responsible” . He urged the state and federal governments to urgently strengthen security around vulnerable communities in Mangu and other parts of Plateau State. Victims who sustained injuries have been taken to nearby hospitals for treatment, while community leaders and residents are making efforts to account for those still missing. Security operatives were reportedly deployed to the community on Tuesday morning to restore calm and prevent further attacks, though efforts to obtain reactions from security operatives were unsuccessful at the time of filing this report.
READ ALSO:
- WAEC 2026 results: Schools raise alarm over alleged grading anomalies
- Trump Threatens to Bomb Oman Over Strait of Hormuz as US-Iran Deadline Expires
- Osun guber: APC rejects Adeleke’s victory, begins audit of INEC results
The Binper attack came just two days after a separate, deadlier assault on the nearby Jwak Maitumbi community on Sunday, August 16, where over 30 people were feared killed and more than 50 houses, shops, churches, and food barns were set ablaze. A resident and youth leader of the village, Lonji Zuhumnan, told New Telegraph that the rampaging gunmen, numbering over 100 and armed with sophisticated weapons, stormed the community at about 7:30 am on Sunday, shooting indiscriminately for several hours. Zuhumnan said: “Our community, Jwak Maitumbi, came under severe attack yesterday morning. The Fulani terrorists numbering over 100 and carrying sophisticated weapons stormed the village at about 7:30 am as people were either in churches or preparing to go to their worship centres” . He further lamented that distress calls to security operatives for help were not responded to until the gunmen had finished their mission and fled into the bushes and rocks, stating: “At the end of the carnage, we counted over 30 dead bodies while several others were injured. Apart from the people they slaughtered, the terrorists also burned down over 50 houses, shops, health centres, churches and food barns” .
A counter-insurgency publication, Zagazola Makama, confirmed the Jwak Maitumbi incident, citing an anonymous military source that troops were deployed to the community after the attack was reported at about 7:45 am. The military source said troops discovered about 45 houses destroyed and valuables belonging to residents looted during the assault. The attackers also reportedly entered farms belonging to Fulani residents and used cutlasses to destroy large quantities of crops. Following the incident, troops summoned the Galadima and youth leader of Jwak Maitumbi community, directing the community leadership to assist security agencies in identifying and producing those responsible for the attack. Makama noted that the conflict in parts of Plateau has frequently been characterised by tit-for-tat attacks, in which an attack on one community is followed by retaliation against another community, often resulting in further deaths, destruction of property, and displacement. The destruction of shelters and crops could become a trigger for revenge if affected residents believe that perpetrators have not been identified or brought to justice. “The danger is that the latest incident could similarly be interpreted through the lens of previous attacks rather than as an isolated criminal act,” Makama stated, noting that failure to establish accountability could deepen perceptions of impunity and increase the temptation for affected communities to seek their own form of justice.
READ ALSO:
- Court Freezes 71 Banks’ Accounts Over N1.34bn Access Bank Cyber Fraud
- Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport
- Customs Names Importers of 399 Pump-Action Rifles, Hands Over Weapons to NSA Office
Plateau State has experienced repeated outbreaks of violence linked to farmer-herder conflicts, communal tensions, and reprisal attacks that have left hundreds dead in recent years, with weak policing and impunity for killings often sparking indiscriminate reprisals along communal lines in the religiously mixed state. Between April and July 2026 alone, no fewer than 200 people were reportedly killed in violence around the Barkin Ladi axis before the deployment of Department of State Services operatives to the area. The attacks have persisted despite federal assurances, with President Bola Tinubu visiting Plateau State on April 3, 2026, and promising that recurring killings would not happen again—only for fresh attacks to continue in the weeks that followed. Security analysts from SBM Intelligence have identified Mangu Local Government Area as a significant flashpoint following renewed clashes between the Mwaghavul community and Fulani residents at Jwak Maitumbi, warning that “the likelihood of further reprisals remains moderately high given that the causative factors remain unresolved, and the recent violence has only added fresh grievances on both sides” .
Residents of the affected communities have called on the state and federal governments to urgently strengthen security around vulnerable communities in Mangu and other parts of Plateau State, while the Berom Youth Moulders Association has previously condemned the continued killings, attacks, destruction of farmlands, and sexual harassment of women across communities in Riyom and Barkin Ladi Local Councils. Meanwhile, the Plateau State chapter of the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) has alleged killings of Fulani herders by suspected gunmen, calling on security agencies to intensify efforts to apprehend perpetrators. In a recent statement, MACBAN condemned the killing of three herders in separate attacks around Kpanchuku in Jebbu Bassa and Gana Ropp communities, describing the acts as “barbaric, inhumane, unprovoked and unacceptable” . MACBAN’s State Secretary, Muhammad Salihu Isa, stated: “In the last one week, we have lost many herders and cattle to gunmen. We cannot move freely to tend to our cattle” . The association urged all members and the general public to remain calm and law-abiding, and not to take the law into their own hands, while appealing to security agencies to intensify efforts to apprehend the perpetrators.
The attacks on Binper and Jwak Maitumbi communities represent a significant escalation of violence in Plateau State, with over 50 people killed in two days and hundreds displaced, while the destruction of homes, churches, and food barns has deepened the humanitarian crisis in the region and fears of reprisal attacks continue to heighten tensions. Efforts to obtain reactions from security operatives regarding the Binper attack were unsuccessful at the time of filing this report, but troops have maintained a presence in the general area while engaging community and traditional leaders in efforts to de-escalate tensions, prevent retaliatory violence, and restore calm.
Over 50 Killed, Scores Injured as Gunmen Attack Mangu Communities in Plateau
![]()
metro
Court Freezes 71 Banks’ Accounts Over N1.34bn Access Bank Cyber Fraud
Court Freezes 71 Banks’ Accounts Over N1.34bn Access Bank Cyber Fraud
Justice Akintayo Aluko of the Federal High Court in Lagos has granted interim orders freezing accounts across 71 financial institutions following an alleged N1.34 billion cyber fraud perpetrated against Access Bank Plc through its internet banking platform. The court’s ruling, delivered on Friday, August 15, 2026, came after Access Bank filed an ex-parte application seeking urgent judicial intervention to prevent further dissipation of funds allegedly stolen from four of its customers’ accounts. The bank discovered the fraud upon resumption of operations on August 12, 2026, after noticing suspicious transactions on its Access SME App, an internet banking platform designed for business customers.
Access Bank’s internal investigation revealed that a total of N1,340,425,393 had been transferred without authorisation from four customer accounts. According to an affidavit deposed to by Sodiq Jimoh, a litigation clerk with Country Hill Attorneys & Solicitors, the stolen funds were traced to multiple accounts domiciled with Access Bank and 71 other financial institutions. The affected customer accounts included MIB TXN Bullion (Aba Branch), from which ₦590,975,889 was allegedly stolen; AIICO General Insurance Company Limited, which lost ₦420,449,504; Apogee Engineering Limited, which was defrauded of ₦136,000,000; and Sims Nigeria Limited, which lost ₦193,000,000. The bank’s investigation further identified the Bank Verification Numbers (BVNs) of alleged beneficiaries and other accounts linked to those BVNs, enabling a comprehensive tracing of the illicit funds across the financial ecosystem.
Access Bank filed an ex-parte motion marked FHC/LAG/MISC/1168/2026, seeking four principal reliefs from the court, with the bank represented by lawyers from Country Hill Attorneys and Solicitors, including Ifeoma Esther Enyinnaya, Aishat Nurudeen, and Faith Itua-Oboh. The bank sought Post-No-Debit (PND) restrictions on all accounts and BVNs that received portions of the unauthorised funds, pending the determination of the substantive suit; affidavits of disclosure from the respondent banks stating the amounts salvaged in the beneficiary accounts; watchlisting of BVNs linked to the beneficiary accounts until the full N1.34 billion is recovered, to the extent received by each beneficiary; and the reversal of recovered funds into a designated Access Bank account belonging to the applicant. Justice Akintayo Aluko granted the first three reliefs, holding that the essence of the application was to preserve the funds from further dissipation and that the court had a duty to protect the subject matter of the case. However, the judge declined to grant the fourth relief seeking immediate reversal of the salvaged funds, ruling that such an order would amount to a final determination of a substantive issue at the interlocutory stage. The judge also directed Access Bank’s counsel to file an undertaking as to damages in the event that the orders are subsequently determined to have been unwarranted, and the matter has been adjourned to August 31, 2026, for further proceedings.
READ ALSO:
- Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport
- Customs Names Importers of 399 Pump-Action Rifles, Hands Over Weapons to NSA Office
- TCN Injects 220MVA Into Lagos Grid, Boosts Power Supply to 134,000 Residents
The 71 financial institutions named as respondents in the suit represent a cross-section of Nigeria’s financial services sector and include major commercial banks such as First Bank, Fidelity Bank, Ecobank, FCMB, Guaranty Trust Bank, Keystone Bank, Stanbic IBTC Bank, Sterling Bank, Union Bank, United Bank for Africa, Wema Bank, Zenith Bank, Globus Bank, and Jaiz Bank, among others. The list also includes fintech companies like OPay Digital Services, PalmPay, Moniepoint Microfinance Bank, Kuda Microfinance Bank, Paga, Carbon Microfinance Bank, FairMoney Microfinance Bank, and Branch International Financial Services, as well as payment service providers including eTranzact International, KongaPay, MoMo Payment Service Bank, SmartCash Payment Service Bank, and 9Payment Service Bank. These institutions are now required by court order to place PND restrictions on the identified accounts and BVNs, and to provide affidavits disclosing the amounts recovered from the affected accounts.
In its court filing, Access Bank argued that urgent judicial intervention was necessary to prevent further dissipation of the funds, disclosing that it had already contacted the respondent institutions and requested them to preserve the funds, with some institutions already placing temporary PND restrictions. However, the bank said a court order was required to sustain those restrictions, stating in its affidavit that there was an urgent need for the order of the court to preserve the funds and every other account in receipt of the funds to avoid further dissipation. The bank further argued that granting the application would help combat cybercrime, which it said had the potential to undermine economic and national interests. It also undertook to pay damages should the court subsequently determine that the order ought not to have been granted, and warned that failure to act urgently could lead to financial losses and irreparable damage.
This case highlights the increasing vulnerability of Nigeria’s financial system to cyber fraud, particularly through digital banking platforms, as fraudsters become more sophisticated in exploiting vulnerabilities. The Access SME App breach demonstrates how a single point of weakness can be exploited to siphon massive sums across multiple financial institutions within a short period, with the rapid movement of stolen funds across banks and fintech platforms posing significant challenges for recovery efforts. The court’s intervention in this case underscores the importance of judicial cooperation in preserving assets and ensuring that victims of fraud have a path to recovery. For financial institutions, this case serves as a reminder of the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures, real-time transaction monitoring, and rapid incident response protocols, as well as the importance of regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and patch vulnerabilities before they can be exploited.
For customers, particularly businesses that rely on digital banking platforms, this case highlights the importance of regular monitoring of account activity to detect unauthorised transactions, prompt reporting of suspicious activity to banks, understanding the limits of bank liability in cases of fraud, and maintaining proper documentation to support claims. The case also raises important questions about the liability of banks and fintechs in safeguarding customer funds and the effectiveness of current regulatory frameworks in addressing emerging cyber threats. The interim orders granted by the court mean that the focus is now on preserving whatever portion of the alleged N1.34 billion remains in the identified accounts while the case progresses, with respondent institutions expected to comply with the court’s orders by placing PND restrictions on all accounts and BVNs identified, filing affidavits disclosing the amounts recovered, and watchlisting the relevant BVNs to prevent further movement or dissipation of funds.
The court has adjourned the matter to August 31, 2026, for further proceedings, at which hearing the court will likely consider whether to extend or modify the interim orders and may also address the substantive issues in the case. For Access Bank and the wider financial system, the case underscores the growing risks of cyber fraud in Nigeria’s banking sector and the critical role of the judiciary in protecting the integrity of the financial system. As digital banking continues to expand, the need for robust cybersecurity frameworks, effective regulatory oversight, and swift judicial intervention will only become more urgent.
Court Freezes 71 Banks’ Accounts Over N1.34bn Access Bank Cyber Fraud
![]()
metro
Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport
Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has launched a full-scale investigation into a passenger, Haruna Yusuf, after the Nigeria Customs Service intercepted a massive haul of undeclared foreign currencies concealed inside footwear and sportswear shoes at the Mallam Aminu Kano International Airport. The interception, which occurred between August 8 and 12, 2026, involved a total of $73,300, £15,957, and 827,800 Saudi Riyals—amounts that, when converted, run into hundreds of millions of naira. The suspect and the recovered cash were formally handed over to the EFCC by customs officials at the Kano/Jigawa Command, marking the beginning of what investigators describe as a thorough probe into possible violations of Nigeria’s anti-money laundering framework.
Customs officers made the discovery in two separate operations, both involving cleverly concealed cash meant to evade routine screening. On August 8, 2026, at approximately 2:20 PM, officers screening an unaccompanied Saudi Airline luggage found 827,800 Saudi Riyals and $53,300** cleverly tucked inside a piece of footwear. Then, on August 12, 2026, at about 1:50 PM, the luggage of **Haruna Yusuf**, who had just arrived on Ethiopian Airlines flight **ET941**, raised red flags during initial checks. A secondary search, aided by **Non-Intrusive Inspection Technology**, revealed an additional **$20,000 and £15,957 hidden inside sportswear shoes. The two seizures, occurring within days of each other, underscored the growing sophistication of currency smuggling tactics and the proactive role of technology in detecting them.
READ ALSO:
- Customs Names Importers of 399 Pump-Action Rifles, Hands Over Weapons to NSA Office
- TCN Injects 220MVA Into Lagos Grid, Boosts Power Supply to 134,000 Residents
- Obasanjo Pays Surprise Visit to Adeleke, Tasks Him on Good Governance
The Nigeria Customs Service officially handed over the suspect and the seized currencies to the EFCC under the authority of Section 4(f) of the Nigeria Customs Service Act 2023, which allows the service to collaborate with other border regulatory agencies in enforcing financial laws. The transfer ceremony was presided over by the Acting Customs Area Comptroller for the Kano/Jigawa Command, Deputy Comptroller U.U. Adamu, who emphasized that the interceptions highlight the need for heightened vigilance at all entry points. He reaffirmed the commitment of the NCS to continue deploying intelligence-driven measures, advanced scanning equipment, and inter-agency cooperation to curb the illegal movement of cash across Nigeria’s borders.
Upon receiving the suspect and the exhibits, the EFCC’s Acting Zonal Director in Kano, Assistant Commander Friday S. Ebelo, confirmed that the failure to declare such large sums of foreign currency constitutes a direct violation of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. He noted that under Nigerian law, travellers carrying amounts above the statutory threshold are required to make a full declaration at the point of entry or exit, and that non-compliance attracts serious legal consequences. However, Ebelo was careful to clarify that declaring money does not automatically lead to seizure—rather, the offence lies in the concealment and the failure to declare, or in cases where the source of the funds is questionable.
Addressing the broader public, Ebelo urged all travellers to comply with currency declaration requirements, stressing that the law is not designed to punish honest declarations. He stated emphatically that no one would have their funds confiscated simply for declaring them, and that the legal issues arise only when individuals attempt to move large sums secretly, often to evade scrutiny over the origin or purpose of the money. His remarks serve as both a warning and a clarification, aimed at dispelling common misconceptions that discourage travellers from making lawful declarations.
The EFCC has now commenced a comprehensive investigation into the circumstances surrounding the movement of the funds, including the source of the cash, the intended destination, and whether the suspect acted alone or as part of a larger network. Investigators are also looking into the possibility of money laundering, terrorism financing, or other financial crimes linked to the undeclared currencies. While no formal charges have been filed yet, the commission has assured the public that the case will be pursued diligently, and that anyone found culpable will face the full weight of the law.
The Kano/Jigawa Command of the Nigeria Customs Service has hailed the interceptions as a major success in the fight against illicit financial flows, and reiterated its resolve to work closely with the EFCC, the Nigerian Immigration Service, and other border agencies to protect the integrity of Nigeria’s financial system. The service also reminded the public that its officers are equipped with both the legal authority and the technological tools to detect hidden currencies, and that attempts to circumvent the law will continue to be met with decisive action.
Customs Intercepts Over $73,000, £15,957, 827,800 Saudi Riyals Hidden in Shoes at Kano Airport
![]()
-
Politics3 days agoOsun Decides: Over 100 ‘Imported’ Voters Arrested With New PVCs
-
Sports1 day agoArsenal thrash Man City 3-0 to win Community Shield
-
Entertainment3 days agoOsun Election: Davido Alleges Soldiers Tried to Stop Him from Entering State
-
metro3 days ago[UPDATED] Osun Election: Police Arrest Lawmaker with 200 PVCs, 146 Suspected Electoral Mercenaries
-
metro1 day agoPolice to prosecute Kogi man for allegedly setting wife ablaze
-
metro3 days agoWorking in Canada Without a Permit: IRCC Warns of Serious Immigration Consequences
-
International3 days agoIndonesia Earthquake: Death Toll Rises to 38 as Rescue Teams Battle Landslides, Aftershocks
-
Politics3 days agoAPC Humiliates Aregbesola, Wins His Polling Unit in Osun Governorship Election
