Politics
Igbo lawyers apply to join suit seeking exit of South-East from Nigeria
Association of Igbo lawyers has approached the Federal High Court in Abuja with an application to be joined as a party in a suit some Northern elders filed for exit of the South East region from Nigeria.
The Plaintiffs, Nastura Ashir Shariff, Balarabe Rufa’I, Abdul-Aziz Sulaiman and Aminu Adam, had in their suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/538/2021, maintained that the National Assembly is constitutionally empowered to set in motion a framework for a referendum to allow the South-Eastern region of the Federal Republic of Nigeria to decide on their bid for self-determination.
Cited as 1st to 4th Defendants in the suit are Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the National Asembly.
Specifically, the Plaintiffs, are seeking three principal reliefs from the court, among which include;
“A declaration that in view of the provisions of Articles 1, 2, 4, 14 and 20(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act 2004, the 2nd and 3rd defendants (the Senate President and House of Reps Speaker) have the power to call for a joint session of both Chambers of the 4th defendant to deliberate on the agitation for self-determination by the Southeastern states of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
As well as, “An order directing the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants to provide a framework that will pave the way for the self-determination of the South-eastern states so as to leave the geographical entity called Nigeria before any further step is taken to further amend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.
They claimed that their action was based on the need to end violence and destruction allegedly occasioned by the agitation for secession, championed by the Nnamdi Kanu-led Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB.
READ ALSO:
https://newstrends.ng/2021/10/26/bandits-attack-mosque-kill-18-worshippers-in-niger/
https://newstrends.ng/2021/10/26/arabic-school-torture-probe-committee-submits-report-to-govt/
https://newstrends.ng/2021/10/25/breaking-edo-pdp-suspends-10-members-mainly-obasekis-loyalists/
https://newstrends.ng/2021/10/25/tiwa-savage-shouldve-sold-sex-tape-to-porn-company-dencia/
“Even before the emergence of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), there was a group at the south-eastern part of Nigeria known as the Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) under the leadership of one, Chief Ralph Uwazuruike.
“The main objective of the group mentioned in the immediately preceding paragraph is also the creation of the Independent State of Biafra, away from the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“Long before the emergence of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and the Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), there was a move by the people of the south-eastern part of Nigeria formerly Eastern Region led by the late Col. Odumegwu Ojukwu to secede from the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The secession attempt by the people of the then Eastern Region under the leadership of the late Col. Ojukwu was directly responsible for the first Nigerian Civil War between 1967 and 1970. The said civil war had claimed many innocent lives from both sides of the divide as well as the destruction of properties worth billions of naira which was detrimental to the growth and development of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The lessons of the civil war have faded in the minds of many Nigerians and a repeat of the carnage of the civil war is not necessary, going forward. The IPOB’s agitation for self-determination has turned violent against both the people of the south-east who are against their agitations and other Nigerians carrying out their lawful businesses within the south-eastern states of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The IPOB through its militant arm — Eastern Security Network (ESN) — is responsible for the killings, expulsions and destruction of properties of other Nigerians not belonging to the Igbo tribe.
“Resolving, with finality, the existential question of self-determination of any part of Nigeria is now more urgent, imperative and prevails over and above the issue of amending the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can be further amended at any time after the question of self-determination must have been resolved by Nigerians”, the Plaintiffs added.
However, the Igbo lawyers, led by a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, Chief Chuks Muoma, Ukpai Ukairo, Ebere Uzoatu and Hon Obi Emuka, in their joinder application, wondered why the Plaintiffs failed to join the South Eastern states in the suit.
They are therefore praying the court to join them as Defendants in the suit to enable them to represent the people of the southeastern region.
In the application they filed through Victor Onweremadu, the Applicants, argued that the suit has the capability to shape the life of the generation of Igbo people.
In a 12-paragraph affidavit in support of their application deposed to by one Ekenna Felix Jonathan, the Igbo lawyers averred: “That this suit is so crucial and a sensitive matter which concerns the Indigenous Igbo speaking tribe in Nigeria and has the capability to shape the life of the future generation of the people of the south-east of Nigeria and other Indigenous Igbo speaking tribe in Nigeria.
“That the Igbo Lawyers Association represented by the applicants are an Indigenous association of lawyers from the south east of Nigeria and other Indigenous Igbo speaking tribe in Nigeria.
“That the Igbo Lawyers Association and its objective is to represent the interest of the Igbo people which said people are Indigenous in the south east of Nigeria. Thus, the association is interested and is a necessary party to be joined.
“That It will serve the interest of justice if the Honourable court grants the application and join the applicants as defendants in the suit and that the plaintiffs will not be prejudiced if the application is granted”.
Meanwhile, Justice Inyang Ekwo has set down November 1 to hear the suit.
Vanguard
![]()
Politics
NDC Introduces Anti-Defection Pact for Obi, Kwankwaso, Others
NDC Introduces Anti-Defection Pact for Obi, Kwankwaso, Others
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has unveiled a stringent anti-defection policy requiring all its candidates seeking elective offices to sign indemnity and affidavit forms pledging to relinquish their seats if they defect from the party after winning elections. The policy, announced on Tuesday at the party’s National Secretariat in Abuja, is aimed at strengthening internal discipline and preventing the wave of post-election defections that has weakened several opposition parties in recent years. Speaking during the unveiling ceremony, NDC National Chairman, Moses Cleopas, explained that the decision was informed by years of observing politicians secure electoral victories on party platforms only to abandon them for personal or political convenience, and he specifically pointed to the experience of the Labour Party after the 2023 elections as a cautionary tale. Cleopas stated, “A very typical example that we have all seen in the last three years is the Labour Party, where so many individuals won elections under the platform of the party. Now, we are in another election cycle. Go and check their history. How many of the people who won elections under the Labour Party and were inaugurated are still members of the party? If all of them had remained, you and I can imagine how the Labour Party could have been today, even if they had not won the presidency.”
Cleopas stressed that the NDC was founded to build an enduring political institution rather than serve as a temporary vehicle for personal ambitions, noting that the party had observed a trend where elected public office holders became detached from the political structures that produced them after winning elections. He stated, “One thing we have come to observe is that in the present polity, when people contest elections and win under political parties, they become gods. And in between the time that they ought to have, they will just use one minor excuse to dump the platform and perhaps go into the ruling party.” The party chairman emphasized that while membership of the NDC is voluntary, anyone seeking to contest elections on its platform must agree to abide by its rules, stating that candidates would be required to sign affidavit and indemnity forms before receiving the party’s ticket, making it clear that if they choose to leave the party after winning, they must also surrender the mandate obtained through the party’s platform. He declared, “If you win, the mandate is owned by the party. If you otherwise choose to leave, go the same way you came and leave what you picked from here.” Cleopas also referenced provisions of the NDC Constitution, specifically Articles 1, 2 and 3, which establish that elected officials remain bound by the party platform through which they were elected.
The party’s National Legal Adviser, Reuben Egwuaba, defended the policy, describing political parties as voluntary associations governed by internal rules accepted by members, and he cited constitutional provisions and judicial precedents, including landmark Supreme Court decisions, to support the party’s position that candidates function as agents of their political parties during elections. Egwuaba stated, “A political party is just like a club, church or mosque where there are rules and regulations. That is why the 1999 constitution, under Section 222, states that a candidate of a political party is just a mere agent of the party. And once a candidate is declared the winner and inaugurated, until the expiration of the tenure upon which that candidate won the election and was inaugurated, the mandate belongs to the political party, not any other.” Egwuaba stressed that the policy does not infringe on the constitutional right of freedom of association because candidates remain free to leave the party whenever they choose—but they must forfeit the seat obtained through the party’s platform. He insisted that adherence to the new requirement is non-negotiable under the party’s internal rules, warning that without the signed affidavit, a candidate’s name cannot be uploaded in the INEC portal. According to Egwuaba, the mandatory affidavit will serve as a binding legal undertaking, and candidates must swear before a competent court that they understand and accept the party’s anti-defection terms before their names can be processed. The party maintained that the new rule was necessary to strengthen party discipline, preserve voter intent, and reduce what it called the distortion of electoral mandates through opportunistic defections.
In a clarification that drew attention, the party’s Director of New Media and Strategic Communication, Theo Agada, stated that the policy does not affect the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and his running mate, Dr. Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, explaining that the party trusts the commitment of its presidential and vice presidential nominees, and they are not bound by this policy. Agada stated, “The policy does not affect the presidential candidate, His Excellency Peter Obi, and the vice presidential candidate, His Excellency Alhaji Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso. The party trusts the commitment of our presidential and vice presidential nominees, and they are not bound by this policy. This internal policy is aimed at building the NDC as an institution and preventing political prostitution among some of its members.” However, multiple reports indicate that despite the significance of the policy, several prominent party figures, including Obi and Kwankwaso, were absent from the signing ceremony at the party’s national secretariat, and aspirants who were absent were directed to obtain, complete, and submit the required documents as a condition for final validation and submission of their names to INEC. Some gubernatorial and National Assembly candidates present at the meeting signed the affidavits before the end of the event.
The policy is widely seen as an attempt by the NDC to avoid the wave of defections that has weakened several opposition parties in recent years, and notably, both Obi and Kwankwaso have moved across multiple political platforms throughout their careers. Obi’s political journey has taken him from the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) , the Labour Party , the African Democratic Congress (ADC) , and eventually the NDC , while Kwankwaso has also belonged to multiple parties, including the PDP, the All Progressives Congress (APC) , the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) , the ADC, and the NDC. Former Adamawa State governorship candidate, Aishatu Binani, is also among recent entrants into the NDC, having moved from the APC to the ADC before joining the party in 2026, and the new anti-defection policy is expected to affect several high-profile politicians who recently joined the NDC ahead of the 2027 general elections. NDC leaders say the initiative forms part of a broader effort to redefine Nigeria’s political culture, strengthen party supremacy, and promote greater accountability among elected officials, with the party expressing hope that the policy would encourage ideological commitment, reduce opportunistic defections, and contribute to the development of stronger democratic institutions in the country. Cleopas concluded, “This is not just a party for one man to rise and achieve his ambitions and do anything he likes with the party. This is a political party that we desire to groom and hand over to the next generation.”
NDC Introduces Anti-Defection Pact for Obi, Kwankwaso, Others
![]()
Politics
Atiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition
Atiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition
ABUJA — The camp of former Vice President and presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has strongly condemned the judgment of a Federal High Court in Abuja ordering the deregistration of the party, describing the ruling as a dangerous attempt to weaken opposition forces and entrench a one-party state ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The reaction was conveyed on Monday by Atiku’s media aide, Paul Ibe, who argued that the judgment was delivered in defiance of a subsisting order of the Court of Appeal and amounted to what he termed “judicial rascality.”
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court had earlier ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister the ADC alongside four other political parties — the Accord Party (AP), Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).
The judgment, delivered in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, followed a legal action instituted by the National Forum of Former Legislators. The plaintiffs argued that the affected parties failed to satisfy constitutional and statutory requirements for continued registration, including winning elective positions or securing at least 25 per cent of votes in any state during the 2023 general elections and subsequent by-elections.
In addition to ordering their deregistration, the court restrained the affected parties from participating in future political activities and directed INEC not to recognize them as registered political parties.
READ ALSO:
- DHQ Launches Fresh Offensive in Katsina to Hunt Killers of Retired General Rabe
- Amad Diallo Fires Ivory Coast Past Ecuador, Sweden Run Riot in 5–1 Win
- 9,000 European Sex Workers Plan 2026 World Cup Trip to US, Canada, Mexico
However, the Atiku camp insisted that the ruling could not stand, citing a pending appeal and a stay-of-action order issued by the Court of Appeal.
In a statement posted on X, Ibe maintained that the appellate court had previously directed Justice Lifu to halt further proceedings on the matter pending the determination of an appeal filed before it.
According to him, a panel of the Court of Appeal comprising Justices Mohammed A. Danjuma, Adebunkunola A. Banjoko and Oyejoju O. Oyewumi, in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CV/569/2026, ordered a stay of further action in the case, with the substantive appeal scheduled for hearing on October 27, 2026.
“The so-called deregistration of the ADC and other parties by Justice Peter Lifu may yet be the biggest manifestation of President Bola Tinubu’s determination to undermine the opposition and entrench a de facto one-party state,” Ibe stated.
He further described the judgment as “the height of judicial rascality” and accused the ruling party of seeking to weaken democratic institutions ahead of the next electoral cycle.
“Nigerians and the international community can see the level of desperation of the government of the ruling party to either have their way in the 2027 elections or destroy our democracy that was purchased at a huge cost,” he added.
The development has heightened political tensions, with observers anticipating a legal showdown at the Court of Appeal over the validity of the Federal High Court’s judgment and the future status of the affected political parties.
As of press time, INEC had yet to issue an official response on the court order or indicate the steps it would take regarding the affected parties.
Atiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition
![]()
Politics
BREAKING: Kenneth Okonkwo Withdraws Support for Atiku
BREAKING: Kenneth Okonkwo Withdraws Support for Atiku
Former presidential spokesperson of the Labour Party Presidential Campaign Council and Nollywood actor-turned-politician, Kenneth Okonkwo, has withdrawn his support for the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, over what he described as the continued marginalisation of the South-East geopolitical zone.
Okonkwo announced his decision following reports that the ADC had selected former Rivers State Governor and former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, as Atiku’s running mate for the 2027 presidential election.
The development was reportedly confirmed by ADC National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi.
Reacting in a statement shared on his official X handle, Okonkwo expressed disappointment over the reported choice, arguing that excluding the South-East from both the presidential and vice-presidential positions would amount to perpetuating injustice against the region.
According to him, the South-East remains the only geopolitical zone that has neither produced a President nor Vice President since Nigeria’s return to democratic rule in 1999.
“I heard from social media that ADC has picked its vice-presidential candidate from the South-South. If this is true, it is unfortunate, as this will continue the crude marginalisation of the South-East,” Okonkwo stated.
READ ALSO:
- Just in: ADC Formally Unveils Atiku-Amaechi Presidential Ticket
- Over 42,000 Foreign Graduates Missing as UK Seeks Recovery of £900m Student Debt
- Troops Neutralise 27 Terrorists, Rescue Hostages in Nationwide Operations
He maintained that denying the South-East the opportunity to occupy either of the top two executive offices in the proposed ADC coalition arrangement would further deepen feelings of exclusion among the people of the region.
The actor-turned-politician also referenced the sacrifices made by ADC founder, Ralphs Nwosu, who he said relinquished control of the party in 2025 to facilitate a broader political coalition aimed at producing a better Nigeria.
“The ADC was founded by Ralphs Nwosu from the South-East in 2005. He made the sacrifice to give up the party in 2025 for the coalition to usher in a better Nigeria. He couldn’t have made that sacrifice to marginalise his own people,” he said.
Okonkwo stressed that he joined the coalition movement to promote equity, fairness and national unity, insisting that no region or ethnic group should be politically sidelined.
He revealed that his only request to Atiku was to demonstrate his commitment to the South-East by selecting a running mate from the region.
“The only favour I asked Atiku Abubakar, who openly declared that he is the pathway to the presidency of the South-East, is to show it by choosing someone from the South-East to be his vice,” he said.
The former Labour Party chieftain declared that if the reports concerning Amaechi’s nomination are officially confirmed, he would not participate in campaigning for the ADC presidential ticket.
“If it is confirmed that he has chosen a candidate from the South-South, I wish him well. I am not favourably disposed to campaigning for any presidential ticket that does not have a person of South-East origin as President or Vice President in 2027,” Okonkwo added.
His position is expected to spark fresh debate within the opposition coalition over issues of zoning, inclusion and power-sharing ahead of the 2027 general election.
BREAKING: Kenneth Okonkwo Withdraws Support for Atiku
![]()
-
Politics2 days agoBREAKING: Court Orders Deregistration of ADC, Four Other Political Parties
-
News1 day agoShot by Bandits, Saved by Soldiers: Dramatic Rescue of General’s Wife in Katsina
-
Politics2 days agoBREAKING: Kenneth Okonkwo Withdraws Support for Atiku
-
metro1 day agoDrugged, Beaten, Forced to Sleep with 60 Men Daily: Teenage Girl’s Harrowing Escape from Lagos Traffickers
-
Opinion2 days agoIf Nigeria Is Not Divided, We Will Never Have Any Sense in the North
-
Politics2 days agoJust in: ADC Formally Unveils Atiku-Amaechi Presidential Ticket
-
News3 days agoGrand Imam of Osun Presents New Olori-Ratib of Osogbo to Muslim Congregation
-
Politics2 days agoAtiku Camp Rejects Court-Ordered ADC Deregistration, Alleges Plot to Cripple Opposition
